|
atcsecure
|
 |
June 03, 2014, 04:19:07 PM |
|
Yes so in this release we are NOT splitting the output, the code will be in v1.37, v1.37 will split the outputs randomly as well to stop this type of analysis
this is an easy fix
How about splitting the output amount and randomly delaying the time of each amount sent up to a maximum of five minutes? And sending each random amount to a different mixer though that would be annoying to code and might put too much traffic in the blockchain. If the blockchain has a log of 100 amounts that add up to the total amount sent even if they are split randomly and sent over a longer period of time it is just a matter of time before a good spider can trace it out. If we send each random amount to a different mixer then that makes it easier to obfuscate the data. This would prevent other types of analysis on the blockchain If they cannot trace by amount or time. Though I am just looking at this from a layman`s perspective so I may be wrong. Maybe you were already going to be doing this. Yes all of this is in the REV2 code as this is part of the multi-path design |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:19:20 PM |
|
No more.
Bye.
I'm sorry but it's clear that you are trying to spread false information. Your testing was good until it started to became extremely vague. None of your posts were deleted. |
|
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:20:07 PM |
|
No more.
Bye.
 You're sense of self importance and ego will make you come back and look. I know you are. What an utter waste of time all this was, all just to massage your ego. |
| BINTEX | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| | | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| |
Powered by,
|
|
|
|
Grifftech
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:20:12 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpringfieldM1A
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:20:39 PM |
|
No more.
Bye.
Goodbye, have a nice evening! |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:20:42 PM |
|
At this point, it appears that if all you know is the receivers address and the amount that you cannot backtrack it to the originating wallet. Am I correct?
cannot ? With current desgin? nothing better than Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
Grifftech
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:20:51 PM |
|
Teka, can you just delete anything Chaeplin has to say. He can PM atcsecure if he wishes to actually prove his claims but I don't think there is any reason to allow him to continue to toss FUD grenades around the thread.
Do not delete his posts. I meant from here forward |
|
|
|
|
BADASS
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:22:58 PM |
|
Fudders trying to be Rudders?  |
|
|
|
|
|
SpringfieldM1A
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:23:09 PM |
|
At this point, it appears that if all you know is the receivers address and the amount that you cannot backtrack it to the originating wallet. Am I correct?
cannot ? With current desgin? nothing better than Bitcoin. I thought you were leaving? |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:24:08 PM |
|
At this point, it appears that if all you know is the receivers address and the amount that you cannot backtrack it to the originating wallet. Am I correct?
cannot ? With current desgin? nothing better than Bitcoin. Here is the problem unless you're next post has real proof or is constructive, it will be deleted. |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:24:27 PM |
|
At this point, it appears that if all you know is the receivers address and the amount that you cannot backtrack it to the originating wallet. Am I correct?
cannot ? With current desgin? nothing better than Bitcoin. 2 coins sent to x address. can you track it? I realize at this point that if I wanted to prove A sent to B, it is traceable if I know A and B. |
|
|
|
|
Grifftech
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:25:33 PM |
|
At this point, it appears that if all you know is the receivers address and the amount that you cannot backtrack it to the originating wallet. Am I correct?
cannot ? With current desgin? nothing better than Bitcoin. Here is the problem unless you're next post has real proof or is constructive, it will be deleted. Slides a free frosty mug of beer Teka's way!!! |
|
|
|
|
benthach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:26:12 PM |
|
of course if chaeplin able to find all the addresses during this test then there is flaw. the question is if developer able to fix this.
|
reddit btcwriter1 - twitter kingpininvestor
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:26:29 PM |
|
Teka, any news on creating a forum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:26:56 PM |
|
of course if chaeplin able to find all the addresses during this test then there is flaw. the question is if developer able to fix this.
As atc said, if he posts real proof, he will take the time to look at it and analyse it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jacques de Molay
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:27:08 PM |
|
chaeplin,
thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?
thanks
atcsecure
Yes Direct Link. Who cares fuck off idiot Welcome to ignore. can you post that data? thanks atcsecure Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it. So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain? I can. are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"
I use block explorer. I have edited this. Who cares - provide your proof for the dev as requested - why be a child dragging this on. Welcome to ignore. |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:27:55 PM |
|
Teka, any news on creating a forum?
I'm working on all the boards and permission, we are pretty close. The new forum won't have a proper theme until the new logo is chosen. |
|
|
|
|
benthach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:28:45 PM |
|
proof or no proof if chaeplin able to find the sender address then there is flaw with the coin and anon is not working of course if chaeplin able to find all the addresses during this test then there is flaw. the question is if developer able to fix this.
As atc said, if he posts real proof, he will take the time to look at it and analyse it. |
reddit btcwriter1 - twitter kingpininvestor
|
|
|
|
megges
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:28:57 PM |
|
Teka, can you just delete anything Chaeplin has to say. He can PM atcsecure if he wishes to actually prove his claims but I don't think there is any reason to allow him to continue to toss FUD grenades around the thread.
the reason is chaeplin already proved he could, look a few pages back ... he got the sending addresses on the first contest you were throwing in, no way he could fake it, he did not only post the address as md5 in here, before the contest was revealed. also he also made an transaction to the senders address before the address got public. Which obv. could have been checked very easy. So he has proofen that he was able to get the senders address with the current xc design, there is no fud in that. But still some are purly deny and call him ****! WOW ! He even stepped back from taking the bounty which he clearly deserves, spending his free time for you (i guess he has no xc at all), and the mayority of you are just calling him a laier and some other grown up words -.- unbelivable ! |
tip me!  XtSrWch1U3BsTBFBHj7acTTzxFo1fy5BMa |
|
|
qawzsx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
NOT FUD! FACTS!
|
|
June 03, 2014, 04:29:19 PM |
|
At this point, it appears that if all you know is the receivers address and the amount that you cannot backtrack it to the originating wallet. Am I correct?
cannot ? With current desgin? nothing better than Bitcoin. Ofc you can trace back only one address, but the point is to not know the both, sender and receiver. Its impossible to track both So GTFO... |
|
|
|
|
|
