|
It's pretty obvious that we have alot of casinos without online presence here on BTT, but does that make peeps reject an offer to bet on their platform? The answer is NO!
People don't really care about it.. afterall, organizing a campaign on the forum is just an AFTERTHOUGHT and the whole project needs funds ; so an excuse (to anyone who might Wanna hear) would be that it incures extra expenditures -- after spending alot already on a customer care Bot? Or hiring a representative to attain to any complaints? That'll be too much. Most gamblers don't even consider that as a preference anyways.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
This is why I strongly believe that Bitcoin will forever keep it's value intact,
Those are just majorly the qualities that Bitcoin posses, that's different from the whole FIAT's monetary policies, yunno. It ain't a reason to keep Bitcoin going dude. I don't think Bitcoin has got any blockage on it's way RN as the system has already been accessed, transaction processes have been ascertained, the Blockchain has been made to serve multiple purposes, including the purpose of a LEDGER, mhannn... Crypto won't replace Fiat, EXCEPT OTHERWISE( maybe several options are made to synchronize like FIAT does) but it's a wise choice. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
Don't rush into investing if you're a newbie as you claimed. Most peeps have been driven into their darkest primes just in a bid to try something new without having an idea about anything in it, stay cool.
Meanwhile, if you do already, then this is actually the right time to buy. It's called the DIP, where you'd buy and HODL coins for lesser cost only to bumb into some huge profits at the ATH, depending on whether or not you investing much in it. Don't Rush and don't panic of the market structure stoops lower; it has happened severally and it always finds it way through.
Stay guided...
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
I don't wanna quote anyone on this, though I've read alot of annoying, self-centered stuffs...
CHYMIST, you're just cute the way you are...btw, I understand how frustrating it is to tender a request only to get snubbed, for a couple of times that you'd easily manipulate -- that's if you had the Techs --. It's really painful (ain't gonna lie) that you're only gonna limit these for some reasons we all understand, it appalling.!! But you seeee, erhhh.... Sometimes, things are not just allowed to workout the way you'd seem to have it(maybe, getting usual obstructions from some powerful people, which is the case here) ... I'm not here to question Theymos for not seeing in the same spectacles as you did, but I'm not also citing his actions (most especially when he's not even saying a dime)... I just want you to keep it together; if someone would quote me previously, I never wanted this whole thing for myself alone, it was for everyone else and that's a priority to me... It's the fact that I felt maybe MS were some kinda logical when it comes to distribution so I had to awaken a lost thread, that's somewhat compatible, I guess it had a different impact anyways but that's not the point here. I respect your decisions as I don't think Theymos would wanna consider an incessant (as he'd have it) request fr.
@Halab, I mean no disrespect but that statement you wrote; that giving 50 merits in 30 days to a user is the stupidest ?? That's quite unruly. I wasn't expecting that you'd fuel up the whole situation like that.... How you expect CHYMIST to feel?? Yeah, that's unfair.
I'd get even more pissed if it were directed on me.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
It seems you're promoting Stake.com here.
From your Twitter account from here, we know what's your purpose for posting this but to answer your question here's my opinion.
Oh my days..!!!!! Damnnn, This is it .....!!! I thought I'd be the only one that wasn't deceived by this treacherous act. The user is simply promoting stakes; the idea is to make that review as a rookie but I'm assuming that user isn't a newbie  This looks wrong to me; we've got a board for promotions like this, the Ann threads, ... anyone is obtainable but for this, IT HAS CROSSED THE THE BORDERLINE. I read a thread previously about a complaint of Stake users that they were restricted to with their big fund on that gambling casino, if you withdraw it smoothly update us here.
"If they pretend not to know what they're doing, pretend to believe 'em" -- I guess this is what you're adoption though but remember thus; "if a handshake passes the elbow, it becomes a fight" I'm just gonna hit the report button right away,...he could attract a few tags if he keeps persisting. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
"Christmas charity"? I'm not sure I've heard anything like that before so this would prolly be the first instance.
Is it supposed to mean that everyone would make their contributions into your bursory/Treasury? I don't wanna jump into conclusion cus I think some part of what you wrote had articulated that already, though (not seemingly). Times are hard; btw, no one is even gonna give into this idea as it's just about merry-making(something that's done individually). I don't think this is relevant, except if the purpose turns otherwise.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
..... becoming a legendary-SHE
count down to the next rank...
merit left: 188
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
becoming a legendary-SHE .... got my ranks lately. Kudos to y'all  no fashion, no styles...nixSandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'd say -- something like an auto-correct -- the type he proposed would be helpful though but -- at the same time -- I think it's not a necessity as Theymos has alot of priorities on his waiting list.
Every smart phone/tab should have an auto-correct initialized in it keyboard right? (Incase you're using one), otherwise grammerly should be a nice take....like me, I don't really get stressed out when typing an idea that's formulated already; I'd just have to vet 'em properly to avoid UNUSUAL typos. Vacab-builder does a good job anyways -- the hardest part anyone would wish to conquer everytime is "proving, arguing, illustrating a point, an idea -- where and when it's necessary.
I'd bet that -- that's simply the truth behind these pin-drop silence from 'em clodpolls lately... lmao, that ain't derogatory though but "you" ...(C'monnnn, when I said YOU, it meant everyone that got some stress with the topic in question) so YOU gotta learn up; stick to the proceed and never forget that learning is a process
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
Wait..!!!!!! I'm I getting this straight? Or I'm being too paranoid or what? Are you trying to promote stakes.com here?? Huh  Because if not, what was the purpose of making a post about some audio-wins? Something we ain't even sure, huh? Why should anyone just pop-up from nowhere and propose a giveaway on B/H and everyone's just keeping quiet about it? .....Tskkk!! I've never seen a gambler that won on just a single wager and latter began to propose about writing an affiliate book for the casino, NEVER,!! This only happens if an external person is paid for it or maybe "the person behind the account is already affiliated with stakes.com"... this whole thing looks fishy, especially when the poster bears a newbie account ...I didn't even click on that link  Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
There is a saying that " if you can't beat them, you join them " ,is this what's going on with Btc and our government?
You can't confuse me that the government aren't buying Bitcoin too, since they knew that this is the real power back to the people, something they really can't control, I'm guessing the only option they have is to join?
The government doesn't really need to stop Bitcoin; in our technological world today, we've got a Grand rule, which is: you can't destroy what you cannot create. Ethical hackers are tryna bypass 'em limits but it's somewhat hard and almost impossible. The government isn't in control of Bitcoin. AFAIK,since BTC ain't a "medium of exchange", alot of Bitcoin's transaction - most especially in p2p - will have a user paid in FIAT, cash, bucks etc....this invariably means that this two are working in concordance, until whenever. For now, Bitcoin serves as a store of value which, I guess is ONE of the reasons for it's volatility. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
The whole idea of merit is to reward a good quality post. I don't think we should confuse it with a reporter's reporting status.
Yeah, this is the same thing I thought though but honestly, I had to give in because I thought we'd need to devise some means to curtail the whole wall of spammy post we get usually.... Well, it might be a little of an abuse to the merit system, but I don't think it'll obscure the original purpose of which it was created. The images and badges is never an exception folks... I'm hearing of this plan for the first time though but, it's a cool one and I think it has some kinda interceptions that'll forfeit Glove's theorem; but that's not just possible when both are still under probation..... Kudos Finding, Edit 1: Agreed, plus there is a loophole, ppl may create their own new alt accounts, start spamming with it and report themselves to earn merit on their other account.
Would someone in their right senses do these? Hahaha.... I couldn't hold over 'em. This is Just impossible cus "how long is that gonna work"?..if you say that the MODS are just gonna be unnecessarily stressed by some incessant request, I'll quickly agree with you. The former was just dumb and impossible. Edit 2: I was wondering if Gloves could possibly get those patches? I mean, for the images? Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
So, the idea would be for each user to have a "millimerit" balance (either hidden from view, or maybe visible next to the existing report accuracy numbers). Moderators could then award members with say 25 millimerits for any good report and -100 for any bad report.
Good proposal Gloves. 1) If the millimerit balance stays hidden, then how's the estimations gonna be made? If it's visible, is that not gonna give everyone the guts to have a users' stat on their finger tips? So how 'bout adding an extra Option to the MOD's tool just to enhance a single user's visibility -- strictly to the MODs alone?? 2) I haven't been taking it as a priority to report 'em post though but, I guess these cut ratio between "a user reporting a post wrongly and getting them right -- looks pretty much like a thug of war, a bridge of uncertainty" Some peeps don't even know which post to report and what standards it has gone against -- those set of asshole would only suffer some lame depreciation with this theorem -- but I don't think they'd get motivated anyways, as the offer won't buy a plate of potato salad (assuming they were bucks) lol.... The thing I like about this system is that it can be completely ignored by the reporters that don't need an incentive (they can just pretend the system doesn't exist and keep doing their thing; it changes nothing for them except that they'll receive an extra merit once in a while). But, it might encourage others to spend their time cleaning up the forum, too. The steep carrot/stick ratio is to prevent would-be abusers from gaining any traction.
True. Those set of reporters won't even recall that there's been an incentive though but it'll be exactly the same thing that'll ignite those yo-yos, dimwittys ... ;too little and it obviously won't jump-start anything, too much and it would likely lead to excessive reporting.
Which is the same thing you wanted right? Lol.... I'm sure you're not expecting an escalation over the previous quantity? If yes, then it'll attract alot if 5 merits could be gained in every 1000 millimerits and 100 is Lost for every bad report.... that seems cool to me An interesting consequence of a system like this is that it would probably compel a decent fraction of merit-seeking newbies to thoroughly learn the forum's rules.
Yes, only for those who would DECIDE to LEARN.... "Compel" isn't the word Gloves; alot would even join the train and earn some merit points (that's if it were appreciable), and won't still know any damn thing for Christ sake!!! ....On the other hand, They could still be seeking for merits yet, won't look at this as an option. This whole thing means that "no matter how hard you try, you'd just end up realizing the forum wasn't meant for everyone AND, not everyone came in with a good motives, as yours. All the same, this is a good proposal and I'd like to hear from others too. turning a legendary-SHE Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I could still remember these....
The memories back then, when I'd visit remote areas in the rural communities, where they've got a cheif and a council of elders(and that's like a system of government in there....I believe that decisions are made based on the standing sovereignty).
After some menial entertainments, they sat me out, in a shed -- where some kids gathered around me at first,(Maybe they thought I'm also a mother like their mom? So they kept staring in confusion or, rather surprise), then the atmosphere was right and it was time for their night play -- it' started and they displayed a whole lot of cultural performances and lastly, it was the Scorpion fight.....(they did that as a means of entertainment though, nobody placed a bet on 'em)
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
I'd first of all start be reminded you that Iran is a belligerent country; a type that's way too troublesome and they're known for fighting inter- boundary wars.... That same austerness could prolly be a big problem here as anyone would react to anything, based on their own discretions.
Is a security man not supposed to protect a citizen? How has loosing in the world cup tournament got anything to do with a homicide? That's fucked up.... There are no excuses for that, and that ass' should be locked and executed immediately. I thought I'd choose my ways to do whatever I wanted? As Long as it ain't a crime? So how could he shoot him on the face? Except they're just gonna play some midgames with that, he shouldn't be set free!!!
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
Then again I'd say that you're not addicted, No!
Yunno what it'll cost you to refrain from gambling if you're addicted already? Denying yourself of the Funtime that you've had almost everyday of your life? All for one reason, and it's that you lost woefully? I mean who gives a Heck? That should prolly be a reason to hold on and keep stacking high cus the very moment you'd decide to let go -- could be the same time you'll win --. As a gambler, I believe you should expect anything; some days, you could get a cash influx, other days could just be like the day you made this decision.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
For me it has a lot of advantages -
- it minimizes losses
- it reduces the chances of being addicted
- it helps to build bonding. We hang out. We watch the game and we have fun.
- We have a budget and we stick to it. It sorts of builds accountability.
When you say that it has an advantage; isn't the first important advantage supposed to be that you won alot from it so decided to share? Just like you'd want everyone else to share theirs? -- Mhan, that shoulda been a priority before these minor guidelines... afterall, there's no way to avoid losses as long as you keep betting... This would have been even more explicit though but I'm seeing it as something "incomplete" without a composed logical trick to maneuver...No way!! Well, I just hope it helps y'all out there but these are just ordinary rules that any gambler should save his ass, AFAIK. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
No!!! I haven't been involved or seen physically how these ordeal is conducted but I know for sure that I have seen a couple of times ; how it's done and I always keep wondering how those animals are made to fight themselves...lol
It's a cool game though but you are not gonna really have that in the outskirts of some metropolitan cities and towns, like you have casinos and it's look like some sort of local bar-betting games. When I watch the seriousness on the faces of those bettors and, how those animals would strain every bit of strength they've got, just to liverage their bettors -- it's almost a WONDER in my little world. I've really watched scorpion fight though.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
It's very important that you know what you're doing...
You can't be be into something -- something you'd expect some huge profits then you don't even know the strength of your predictions...it's weird.
Since you've realized that those are your weaknesses...Lets assume 'em -- Sport booking, roulette etc... No matter the odds that games are given under them, you shouldn't feel any interest right? Cus afterall, what you get -- is merely those infuriating losses and, since you haven't had the experiences or say - the "luck" to predict sportgames, it'll just keep happening. I wonder why peeps get so unlucky even when we've got a whole lotta sites that Could even go as far as -- supporting, teaching or building your gambling experiences....and there are.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
Germany with an expected win i even expected that after the losing that they were gonna turn it around. But they didnt expect Japan to win against Spain and they didnt count on that and probobly came really shocking to them. For spain this is better because they are going on Morroco that is easier
Actually, Germany did a big turn around after the big loss but, it was useless as that wasn't even meant to guarantee Thier victory into the group E,... It was just fucked up! Spain also made my breath cut as the LOST to Japan? How's that? Yeah, but afterall - it happened right to my face, but the most shocking part is that Espanyol was in full control of the game , with a good gameplay, pushing in those coordinated japanese players - into their coast but, it was too tight and they barely had a space to drift through with the ball. Let's see how their performance will be against Morocco. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
