Hello admin, this is my email registered with approved kyc quilinoal@gmail.comTwitter spreadsheet: 876 Facebook spreadsheet; 862 And this is my wallet address 0xFd23501DfF368b3aD756350fF9B18e6afB638afD All email addressed that have been posted after this post have been updated!
|
|
|
Can the signatures be removed now bounty managers?
They could have been removed 1 week ago.
|
|
|
My email address: ico.aldar@gmail.comMy status KYC is: verified and complete Bitcointalk Name: aldar_sugarof Twitter campaign: spreadsheet # 269 Facebook campaign: spreadsheet #278 My wallet address: 0x998f388c91AF04b25642c5cc1D72353Ca43406C8 You aren't on the spreadsheet.
|
|
|
Hello Admin, If someone blocked own bitcointalk profile then how they claim for his token ??
You won't be able to post your KYC so you won't be able to get your tokens if you are banned.
|
|
|
Hi guys, for requests to change eth addresses to email address, I will only update it in the final spreadsheet (since that saves time and the devs are only getting that), so don't panic if you aren't updated in the other spreadsheets, just control f, and make sure your address is in the final spreadsheet.
So, just post your eth address and the new email address.
All email addressed that have been posted after this post have been updated!
|
|
|
Hi guys, for requests to change eth addresses to email address, I will only update it in the final spreadsheet (since that saves time and the devs are only getting that), so don't panic if you aren't updated in the other spreadsheets, just control f, and make sure your address is in the final spreadsheet.
So, just post your eth address and the new email address.
|
|
|
UpdateEveryone who has just posted a report is now on my ignore list. This is getting very annoying. Social media, telegram and signature campaigns are fully counted. I am preparing a full sheet for everyone's stakes, and so I can easily just replace everyone's email from there. Please repost your email address here in case I haven't updated it yet. There are a lot of entries and I may have missed a lot, and it'll be easier now for me to update with just one sheet, and no reports to sieve through. Thanks, everyone for the great turnout, this was a great 6 weeks, and it was super fun dealing with so much of you guys! Now, let's get you the MTV and make a couple bucks each, yeah? Your hard work will finally pay off! Also! I've made 2 separate channels for future bounty programs, one a group chat, and one an announcement channel, feel free to join them! https://t.me/zapoannshttps://t.me/zapobountyThank you!
|
|
|
UPDATE
Signature campaign fully counted!
STATS Total Budget: 312,500 Total Stakes: 633 Tokens per Stake: 493 Most tokens per user: 14,790 (15,000 USD Value!) Total Tokens able to be distrubted: 312,069
|
|
|
BOUNTY HAS ENDED! Anyone who is posting ANY reports from here on, will lose half their stakes. I need the thread to be clean, and the only posts should be questions about the bounty campaign or KYC reports. Do not spam the thread with reports.
So far, I've COMPLETELY finished the signature campaign, those signature campaign participants can remove their signatures, and just need to wait for the dev's to send tokens to their accounts.
I'm in the process of checking facebook and twitter campaigns, and finishing everything.
I'll have a much informational post within 12 hours, I'll try have sheets ready by then.
Thank you for the participation!
Seems like the users who've posted reports are either blind or bots. They will lose half their stakes.
|
|
|
<snip>
I don't think campaign managers have a duty to research the project in as much depth as you suggest. They're just taking on a job, and when any of us apply for a job we usually assume good faith on the part of the employer. It also assumes the manager is capable of and has the time to delve into detective work. I think what you're saying shifts the blame way too much onto the campaign manager's shoulders. What if there's a critical detail that the manager misses? If a project turns out to be a scam, and they're in the middle of running a campaign, I think it's enough for a manager to do as Yahoo62278 just did and end the campaign. Basically it comes down to the question of whether we're assuming a project is a scam until proven otherwise or legitimate until proven to be a scam. There have been enough scams such that we probably ought to be assuming all ICOs are, but I don't think it's a campaign manager's duty to expose them before taking on the job of manager. Agreed, what you all said, but how bounty manager can accept ICO which offering 40% monthly return. It's clear sign of scammy nature of ICO, there is no way any project can give 40% return monthly on consistently. Did he read at all or just negotiated his fee without checking what is the project and whom behind it? I don't think, he did read it at all or he did read and don't care about anything, just wanted to earn his fee. As a bounty manager sometime we really can't filter scammy ICO because it is fool proof or really good in everything. But Coinect ICO had fix high monthly return that is clear sign of Scam. How any bounty manager can miss that? I am probably the most impartial person on this forum, as my life isn't only about this forum or a single person. And this is a statement which I strongly support.
You are working with Wapiner, how you can be impartial? You are directly linked with Wapinter and you lectured here like you don't relate to Wapinter. Very well said Deadly! That was exactly what I was going to say, and you nailed it.
|
|
|
You are supposed to submit this via google forms. I won't take it if it's on bitcointalk. Do you want your stakes removed?
|
|
|
Monopolising something is never good.
When I learned about this a couple years ago, my teacher showed me this example.
Imagine Virgin mobile was the only phone company in your country. They owed all the poles and the wires that transmit data and no other company could break into the sector because they just didn't have the tech. So Virgin didn't bother to do any marketing (since they where the only available choice if you wanted data/calling time) and started overcharging, and offering slower network speeds.
No one want's this to happen (except the big company) and I hope this helps with your opinion on monopolization.
Well and I wouldn't be able to make a couple bucks managing campaigns
|
|
|
BOUNTY HAS ENDED! Anyone who is posting ANY reports from here on, will lose half their stakes. I need the thread to be clean, and the only posts should be questions about the bounty campaign or KYC reports. Do not spam the thread with reports.
So far, I've COMPLETELY finished the signature campaign, those signature campaign participants can remove their signatures, and just need to wait for the dev's to send tokens to their accounts.
I'm in the process of checking facebook and twitter campaigns, and finishing everything.
I'll have a much informational post within 12 hours, I'll try have sheets ready by then.
Thank you for the participation!
|
|
|
Hey Wapinter, I'll try to shed my opinion on your situation here. If it's possible, could you pretend I'm just a regular user and not your competition (a fellow manager) and I'll try to address this as neutral as possible? Why blaming me for the scam ICOs?
Because, my dear, you've posted their ann threads (without a disclaimer) and you seem to be quite foolish with your selections of ICOs. Am I not co operating with anyone who reports a scam ICO?I immediately lock their threads.
Locking a thread a week, 2 weeks after you've posted it doesn't mean you've done your due diligence when taking projects. A respectable manager would be someone who researched the project's team, read the whitepaper, expressed any remaining doubts to the managers of the project, and then, take the project. If you even took an hour of your time to check the team members/whitepaper of the 2 scam icos in op, and taken 10 minutes to think how unachievable coinect is, you would have saved yourself a lot of trouble. Do you get paid for this? If you get and upfront fee, it would be very profitable for you to take scam icos as a client, get them to pay up, and then turn on them when the forum cops come knocking at your door. If this is the case, I believe there is no turning back for you... For the past few days I am being constantly targetted on this forum.
This is all due to the fact that you abused your reputation to promote 2 confirmed scams and 1 very suspicious ico. I have publicly expressed my willingness to help fight these scam ICOs.I suggested we should have a group of members who do research before ICOs are allowed to post their ANN and bounty.
Oh no... You totally messed up here. When a company/freelance such as yourself has a client who they work for online, it is their responsibility to make sure the company is legitimate, and when you are working as a marketing firm/promoter (if you would call yourself that), it is even more your role to do your due dilegence. There shouldn't be a group of people who do research for YOU so YOUR ass doesn't get kicked when they turn sideways, it is your own role and you must take it very seriously. I accept I made a wrong choice in megatron and xeonframe case but I was not a part of them.
You promoted them. You posted their thread. So you will share the blame, although definitely not most of it. My fault I didnt do proper research before accepting these bounties but I locked their threads immediately as soon as I learnt about them.
Great on you for admitting your mistake, you can improve as a person this way. Prevention is better than a cure.Lets fight these scam ICOs together.I assure everyone that I will be more vigilant in accepting the bounty campaigns from now on.
You must be. A lot of people are in your bounties and they all trust you. Haha, this got a bit long, sorry for the rant, this'll be my last consecutive post, so you won't get overloaded with my spam. Great job OP!
Have a great day everyone!
|
|
|
I'll try and ignore the other projects that are either confirmed to be scams, or are being busted right now and focus on coinect.
When I was first tackling the issue, I was going to straight out call it a scam, but after further research and fully understanding the words that were on the website, I wasn't able to call it a scam at first, it was just a very dodgy ico with fake/dodgy team profiles. I could ask them for some other details (more in-depth knowledge about how the code works, but that would be confidential, and they definitely wouldn't hand it over).
They are sort of in a situation where you can't fully prove them illegitimate, and they have an excuse to not fully prove us wrong, so at the end of that, I'd only like one doubt fixed.
What's up with the team coinect? The whole team has 7 connections each on linkdelin and the connections are all your team members. Entering such a huge industry and expecting to raise millions with a rookie team like this would either mean a complete failure or an outright scam. Where are the industry connections? Where is the industry experience? Where are your teams' past experience? Where is your ceo's past work?
EDIT - more info about coinect
|
|
|
I agree with you about this cheaply made attempted scam ICO and it's unfortunate this thread hasn't been seen much. One or two skeptics are currently ah 'interacting' with Coinect on their ANN thread.
Thank you tmfp! I was careful with my words as it is incredibly shady, but not on the level where it is a confirmed scam. The team clearly know how to manipulate words so it isn't dodgy enough to call it a scam, but it is definitely not legitimate. As soon as a project promises 20 to 50 percent monthly profit you know it's trash.
I mean, if you knew your idea would return you 20 to 50 percent per month, why would you need investors? Just rollout your idea and print money for yourself. The sad thing is some people obviously still throw their money at these things otherwise they wouldn't bother creating these icos.
I agree!
|
|
|
Hi Everyone! I saw some stuff about Coinect and I made this post a while ago, so I'll quote it here I was scrolling around the bounties section looking for a signature campaign when I found this project . Here's an introduction to the project and what it looks to do in the industry - IntroductionCoinect is a new trading bot/tool/system that is able to implement on popular exchanges (binance, kucoin, bittrex, bitfinex) and uses AI to minimize a loss while making favorable trades that will profit. They claim that in 1 month, they are able to make a 48% profit, which sounds incredibly similar to popular ponzi schemes . AI System for guaranteed profitCoinect claims that they are able to implement a trading system that guarantees in average about 20-50% profit. From their whitepaper, they claim that they will have a system that will cover ~20 exchanges and will work in a way which is as follows - An arbitrage situation on exchanges A and B is detected. At present, BTC (Bitcoin) = 3 BCH (Bitcoin Cash) on exchange А, while BTC=2.9 BCH on exchange B. In order to benefit from the situation, it is necessary to sell our available 1 BTC (Bitcoin) for 3 BCH (Bitcoin Cash) on exchange A. Simultaneously, it is necessary to carry out an inverse operation on exchange B, buying 1 BTC for our available BCH at the lower cost of 1 BTC=2.9 BCH. The result of this arbitrage is the possession of the original set of instruments (1 BTC + 2.9 BCH) as well as an invested profit of 0.1 BCH, capitalizing the investment. A further conversion of the profit at the maximum rate of BCH_USD, in fact, creates an arbitrage chain from 2 transactions.
They claim that they are able to calculate this, but how would this work from 20 exchanges? On popular exchanges like binance, the price of something is changing constantly and since you are making small trades and arbitraging, this might go wrong a lot of times. (This part is a bit messy, I am not very well versed in trading/arbitraging, if anyone has any better comments/analysis, feel free to comment). False Advertising/SloppinessThe entire website is very sloppily made and the details are often wrong, for example - At first glance, it shows the profit is around 40-45% a month Then in the section next to that, the text reads 20-50% profit a month. Then if you try forecast your profit, it shows 48%? You are also unable to change the slider from 1 month, it seems like that parts broken. They also make it seem like they are going to be listed on popular exchanges, or at least know them and are connected with them shown in this picture - I am unsure about other exchanges, but binance doesn't announce partnerships before the ico ends, so definitely dodgy at least. They are trying to mislead dumb investors here. No experienceWhen you are looking to make a financial asset platform, especially if it is ai involved, you better have a lot of industry relationships and experience. This is the total opposite of the Coinect team, and the linkdelin profiles they provide are incredibly barren and they either have no experience or have some experience with some unknown company. They should have proven performance, social media presence, industry connections, instead, we are greeted with some possibly fake accounts that look like they were made 1 month ago. The CEO/Team lead - Dominic Hall The CEO has made a total of 7 connections on linkedlin and has 1 past job at GFT, which I can't find anywhere. Definetly not fit to be running a million dollar finanical asset platform. I think these 7 connections are the fellow team members in coinect, as each of them have 7 connections each. ConclusionDoes not look like a very trustable ICO. I'd love to hear your thoughts though, thanks! I'll address some other stuff in the next post! This one's getting a bit too big, haha.
|
|
|
Update Looks like I have a solemn announcement to make...
It appears that the bounty hunters should now pass KYC to receive their rewards from MTV. I was just made aware of this a couple hours ago and I've been trying to come up with some solutions. I'm sorry if you feel cheated for your one week of work, it was an unexpected event that just happened.
So after talking with the devs, it seems like you'll need to do the following to receive your bounty rewards.
1. Register on the website here. 2. Pass KYC via the dashboard there, you'll be notified if you passed or were rejected within 48 hours (if not, please pm me). 3. Post your email address here, as well with your role on the spreadsheet and I'll replace your eth address with your email one. 4. Then after the 4 weeks, tokens will be sent to anyone who has a valid account and passed KYC.
And once again, I apologize for any wasted efforts.
My email address: atahila2018@gmail.comMy status KYC is: verified and complete Join to twitter campaign, spreadsheet № 511 Join to facebook campaign, spreadsheet № 505 My email address: snacksnack133@gmail.comMy status KYC is: verified and complete Joined to signature campaign, spreadsheet № 154 My email address: belamarbela2018@gmail.comMy status KYC is: Waiting for Multiversum Team approval Join to twitter campaign, spreadsheet № 506 Please, follow up my status approval My email address: marina_belkova_1987@mail.ruMy status KYC is: Verified and complete Join to twitter campaign, spreadsheet № 488 Join to facebook campaign, spreadsheet № 484 My email address: cryptoreflector@gmail.comMy status KYC is: waiting for approved Join to twitter campaign, No 1186 Join to facebook campaign, No 1127 Update Looks like I have a solemn announcement to make...
It appears that the bounty hunters should now pass KYC to receive their rewards from MTV. I was just made aware of this a couple hours ago and I've been trying to come up with some solutions. I'm sorry if you feel cheated for your one week of work, it was an unexpected event that just happened.
So after talking with the devs, it seems like you'll need to do the following to receive your bounty rewards.
1. Register on the website here. 2. Pass KYC via the dashboard there, you'll be notified if you passed or were rejected within 48 hours (if not, please pm me). 3. Post your email address here, as well with your role on the spreadsheet and I'll replace your eth address with your email one. 4. Then after the 4 weeks, tokens will be sent to anyone who has a valid account and passed KYC.
And once again, I apologize for any wasted efforts.
My email address: maksim462ann@gmail.comTwitter spreadsheet - 532 Facebook spreadsheet - 525 Updated.
|
|
|
Hello guys!
Due to some disagreements between me and the devs, this campaign will be closing today. The first 4 weeks will be finalized and sent to devs for payment.
Due to the devs not making any updates on social media, refusing to pay me after 4 weeks, they have terminated the agreement and I will be closing this thread.
I will still be finishing the first 4 weeks of work though, no need to worry.
Thanks! Zapo.
PS: Thread will remain open for 1 week if you have any questions.
I correctly understood, that the fifth week is no necessary to work? Yes. The campaign has ended.
|
|
|
My email address: bitcoindamir@gmail.comMy ETH wallet: 0x8F56aB0A265AE5a14a1F4243E0F59135364FEf66 KYC: approved Join to twitter campaign, spreadsheet № 707 Join to facebook campaign, spreadsheet № 702 Update Looks like I have a solemn announcement to make...
It appears that the bounty hunters should now pass KYC to receive their rewards from MTV. I was just made aware of this a couple hours ago and I've been trying to come up with some solutions. I'm sorry if you feel cheated for your one week of work, it was an unexpected event that just happened.
So after talking with the devs, it seems like you'll need to do the following to receive your bounty rewards.
1. Register on the website here. 2. Pass KYC via the dashboard there, you'll be notified if you passed or were rejected within 48 hours (if not, please pm me). 3. Post your email address here, as well with your role on the spreadsheet and I'll replace your eth address with your email one. 4. Then after the 4 weeks, tokens will be sent to anyone who has a valid account and passed KYC.
And once again, I apologize for any wasted efforts.
I have completed KYC My email address: hayatnoouf140@gmail.comMy status KYC is: verified and complete Join the Content Campaign (facebook, twitter,): spreadsheet FACEBOOK : 194 spreadsheet twitter : 178 email: veniaminsaburov@yandex.ru Bitcointalk name: veniaminsaburov My status KYC is: verified and complete Content compaign: spreadsheet № 918, 920 Done. Hello, twitter spreadsheets #1229 - scammer
Checked further into it, removed his entry. Thanks. Did you submit it via the google form? If not, I can't accept it.
|
|
|
|