Little mistakes, the campaign should be listed according to their payment terms and then alphabetically  Did this mistake on my first time too  Anyway, Fixed on my pastebin  http://pastebin.com/uP855xz1Thanks.
I don't have time to update the thread, which is why Shorena has started helping me. I'm currently waiting for a new Pastebin from them, but if I don't have one tomorrow I guess I'll have to do it myself.
Sorry, but the time I can spend on the forum changed significantly as well. I didnt expect this, but it is what it is now and I cant change it. I updated the last changes (those that have been posted here at least) in the following pastebin, but if no one else can take over or help out, I fear what I can do wont be enough to keep the thread updated.
-snip-
Just a reminder that, the slots are full for signature campaign of Jetwin.ps
Mitchełł, you can move it to CFNP.
done They are closed now -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1472638.msg14937067#msg14937067
a new signature campaign have just appeared, Betking.io https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1472343.0their information: Total Available Spots: 15 Payment rate: 0.001 BTC/Post Users Allowed to participate: Senior Member, Hero Member, Legendary Member, Staff. Maximum number of post allowed for each week: 25 closed -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1472343.msg15007561#msg15007561
removed
removed
a new signature campaign has just been started today: Coinroll https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1491815.0only Sr. Member and up can register - $0.25 per new post - $0.0005 daily * total post count Amount is credited in BTC Payments will be processed once per week (during weekend) no post limit per week Posts can be in any section added
-> http://pastebin.com/KwxqSG16 |
|
|
|
|
Just added you to the overview thread. Im currently tied up in a long contract, but a 4.5+ USD payment in BTC per day is pretty high for not even posting. You should probably implement some checks, to make sure people are not just parking old unused accounts on your campaign.
Note: I just skimmed to thread, if someone already brought up the point, sorry.
|
|
|
|
The transaction ID is: 512b84a88f1c07bd55c013f156973855e3d0ae85d517cb549ddf8180762e662e
I'm not an expert, but i think my hunch was correct: https://blockchain.info/tx/512b84a88f1c07bd55c013f156973855e3d0ae85d517cb549ddf8180762e662e?show_adv=true1 input of 4.1675, 2 outputs (one 0.1 to 1Myc5HAhMPjq1MatFZaz47gFjjPWc7zJAV, one 4.0675 to 1JCswiVV4SeypsqwXXAFRX85Pe7fGNMPfV) Since you clearly indicated you were trying to send 0.1 BTC as a test, i think it's safe to assume 4.0675 was sent to a change address. I'm reasonably sure the 4.0675 output will pop up as in input as soon as your wallet is synced.. I think so as well. The question is when the TX will confirm, considering that its not paying a fee. The sinlge input has 124009 confirmations though, so I think it will get confirmed soonish. In order to help this a bit I will keep broadcasting the raw TX[1] maybe others will help as well. Due to the test TX I would not recommend exporting the private keys, but rather wait for the sync to finish unless there is a reason why its not easily possible (disk too small) or it would take too long (coins must be moved until a certain time). [1] https://blockchain.info/tx/512b84a88f1c07bd55c013f156973855e3d0ae85d517cb549ddf8180762e662e?format=hex |
|
|
|
hi shorena
-installed Electrum on 3 different computers (Mac, Windows, Ubuntu), everwhere the same, stops at 999.
-don't understand "mess with the cap limit", can you explain, please?
It should have been "gap" limit, my bad. Usually if you dont know what it means it also means you have not messed with it. By default the gap limit is 20, which means that you will see 20 addresses. If you had increased that in the past it might be that you are using addresses that are not checked by electrum for a balance. It doesnt sound like this is the case though. -blockchain.info shows 1003 Tx and correct balance.
Thx for your suggestions, nerioseole
I've got 5 bitcoin addresses, all showing correct Tx and balance, except the one with more than 999.
Also tried to set active servers manually to some with 10000 limit. Though it then starts new synchronization, it stucks at 999.
My guess its a server issue as well. What you maybe could try: #1 export the private key for the address in question #2 import it into a new electrum wallet #3 see if you can find a server that lets you sync (aka the annoying part) #4 send the coins to a new address that is covered by your main wallet's seed |
|
|
|
If the above didnt help you can try to brute force it, e.g. with btc-recover[1]. If you need help with the setup you can ask here, I will try to help you. If you rather want someone else to do it for you, you can contact dave[2] who has a long recover of recovering passwords or send me a PM (my cut will be lower than 20%). [1] https://github.com/gurnec/btcrecover[2] http://www.walletrecoveryservices.com/ |
|
|
|
Thanks! But if the electrum software gets updated, what will happen to my bitcoins? Do I have to use download the latest electrum to keep my bitcoins?
For most updates altcoinhosting is correct. There have been a few exceptions in the past. They have been due to bitcoin network changes which required a new electrum version. You will usually get some error when something like this happened and you try to send some coins. If you ask in the electrum section[1] you usually get a good and quick answer, esp. when there is a required patch due to network changes. It's most like blockchain, and yes its safe.
Electrum is nothing like "blockchain". For one what do you mean with "blockchain"? The service blockchain.info? If so, its a service that can go offline and fail you (as it has in the past), whereas electrum is a local wallet. Yes, electrum requires an electrum server. These are run by the community and even if all should fail you, you can still export your private keys into a different wallet. If you are refering with "blockhain" to the blockchain, the database where all bitcoin TX are stored, electrum is nothing like that either. Its a wallet. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=98.0 |
|
|
|
Electrum doesn't show more than 999 Tx and balance is wrong
Did try creating a new wallet from the seed? Did you mess with the cap limit at some point? How do you know there are more than 999 TX? |
|
|
|
Hallo zusammen,
-snip-
Moin Hat noch jemand einen Tipp?
-snip-
Da es so klingt als würdest Du core eh nicht mehr nutzen wollen und ich geh von Windows aus: #1 erstell dir eine neue (leere) wallet mit Electrum (oder was auch immer du sonst nutzen möchtest), sichere den seed, etc. #2 öffne bitcoin core (unsync) mit deiner wallet.dat #3 geh in die Console: Help -> Debug Window -> Console und gib folgendes ein um die Datei auf dem Desktop zu speichern (shorena durch deinen lokalen Benutzernamen ersetzen, die " müssen bleiben) dumpwallet "C:\Users\shorena\Desktop\privatekeys.txt"
#4 öffne den entsprechenden Ordner und dort die Datei privatekeys.txt, die sind dann in etwa so aus: # Wallet dump created by Bitcoin v0.12.0 (2016-02-17 09:40:03 +0100)
# * Created on 2016-05-27T09:46:19Z
# * Best block at time of backup was 413613 (000000000000000002e1cee03ebcd647f98db93a1472c12c746ca2c549e72ebc),
# mined on 2016-05-27T09:42:13Z
KzvgWFeQ4egSHNrCxobosh8o5ToD7kGmzC3NsB4d2nwERFBHmhXx 2015-06-29T20:35:09Z reserve=1 # addr=1B9bSWdrD6xmCsTNWHSpww22jbUkYLvmS
-snip-
# End of dump
Das erste in jeder Zeile sind die privaten Schlüssel, zeig sie niemandem und poste sie auch nirgendwo. Der oben ist aus einer extra erstellten wallet.dat und wurde nie benutzt. Kopiere alle privaten Schlüssel, aber sonst nichts. Öffne nun Electrum und klick #5 File -> New / Restore #6 namen aussuchen, ok klicken #7 "Restore a wallet or import keys" und "standard wallet" anklicken, dann "next" #8 im nächsten Fenster die privaten Schlüssel in die Box kopieren und den restlichen Schritten folgen #9 warten bis die wallet synchron ist, dauert nur ein paar minuten #10 sende die BTC an deine wallet aus #1 |
|
|
|
Benutzt denn noch jemand Telegram, jetzt da WhatsApp End-to-End-Verschlüsselung hat?
Also Telegram ist Anonym, Whatsapp nicht Es scheint mir eine Anmeldung ohne Telefonnummer ist nicht möglich. Damit bin ich raus. |
|
|
|
-snip-
First im not shifting the blame to any others,i had bought account again,its allowed.
Well buying might be allowed, but you are not to use them while any single other account you own or owned is banned. Its not the account that is banned it is you as a person, as difficult to enforce as it is. My mistake is admin doesnt like the account buy and sell and i got banned because i were posting always related to the topic,and never a spam post.I took the opportunity from admin to keep getting my income.
Admins do not like account sales, but they allow them. If you see your time here as a source of income you should reconsider your life decisions. Just open your eyes and go read knowhow post did you find spam there?Really?I dont believe you can agree i got banned because i bought once again accounts and i were making my normal posts in the threads ,replying on topic avoiding spam.Soo i dont see why i got banned besides the fact i had bought accounts ,there is no other reason.
I will stay away and out from here as is the wish of admin badbear,even when i dont agree with the ban.
Thanks for all the time and opportunity gaved to me,sorry badbear if our opinions are different,but thanks for everything.
|
|
|
|
For security purposes, you should use the vanity address only for receiving and never let it be in the address for too long. Electum and Armory both supports importing of private keys into seed wallets but they will not be restored should you lose/delete the wallet data.
You should update to electrum 2. |
|
|
|
I was wondering how many people on here really believe in the 'longest chain wins' philosophy or whether it is only because it largely matches a 'first to publish' in the long term?
For example, if it turns out that what we currently believe to be the longest chain is suddenly and unexpectedly demoted to a side chain with the appearance of a new chain which goes back, say, 3-6 months. Would you accept this as the 'true' chain or would you push for reverting or locking to the chain that has been publicly seen?
The bitcoin nodes would switch to that different chain. The question - as others have brough up already - is where does this new chain come from. "The longest chain" is just an abstraction of what really happens. The number of blocks is not as important as the work that had to be done to find them. Thus a longer chain would only be possible if someone could amass as much mining equipment in secret as is currently used worldwide. This is no simple nor cheap task. It's a thought experiment, but let's say for the sake of argument, that a number of miners with >51% hashing power has been mining in parallel for 3 months, but were not connected to the 'known' network and then later join the network and have the longest chain. Would we be happy to accept this? From their point of view, we join them and have a shorter chain. I dont know about user happyness, but the nodes would switch the chain, yes. |
|
|
|
-snip- Wasnt amazon also among the ISPs that hosted a significantly large portion of the classic nodes? It might be an attempt to kick them off the network or make it look like someone was trying to do so.
Correct. However, almost all of those nodes have disappeared (a day or two before those connections appeared which is a strange coincidence)[1]:  -snip- [1] - https://coin.dance/nodesMaybe its the same IPs, but the money ran out to run full nodes. |
|
|
|
I want to make a vanity bitcoin address, I do not intend to make any btc deposit on it, just for signing messages.
Is there a reliable way to have one ? Can I import the private keys to another desktop wallet like electrum ?
Vanitygen Yes, you can import into electrum, but the imported address will not be covered by the seed and will be stored in a different wallet file. Not covered by seed in electrum is a bit problematic, although I don't intend to put any bitcoin in it, I don't want to lose it eaither in case of PC crash. How to make sure to never lose the vanity address ? Print the private keys on paper ? You need to secure the private key, yes. If on paper works for you, sure. You could also encrypt the wallet and create a digital backup or whatever else makes the most sense in your situation. It would be nice to have a seed that would cover a vanity address, but it would require brute forcing the matching seed as its impossible to shove any private key into a seed in hindsight. |
|
|
|
I want to make a vanity bitcoin address, I do not intend to make any btc deposit on it, just for signing messages.
Is there a reliable way to have one ? Can I import the private keys to another desktop wallet like electrum ?
Vanitygen Yes, you can import into electrum, but the imported address will not be covered by the seed and will be stored in a different wallet file. |
|
|
|
-snip-
1. I NEVER do nothing bad here
Thats not the implication here. 2. I have no btc to pay
So dont. 3. I want to use TOR 100% and i can not use it here? It is all about crypto anons etc than Why i should be not able to use tor?
You can use Tor all you want, but you may(!) run into a proxy ban when you create a new account. Yes i've tried to change location etc but all the time same message.
You need to change location and create a new account. Its possible to create an account over Tor without paying for it. Its a bit of work though. If you prefer to avoid this, go to some public WiFi, create the accounts there and use Tor for all further connections. This only applies when you create an account over an IP that was used to spam in the past. Tor is often misused to spam, dont blame the forum for protecting against this, blame the spammers.
-snip-
Eh... okey i think i understand the politic of this FREEDOM WORLD here....
Thank You for information
I dont think you do. This policy does not affect your freedom of using Tor. It may not be as comfortable, but thats not what being free is about anyway. |
|
|
|
-snip- It also ensures that I dont ban IPs for a long time when its not needed or if its a false positive. This prevents that my node helps separating amazon nodes in general from the network.
Correct. This is why I've chosen a 1 month trial period for only the IP's that were misbehaving. I do wonder though, what the person things that they could accomplish with this. They surely don't think that they'd able to completely separate Amazon from the network with such a small attack? I dont know the reason behind this, but freaky1's idea of separating amazon from the rest of the network makes the most sense. Amazon does not seem to care, this might be something the attack knew in advance. Wasnt amazon also among the ISPs that hosted a significantly large portion of the classic nodes? It might be an attempt to kick them off the network or make it look like someone was trying to do so. Btw I dont think there is a big difference between manually banning single IPs for a month and automatically banning single IPs for a day each hour if needed. The only advantage I see in my approach is that have clear log file that indicates when the attack stopped (on my node). |
|
|
|
[size= 15pt]Hello everybody. What is the possibility of someone using a website like: http://offlinebitcoins.com/ to find a private key of a wallet that contains money randomly. I mean websites like these allow you to generate random private keys in one click. What if someone who have super computer could automate this process until he finds a wallet that contains money. Wouldn't that affect bitcoin wallets safety? I am just asking if that is possible. Regards [/size] No, if it should ever happen - it wont - it would be a freak event like 6 lottery wins by the same person in a row. Someone that is extremely lucky does not change the security of a robust system. |
|
|
|
-snip-
First after 50.000 I have detected the first block with multiple transactions inside.
-snip-
Try block 170, IIRC it includes the first transaction where satoshi send 10 btc to hal. |
|
|
|
Thanks, I have a working script that automatically scans for these connections, adds the IP to a log file and bans them for a day now.
Why bother with it and not ban them for a longer period at once? I don't understand your approach here. I've used 1 month to check whether it is going to stop in the meantime, if it doesn't then these nodes will go to my yearly ban list. Well I wrote the script so I dont have to care about this anymore. Changing the bantime is trivial now, esp since I can see in the log whether or not the attack still continues. It also ensures that I dont ban IPs for a long time when its not needed or if its a false positive. This prevents that my node helps separating amazon nodes in general from the network. If franky1 is correct, and I think its likely they are, its a bad idea to help the attacker by splitting amazon nodes off the network. Its still rank #4 on ISP according to bitnodes[1]. [1] https://bitnodes.21.co/nodes/#networks-tab
i have no idea about this. i never face such things ever. may that i am quite new in bitcoin forum. so i hope that the problem will be solve very soon. let me know that if something like this happend what suoul i do then.
Do you run a full node? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
