Bitcoin Forum
July 01, 2024, 04:21:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 [885] 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 »
17681  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Is it just me, or does this chart look too uniform? on: August 01, 2014, 05:27:03 AM


<link> A chart showing the the average number of bitcoin transactions per block on a daily basis.
17682  Economy / Securities / Re: LEGAL---NOT A LOAN--- Cali Business op. on: August 01, 2014, 04:53:07 AM
Couple of q's for ya

What's your expected gram per watt?
What's your lighting plan?
What type of method will you use? Scrog/sog/Christmas tree
What medium?
What rooms size, veg/mother/flowering
Will you sterilize rooms to reduce risk of buggage?
What wattage and type of lighting?
What safety equipment will be onsite to deal with known risks?
Does your insurance on the house cover fire under these circumstances?
Confirm you are borrowing neighbors electric?
What extraction?
What odour control?
What strains?
Do you have any experience growing 100+ plants?

These come to mind as common sense questions heh


Hash rate?  Grin

BTW, I'm not dissing your endeavor, nor plan on vetting/doxxing you, in case you're wondering. Just here enjoying the thread, bud (no pun intended).
17683  Economy / Securities / Re: LEGAL---NOT A LOAN--- Cali Business op. on: August 01, 2014, 04:48:41 AM

BitcoinBudZ is a investment

Yep, all I need to know here as well.

Not sure what that means.

Any word beginning with a vowel should be preceded with 'an', not 'a'.

BitcoinBudz is an investment. This rule also holds true with words beginning with 'h', like 'honest', due to the vowel sound.

This may seem really nitpicky, but it's hard to read much further into a 'prospectus' after glaring grammatical errors like this.

You meant vowel sounding nouns, i.e. a utility is correct (not an utility).
17684  Economy / Securities / Re: The Next American Gold Rush! ⋆⋆⋆⋆฿itcoin฿udz⋆⋆⋆⋆ on: August 01, 2014, 04:42:51 AM
“Shatoshi Gold

17685  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: August 01, 2014, 04:27:38 AM
Hey, guys. Can we call a truce on busting the balls of HASH and RENT?

I've read their entire Litecoin Forum thread, and the best I can come up with is a tiny handful of missteps that may, or may not be concerning, of which it's those that we've collectively beat with buggy whips.

To date, I don't believe there's been one disgruntle customer or investor of theirs.

I've come to this conclusion on my own accord sans speaking personally with no one, thus don't want be judge by fellow bitcoiners-in-arms, and the pleasure of your participation was all mine.

I'm sure if we hunt hard enough on this forum  Roll Eyes we should have no problem finding bigger fish to deep fry.

~Bruno Kucinskas

PS: If at all possible, please show us something pertaining to John Kenton Freeman.
17686  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] RentalStarter - A Midwest Real Estate Investment Company on: August 01, 2014, 04:10:28 AM
You think that these two are willing to swindle US government ...but not you.  Because ...because real convictions!  Comrades, hand in hand on the barricades against The Bankers, The SEC and... and The MAN!!

All crypto-currency based businesses are operating in something of a grey zone. In some US States it may still be defacto illegal to own crypto-currency, or to exchange it for goods or services. Isn't California on that list? I'm not sure if they fixed it recently or are just mulling over fixes. Globally, there's plenty of countries that have specifically banned BTC (Thailand is one example, but there's others).

OK Wild One.  Just remember, YOU are The Man they're sticking it to.  Without even a kiss first.
We wanna be free.  We wanna be free to ride our machines without being hassled by The Man!  And we wanna get LOADED!!

I love it. Love it. Gonna show my wife this one.

Show here the clip, bud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc14gU-OSMM

EDIT: GULP! Was beaten to the punch above, albeit he linked the entire movie.
17687  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SWARM] Swarm - Cryptoequity Crowdfunding - Official Thread on: August 01, 2014, 03:59:10 AM
I am not really interested in the price of a SWARM coin, I invested to get a percentage of the start ups launched using the platform.  I am also planning on investing more on start ups I like in the future and maybe even launching my own projects using SWARM, sending friends your way etc...  I really think you should stick to the original plan and distribute the remaining coins.  If this burn goes ahead then I might as well have stuck to speculating on alts.  The whole reason I invested was to help start ups, getting their coins and potential dividends.  I am sure loads of other community members invested for the same reason.  For me its the about a supporting revolutionary crypto equity project while getting a percentage of start ups (no mater how small) not the dollar value of a SWARM coin.  I really think the burn is a BAD idea.  I have spent some time with you guys, really like the project and have defended SWARM from those calling it a scam.  Please don't destroy the project and make me look like a complete mug.  I can already hear a lot of people telling me "I told you so".

In between my rants, I've been working behind the scenes on a project I believe is tailor-made for Swarm/CounterParty (no, it's not CoinProLite, a spoof alt).

Yes, it's an alt, moreover, an ongoing series of alts, whereupon miners can alternated between the most profitable alts via the parameters they preset. All the alts would be based on the same exact hashing algorithm, et al.

Distribution of alts won't be a problem, for many non-cryptocoiners will not have a problem participating. Also, getting notables to back their various alts will be accomplished fairly easily.

I've already procured domain names for the project, with a handful more needing to be purchased outta my pocket (what's another hundred+ bucks?).

The site is already live, albeit not indexable for the search engines. The few I presented the idea to while in Chicago a couple weeks ago loved the idea, offering up their kind input, of which led me indirectly to Swarm, et al. albeit I, too, am still getting my head wrapped around the whole thing, but see its promise.

Currently, I'm seeking a trustworthy team to further develop the idea to a point of garnering minimal funding. I would love to see my project be the first mega project spawn from Swarn, offering up nothing less than FULL transparency along the way, for the notable reps of those attached to the various alts DON'T want their brands scarred by a misstep on theirs, or ours part while they hope to benefit handsomely for their involvement.

Needless to say, such an endeavor seen to fruition WILL bring further awareness to all viable cryptocurrencies.

Are you interested to check also the PoS side for development of your project? Counterwallet beta remains horrible compared to NXT and FIMK, where the speed of adding functionality is remarkably better than on bitcoin 2.0 side from all what I have seen so far. If I understood right, your idea is advanced and accessible PoW hash pool, and I can see lot of synergy with combining your idea for PoW with PoS platform.

Since I posted here, it was brought to my attention via another thread that all is not currently swell with Swarm, et al. I honestly saw promise here, for I love the concept.

I've explored the PoSPoW ( Smiley) and Ethereum options. Ideally, the project I have in mind would establish synergy with existing builds by trustworthy cryptopreneur developers, assuming such varmints exist.

PS/EDIT: This is one helluva active subsection. I posted, and within seconds this tread was bumped by a ~dozen ANN alts. I wouldn't be surprise to see my spoof CoinProLite thread buried by ~dozen pages since last posting this morning.

PSS/EDITT: Thanks for the valuable input, bud.
17688  Other / Off-topic / Re: Change ONLY one word in the post above of the iconic novel opening. on: August 01, 2014, 02:13:36 AM
Lucy was the boffin, a schtupped öyster; verboten porn reject in Lackawanna - siphoning the occasional intercourse, like it was lost by a maniac bedlamite on LSD who rode down the mountain (for it is on Whoppers that our penny-farthings ride), cackling at the gibbosity, and quizzically agitating Gleb the Flame by the fire that raped against the wombats.
17689  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: August 01, 2014, 02:11:18 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actinopterygii
17690  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: August 01, 2014, 12:24:55 AM
...and more threats because you have an inability to play nice with others... and also an absence of logic, for that matter.

Yep! I threatened to turn your gray hat around, in reference to your avatar seen elsewhere, of which I'm kind enough to not publish, i.e. your Twitter account.
17691  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: August 01, 2014, 12:22:59 AM
That's a pretty short list to be "never-ending"... It's funny that the relevance of these arguments rely on crypto being classified as "currency" last I checked the general perception was that it was not classified as such. At least there is attempt to file voluntary participate in regulation as it evolves. How many of the other offerings that you've spread your FUD on have done this much?  It's one thing to jump through hoops, but it's a completely different thing when those hoops are moving.



Since you're a staunch supporter of HASH, and seem to have no problem purchasing shares, seeing that the market cap's ONLY at ~$5,000, it's obvious you didn't invest much in this venerable endeavor.

For Brothers Schlick having the bestest IPO to date sans nary a worry, where's the five-digit investors? Looks like all the nickle and dime investors are already in. Even Benny's Litecoin thread has become stagnate: https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.1620.

What I'm witnessing is a Dead IPO Walking.
17692  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: August 01, 2014, 12:14:10 AM
The part where you started typing...

Fuck with me one more time and I'll turn your gray knitted stocking hat sideways.
17693  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: August 01, 2014, 12:08:43 AM
Sorry, legitimate HASH investors, I'm going to poke the trolls. I urge potential investors to disregard this post.


Dear "Whiteknights",

Your posts belittling how much the IPO has received actually work against yourselves, you're failing in preventing everybody from buying shares and actively showing it! Besides that, rather than "omg look how little you've got" shouldn't you being simply telling people to stop buying as "its a scam"?

How many children attend a church has nothing to do with this discussion, regardless how you try and sell it. Fact is, you haven't been able to deconstruct the business (a year's worth of success probably makes that pretty hard) and now you're made to look the fool and attempting to fabricate what a google search returns into something worthwhile.

Lets recap the best, relevant, arguments, so far:
- You puts all eggs into the one argument that Benny didn't win the auction for the 68,000 ft facility at all and, if he did, only had 30 days to close: This has been debunked.

Guess that's all we've got time for folks, carry on.



PS. (without sarcasm now) Please make a legitimate argument against the business, I'm more than willing to get to the bottom of any more confusion that you may have with regards to it, speculation that it's a ponzi scheme, is just that, speculation, give me some real meat to chew on and I'll chow down.


Nobody, but Brothers Schlick, knew the location of, or what the 68,000 sq ft facility consists of until I uncovered it. Benny always referred to it as a conventional real estate purchase, only recently revealing that it was indeed an auction purchase.

Benjamin Schlichter promised to release who is this mysterious John Kenton Freeman, yet to this second no such person has been presented.

Brandon is on record in bragging that his brother, Ben, makes ~$350,000/day via selling apps, but no longer replied to that thread once people question its validity.

Brandon has a YouTube video showing how you, too, can earn $8,000/day via Google.

In spite of all that money made, they virtually had nothing prior to mid last year when they struggled getting a couple Litecoin miners to run properly.

What part of this post is a lie?
17694  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] RentalStarter - A Midwest Real Estate Investment Company on: July 31, 2014, 11:14:59 PM
I'm really really not getting it.

So far as I can see, you've proved the following:

1. Any asset traded on a BTC exchange does not have the level of government protection that shares traded on the NYSE do.
2. That a couple of brothers are hustling really hard to build their businesses.
3. That they occasionally use profane language on internet chat rooms.
4. That the person they used to incorporate their business is shady.
5. That one of the brothers used to own an SEO company.
6. That the price of RENT shares is extremely volatile.

I'm impressed with your ability to dig up background info, BTW. That takes a lot of skill.

I'm unable to draw a line from these factoids to the inference that this somehow proves fraudulent intent. All of this just sounds like the normal activity of starting a company.

** I think everybody with money on Havelock understands clearly that no small business really should be a publicly traded company (just on the basis that they're too new and too small, and the underlying economic model isn't proven), that there have been numerous instances of fraud and poor enforcement, and that there's a significant element of risk.

What are the odds?

http://www.dcirules.org/resources/french/MTG_PEIP-10_10Feb01_FR.pdf



http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=grandprix/hongkong04/facts

Quote
PLAYER CONTACT
David Ong
Territory Manager, Far East
david.ong@wizards.com

TOURNAMENT
The main tournament at Grand Prix–Hong Kong is open to Magic players of all ages.

Quote
The Magic: The Gathering® Grand Prix tournament series is an international circuit of large-scale Qualifier tournaments featuring cash prizes and multiple invitations to Pro TourTM events.

Gleb,

you put a great effort into digging up shit in this thread (which is fine for me) but then I see you praising (and willing to participate in) a scheme which has clearly tricked its investors from day one after the fundraiser:


In between my rants, I've been working behind the scenes on a project I believe is tailor-made for Swarm/CounterParty (no, it's not CoinProLite, a spoof alt).

Yes, it's an alt, moreover, an ongoing series of alts, whereupon miners can alternated between the most profitable alts via the parameters they preset. All the alts would be based on the same exact hashing algorithm, et al.

Distribution of alts won't be a problem, for many non-cryptocoiners will not have a problem participating. Also, getting notables to back their various alts will be accomplished fairly easily.

I've already procured domain names for the project, with a handful more needing to be purchased outta my pocket (what's another hundred+ bucks?).

The site is already live, albeit not indexable for the search engines. The few I presented the idea to while in Chicago a couple weeks ago loved the idea, offering up their kind input, of which led me indirectly to Swarm, et al. albeit I, too, am still getting my head wrapped around the whole thing, but see its promise.

Currently, I'm seeking a trustworthy team to further develop the idea to a point of garnering minimal funding. I would love to see my project be the first mega project spawn from Swarn, offering up nothing less than FULL transparency along the way, for the notable reps of those attached to the various alts DON'T want their brands scarred by a misstep on theirs, or ours part while they hope to benefit handsomely for their involvement.

Needless to say, such an endeavor seen to fruition WILL bring further awareness to all viable cryptocurrencies.

Don't you see a contradiction here?

Nope! No contradiction, albeit I WILL look into the allegations you kindly provided, for I WILL not be part of Swarm if wrongdoings are afoot. Thanks, bud.
17695  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: July 31, 2014, 11:12:20 PM
Quote
Still batting zero with your threats I see...

If you had 5-8 year old children attending a church, would you like to be informed that their ministers (yes, plural) were administering gambling and porn websites on the internet, or would simply tell those who informed you to kindly fuck off?

Brothers Schlick have pissed off the wrong people, ergo somebody's goin' make da call. Getting excommunicated from a church is not a very pleasant experience.

17696  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: July 31, 2014, 10:10:06 PM
Wow, you guys are still posting the same trash and unfounded allegations because you have nothing better to do?  Seriously, go get a life instead of bothering an honest business trying to run the business. This thread is for the people interested in the offering to ask questions. You have your own thread, which I might add, is posted in the wrong part of the forum. It should be posted in "Scam Accusations" instead of purposefully and maliciously made to look like an official thread.

As stated before, if you don't want to invest then don't... But, it looks like plenty of people are interested despite your best efforts of spreading FUD, which you are now recycling...



To da moon, albeit it has yet to clear the launch pad. Too bad you can't invest, being from the states and all. We're sure you would have purchased enough to at least get this ship to the 72s mark of reaching escape velocity.

The only saving grace is that there's now enough in RENT to pay off that 68,000 sq ft facility that Benjamin Schlichter won at auction, currently having to pay the $150/day late fee. Luckily, the taxes are ONLY $15,000/year. Insurance? And, the 50 grand Benny quoted to get the facility ready for the electric needed to power them LTC miners in what used to be a 5,000 sq ft Ace Hardware. The rest of the buildings are just glorified sheds sans insulation.
17697  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: (ANN) CoinProLite on: July 31, 2014, 06:48:15 PM
Although this is a spoof alt that possibly could be monetized if marketed correctly, I am working on a real project: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=664071.msg8123664#msg8123664
17698  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SWARM] Swarm - Cryptoequity Crowdfunding - Official Thread on: July 31, 2014, 06:39:16 PM
I am not really interested in the price of a SWARM coin, I invested to get a percentage of the start ups launched using the platform.  I am also planning on investing more on start ups I like in the future and maybe even launching my own projects using SWARM, sending friends your way etc...  I really think you should stick to the original plan and distribute the remaining coins.  If this burn goes ahead then I might as well have stuck to speculating on alts.  The whole reason I invested was to help start ups, getting their coins and potential dividends.  I am sure loads of other community members invested for the same reason.  For me its the about a supporting revolutionary crypto equity project while getting a percentage of start ups (no mater how small) not the dollar value of a SWARM coin.  I really think the burn is a BAD idea.  I have spent some time with you guys, really like the project and have defended SWARM from those calling it a scam.  Please don't destroy the project and make me look like a complete mug.  I can already hear a lot of people telling me "I told you so".

In between my rants, I've been working behind the scenes on a project I believe is tailor-made for Swarm/CounterParty (no, it's not CoinProLite, a spoof alt).

Yes, it's an alt, moreover, an ongoing series of alts, whereupon miners can alternated between the most profitable alts via the parameters they preset. All the alts would be based on the same exact hashing algorithm, et al.

Distribution of alts won't be a problem, for many non-cryptocoiners will not have a problem participating. Also, getting notables to back their various alts will be accomplished fairly easily.

I've already procured domain names for the project, with a handful more needing to be purchased outta my pocket (what's another hundred+ bucks?).

The site is already live, albeit not indexable for the search engines. The few I presented the idea to while in Chicago a couple weeks ago loved the idea, offering up their kind input, of which led me indirectly to Swarm, et al. albeit I, too, am still getting my head wrapped around the whole thing, but see its promise.

Currently, I'm seeking a trustworthy team to further develop the idea to a point of garnering minimal funding. I would love to see my project be the first mega project spawn from Swarn, offering up nothing less than FULL transparency along the way, for the notable reps of those attached to the various alts DON'T want their brands scarred by a misstep on theirs, or ours part while they hope to benefit handsomely for their involvement.

Needless to say, such an endeavor seen to fruition WILL bring further awareness to all viable cryptocurrencies.
17699  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: (ANN) CoinProLite on: July 31, 2014, 05:44:38 PM
In ~8 hours, this thread was buried via ~160 threads/altcoins. At least CoinProLite garnered ~280 views to see what this shit is all about.

The group-buy option is still on the table to procure coinprolite.com if anybody is interested.
17700  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: South Park Bitcoin episode revisited. on: July 31, 2014, 05:17:39 PM
Phinnaeus has been missing in action.   Has anyone spoken with him?

I heard he was eaten by a gam of lizards.
Pages: « 1 ... 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 [885] 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!