Where is that LBRY block  I know  When its hit we should put in about 10 to 20 gig that should make zpool very very profitable. Or just do it now. Again profit to hash to hitting a block ratio. 10 to 20 gig. Still waiting.... I have my eyes on it. LBC ticker lbry algoProfit doesn't depent on pool hashrate. Hitting blocks do... which=profit.  Which is total amount of hash. More Hashrate = more blocks divided between more miners. Average profit is the same. But one has to enter into that equation 140 coins and time per block. = more coins per day at 20 gig. |
|
|
|
Where is that LBRY block I know When its hit we should put in about 10 to 20 gig that should make zpool very very profitable. Or just do it now. Again profit to hash to hitting a block ratio. 10 to 20 gig. Still waiting.... I have my eyes on it. LBC ticker lbry algoProfit doesn't depent on pool hashrate. Hitting blocks do... which=profit. Which is total amount of hash. |
|
|
|
Where is that LBRY block I know When its hit we should put in about 10 to 20 gig that should make zpool very very profitable. Or just do it now. Again profit to hash to hitting a block ratio. 10 to 20 gig. Still waiting.... I have my eyes on it. LBC ticker lbry algo |
|
|
|
Funny thing is: I can mine at default intensity (20) and still play games such as League of Legends on max settings in 1080; no hiccups, no stutters... pretty impressive profitability and usability. neoscrypt hammed up my card pretty bad... intensity went down to 15 I think.
On lbry algo JK? How much hashrate is that card giving you on lbry algo? thx ~158Mh. Its an Asus GTX 980 Check the benches for my specific card by: Clicking here. Its in P2 state. You may have been right; im stepping away from forcing P0. Allthough, my watercooled GTX 480, it has no P state problems. Are you oc'ing I can only get 100 mh out of my 980ti. EDIT: I was using the wrong version. 223 mh I GET ABOUT THE SAME-- My 750ti cards get about 50MH/s rock steady, but my EVGA Classified 980ti starts out at about 250MH/s, then throttles to 200-225MH/s. The big card runs to hot for summer weather. --scyptr scryptr how much spacing do you have between the big cards? |
|
|
|
223mh 64x  980ti ty |
|
|
|
no, but dont use the cuda 6.5 versions for this algo
ooooo Ok I'm checking what version I have. |
|
|
|
Funny thing is: I can mine at default intensity (20) and still play games such as League of Legends on max settings in 1080; no hiccups, no stutters... pretty impressive profitability and usability. neoscrypt hammed up my card pretty bad... intensity went down to 15 I think.
On lbry algo JK? How much hashrate is that card giving you on lbry algo? thx ~158Mh. Its an Asus GTX 980 Check the benches for my specific card by: Clicking here. Its in P2 state. You may have been right; im stepping away from forcing P0. Allthough, my watercooled GTX 480, it has no P state problems. Are you oc'ing I can only get 100 mh out of my 980ti. EDIT: I was using the wrong version. 223 mh |
|
|
|
When the psu was shutting off I was trying to draw 1085 watts on a continuous 1300 psu which really equals 1200 available.
Yep; that's what I was thinking. When you start drawing too much, internal voltage drops and amperage turns up. This causes more heat in the components and a snowball effect ensues. My comment about several 50A rails was literal, and is a pretty close and very realistic situation. When I give these values, i'm not joking.... They are coming from my Coolmax 1600w. I know the math says there's ~1920W of just 12v power available (E/I*R) cause the sticker says 110A and 50A of 12V power: But the sticker, shows that its only allowing 1600W total from the PSU; with a max of this, and a max of that on each designated supply line (12V#1 and 12V#2 are stickered to be a max draw of 1560W even though the math of E/I*R says more). I have seen a few people burn down S7's and S7 power supplies because the the two sets of PCIE plug rails were only capable of 110A total when they were under the appearance of being both separate circuits; Yet the power supply said there was another ~40A of overhead. (1560W of 12V between the two is available total if you trust whats on the sticker)... This is not an 1800W power supply; but it allows for a total of 1600W to be drawn from it across all voltages in a combination which allows a massive; nearly 1600w of +12V usage in theory. The problem is 12v rail 1 only supplies PCIE (110A), and 12v rail 2 only supplies the motherboard plug, CPU plugs, and accessories such as SATA power and the like. You would never know this is true unless you took it apart. One of my coolmax PSU's are from a person that burned down an S7 drawing too much from it. I had to open it up, and hack-job-rewire the modular plugs in the back of the PSU to bypass and cut out the old melted PCIE cable plugs and fix the remaining good ones to have a good usable PSU again. I will also rig up some PCIE plug adaptors to utilize the FDD/HDD power ports, and the motherboard connectors as well. To finish: You not only have to obey the sticker, but you have to use a little extra sense when trying to figure it all out. Don't ever assume any one thing is correct unless its totally verified Yes exactly. I even called antec about that and they said they did a test run with 3 980ti and of course supplying power to the mb ect. is the max. 12 at 50amp rail is for 1 980ti only no more. They say they have it down as drawing 39amp. Even though it doesn't. But now the problems as far as psu have been solved having 2 of them sli.  But at the moment they are not sli. And the extra 970gtx is still in the box. ps Been running an algo for days now no crashes no oc'ing ..if I do oc ....crash. Since 2 problems maybe out of the way out of maybe 6 problems I may try again sli psu and put the other 970 doing this same algo no oc. If that mines stable then on to test the other problems. Thx JK |
|
|
|
the normal is more 120MH/s try to reboot
I did..same thing. Then I tried oc'ing and it just crashes. So by default that 970 gtx g1 gigabyte core clock is 1413 and running in the p2 state. Do you have yours in p0 state? Thx |
|
|
|
|
How do you get 118mh lbry algo on a 970gtx g1? with latest 1.8 I can only get 62mh no oc'ing.
Thx
|
|
|
|
Спасибо! Иногда захожу на этот кран а вот по закладках не шастал! huh  What on earth. Someone wont let this poor coin rest Nope It needs to be revamped because a certain use to be exchange has a lot of coins. But its unique type of difficulty adjustment settings should be keep the same. |
|
|
|
Funny thing is: I can mine at default intensity (20) and still play games such as League of Legends on max settings in 1080; no hiccups, no stutters... pretty impressive profitability and usability. neoscrypt hammed up my card pretty bad... intensity went down to 15 I think.
On lbry algo JK? How much hashrate is that card giving you on lbry algo? thx |
|
|
|
Come on people ..more hash on LBC It pays very well if we get more hash.EDIT: We need another 10 gig. Link to the Nvidia miner? [/quote] Crackfoo beat me to the links. |
|
|
|
switched to LBRY last night. Wanted to see what all the fuss was about. Looks like for the time I was on the last block, I got half reward as shown. Should be double for the next block if pool hashrate stays about the same. I like those numbers..... Hopefully pool luck stays in the green >snip< Were at 3.5 gigs if I did the math right 10 gh will get us the best profit per hash per block per time to hit a block. |
|
|
|
I hope you are figuring your power availability per rig @ 120-160% expected draw? If I ran a 4 card machine I would be for sure running a 1600w power supply.....
I wonder if you are drawing too much +12V off the same rail that supplies the processor and are causing this all to happen.
I have seen many strange configurations once opening up power supplies and seeing what is tapping which available rail. Many PC power supplies have 3-4 independent +12V power supply circuits at roughly 50A each... give or take.... As far as knowing how they are distributed...... you have to open the power supply often to know the real truth...
I dont really agree with the above (per-se): 1) I agree with giving about 20% headroom, but a 1600W PSU for 4 cards isnt necesary (unless they are 290/390 cards or some other varient that would be drawing 300w/card). the rx480 or gtx1070 you could run 6 cards with a 1200-1300W PSU just fine. 2) most quality power supplies have a single 12V rail, and the ones wit multiple rails normally are more like 2-3 rails at 30A each (3x30Ax12V=1080W) Your suggested 3x50Ax12V PSU would be a 1800W+ beast 3) you DONT need to (or want to) open up your PSU and start poking around. youll void the warranty, risk damage, and waste your time. any half-decent power suply will have the power rating and rail ratings marked on it and also on its packaging. If not, use google. pretty much any PSU that is gold-rated and costs >$100 should be a single 12V rail thats rated at about 95% of the actual PSU specification. for example, the corsair ax1200 has 1202W on a single 12V rail: http://www.corsair.com/en/professional-series-gold-ax1200-80-plus-gold-certified-fully-modular-power-supply (click on the technical specs tab) When the psu was shutting off I was trying to draw 1085 watts on a continuous 1300 psu which really equals 1200 available. |
|
|
|
AFAIK=as far as I know
If its a temperature problem, theres a system level component that's having an issue I would think.
Run a motherboard monitor and CPU monitor.... but a voltage issue could still be the case. I hope you are figuring your power availability per rig @ 120-160% expected draw? If I ran a 4 card machine I would be for sure running a 1600w power supply.....
I wonder if you are drawing too much +12V off the same rail that supplies the processor and are causing this all to happen.
I have seen many strange configurations once opening up power supplies and seeing what is tapping which available rail. Many PC power supplies have 3-4 independent +12V power supply circuits at roughly 50A each... give or take.... As far as knowing how they are distributed...... you have to open the power supply often to know the real truth...
You dont happen to be CPU mining at the same time are you?
oooo on the overloaded rail... yes I did...now fixed. That was when the psu was shutting off. No cpu mining at all I have to use --cpu-affinity 1 --cpu-priority 0 |
|
|
|
AFAIK=as far as I know
If its a temperature problem, theres a system level component that's having an issue I would think.
Run a motherboard monitor and CPU monitor.... but a voltage issue could still be the case. I hope you are figuring your power availability per rig @ 120-160% expected draw? If I ran a 4 card machine I would be for sure running a 1600w power supply.....
I wonder if you are drawing too much +12V off the same rail that supplies the processor and are causing this all to happen.
I have seen many strange configurations once opening up power supplies and seeing what is tapping which available rail. Many PC power supplies have 3-4 independent +12V power supply circuits at roughly 50A each... give or take.... As far as knowing how they are distributed...... you have to open the power supply often to know the real truth...
You dont happen to be CPU mining at the same time are you?
Yes I did have that issue ... I can't add another card 970 without sli the 2 psu's 1300 watt each. I did try taking 1 980ti off that rail and add it to the 2nd psu along with the 970. It crashed ... but I should try the new 970 all by itself. That maybe a bad card.. not sure..I did a rma on it and it also crashed. I think the main problem is the asrock btc 81 pro cant handle that many high end cards running windows 8.1. And the 2nd most thing was temp spin down time changing algo's which is fixed. I think. |
|
|
|
What is AFAIK? joblo and when that neoscrypt or lyra2v2 that it crashes on once in a great while showing this sign, some people have reported that I think... but also happens at room temp too. There maybe to many cards for windows memory to handle. But will look into what you said.
Someone did say they were having problems with those private releases.
Thx
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=afaikThis the first time you posted this symptom, has it always crashed this way? If you think it's the miner try a different one. Thx This happens once every 2 weeks unpredictable and I think it maybe the app ccminer not sure. I just wanted to post that as one of the secondary issues for now. Right now I'm mining a straight algo and no crashes at all... very very smooth at 93f room temp. |
|
|
|
What happened crackfoo, is everyone on the ccminer thread was saying lbry as if that was the ticker, like lbry coin, so I tried mining it on another pool and I had c=lbry and it worked.  Not thinking it should have been c=LBC. So I copied and pasted the commands here.  Working great now. Lets hits some blocks. I have about 850 mh on it now. probably because they didn't have BTCD on the pool, so there was not another wallet using the same address version. so it just worked, and technically.... the c=lbry would just be ignored. I see .. thx crackfoo. Come on people ..more hash on LBC It pays very well if we get more hash.EDIT: We need another 10 gig. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
