@LoyceV it looks like that the problem of too high closing and opening fee has been addressed by Lightning Labs team. Users will be able to use either RBF or CPFP if the fee is too low. I will prepare a detailed post on the latest LND update tomorrow. Eclair Mobile is powered by Eclair's implementation of the Lightning Network so it won't be available for you anytime soon

Gdyby faktycznie chcieli zaoszczędzić, to stawki byłby znacznie niższe oraz zostałby wprowadzony limit uczestników. Manager zajmowałby się doborem odpowiednich osób oraz odrzucałby posty, które byłyby tragicznej jakości - masa oszczędności. Moim zdaniem, ich celem było zrobienie sobie darmowej reklamy, tak jak to opisałem to w poście wyżej.

Jakiego managera? Posty były zliczane automatycznie przez bota. Liczba zaliczonych postów oraz opcja wypłaty były dostępna na stronie Yobit.


Najwidoczniej ktoś w Yobit wyszedł z założenia, że bardziej liczy się ilość niż jakość. Weź też pod uwagę, że zdarzyło się im już wcześniej nie wypłacić użytkownikom pieniędzy za posty. Skoro i tak mają zszarganą reputację na forum to czemu by nie skorzystać z darmowej reklamy? Osoby, które nie mogą dostać się do normalnych kampanii, z wielką chęcią będą trzymać ich sygnaturę wierząc, że dostaną wypłatę.

Wygląda na to, że temat został usunięty po raz kolejny, więc kampanię można uznać za zakończoną, przynajmniej na jakiś czas. Dziwi mnie, że całkiem dużo osób podjęło ryzyko. Nie chodzi mi tu o możliwość braku otrzymania zapłaty, a o bycie zbanowanym. Najwidoczniej większość uczestników niezbyt wysoko ceni swoje konta lub po prostu mają zapasowe pod ręką.

Not to mention that he will also have to spend some coins in order to be able to receive payments. @Timelord2067 check out this website.

Firstly, you wouldn't be able to open such a small channel due to dust limit. Let's assume that numbers are much higher (5000.1 sat and 4999.9 sat). Leaving 1 satoshi would not make any sense (dust limit) so the only reasonable answer is that it would be added to the fee.


By default, the funder [X] is obligated to cover all fees. The fee rate is negotiated before funding a channel and it can be changed anytime if both parties agree. [Y] won't be obligated to cover the closing fee. If the fee is too low then the channel MAY fail. Last commitment transaction will be used in such case.


I have never heard of such limitation. One should be able to close a channel even before the funding transaction gets confirmed.

Not only does it have more storage capacity but also allows user to connect with another device using Bluetooth. For some people, it is a clear security hole. If you don't intent to move your hardware wallet around and don't mind uninstalling apps (it's not a real issue if you are not interested in altcoins) then go for the older model.

I had used Windows Defender for a long time and I had never been infected. However, I am really cautious when it comes to downloading files from the Internet. I have recently switched to Malwarebytes Premium and I am satisfied with its real time protection, especially the web one.

Raspberry Pi 4's CPU is much faster than 3B+'s. 1 GB version seems to be priced the same as the third model, at least in my country. If I were you, I would buy 2 GB or 4GB model of Raspberry Pi 4 and HDD rather than 3B+ and SSD. The fourth model has USB 3.0 and gigabit Ethernet unlike previous models. Buy a small SD card only for the OS, either 8 GB or 16 GB one.

@Farul I will answer your post tomorrow once I have more time to explain it.


Yes, see the last answer for more details.


What node are you reffering to? Bitcoin Core? If so, then the answer is yes. Lightning Network node? You don't have to open channels but then such node doesn't do anything. In order to route payments, you have to open quite a lot of channels.


Raspberry Pi 3B+ is enough to handle Bitcoin Core and Lightning Network node (LND recommended). However, I would recommend you to synchronise with the Bitcoin network on your computer and then copy blockchain data to an external hard drive. Don't use 256 GB memory card. Most of such cards are not designed to handle constant reads and writes. If you haven't bought that model of Raspberry Pi yet then consider buying the latest model (4B) with some extra RAM.

You should be able to get Lightning Network running easily on every Bitcoin fork which supports SegWit. If you make a fork of Bitcoin Core 0.18 then there shouldn't be any problems.

Why don't you open a channel with LNchat's node? I reboot the server manually once a week so the downtime is negligible.


Coins are locked in a multi-signature address which is in control of both parties.


The Lightning Network is an off-chain scaling solution so that's why miners don't participate in payments (except when closing and opening a channel). It works thanks to Hash Time Locked Contracts.


That's a known problem which has been already addressed. Sphinx solves it but it's available only to nodes which update to a specific branch.

If you want to test it out without touching your mainnet coins then install Eclair Mobile Testnet, grab some free testnet coins and buy yourself a coffee via the Lightning Network.

The amount is rounded down when the channel is closed. 1 msat = 1/1000 sat. For example, if you have 900 msat then you will get 0 satoshi on channel closure.


The person who opened the channel covers the closing fee. Note that it's not possible to use up all funds that are locked up in the channel.

There is no fixed time. I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to move all coins to their new wallet, which is currently used by XRP and ETH, before pushing changes to the normal branch.


He asked about something different. Software updates don't take much time, especially on Trezor T which has a faster CPU than the previous model.

That's an overkill for a simple Lightning Network node. By default, one have 24 hours to bring back one's node online before forced channel closure (old channel state might be broadcast to the network).

To nieszczęsne fatum sprowadziło na mnie remont. Wróciłem 2 dni temu i zacząłem nadrabiać zaległości związane z moją aktywnością w tematach o Lightning Network. Postaram się przeglądnąć posty z przed kilku dni. Muszę wymyślić jeszcze zasady konkursu, w którym chcę nagrodzić kogoś Trezorem One. Szkoda by było nic nie dać za 2 i 3 miejsce.

Wouldn't RAID 1 be better in such case? On-chain funds can be easily recovered using a seed but it won't restore the file which keeps channel state. Once you lose it, you have to depend on the other party. They might attempt to cheat. Using an old backup will be treated as a cheat attempt.

If you didn't check that option then only mprep (local moderator) and global moderators would be able to delete posts. If you want to be able to delete posts then check self-moderation option.

Correct. Only moderators are able to remove posts in non self-moderated threads.


If you checked the correct box then you should see 'Delete' button next to 'Quote'. You might have not checked the box by an accident. Re-create the thread with self-moderation option checked. If you can't delete the first post then lock the topic (bottom left corner).