I'm using slightly different software versions, but this just works:
It saves on /dev/shm (which is more or less a RAM-drive in Ubuntu). Can you test this, just to see if that gives you the same error?

Just in case: In your screenshot, you ticked pruning. That means it'll fit on the default location too.

I'd like to take you up on this offer once I have all my data sorted out again.

As an alternative: would anyone be interested in email notifications? If so, I'll look into how to do this add it to my TODO.

So basically, if we skip December 31, I win

I haven't forgotten about this, but because of the sudden disappearance of my webhost I have to fix that first.

You forgot the "Notifications: " in front of the URL. Scraper is picky

Please stay on-topic.

How's this:
I can't add "solved" to the title, it's too long.

Lol. Now where have I seen that before?

Interesting service
Unfortunately I don't have any digital files to sell, so I created a test-file.

Some things I've noticed:
1. After clicking "Go to payment page", the browser "Back" button doesn't work.
2. If I update the Available quantity to 0, I can still click "Go to payment page" if I had the public link open in a Tab already. That probably means that if there's only 1 item left, and 2 people open the buy-page at the same time, the item gets sold twice. Is that correct?
3. I can't find the public marketplace.

Depending on the transaction fee you use, this'll be terrible for micropayments. Any chance you'll support Lightning Network in the future? Or is this service meant for more expensive digital files?

Another thought:
This can probably easily be abused by either scammers, or criminals selling for instance illegal photographs. Apart from escrow, maybe you can add a service that verifies the file to be as advertised?

I need a reference topic for a neutral tag:

User Atobmixer is abusing feedback:


Please read LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system and don't use negative feedback when you don't like someone's opinion.

No spam
Self-moderated to stop spam. Atobmixer is allowed to respond here, but his posts should be on-topic and shouldn't look like he's advertising.

I'll give you an example: I've received positive feedback from DavidXXXX Banned! (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -4).
I'm on DT1, so if I would include DavidXXXX on my Trust list that would make him DT2 and my (green) Trust score would increase 1 point.
That would be Trust abuse.

In your case, I think you confused your Trust list with feedback, and all this happened long before you were on DT (and before the users got banned). I don't think you had bad intentions, but when you reach DT1, those decisions suddenly mean something for other users too. So it's good you reconsidered, thanks for that.

I'm at 3.96% unhandled reports.
In my experience, it is indeed the "gray area" reports for which Mods give the poster the benefit of the doubt, while the reporter gets the benefit of the doubt too by not marking it as "bad". When unsure, don't Mod!
Clear spam is usually removed quickly.

@TECSHARE: would you mind posting links to the reported posts here?

I can already confirm klarki removed the 3 banned users with negative feedback from his Trust list:


Only lega46141 (banned, but no negative feedback) is still on it.

---

---

I made a topic for this a while back:
LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system
It's been translated by the community for 10 local boards, which makes me believe many forum members support what I wrote there. Here's the Russian translation:
[Pyкoвoдcтвo] Cиcтeмa дoвepия

Thanks

You can use one post to comment on many Flags.

However, I'm still working on migrating data to another server, so if it doesn't show up instantly, just wait a few days

OP keeps creating new ANN-threads, trying to get rid of the negative posts. Unfortunately for him, Mods keep deleting them because it's against the forum rules.
He now changed the thread title to Remote Control RFID, trying to hide the negative comments.

I see several red flags here that remind me of another mixer that turned into a scam.
Example:
There's no reason to test a service that you don't trust. Even if they wouldn't steal a small amount, this post is what's expected when someone's building up to selective scamming. Like BITMIXCOIN.IO scam confirmed: 16+ Bitcoin stolen.

That's always a trade-off indeed. There's still far too much retaliation in the Trust system.

I don't like to jump to conclusions, that's why I wanted to get community opinions first. Eddie13 made a good point that I missed: klarki had them on his Trust list long before he was DT1.
I was also hoping klarki would respond here, but instead he posted in Russian:

Translated:
The part in red (if translated correctly) makes me think he confuse the Trust list with feedback.

---

Please join I posted this in public for a reason (and unfortunately can't do that in Russian).

Thanks, I've added it to my TODO.

Correct. I wasn't ready to quickly move to another host, so it takes some fiddling to get everything working again. The links to the unedited posts are correct, they just don't work yet.

Good point: his Trust list is the same now as it was in January.

Without posting your own link your entry gets rejected.

I don't expect this to happen: theymos has blacklisted a few people from DT1 (several of them at their own request), but I haven't seen anyone blacklisted from DT2. The system is designed for DT1 to keep DT2 in check.

It's been discussed before, that's why I posted this individual case in Reputation.

Agreed. But DT1 changes monthly, DT2 changes continuously, and individual Trust lists can change at any moment too. It's very time consuming to keep track of all bad actions all the time.

In his defense: he mainly posts in Russian, which most forum users can't read.