|
Thought I'd bring this up since this has been long forgotten.
Wolf said that a he made a new miner for the green team and sold it to someone, but then he also said that Viz would release it pretty soon, and this was something like 3 months back.
This is also the reason why I stopped mining. Red team got their update a long time back, green team got a beta miner that wasn't finding blocks, and now this.
I think it's better to fix kinda older patches first rather than just innovating on new ones.
I'll be on this coin for a little while longer, but if appropriate responses aren't given within the respective times, then I'll have to pack my things up.
It's been over a year since I'm with you guys, we hit bittrex in January 2015, but unless the foundations aren't right, then I cannot be a part of it.
|
|
|
|
After reading all the posts, it's pretty obvious that the trust keys shouldn't be associated with the mining part.
I barely even mine it directly anymore. And there's no denying that this isn't the best coin to mine.
Investing and holding is a different thing.
Might not be the best coin to mine but you can at least break even or make a tiny profit with current price and difficulty. But then again I believe that is the point of association between trust keys and mining. More miners is more security so its not a bad idea to incentivize people to maintain the network, the key here is finding a way to make the coin more attractive to support with constant mining whilst not making it so bad that opportunistic miners would never touch it. From my opinion, the most attractive way for miners to mine this or any coin is to firstly have a pool. Otherwise ask yourself, how many would wanna download the entire block chain and on top of that just break even? I've got most of my Niro with mining other coins and I stopped gathering quite sometime back. My plan wasn't to mine or collect forever. I believe just keeping our wallets open for staking already helps secure the network, no? |
|
|
|
|
After reading all the posts, it's pretty obvious that the trust keys shouldn't be associated with the mining part.
I barely even mine it directly anymore. And there's no denying that this isn't the best coin to mine.
Investing and holding is a different thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is the correct one, but this is where I get my stake from: 2RxoCyLzADWwJzCdtveW39S7fG95vV6fdfjgBA9V247ed8iatnm
|
|
|
|
|
My staking reset at new years for some reason. I was over 2%, closing at 3%.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone know what BTC can you get with 100 mh/s on ETH?
|
|
|
|
By thinking .. ETH 970 100ME(elpida) - 22 Mh/s 960 100ME(samsung) -10 Mh/s ethminer-cuda-0.9.41 Windows 8.1 x64 My 970 works 22Mh/s. 970 no 100ME- 17Mh/s.Assume the memory effect Elpida. Windows 8.1x64 (970+960)-32Mhs Windows 10x64 (970+960)-12Mhs Windows 7x64 (970+960)-31.5Mhs  chart (1).jpeg I was wondering about the lower hash I was getting on W10, thanks for the info. |
|
|
|
sp your private miner is giving me json error when I try mining spr. Did I get the wrong file? I was wanting the 750ti spr miner.
I usually refer to a coin via it's trade symbol.
Why bother? You'll have better luck on nicehash. |
|
|
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it. therefore escrow ... Bro, are you high? |
|
|
|
MINERS WILL DONATE FOR FRANKEN-WEENIE--
No waiting. Work on the purist executable at your own pace. Maybe DJM will flip out some useful code for neoscrypt. Maybe we will all just get along. --scryptr
hmm... You must mistake me for Santa Klaus  Will see what I can do during christmas vacation...  Yo, what's your fastest kernel speed for 980 on neoscrypt? |
|
|
|
|
Is there anyone that's mining Niro regularly from over here?
|
|
|
|
New miner will be optimized just for AMD?
Yes. Maybe Viz could pay Djm to optimize the Nvidia version to keep things fair and even. Although I do recall Djm saying that he did not think speed could be improved much when I asked a while ago. I remember Cestballot updated the AMD miner, and months later, he did the same to the green team, but it didn't end up working. Now the AMD guys are getting another update? Quite the BS I smell.... Cestballot has nothing to do with miner updates other than posting links for binaries. Current miners were developed by djm34. Indeed, I am just share all the miner I have. I'm not Miner developer. Sorry its the other guy, I've forgotten his name. The one who made the beta miner. |
|
|
|
New miner will be optimized just for AMD?
Yes. Maybe Viz could pay Djm to optimize the Nvidia version to keep things fair and even. Although I do recall Djm saying that he did not think speed could be improved much when I asked a while ago. I remember Cestballot updated the AMD miner, and months later, he did the same to the green team, but it didn't end up working. Now the AMD guys are getting another update? Quite the BS I smell.... |
|
|
|
Hi
I'm trying sp-mod ccminer first time and maybe I misunderstood something.
When I try to mine with myr-grs algo, it doesn't work and only getting low difficulty shares.
Seems like diff multiplier is different than other ccminer versions or hashing is totally making wrong values.
ccminer.exe -a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:20479 -u username.workername -p x
But when I mine with ccminer by tpruvot v1.6.2, it works well.
I believe its broken. |
|
|
|
Well, I'm making progress on my bit. Proof of concept miner works.
Please.... don't.... |
|
|
|
I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.
3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?
With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.
I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation. You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards. I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16. I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us  not obvious... In principle Pascal should have a 16nm die and should be more powerful also it should come with new HBM vram closer to the processor. So it should be more powerful. Yes ofc it will be more powerful, but i think the performance expectations are a little too high at this point. But the future will tell when we see the new cards up and hashing. In the end everything is all about pricetag, power consumption and performance vs cheap older gear. power consumption should be lower or I miss the point... (or more operations for same consumption) Yes power consumption will probably be lower, but the pricetag will probably be pretty high. So older gear could still be in the game. But we will have to wait and see when someone get their hands on some new cards. Not really, it's not just about hardware. After compute 3.5, the jump to compute-5 with maxwell changed the game quite a bit. |
|
|
|
I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.
3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?
With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.
I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation. You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards. I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16. |
|
|
|
I got two Inno3d 980 cards delivered today:  Running on R74, but not that happy about the perfomance. Both cards are overclocked with 220Mhz  I am returning these and will switch them for 3x Asus Strix 970 cards instead. The info could maybe be usefull for someone. I think some of the kernals need some more tuning on the 950, 960, 980 and the 980ti. I have a few cards, but not enough to make it worth it.. Is that 375W for the whole rig? The cpu, harddrive and motherboard can draw 75W alone. Then you have 150W per card wich is pretty good. An AMD 280x@4.2 MHASH use 200W Ah i see. I did not think it should be that much difference between the 980 and the 980Ti actually. I am going for 3x970 now instead, its the same price as for 2x980 here right now. The whole 2x980 rig including system is pulling 375w from the wall during full load (overclocked) and that is actually really good. 980's give the best performance per watt, even better than two 980 ti's, price factor kept on a side. I went from 2 970's, 1 970, 1 750 ti, to 3 970's, 1 750 ti, to 2 970's, 2 980's, and now finally two 2 980's and 2 980 ti's. I think that keeping one card from almost every branch is great as it covers the entire spectrum of hash when solo mining. If you're a pool guy, then the bigger maxwells would favor you more. Reference 980's take only 20W more than reference 970's, with the same 2 6-pin power connectors. Custom pcb cards are the worst for mining. |
|
|
|
@The existing system already strikes a balance between large and small holders by restricting the number of consecutive pos blocks a single wallet is allowed to create.
If you implement more aggressive curve for this sistem ( restricting the number of consecutive pos blocks a single wallet), then in result you will reach breakpoint to stimulate the corresponding number of 24hour runing wallets.
Major problem of pos, compared to mining is that POS is more reward for rich, and small or nothing for small, this is reason why all pos coins suffer, insufficiently willing people to run wallets
Viz already discussed increasing the restriction on consecutive blocks just a few days ago. However it does not seem unfair those who invest more get greater returns thats just how life works. What i mean to say is your reward is proportional to ur investment how is that a "major problem"? I also fail to see how pos reward is somehow different from mining reward as the "rich" can easily afford more/better mining hardware anyway. Mining reward is a different ball game, For a farm, may be. But even with having a couple of decent GPUs, NIRO's miner has always been the bottleneck for the green team, not really the hardware, so the 'rich' concept wouldn't make sense in this case (except for the already mentioned, farms). |
|
|
|
That was my assumption as well, but it's always good to verify rather than assume at least in my opinion Thank You,Viz.Viz, you can see how long since this coin has been released. You also know how many chances we've had for mining, or buying low. Not sure how much it's worth it, just to put a few extra coins in the pocket. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
