your post is very important for me... or you bought merits from me...?
Is this an attempt at smearing my reputation? If so, you should know that I don't react kindly to those. you do not react, but your superiors should do an investigation, is not it so? how do you differ from me? |
|
|
|
I am amazed you people - a group of users decides the fate of people of a lower level.
*Lower level*? Maybe you meant lower intelligence. and all this is happening in the forum on the crypto currency. this is called dictatorship.
No. It has nothing to do with dictatorship. Does not the crypto currency pursue the goal of decentralization?
That has nothing to do with the forum. let the common people decide the fate of the guilty users
Welcome to democracy. your post is very important for me... or you bought merits from me...? |
|
|
|
|
I am amazed you people - a group of users decides the fate of people of a lower level. and all this is happening in the forum on the crypto currency. this is called dictatorship. Does not the crypto currency pursue the goal of decentralization? let the common people decide the fate of the guilty users
|
|
|
|
You do realise that people can ask for payments in order to send other users merits That must be beyond faux pas: It must result in an instant automatic permaban. It can’t always be caught; but it should be made risky enough that no craven blackguard with a high-value account would find it economical. It will happen and a lot more than what you think Merit system is bad for the forum and its somethign I would never ever use again I don’t know you; but a reasonable person might ask if your opinion of what is “bad for the forum” might be coloured by your being a Jr. Member with zero merit, as you are at present. Edit—P.S., to be clear about my own biases or lack thereof, all my current merit was earned by me; none came from any prior status. I ranked up to Member at the the activity rollover yesterday, 30 January. This may be easily verified by anybody who examines my post history and calculates the activity periods. how arrogant you are with all communicate. status allows? as I wrote earlier - even a novice can know more than either of us |
|
|
|
So, so, so... First, you sent 50 ( fifty) merits to Chetty for a post in a thread advertising a “90% AIRDROP”, a post which said only and exactly this: Да точно, он вчера писал что осталось 9% монет у него Approximately: “Yes, certainly, he said he sent 9% of the coins.” Fifty merit points for that is not a “test”. Either you are claiming to be such an imbecile as might make such a “test”, or you presume that we be such imbeciles as to believe such a transparent lie. ...well, well, well. Yes, I am guilty, but not so much :-( Then after you got red-handed and your trust bled, you sent a message posthaste to someone whose profile page expressly states: IF YOU HAVE RED TRUST: DO NOT MESSAGE ME IMMEDIATELY. WAIT AT LEAST 72 HOURS OR THE PM WILL BE IGNORED. Oops! actmyname kept his promise by ignoring you: I wrote actmyname, but he ignores me. As you conveniently forgot to mention, you also sent retaliatory negative trust against actmyname. Of course, this will accomplish substantially nothing: Nobody trusts you by default. actmyname’s trust will not bleed like yours, except for people who explicitly add you to their own trust lists. You even helpfully lied, and claimed that you risked 1.0 BTC in a matter whereby actmyname violated your trust ( n.b. that actmyname properly claimed he risked 0.0 BTC as to you). Though you have been on this forum since 2015, somehow, you are ignorant both of how trust works, and of the policy that theymos does not intervene in such trust disputes: I sended PM theymos too, but he is silent too.  And you have the nerve to ask: why this attitude towards people has become on the forum? Well, here’s a hint: Maybe, just maybe, people on this forum have become a tad peeved and impatient with swindlers who use alts to pump scamcoin airdrops just like you did, prima facie, you sneaky bastard. And either you are guilty of that, or you are guilty of criminal stupidity; there is no third option here. Thus now, your life is “broke”. Ruined! Destroyed by the evil merit system, whose malevolent tyranny knows no bounds! Therefore, I suggest that you get a life. Kudos to you sir! OP you can ba a great example of people who achieved legendary because of time. You're the exact person low ranks are pissed with. If that is your life and work, why would you do a thing that may potentially ruin it? Don't beg for mercy cause we all know, including you since you're legendary, that these things are prohibitted. Maybe they were not written in any post but i think you're also old enough to know what you did was unforgivable. Hello! since it was an innovation on the forum, I did not know all the rules. Yes, now that I completely understood this system, I realized that I made a gross mistake. about the examples for the rest - it will certainly be, but in my personal opinion this is a very tough punishment .. |
|
|
|
I have repeatedly helped users of this forum with their developments for free.
You have no right to say so!
Of course I do, classic self-entitled shitposter. it's up to you, not me. |
|
|
|
If your shitposting life has been ruined by receiving a negative rating on this forum, then you really need to leave.
Complaining about it in the wrong section will not help you.
I have repeatedly helped users of this forum with their developments for free. You have no right to say so! |
|
|
|
right now i have 1001 merit - look in my profile please.
about what sMerit you say? When you click that +Merit button you are giving Merit to other users but you do not detract from your own merit. There are two different forms of merit: static merit and sMerit, which is the sendable merit. When you are sending merit to another individual you subtract from your sMerit total (which is less than your actual merit). Then, an equal amount is added to the user's merit count and they are also given 50% of the sMerit that you sent. You should read up on the merit system. That would be a better way of learning rather than to 'test' by sending to other users. Also, even as a test, is 5% (what you assumed) really reasonable? I really did not read the rules completely, sorry. But seeing the amount of 1000 for me 50 is like a drop in the sea. I promise that I will carefully manage to merit and only worthy posts. Well, forgive the fool :-( |
|
|
|
So, so, so... First, you sent 50 ( fifty) merits to Chetty for a post in a thread advertising a “90% AIRDROP”, a post which said only and exactly this: Да точно, он вчера писал что осталось 9% монет у него Approximately: “Yes, certainly, he said he sent 9% of the coins.” Fifty merit points for that is not a “test”. Either you are claiming to be such an imbecile as might make such a “test”, or you presume that we be such imbeciles as to believe such a transparent lie. ...well, well, well. For me merit - is just a wrapper. I had 1,000 of them so 50 coins of the picture would not change. Of course, if I had only 10 of them, I would not give them all 10, I would not send anything without having understood You do not have 1000 sMerit. You have far less. AFAIK all Legendary (non-source) members got 200 sMerit. 50 out of 200 would be 25% of your sMerit. That's a significant amount for a test. right now i have 1001 merit - look in my profile please. about what sMerit you say? |
|
|
|
So, so, so... First, you sent 50 ( fifty) merits to Chetty for a post in a thread advertising a “90% AIRDROP”, a post which said only and exactly this: Да точно, он вчера писал что осталось 9% монет у него Approximately: “Yes, certainly, he said he sent 9% of the coins.” Fifty merit points for that is not a “test”. Either you are claiming to be such an imbecile as might make such a “test”, or you presume that we be such imbeciles as to believe such a transparent lie. ...well, well, well. For me merit - is just a wrapper. I had 1,000 of them so 50 coins of the picture would not change. Of course, if I had only 10 of them, I would not give them all 10, I would not send anything without having understood Yes, I am guilty, but not so much :-( Then after you got red-handed and your trust bled, you sent a message posthaste to someone whose profile page expressly states: IF YOU HAVE RED TRUST: DO NOT MESSAGE ME IMMEDIATELY. WAIT AT LEAST 72 HOURS OR THE PM WILL BE IGNORED. Oops! actmyname kept his promise by ignoring you: I wrote actmyname, but he ignores me. it took more than 3 days As you conveniently forgot to mention, you also sent retaliatory negative trust against actmyname. Of course, this will accomplish substantially nothing: Nobody trusts you by default. actmyname’s trust will not bleed like yours, except for people who explicitly add you to their own trust lists. You even helpfully lied, and claimed that you risked 1.0 BTC in a matter whereby actmyname violated your trust ( n.b. that actmyname properly claimed he risked 0.0 BTC as to you). I have the right to evaluate my work myself. having lowered to me trust the person has deprived me of work and which I was engaged in earnings for 3 years. Though you have been on this forum since 2015, somehow, you are ignorant both of how trust works, and of the policy that theymos does not intervene in such trust disputes: I sended PM theymos too, but he is silent too. And you have the nerve to ask: why this attitude towards people has become on the forum? Well, here’s a hint: Maybe, just maybe, people on this forum have become a tad peeved and impatient with swindlers who use alts to pump scamcoin airdrops just like you did, prima facie, you sneaky bastard. And either you are guilty of that, or you are guilty of criminal stupidity; there is no third option here. Thus now, your life is “broke”. Ruined! Destroyed by the evil merit system, whose malevolent tyranny knows no bounds! Therefore, I suggest that you get a life. why does everyone have this opinion - once on the forum for a long time, then I must know absolutely everything, while the novice should know nothing? You can spend your whole life in one section. |
|
|
|
it is unlikely that it will help me, but thanks for the post! |
|
|
|
Hello everyone! When only merit entered on the forum, I started testing - I sent various amounts to different people (I tested the functionality). The next day, comrade actmyname lowered me to the trust with the words: "Gave max merit to a post that clearly did not deserve it. Likely alt. ". I maintain my account from 2015 persistently. My account is my work and life. I wrote actmyname, but he ignores me. Can tell me how to proceed? Yes, I am guilty, but not so much :-( I sended PM theymos too, but he is silent too. why this attitude towards people has become on the forum? You gave 50 to a single post that didn't deserve more than 1.. what did you expect to happen? I did not know that such consequences are possible for this. So I had 1000 merits so I tested all the possibilities Come on you are not new to the forum. You are one of the senior most ranked people of the forum and no one expects such experiments from anyone of this rank. I guess we all know the consequences, when we behave abnormally for certain things. A newbie, junior member or a member if comments any irregular behavior can be ignored or warned but I am afraid if the senior category members get involved in improper activities, then the forum performance will definitely be affected. Merit is introduced to up bring the forum quality not to create a mess for anyone. Look. I had 1000 merits, for me 30 do not mean anything. especially if it's bad to send so much much then why do I have restrictions only in 30 and not in 2 say. you do not think that I sold these merits? |
|
|
|
Trust is not moderate by admin so only actmyname able to remove it.
You say want to test the merit but why small rank account ?
I think the story will be different if you give 50 merit to satoshi account
i send to random user, i'm not choose somebody. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone! When only merit entered on the forum, I started testing - I sent various amounts to different people (I tested the functionality). The next day, comrade actmyname lowered me to the trust with the words: "Gave max merit to a post that clearly did not deserve it. Likely alt. ". I maintain my account from 2015 persistently. My account is my work and life. I wrote actmyname, but he ignores me. Can tell me how to proceed? Yes, I am guilty, but not so much :-( I sended PM theymos too, but he is silent too. why this attitude towards people has become on the forum? You gave 50 to a single post that didn't deserve more than 1.. what did you expect to happen? I did not know that such consequences are possible for this. So I had 1000 merits so I tested all the possibilities |
|
|
|
Hello everyone! When only merit entered on the forum, I started testing - I sent various amounts to different people (I tested the functionality). The next day, comrade actmyname lowered me to the trust with the words: "Gave max merit to a post that clearly did not deserve it. Likely alt. ". I maintain my account from 2015 persistently. My account is my work and life. I wrote actmyname, but he ignores me. Can tell me how to proceed? Yes, I am guilty, but not so much :-( I sended PM theymos too, but he is silent too. So, why do you 50 merits to your alt in the first place, if you trying to test the merit system, you shoul've sent only 1 merit but you don't you sent 50 merits to the poster that doesn't desreve 50 merits that's why you have been tagged. Anyways your trust will not likely to be removed (unless he changed his mind and change it neutral) so, get used to it. i try send maximum merits as i can. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone! When only merit entered on the forum, I started testing - I sent various amounts to different people (I tested the functionality). The next day, comrade actmyname lowered me to the trust with the words: "Gave max merit to a post that clearly did not deserve it. Likely alt. ". I maintain my account from 2015 persistently. My account is my work and life. I wrote actmyname, but he ignores me. Can tell me how to proceed? Yes, I am guilty, but not so much :-( I sended PM theymos too, but he is silent too. why this attitude towards people has become on the forum? |
|
|
|
I'm not receive coins for bitcointalk  |
|
|
|
|
Отлично, пошёл закупать плюсы)
|
|
|
|
Лауда троллит  «Что дозволено Юпитеру, не дозволено быку». То есть, с одной стороны можно "вознаградить" любой понравившийся пост, исходя из личных симпатий, а не объективной оценки его полезности, другое дело, что 99% пользователей этого форума получат за подобное красный траст. мне одному не понятно - кем они себя возомнили? цари, повелители форума, судьи? если для меня пост ценнен и я его поощрил - значит для меня это важно. Потому что твое действие реально похоже на продажу смерита. Ты помогаешь рости всяким шитпостерам. Лауда же шитпостеров красит. Как по мне риторический вопрос кто на что заслуживает. Опять таки, проблема в другом: что они сжигают смерит между собой, хотя никому из них он по сути не нужен. (ради этого я и сбросил его пост). Он по сути помогает централизации форума. я отправляю мериты только тем постам которые я считаю полезными. Люди все разные, для кого-то он полезен, для кого-то уже пройденный путь. Я не прав? Если вы в вк или фб ставите лайк - за это же не дрючат - не банят - якобы ты поставил лайк на ерунду |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
