I'm taking 1 BTC and .5BTC bets that LC is at .0001 in 24 hours. On your honor and name. I have 10 BTC to spare
Just a public reminder to moneymanagement that he hasn't made good on our 1BTC bet that ended yesterday. moneymanagement, if you weren't just looking to scam, please send the payment to my address at 16caqdKMggN2WzHx7znW9pwGt8b5G8sZMv He's trying to sell his shares of LC to pay you off, just wait for the 20 TH to come online. All jokes aside, stay true to your word and pay up. +1
|
|
|
At least they are consistent in saying that the 20TH/s will come online around the 3rd/5th of October.
I don't know but "within October" sounds like "before 31 October" In what timezone? Mars Sidereal Time? I agree, "within October" to me means "sometime before the end of October". But that could be a linguistic mistake on sam's part.
|
|
|
I can understand people selling at this point but... Who the hell is buying ? Do they buyers know something we don't know? Or maybe they don't know what we know.
|
|
|
What I really care about at this point is knowing exactly what's being done to make the hashing work.
What is the problem? Who is working on it? Give us precise answers.
We do not want promises of future hashing, we want to know what is going on RIGHT NOW.
The usual shuffle is not going to work this time.
YOU MUST ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS.
|
|
|
It's the Labcoin mining address that TheSwede75 told us,and the speed is about 20Th now... what are u talking about man.... Maybe he's a cynical troll?
|
|
|
I also support bitfunder, speed increased or not. I think most of us are intending on holding labcoin stock rather than daytrading it. To that I just want it kept safely somewhere and so far Ukyo's done a fine job of keeping my investments secure.
+1 +1 +1 +1 While I am not confident in giving exact figures I can say that the team will be (and is) testing and bringing more miners online on a daily basis.
If you can pass this along - it would be helpful if they just mined with an 'unstable' hashrate on the labcoin team rather then having inexplicable payments going to their address so we don't have to guess That would be great.
|
|
|
Labcoin needs to hire and announce a person to manage the direct shares and handle the new exchange listing, and do so ASAP.
I vote for Ytterbium to do this job
|
|
|
The point is, Neo Bee is for long term investment. If you're willing to wait for a couple years then these shares could be worth a fortune but if you're in it for the short term dividends then go somewhere else. Neo Bee is the type of thing to raise the price of Bitcoins to $5000-10,000 and that would make the shares extremely lucrative.
Cyprus: The next world power? Well it was one of the strongest currencies before it entered the euros (stronger than GBP)
|
|
|
+1 Also which mining pool and hashrate (...and when you have time lock the shares...)
|
|
|
why are people placing bids above the IPO price???
Because such bids will be filled first (or so I understand) That's correct, but mainly because they are retards. or this: So if you expect the IPVO to sell out, you should ensure that you are either among the first to bid at the IPVO price or place a bid at a (small) premium.
|
|
|
why are people placing bids above the IPO price???
Because such bids will be filled first (or so I understand)
|
|
|
Now they're getting coins from some totally new address 0.7BTC
Wtf...
Just saw that... maybe someone trying to manipulate the market this time?
|
|
|
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post). Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site.
Take a look at #11824. If they want, they can show us what they have. Nice, I must have missed that post.
|
|
|
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post). Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site. here's how the setting page looks like, if anyone's interested...
|
|
|
I would of course argue that the missed deadlines are a direct result of the issues the developers have had and not anyone deliberately misleading anyone. Either way, there is now an address public where pooled mining income will be sent once the software issue that is being worked on is solved. I can't think of a more 'definite' means of communicating the status of the project then that.
so, have you been mining with 2 TH/s or not? yes or no? If you say no, then you have deliberately misled us. If you say yes, then why did you post a new mining address, other than to deliberately mislead us? +1. Please answer. +2. Please answer.
|
|
|
I would of course argue that the missed deadlines are a direct result of the issues the developers have had and not anyone deliberately misleading anyone. Either way, there is now an address public where pooled mining income will be sent once the software issue that is being worked on is solved. I can't think of a more 'definite' means of communicating the status of the project then that.
A couple of suggestions to improve communication: * Stop lying, like in "we are hashing at about 2 TH/s now", more than 2 weeks ago * "We will sign mined blocks in coinbase" you never did * "We are solo mining" where are your blocks? Now pooled mining? HOW are we going to be able to CHECK that this is not MORE BULLSHIT AS USUAL? The fund could come from anywhere. No generated blocks, no proof of hashing. At least until you provide a publicly verifiable stats page with an account that you claim to be yours on the pool. Unbelievable... This
|
|
|
|