|
I noticed that when exiting, the cards clocks reset to default. I don't want that, is there any way to prevent it?
Also, 3.0 seems a bit slower that 2.9
With all setting equal (launching from bat file) 2.9 gives around 600h/s more with 3 ellesmere cards.
|
|
|
|
|
After autotuning, should I just put the found values in the bat file, or could it change from run to run?
I was using -gt 15 for 3 cards (480, 570 and 580) and now autotune found -gt 13,18,16.
|
|
|
|
I know you all have your conspiracy theories that a miner must steal your hashrate, but i will have to dissapoint you.
Your math is bad, to get average of something you divide total with something, in this case :
Total time in seconds since connected to pool / total number of sent shares (good & bad)
And end of story. This is how you get average time needed to find a share.
Sorry im not stealing 9% of your hashrate.
Your case:
Mining time 15 hours, 3 minutes 10 seconds = 54190 sec (in this case this can be taken because you did not have pool disconnects)
Total shares : 1213
Average : 54190 / 1213 = 44.6 sec
Now check your screenshot.
Thanks for the reply, dear! There were no thoughts about theft of hash. Based on your mathematics, you can calculate the real hash of the miner 1213 * 240000 = 291120000 total hash. 291120000 h / 54190 sec = 5372 h/s. Why then this figure is obtained, not 5800? What am I doing wrong? too much theory guys. Better take a 24,48h average from the pool, at the end that's what really matters. If you get numbers you don't like, switch mining software  Don't get mad, but i really don't have time and nerves for these kind of things. I mean if your point isn't that the miner/me is stealing from you, then what is it? What are you trying to say ? Maybe wanting to report a bug...  I'm mining Monero, SRB reports 2580 H/s, Nanopool 2 hour SMA flutuates slightly from 2520 to 2677 H/s. Seems more than fine to me. |
|
|
|
Why so many stale shares?
I tried all the pools and I always got around 10-15% refused shares using Java Miner.
Are you experiencing the same thing?
What is your Avg Submit RTT? (Find this information while mining.) Nonces: Attempted: 6 Rejected: 0 Eff: 100.00% Avg Hash/nonce: 2867 Avg Submit RTT: 964ms 10744 ms... I suppose that is very high, right? Yes, that's why you are getting so many rejects, by the time your submitted nonce reaches the nodes it's already become invalid But why is that? When mining Monero/ETH shares are submitted in 60-70 ms. Even mining Iridium to Canada pool, I never get refused shares. More: ping aro.party resolves to 104.25.12.22 and gives 11-14 ms avg 12 ms. I'm in Europe BTW. |
|
|
|
Why so many stale shares?
I tried all the pools and I always got around 10-15% refused shares using Java Miner.
Are you experiencing the same thing?
What is your Avg Submit RTT? (Find this information while mining.) Nonces: Attempted: 6 Rejected: 0 Eff: 100.00% Avg Hash/nonce: 2867 Avg Submit RTT: 964ms 10744 ms... I suppose that is very high, right? |
|
|
|
|
Why so many stale shares?
I tried all the pools and I always got around 10-15% refused shares using Java Miner.
Are you experiencing the same thing?
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, OCTAEX, big time scam.
260 ARO lost, could be worse.
|
|
|
|
I'm getting only rejected results on my laptop (i5 6300HQ + GTX 960M 4gb)
What's happening?
You have selected the wrong algo, for sure. |
|
|
|
I think author must make Windows 10 1803 April Update compatibility with new drivers.
AMD Adrenalin 18.5.1 driver normal works with Claymrore's miners...
I have 1083 update in one rig, installed 18.5.1 drivers yesterday to try them out, and Phoenix miner worked just fine. |
|
|
|
What is important to mine ARO?
As you know cryptonight is L3 cache important.. rule number of cache / 2 = Threads you should use. So huge cache L3 most important. RAM 4 GB enough.
Is there any rule with ARO algo? To look for appropriate equipment
I would like to know this also. It seems to like recent Intel CPU's. My 8 core Ryzen 1700 is only 40-50% faster on 14 threads than my laptop's 2 core i7 7500U running 4 threads... both on AVX2 miner. I have an old 6 core Xeon E5645 that also doesn't run faster on 11 threads than that i7 7500u - 9-10 H/s. No AVX, though. Ok, so basically ARO is very memory intensive. A lot of discussion has happened within our Discord channel on the benefits of Dual and Quad channel memory, with most people getting higher h/s using Quad channel. Memory speed is also crucial, overclocked memory has proven better results, however runs the risk of more rejected shares. Newer Intel CPU's do better, agreed, however again it all comes down to memory bandwidth/speed/channels. Well, actually I have 16 Gb of 2133 DDR4 in the laptop and 3200 DDR4 in the Ryzen system, so... |
|
|
|
What is important to mine ARO?
As you know cryptonight is L3 cache important.. rule number of cache / 2 = Threads you should use. So huge cache L3 most important. RAM 4 GB enough.
Is there any rule with ARO algo? To look for appropriate equipment
I would like to know this also. It seems to like recent Intel CPU's. My 8 core Ryzen 1700 is only 40-50% faster on 14 threads than my laptop's 2 core i7 7500U running 4 threads... both on AVX2 miner. I have an old 6 core Xeon E5645 that also doesn't run faster on 11 threads than that i7 7500u - 9-10 H/s. No AVX, though. |
|
|
|
|
Does it work with latest AMD drivers?
|
|
|
|
Just to share, did some overclocking today on my 2700x. 4.4GHz@1.45V (60C, 19C ambient) - 780 H/s cryptonight v7. Mining does not load this CPU so much, so it is kept barely hot at this settings. Power consumption should be too high for that hashrate. When overclocking, power consumption increase not in a linear way, and you may actually loose money for a modest increase in hashrate. My Ryzen 1700 does 520H/s at stock speeds (3.2ghz turbo). When overclocked to 3.8 ghz it does around 580-590, but power consumption goes from 65w to 100w... |
|
|
|
|
Just copy CLI-2.0.2.1 contents to GUI-2.0.1 folder.
Run wallet GUI.
There you go, a working GUI wallet.
|
|
|
|
Your CPU supports AVX, not AVX2. |
|
|
|
Finally a good lite V7 coin to mine. |
|
|
|
|
Is it possible that a miner software reports higher hashrate, but the effective result at the pool tells otherwise?
|
|
|
|
I think I asked this before, but no one replied me.
With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
We can't know for sure,as we don't have enough info about the pools. However: It does not matter which pool you pick if both pools have the same historic range (length for historic shares) and the same deadline.Over long periods of time (lets say weeks) you will get the same result on either pool For short mining periods: you probably get a quicker payout with 100% historic, but you'll never hit that jackpot... Yes definitely. But point is that I seem to be getting quicker payout with aropool than aro.cool... and that makes few sense to me. |
|
|
|
Could it be configured to run Argon2i + SHA512 (Arionum)?
The miner already has both argon2i code and sha512 code but there are some issues. First the Argon2i version is currently untested although I see no reason it shounldn't work. Second I need Aronium's Argon2i parameters. They can be obtained from a spec or sample code. Additionally there are differences in the implementations or Argon2 and Sha512 that need to be resolved. Argon2 uses linear vectors while sha512 uses parallel vectors. Without going into technical detail, this complicates the implementation of an algo that uses both. With all that it should be doable. That would be nice, Arionum is getting some traction now, CPU only coin (almost, but algo revision made GPU's fairly inefficient), and I guess the existing miners aren't too much optimized. It uses AVX2 tough. https://github.com/ProgrammerDan/arionum-javaThe proof of concept: https://github.com/arionum/miner |
|
|
|
Now just release the wallet and set up a pool.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
