Seeing to the ccminer commands, how do I implement --cuda-schedule?
Never mind. I already found the answer. http://cryptomining-blog.com/5684-updated-ethminer-0-9-41-nvidia-cuda-version-for-windows-2/--cuda-schedule Set the schedule mode for CUDA threads waiting for CUDA devices to finish work. Default is sync. Possible values for mode are: auto – Uses a heuristic based on the number of active CUDA contexts in the process C and the number of logical processors in the system P. If C > P, then yield else spin. spin – Instruct CUDA to actively spin when waiting for results from the device. yield – Instruct CUDA to yield its thread when waiting for results from the device. sync – Instruct CUDA to block the CPU thread on a synchronization primitive when waiting for the results from the device. What use is this plz? Any increase in hashrates? thx PS I still don't understand this command. Any help plz. This setting determines how the CCMiner process interacts with the CPU and other processes (including those that belong to the operating system) running on your system. Whether it improves your hash rate depends on how many GPUs you have, how fast they are and the speed and number of cores your CPU has. CCMiner uses the CPU to validate results from your GPUs, so if CCMiner cannot validate results as quickly as your GPUs are creating them, your hash rates will suffer a little. Changing this setting can give CCMiner more access to your CPU, which can increase the speed at which results are processed. However, changing this setting will increase CPU utilization and may decrease system responsiveness because other processes will have to wait longer to use the CPU. For example, the Spin option gives CCMiner the fastest access to the CPU because it keeps the process active on the CPU as it waits for new GPU results. This prevents other background processes from interrupting it and can improve CCMiner performance at the expense of the operating system and anything else also running on the computer. Yield is a compromise because it gives CCMiner a bit more access to the CPU than sync, but it allows other processes to interrupt it when it isn't doing anything. Sync tends to be the most friendly towards other background processes so the system remains responsive during mining, but it also means that the CCMiner process may be interrupted a lot, which might affect your performance if you have several fast GPUs in a system with a slow CPU. Some variants of CCMiner, such as Klaust and Tpruvot, may use a different default setting then the one described above. For example, sync might be the default setting for those versions. In those cases, it may be worth trying yield instead even if you have a relatively fast CPU as it will give the miner process better access to the CPU while not blocking other background processes. I find that yield gives more consistent hash rates than sync on a i7 running 1080 and 1070 ti cards. Thx HashAuger Now I understand. So how would the command go.. like this? --cuda-schedule yield
|
|
|
Hi...In ccminer it has Bitcore as bitcore algo. Is it bitcore or timetravel10 plz? Thx Hi. It's the Bitcore algo, which was originally named TimeTravel10. Maybe it's a typo or it has been changed to save space, but you should just put it like this in your .bat file and everything should be OK: ccminer -a bitcore -o stratum+tcp://server:port -u wallet_address -p password Edit: More clear now. Yes thx...What happened was..there is a timetravel10 update. So dev named timetravel10 update... another coin.. to timetravel and named BITCORE algo bitcore...which is really timetravel10.
|
|
|
I see there is a z-enemy 1.09 out.... any links plz? Yes 1.09 ready, soon ill add links and we start tests in our test discord... But 1.09 not for public, only after we finish all tests. Ok thx
|
|
|
I see there is a z-enemy 1.09 out.... any links plz?
|
|
|
Hi...In ccminer it has Bitcore as bitcore algo. Is it bitcore or timetravel10 plz? Thx
|
|
|
If you can show us the screenshots of your miner hashing at these rates, then I will pull the trigger and place an order for eight of these units. For $35,000 why not fly out and meet, see it for yourself, or something of that nature? Because he doesn't have that much money to spend on these to begin with. No one demands proof and then spends that kind of dough by simply seeing a screenshot. The heavy hitters already know what sort of capabilities are out there. Oh please spare me. I’ve been tracking and renting these VU09P FPGAs ever since Amazon AWS had them for rental. They are currently renting for approximately $0.50/hr (f1.2xlarge -> 1 FPGA) and $4.00/hr (f1.16xlarge -> 8 FPGAs). So far, it hasn’t made any sense to actually purchase one vs renting for what I use them for. But if someone had an FPGA bitstream which made renting these FPGAs less desirable, then purchasing would be preferred. By the way, requesting evidence even something as trivial as a screenshot, doesn’t imply that someone is lying. How do you rent the Amazon AWS FPGA's for mining? Do I need to be able to code? thx
|
|
|
How long before the launch plz.
|
|
|
Pool webpage won't display??
|
|
|
Seeing to the ccminer commands, how do I implement --cuda-schedule?
Never mind. I already found the answer. http://cryptomining-blog.com/5684-updated-ethminer-0-9-41-nvidia-cuda-version-for-windows-2/--cuda-schedule Set the schedule mode for CUDA threads waiting for CUDA devices to finish work. Default is sync. Possible values for mode are: auto – Uses a heuristic based on the number of active CUDA contexts in the process C and the number of logical processors in the system P. If C > P, then yield else spin. spin – Instruct CUDA to actively spin when waiting for results from the device. yield – Instruct CUDA to yield its thread when waiting for results from the device. sync – Instruct CUDA to block the CPU thread on a synchronization primitive when waiting for the results from the device. What use is this plz? Any increase in hashrates? thx PS I still don't understand this command. Any help plz.
|
|
|
problem is do I stand a chance of getting a block with a combined hash of just 110.000?
or server farms are taking all the coins?
110 what? mh/s or kh/s or h/s ? This looks like a spam bot which makes messages from early history in the thread, just ignore it. Zoidberg Ya.. I figured it might be.
|
|
|
Watch out btc-alpha is a scam on withdraws. Segwit problem.
Hey HoneyBear any links to claims? I did a work around by withdrawing to my wallet address beginning with a l and then it worked.
|
|
|
Watch out btc-alpha is a scam on withdraws. Segwit problem.
No problem for me there. Describe a problem. Try withdrawing Litecoin with a segwit address....one that begins with an m.
|
|
|
ETN linux and macOS command line wallets are very slow.
So are windows. Very,very slow.
|
|
|
problem is do I stand a chance of getting a block with a combined hash of just 110.000?
or server farms are taking all the coins?
110 what? mh/s or kh/s or h/s ?
|
|
|
So I noticed that the dev. didn't fork this coin. So now it is an ASIC mining coin. Any plans on anti-asic forking? thx.
|
|
|
Wish I had a 1080ti....can't afford it. I'll wait for the new series.
|
|
|
The dev needs to make this wallet official. Nice wallet.
|
|
|
Watch out btc-alpha is a scam on withdraws. Segwit problem.
|
|
|
Could be.
|
|
|
|