|
breakout is due tomorrow around 1300 GMT
log this post.
|
|
|
|
|
earned as many in 2 min on dedicated as I did in 15 on supr
|
|
|
|
supr all over the place, hardly any of my hashrate accepted. Moving to dedicated
me too had the same with XC. Put 1ghash on supr, was highest single user, had to move. |
|
|
|
|
supr all over the place, hardly any of my hashrate accepted. Moving to dedicated
|
|
|
|
I saw 18k XC coins get dumped on Mintpal at 200k just after Chaeplin got the correct sender address.
This is a professional pump group they are using news in this thread and the sensitivity of coin holders to spook the market.
or maybe someone expected the price to drop and was acting accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
Anyway.....
so after all of that Chaeplin was using the mixing pattern to trace the transactions back to their original destination.
Good to know and easy to fix.
After all that..... he wasn't trying to be a dick its just his English isn't that good.
|
|
|
|
Chaeplin, you have given me endless entertainment and provided good info today. Thanks  Please don't improve your English too much, it would spoil some of the fun. Anyway let me get this straight it was the mixing pattern that you spotted and could follow back from there right? Yes. when open sourced, no matter how many txs are in. Gotcha, thanks. Sorry if I said anything nasty  |
|
|
|
I like him again now.  he keeps me entertained. |
|
|
|
Chaeplin, you have given me endless entertainment and provided good info today. Thanks Please don't improve your English too much, it would spoil some of the fun. Anyway let me get this straight it was the mixing pattern that you spotted and could follow back from there right? |
|
|
|
He asked me can you see direct link in block chain?
What the hell direct link is ?
I wish I was born in country using english.
I just click block explorer and can tell which is sending address and which is receiving.
I use direct web browser link.
I think Dev should know about this.
Few click, revealed.
So I answered Yes, I use block explorer.
He asked me Can you provide it ?
What ? provide web browser link ?
Are you mad ? I refused it.
Should I tell the community, It's so easy ??
Suddenly community people got mad..
Oh my...
I realized that the meaning of direct link.
Hell there is no direct link in block chain.
So I stopped conversation.
|
|
|
|
Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story.  Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount? That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment. we were looking for the sender address, not receiver address. |
|
|
|
so you saying if there are more xnodes it would be hard? also you saying the reason transaction he would use explorer to check one by one to see the transaction? proof or no proof if chaeplin able to find the sender address then there is flaw with the coin and anon is not working of course if chaeplin able to find all the addresses during this test then there is flaw. the question is if developer able to fix this.
As atc said, if he posts real proof, he will take the time to look at it and analyse it. tracking recent transaction on explorer. only few xnodes and few transactions, and he also know the amounts. This is what I think, he is vetting the chain because the size is small and the network is small. He's a bit of a self important conceited type so he like to make out he is doing more than he is. His ego gets in the way of him being a useful person. Shame really because he's obviously not stupid. If he could really directly link via the block chain he would prove it. |
|
|
|
Teka, can you just delete anything Chaeplin has to say. He can PM atcsecure if he wishes to actually prove his claims but I don't think there is any reason to allow him to continue to toss FUD grenades around the thread.
the reason is chaeplin already proved he could, look a few pages back ... he got the sending addresses on the first contest you were throwing in, no way he could fake it, he did not only post the address as md5 in here, before the contest was revealed. also he also made an transaction to the senders address before the address got public. Which obv. could have been checked very easy. So he has proofen that he was able to get the senders address with the current xc design, there is no fud in that. But still some are purly deny and call him ****! WOW ! He even stepped back from taking the bounty which he clearly deserves, spending his free time for you (i guess he has no xc at all), and the mayority of you are just calling him a laier and some other grown up words -.- unbelivable ! Actually most of us were very friendly and supportive towards him until we realised that he had no intention of helping and was just doing it for the ego trip. How childish is it to say you have found a flaw with something and then refuse to reveal what that flaw is? The kind of thing five year olds do. Smart enough to trace the transactions but not smart enough to behave sensibly and maturely with the information. |
|
|
|
No more.
Bye.
You're sense of self importance and ego will make you come back and look. I know you are. What an utter waste of time all this was, all just to massage your ego. |
|
|
|
chaeplin,
thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?
thanks
atcsecure
Yes Direct Link. can you post that data? thanks atcsecure Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it. And this is what you get for trusting a retard .....  Oh yeah, but everyone seems to be all huggy lovie for him though. Good grief people look at the guys post history and shit he says in the non-moderated XC thread. But he is sooo trying to help us at least someone is vs everyone praising it when there are obvious holes. those holes are not obvious to all, but we need people like him to help out. remember, it is not about coin vs coin, it is about moving cryptos forward. What obvious holes? He refuses to back up his statements, until then it is just pure shit, plain and simple you mean apart from the fact that he succesfully traced the transactions back to the originating wallet? |
|
|
|
|
I think chances are that Chaeplin vetted the blocks but his ego is so big he wanted to show he had more knowledge of how it works than he does.
If he actually was smart enough to spot a direct block chain link he would post it. As it stands he's just lucky there are not many transactions.
|
|
|
|
chaeplin,
thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?
thanks
atcsecure
Yes Direct Link. can you post that data? thanks atcsecure Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it. and I was warming to you as well. Oh well. I'll put you back in the troll box. |
|
|
|
|
I guess at this stage I won't bother doing another test until code is updated.
|
|
|
|
This coin is crap. sorry.
oops, missed that post when I posted my last comment. Oh well, there's always one. |
|
|
|
just home. Good stuff. Nice to see people being proactive and positive and not just shouting abuse and opinion. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
