I'm really glad to see more and more project coming on the cryptoeconomic side. And especially I'm glad to see the project like Pulsar, making this moving simpler. I hope you, guys going to have a success
I think that such a project will really help newcomers. It's hard to analyze the project yourself and manage your own funds. It takes experience Yes, it would really help me earlier, when I was just starting to invest) |
|
|
|
Tokenize milk production? Really? Are you kidding?
Why not? This is a real economy - always beneficial to investors I do not know ... ICO is something high-tech, computer. It's silly to tokenize a regular farm ICO's are merely a form of fund raising, using the blockchain as a secure and transparant platform. Honestly, this works great for milkcoin IMO. Exactly. It's quite difficult, but it works. Moreover, it is more popular than other ways of collecting investment |
|
|
|
It seems to me that in order to really win a large part of the market, you need to really differ. You need to do some kind of function that is not available to users of other funds
It is also enough that this fund will bring money  |
|
|
|
By the way, I'm a little worried that the fund opened recently. Yes, the developers have enough experience, but the organization itself has not gained confidence in the eyes of the community.
Well, you yourself answered. Developers have enough experience, this is the most important thing. It seems to me that the community will be more focused on the success of team members. Nevertheless, the developers themselves in the White Paper indicate this as a risk factor. I do not argue, there are much more significant dangers, but I need to understand where I invest my money Oh, come on. There are so many risk factors that can influence the campaign of ICO. This is business, you can not completely escape from risk. On the other hand, it is precisely these funds that are good: you take responsibility off of yourself and place it on the manager |
|
|
|
Does the company have any major investors? Such a project might be interested in crypto-currency funds
It seems to me that the project should count more on community support than on investments from major players Why do you think so? Investments in the real economy are very attractive Probably, because for large investors this is too small production. Although I may be wrong |
|
|
|
|
By the way, what about competitiveness? Surely in Russia there are hundreds of similar farms. It will not be easy to compete with milk producers
|
|
|
|
Why does the white paper listed such high numbers come from? Is it somehow possible to prove it or is it just a guess?
Honestly, I did not find the exact figures. However, I can say that, judging by what a vast portfolio of projects these guys have, these data can be true. Moreover, they already had experience of projects, which increased their profitability dozens of times. I think this is an indicator of trust. |
|
|
|
Are there any risk factors? I think this project is very promising, but in fact there is certainly something that can prevent success.
Such factors are present and this is detailed in white paper. The foundation was founded recently, despite the impressive experience of its creators. In addition, rapid scientific progress can also damage the project |
|
|
|
Do I understand correctly that you are selecting prospective projects before the start of fundraising? That is, do you have any criteria for determining whether a project will be successful? Is it some kind of developed scheme or just an experience?
I think it's all the same experience and skills. The guys in the portfolio have very cool projects. Surely they do not cheat about the figures of profitability. It seems to me that this fund is worth attention What projects do you mean? I looked at what the team presented on the site and I want to say that not all of them are strong. Something is very controversial Yes, that's what I mean. I do not argue, there are projects that may seem questionable. But I do not think that they would be in the portfolio of such a respected team. Diversity is also understandable, they want to please all investors. |
|
|
|
Do I understand correctly that you are selecting prospective projects before the start of fundraising? That is, do you have any criteria for determining whether a project will be successful? Is it some kind of developed scheme or just an experience?
I think it's all the same experience and skills. The guys in the portfolio have very cool projects. Surely they do not cheat about the figures of profitability. It seems to me that this fund is worth attention |
|
|
|
Is it possible to release tokens without using them in the system? That is, only to raise money for the development of the project? Forgive me for asking, I do not have much experience in ICO
Why not? Companies of the real economy often work that way. This is beneficial, given the trends of the crypto-currency market. Given the latest trends in the fall in prices for the BTC, this may not be so profitable. But I still like the project. |
|
|
|
|
What is the reason for the confidence that the token will grow? I only recently thought about this issue. This is not the first such service.
|
|
|
|
What about the US? Are you not going to develop a platform in this direction?
Well, it seems to me that if the platform services are common, then there will be time for expansion in the US. But for some reason, the developers do not indicate this even in the plans What is the reason for this decision? 30-40% of investors come from North America. It is simply unprofitable to not even try to occupy this market I can only guess, but in North America there is quite a lot of competition in this area. Banks offer microloans on sufficiently favorable terms, users do not have sense to use tokens. Bad guess. Tokens will still be more profitable at the expense of the fact that they can be provided to creditors who have been denied ordinary banks. Therefore, the decision to abandon North America is still not clear to me. Then it remains only to wait for the developers response. |
|
|
|
We decided to introduce a few changes to our schedule to make our offer for investors even more attractive. First of all, we are going to start our public pre-sale phase on November 15. Until November 29, Inspeer's early investors will have a chance to get significant bonuses. The bonus scheme for public pre-sale phase: 1-5 day - 25% 5-12 day - 20% Today we also announce ICO dates. Our ICO starts on December 1 and will be running until December 29. Please note that ICO may end earlier if the maximum goal is reached. The bonus scheme for main ICO phase: 1 day - 15% 1 week - 10% 2 week - 5% 3-4 weeks - 0% Take your chance to join one of the most innovative P2P lending project. And feel free to contact our support team in case you have any questions or feedback. Our telegram: https://t.me/Inspeer_ioFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/Inspeere/Twitter: https://twitter.com/Inspeer_io/Such a small gap between the stages of sales? Do you really have time to prepare everything? |
|
|
|
I see that this project has quite a few competitors who offer roughly the same services. How does Tokenbox plan to fight competition in this area?
What kind of competitors are you talking about? For example, such projects as Geneses or CrowdWIZ LOL You say that the project has a lot of competitors, but you named only 2! Is this competition in your opinion?  I can not remember everyone, I just follow these two projects, but trust the competitors in the market much more than these two projects! If you follow these projects, then you should know that they are very different from Tokenbox, I would not call them direct competitors! Perhaps their services are slightly different, but they occupy the same niche in the market. Well, at least pretend to it Just the same play the role of those details that you consider insignificant, but to which the developers are emphasizing. I did not quite understand what exactly you mean  Well nevermind |
|
|
|
I see that this project has quite a few competitors who offer roughly the same services. How does Tokenbox plan to fight competition in this area?
What kind of competitors are you talking about? For example, such projects as Geneses or CrowdWIZ LOL You say that the project has a lot of competitors, but you named only 2! Is this competition in your opinion? I can not remember everyone, I just follow these two projects, but trust the competitors in the market much more than these two projects! If you follow these projects, then you should know that they are very different from Tokenbox, I would not call them direct competitors! Perhaps their services are slightly different, but they occupy the same niche in the market. Well, at least pretend to it Just the same play the role of those details that you consider insignificant, but to which the developers are emphasizing. |
|
|
|
I see that this project has quite a few competitors who offer roughly the same services. How does Tokenbox plan to fight competition in this area?
What kind of competitors are you talking about? For example, such projects as Geneses or CrowdWIZ LOL You say that the project has a lot of competitors, but you named only 2! Is this competition in your opinion? I can not remember everyone, I just follow these two projects, but trust the competitors in the market much more than these two projects! If you follow these projects, then you should know that they are very different from Tokenbox, I would not call them direct competitors! |
|
|
|
I see that this project has quite a few competitors who offer roughly the same services. How does Tokenbox plan to fight competition in this area?
What kind of competitors are you talking about? For example, such projects as Geneses or CrowdWIZ LOL You say that the project has a lot of competitors, but you named only 2! Is this competition in your opinion? |
|
|
|
I see that this project has quite a few competitors who offer roughly the same services. How does Tokenbox plan to fight competition in this area?
What kind of competitors are you talking about? |
|
|
|
Developers say that the factor that constrains the development of such projects P2P lending - this is a large interest rates on loans.
The developers say that in their project these interest rates will be significantly reduced. Due to what exactly will this happen? How exactly?
Well, maybe this is the role that they will work with the crypto currency market. Maybe it will somehow matter. I do not understand how this could affect the reduction in interest rates on loans Perhaps attracting additional investment through ICO affects it in some way. I think everything is much simpler. Unlike other companies that rely on excess profits from their activities, INSPEER is aimed at a long-term perspective of its activities. A low interest rate on loans is due to another business strategy. Most likely so  Maybe it is ... In this there is a definite meaning! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
