So why dont you sell some shares now and buy at 2.3 if you believe it's going to fall?
I don't know about him, but I don't do that because I'm not sure it will fall: I can afford to buy some shares at lower rates, but not at the risk of not being able to buy them in case the rate didn't actually drop. Hence I'll invest spare money into that, but I won't risk selling my current shares. |
|
|
|
So, let me get this straight. Friedcat has already told you that the price of hardware will be getting slashed, and you don't think that will cause a decrease in dividends from hardware sales?
Which is the bigger value, x*10 or x*20?
Except it's not x and x, it's x and y. When cost goes down, quantity sold goes up. The quantity available for sale is limited, so it is x and x. You are talking nonsense. Unless you sold out and you are not able to produce more units, lowering the price might increase the profit. So it's x and y and you are terribly misguided. |
|
|
|
|
Current price is $100, if you don't offer more, there's no reason to sell to you instead of using an exchange.
|
|
|
|
Those report sheets contains numbers for all we have, except the servers. There is no extra assets, no extra funds, no extra debts, no extra obligations.
I feel your pain, it must be exhausting to have people constantly asking over and over for something that isn't there... I'm sorry; keep on the great work nonetheless! |
|
|
|
Great. And is there any good reason not to use that instead of a 3rd-part service like bitcoinlaundry.com?
This kind of service only works if it has a high volume. I guess blockchain's shared send might easily have a much higher volume... |
|
|
|
I personally believe that U.S. Americans are unable to do so because uh some people out there in our nation don't have trolls and uh I believe that our education like such as South Africa and uh the Iraq everywhere like such as and I believe that they should our education over here in the U.S. should help the U.S. er should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries so we will be able to build up our future.
What are you talking about? I've no clue, can anyone translate? |
|
|
|
How much money would you say is safe to keep in a blockchain wallet?
It depends on how much that wallet is secure. |
|
|
|
It is a catch-22; we want transparency as investors, but any pictures of the actual data center also compromise security.
If you trust ASICMINER, then you have to trust them they also have sound security measures. If you don't trust them, then you shouldn't buy their shares anyway. Either way, they shouldn't release information compromising security, then. That said, a statement such as "don't worry, we're aware of that, everything's ok" would be nice. |
|
|
|
HI everyone,
do you think mtgox is secure to keep bitcoins?
Regards,
ilpirata79
No. Read here. |
|
|
|
|
If you still have one, I'll gladly take it, thanks : )
|
|
|
|
i just want a post here  And what? And raise his post count. . |
|
|
|
Just asking. All over this forum, if you have a different opinion, or hate a idea you're instantly labeled a troll by most people. I'm not saying all over like you see a thread like this everyday, but it's annoying when people do it. It just makes no sense.
Sometimes, I personally just want to strangle people who do it. I go on various forums, and on every forum there's somebody like this. (I can't blame it all on BitCointalk.) And when somebody tries to explain their definition of 'trolling' or being a 'troll' is false, but they still use a false definition.
If this same logic was used 'offline', everybody in the world would be a 'troll'.
Is there something I'm missing? Can you just label anybody a troll? Why do people do it? Am I just crazy, and imagining things?
God-tier master troll lord detected. +1 rofl |
|
|
|
|
n3fdqJaRaZYpXHunSHSfzXpCumwF3int8N nevermind: I found a couple of faucets - thanks anyway! : )
(hoping I'm on the correct testnet, haven't tried it so far)
PS: I'm trying to find the block height of testnet, but googling returned me only crap... I have 80505 blocks, is that correct?
|
|
|
|
Guys beware of Pizza's posts his account was hacked and someone is using it. Mods disable his account. Great you just move it instead of blocking his account.
Source? Why do you believe this account was hacked? |
|
|
|
From Spain, Europe.
It is interesting then, thanks! |
|
|
|
what about all the untrusted feedback? I want that gone too.. it's funny how everybody's actions are the only thing stopping me from making payment. Kind of ironic..
You are not in the position of "demanding" anything. You are a scammer and you got the tag you deserve. This was caused by your actions and your behaviour. |
|
|
|
|
Shipping from where?
It is relevant regardless of shipping cost, due to custom duties...
|
|
|
|
Alex, io questa tua affermazione non la capisco, puoi spiegarla per favore?
come hai fatto a consigliare di utilizzare escrow tra mario bevilacqua e pitchotto?
Tu eri a conoscenza del fatto che mario bevilacqua stava comprando da te 68 euro di bitcoin con l'intenzione di rivenderli a pitchotto?
Se avevi consapevolezza che l'offerta di mario bevilacqua era sospetta, perché hai continuato nella transazione e non ti sei ritirato?
Io fino ad ora credevo che tu fossi completamente all'oscuro dell'operato di mario bevilacqua nei confronti di pitchotto, ma se hai addirittura consigliato (a chi? a mario bevilacqua o a pitchotto?) di usare escrow tra di loro, vuol dire che qualcosa sapevi, od ho capito male?
Per consigliare a qualcuno di usare escrow, al di la della transazione che hai svolto tu in prima persona, dovevi avere altre informazioni.
Non sto davvero capendo...
Ottima osservazione... |
|
|
|
Cyanogenmod misses a way to assign a default contact to a number [ link]. I'm wishing to fund the developement of such a feature if it happens to be easy as it seems. What: - two contacts (Alice and Bob) share a common number - currently both the call and the sms applications will arbitrarily chose one contact (Bob) to associate that number with, so that when you receive a call or sms from that number, it will be displayed as a call from Bob - I want to be able to chose to assign that number to either Alice or Bob, instead (obviously while keeping it on both contacts) How: TBD 1. it would be ideal if it was a small patch that ends up in official cyanogenmod, but that's not required 2. in case (1) does not happen, then I don't want to install shady patches or applications, so it should be something simple which doesn't require strange permissions 3. it is perfectly fine if the interface is quirky or barely existent, it is fine even if it is just a text config file or something like that... as long as it works 4. it has to be fully open source How much: I'd expect to spend up to 1 BTC, but 0.25~0.5 would be much preferred. I guess it would be easy to do such a thing if you already know cyanogenmod or android, while it will likely be too much work otherwise. Please correct me if you know if any of my assumptions are wrong. Thank you : ) NOTE: in case someone didn't read carefully, this is the opposite of selecting a default number for a contact (it's selecting a default contact for a number). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
