Epsylon3 I sent you a pm plz read.... thx  |
|
|
|
Adding the 2nd 970 Msi afterburner doesn't recognized it on graphics monitor but does on the control panel. Mining for 2 minutes then crashes with the 2nd image below. Now going to set the clocks.   maybe you are pushing just a bit too hard? also whats your cpu/ram combo? I found that running lbry and ethereum side by side (i mixed amd and nvidia cards) can take up a lot of the system resources, including ~3GB of ram. Thx but no I'm not pushing the clocks higher ... something else is. I'm now setting the clocks to normal 1064 for the 980ti's and 1178 for the 970's. I wonder if ccminer is doing this? |
|
|
|
Adding the 2nd 970 Msi afterburner doesn't recognized it on graphics monitor but does on the control panel. Mining for 2 minutes then crashes with the 2nd image below. Now going to set the clocks.  |
|
|
|
For a reference before I change clocks.  |
|
|
|
Also: Any special edition cards such as "OC" or "SSC" should never be overclocked. The manufacturers have already done the legwork for us for the max reliability/stability on their card build. Keep this well in mind..... I never overclock a SSC or OC edition card.
This card http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125684and something is oc'ing it an app IDK So this maybe one of the main problems. Clocks are at 1393 right now. p2 state. |
|
|
|
This is the problem with installing more than one GPU type per system:
You'd have to do a nvidia driver "clean install" for the device's specific driver to fix that issue..... Which would remove the other versions of the driver for the other cards........
Any chance on getting the 2 970's in their own box by themselves to test this?
No but the driver I use is made for all cards JK. I think we got the problem down to 2 issues now. One windows 8.1 can only handle so many high end cards like someone I know tried to put 6 980ti on his rig...it can't be done. He got 5 but with lunix I think. So if I had that many cards and did windows 8.1 the max maybe 4 cards...but it maybe msi afterburner seeing only 4 cards. 2nd I'm working on right now is the clocks are most definitely wrong on the 970's. Going to set clocks to 1178 like their suppose to be with 2 970 in the system and see if that works. If not going to delete all monitor app and try again. |
|
|
|
Ok On my 970's g1 trying now to add the 2nd one. msi afterburner display wont show the extra 970 but it is recognized on the control panel. And the clocks mining in the p2 normal state are showing 1400 core clock...so something is overclocking them causing them to crash? Going to delete all monitoring software to see if the clocks go to normal. Also going to manually set the clocks to 1178 mhz where they are supposed to be if necessary. Even though the rig has been mining for days now and no crashes without the extra card. 2 days ago I tried the extra card in and clock default to oc'ing 1413 to high. With the extra card it will mine for 3 minutes exactly then crashes the drivers. Reboot and mine and 3 minutes drivers crash. Gigabyte says to download OC GURU and try the other bios non gaming to see if that helps. Be back asap with the results. This is what happens sometimes on a fast reboot, it is the 970 1st card 2nd card not installed. After rebooting a 2nd time this doesn't happen. I think I need to take fast boot off on my asrock 81 btc pro to normal boot. This is the first 970 crash below.  This is with 5 cards installed 5th card not recognized by windows.  |
|
|
|
yes with the MB there are 3 slot for the fan and they are controllable, i've set them at 50%-60% max i didn't try quark because lbry is the best for now, but i guess should be around 30MH with oc here you have all algo http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/gtx-1070-hashrate/ (i'm getting more for some algo, like lyra2, 6.1MH) Thx |
|
|
|
Ive a preversion of a ccminer compatible with suprnova getwork over stratum and nanopool getwork over http...
Preview funding price for the prerelease is 0.05 btc... limited to the first 20 users. I will try to handle more protocols in the final release (like other stratum variants)
PM me if interested
oh about the hashrate : 1GH/s on a 970, 670MH on a 960, 375MH on a 750ti, pascal speeds are good too, but speeds are more variable with oc/models.. so i dont report them for now
Thinking about it.. need to run some tests on my rig then I'll look into it. thx |
|
|
|
yeah but i like that it come with a wattmeter inside it and you need only 3 cable to run six gpu So you only need 8gig of ram .. nice.
What is the make of the card and are they g1 plz
And I don't understand what rm1000i means.
Thx
g1 gaming 1070, but it seems that the palit is also good rm1000i corsair psu here the rig   Nice One last question plz how do you supply the 3 cooling fans.. off the mb? And if so I think the asrock only supplies to fans. And for a reference I wonder what hashrate you can get with quark? Thx Amph |
|
|
|
WOW  .............. but look at the cpu -102c must be in liquid nitrogen to keep it cool. |
|
|
|
of course, and anyway anyone, not naive enough, will tell you that it is impossible to have that hashrate with just oc, i'm not believing that, he is running a private miner, optimized with pascal, i can believe this easily
also there are no insult, you guys see insult everywhere, something wrong...
Believing something doesn't make it true. You just assumed Wotan's results were faked and have berated him since he posted them. That's unfair and insulting whether you believe it or not. It's not a matter of naivete, it's a matter of respect. no i did not assumed that they are fake, i assumed that they are fake if done with oc, until i'm proven wrong by actual number, which he don't won't to reveal(coincidence?), i'm staying with my view of course, and anyway anyone, not naive enough, will tell you that it is impossible to have that hashrate with just oc, i'm not believing that, he is running a private miner, optimized with pascal, i can believe this easily here my old result(now i'm getting up to 1500-1530MH with 80% power limit, so better than this)  also there are no insult, you guys see insult everywhere, something wrong... Amph what mb are you using and operating system and psu plz thx I see you got 6x 1070 running .. good job. And what monitor oc'ing software is that? my build is simple, similar to many other h81 pro btc, g1840, 8gb ram g.skill sniper, ssd 60 or 120gb, rm1000i and 6 standard riser, SO was win 7 now win 10, i experience no difference great result on both that thing that it is showing me the wattage is corsair link, you don't need wattmeter anymore, beautiful addition by corsair @Amph
Any chance you know power usage for 1950-2000mhz with stock voltage per 1070?
I am building few rig on corsair rmx 1000 and have no way to measure, but I will put 5 GPU per it
it depend on the gpu, the g1 gaming is consuming up to 180w i measured it, this with maximum power limit i would suggest to buy rm 1000i and not "x" version, they can tell you the wattage So you only need 8gig of ram .. nice. What is the make of the card and are they g1 plz And I don't understand what rm1000i means. Thx |
|
|
|
Yes I can get money I believe ... have 2 970 ... thx |
|
|
|
The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.
Some algos like Neoscrypt/scrypt-jane and at least a couple others can fill 4GB and then some if you increase the intensity. Yes easily too. |
|
|
|
From the same thread: Reasons: Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices: 1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory 2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs 3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary. 4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses. Thx bathrobehero. So this could lead to instabilities? I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that? I have no idea on any of those fronts. I never had any issues with my WF3OC 970's for mining or gaming. Not even when using more than 3.5 GB memory. I basically love everything about these cards. Thx I hate these cards clocks locked at 1400 and just loves to crash. Tomorrow going to try to set the clocks to where their supposed to be see if that helps. |
|
|
|
I am doing great at yiimp testing another pool then back to yiimp.  |
|
|
|
last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty
That's because Bensam left. He was holding the pool back.  |
|
|
|
From the same thread: Reasons: Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices: 1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory 2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs 3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary. 4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses. Thx bathrobehero. So this could lead to instabilities? I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that? |
|
|
|
of course, and anyway anyone, not naive enough, will tell you that it is impossible to have that hashrate with just oc, i'm not believing that, he is running a private miner, optimized with pascal, i can believe this easily here my old result(now i'm getting up to 1500-1530MH with 80% power limit, so better than this) also there are no insult, you guys see insult everywhere, something wrong... Amph what mb are you using and operating system and psu plz thx I see you got 6x 1070 running .. good job. And what monitor oc'ing software is that? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
