#Joined: Signature
BTT Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1440423
Post Number: 5160

It’s a good idea, for example, it would be possible, for example, to pay part of the company's profits to the holders of tokens, as implemented in some projects. Thus, the price and liquidity of the token grows, which is important for any project.

Airtaxi is a cool idea, but I’m not sure that it can be implemented before August, but it would be interesting to look at the finished product and its performance in real conditions.  So far, no one has talked about shifting deadlines in the project roadmap.

This is quite logical, so I agree with you. Third-party confidence is an additional guarantee for the investor and raising the status of the project as a whole.

If you are talking about updating the network Ethereum called Serenity, then it really should fix the situation with network bandwidth, but this will not happen until next year, considering how carefully the Ethereum team is concerned with network updates.

The concept of the project is quite interesting and considering how quickly the project is developing, we will be able to see the implementation of the plans soon.

As far as I understand, Invech wants to run IEO on its own platform, but the platform is not yet running? It seems the team needs to correct the roadmap, according to the current work they are doing.

Yes, but I was interested in paying dividends twice a year. How will it be made: by prior request, or automatically, on wallets with AMAL tokens? Of course, it would be better if they went straight to their wallets.

---

By the way, soon KYC check can be made significant changes in order to mitigate the situation with such a check. The US Congress recently introduced a draft law on the regulation of cryptocurrency, in which the cryptocurrency will not be classified as securities and then the SEC commission that establishes its draconian rules will have no relation to the cryptocurrency and its KYC verification instructions will not be valid. There is a high probability that this project will be accepted.

Cryptocurrency can not significantly affect the reduction of corruption in the world. Cryptocurrency does not make financial manipulations of officials more transparent, and if it could do this, then corrupt officials would find other ways to continue their illegal activities. However, given the greater degree of anonymity and confidentiality of cryptocurrency, the cryptocurrency will even contribute to an increase in corruption. .rai bribes in cryptocurrency are very convenient even in the event that law enforcement agencies will monitor the commission of this crime. It is very difficult to bring affiliation of a wallet to certain individuals, especially in those cases if the wallet is new. And without access to the secret key, even the court cannot confiscate the cryptocurrency.

We will certainly not know what will happen if the last bitcoin is obtained. I believe that nothing will happen at all. However, by that time we can confidently say that the situation with Bitcoin will change by 2140. Most likely, the latter Bitcoin will be extracted much earlier than this period, or there is no need for its extraction and there may be many reasons for this. As another cryptocurrency develops, it is unlikely that Bitcoin will then be very expensive.

Cryptocurrency can never replace the fiat currency with itself. This will under no circumstances allow governments of states. And without their active position and the adoption of appropriate decisions, the cryptocurrency itself cannot make such a replacement. Therefore, visionaries and optimists can calm down with this issue.
National money of the state interacts with the state economy. Cryptocurrency exists by itself and cannot be used for planning economic indicators of the state due to high price volatility.

Yes, a few days ago we saw a decent drop in the price of bitcoin and another cryptocurrency. This caused a certain panic among holders of cryptocurrency and reminded us that there is no stable cryptocurrency market. The fact that Bitcoin sometimes seems to be stable in price is rather an exception to the general rules of its high price volatility in nature.

Unfortunately, we still have not been able to see a good growth in the cryptocurrency market, and our hopes for its growth this year are noticeably decreasing every day. After the recent fall, the chances of a quick rise in the market have dropped further. If Bitcoin does not grow this year, it is likely that this will delay the stagnation of the market over time, since many cryptocurrency holders and investors will panic and sell their coins and tokens.

In any case, the sale of your property is much better than obtaining a loan for the purpose of buying cryptocurrency. Perhaps this is a good decision, because in two years ethereum will definitely increase significantly in its price and you will get a good profit. Now this coin has fallen in price very much and I hope that this is its price bottom, after which it will only rise.

I believe that the regulation of the activities of the ICO by the states should have happened a few years ago. Then the situation with fraud in this kind of activity would not have reached such a threatening scale. Pretty good conditions for the regulation of ICO prepared in Russia. If they are introduced, there can be no fraud of ICO teams at all. Before registering, the ICO team must have a significant amount on the bank account, I assume that they can go on to recover possible damages or fines. All fundraising activities from investors there should take place only through the bank and the relevant state bodies will control even the target expenditure of the collected funds.

This is not about taxes at all, but about taxes on cryptocurrency. After all, taxes in Ukraine will continue to be levied. This is a good move in the sense that the cryptocurrency is very difficult to control in terms of tax collection and in order not to hire an additional army of tax cryptocurrency tax collectors that can work inefficiently, it’s better not to tax it at all. For the state, it will be cheaper. It is unlikely that in Ukraine this tax, if introduced, would be paid voluntarily. There, a significant part of the business is in the shadow, and the officials are completely corrupt.

All the same general phrases and nothing concrete. It is already good that the G-20 countries are not going to prohibit cryptocurrency, but only to regulate, and the report mentions that the danger of cryptocurrency is not. I hope that the report implies the protection of the rights of users and investors, including the regulation of the activities of ICO, which has long been overdue.

The KYC verification has nothing to do with reducing cryptocurrency fraud. If you mean reducing the number of multi-accounts in ICO bounty campaigns, on the one hand, KYC checks should not be conducted for this purpose, but on the other hand, if desired, multi-accounts can provide data of their relatives and friends with their consent and thus successfully pass KYC. This is a very big price in order to fight with several accounts on this forum and a great folly. KYC checks should not be carried out for bounty hunters and especially at the end of the ICO. This is precisely the fraud on the part of the ICO teams. Some bounty hunters simply cannot physically provide certain required documents, such as proof of residence at the place of registration, since in many cases we will not live at the place of registration. In this case, after we do our work, we learn that we lose the right to receive earned tokens. Of course, this is a direct fraud.

Forecasts are very disappointing. If by February of next year Bitcoin drops in price to $ 2,800 and pulls the entire cryptocurrency with it, there will be a great distrust of cryptocurrency. It is even difficult to imagine what period of time after that will be needed to restore the cryptocurrency market. It would be better if such a forecast did not come true.

Very interesting information. The article itself states that, unlike such coins as EOS and ripple, the specific addresses of BTC and BCH cannot be blocked even by the all-powerful US government. Bitcoins come and go to two specific BTC addresses, and the US government can’t stop it. On the one hand, this is good, as it proves Bitcoin’s invulnerability for outside intervention. However, in this case, the United States can go further and prohibit the general circulation of Bitcoin in its own country.