Surely with the crypto you can get rich in a very short period of time.
Even in one night.
But let's not forget that in the same time frame you can also LOSE everything, and it's much more likely ...

We must realize that the movements of the coins have very little to do with the real market or with the validity of the project.
The coins born and die according to the wishes of the whales.
What we can do is bet in which direction a certain whale will go and put us in its wake.
Let's forget the analysis of the charts ...

Self-discipline is a value in any activity, not just in trading.
Most people are totally unable to manage themselves, and need a boss who tells them what to do and constantly encourages or punishes them.
And in fact self-discipline is what differentiates the winners from the losers

Well, if we're here, it's clear that we share a vision of a world where traditional powers can be scaled down, and so the banks stop controlling the world.
So, it is clear that I prefer the crypto ....

Making money without any kind of investment is impossible.
If you do not want to invest money - or you do not have it - you will certainly have to invest time, effort, work, skill, risk, etc.
As an old saying goes, there are no free lunches.

Unfortunately, many bounties do not give results and do not pay the amount due, and this also happens with those that at first seemed serious.
Too bad because if you lose confidence then it is difficult to recover it.
On the other hand, many bounties have not succeeded not because of bad faith or incapacity, but because they drag down from the general collapse of the altcoins.
We hope they recover ...

It depends. Although it is hard to admit, most of the altcoins are just shitcoins. And these will almost certainly never recover again.
But there are some excellent projects that are now penalized by the general depression, which deserve to recover as lost. And these will probably succeed.
But it will not be easy and it will take time.

There are too many coins that are based on Ethereum, and big investments have been made. I do not think that ETH is allowed to die.
So, there is a good chance that - after the moment of stagnation - Ethereum will resume its run.

It is absolutely true that many bounties prove to be failures, but I do not think the intentions were bad or fraudulent.
Quite simply, many people have thought that starting an ICO is a simple method of collecting money and they started without sufficient expertise.
So, not so much scam as incapacity.

Well, before you complain, think about who bought Ethereum  for $ 1,000 ...
The crypto market is like that, you can expect big growth but also big losses. If you can not handle this kind of stress and accept risk, better invest in mutual funds ...

It seems to me that we are not able to predict how the crypto industry will be in the next few hours or days, so wondering how it will be in the next few years (assuming there is still a crypto industry) seems completely out of place.
Time will tell.

The school has always been late for technological innovations, and we can be sure that when something becomes a school subject, it is something that is already old and outdated.
However, on the initiative of individual professors, the crypts are a field of which one begins to speak, therefore, never lose hope.

Undoubtedly, today everything is more difficult because the number of offers has increased dramatically, the bounties have a duration of months and months, and there is no guarantee that after hundreds of messages you receive the compensation, and that - if you receive - this fee is worth something.
However, I think it's worth trying.

"Death" means the cancellation of Ethereum from the market, and I find it very unlikely, given the capital invested.
I do not know if it will be back to last winter, but Ethereum is a solid protocol, and - beyond speculation - it has every chance of becoming a standard and perhaps more widespread than Bitcoin.
Then, nobody can know what the future holds.

"Free" is a concept that does not exist in the universe, because nothing is really "free": even if something does not cost money, it certainly requires time, effort, ability, work.
Airdrops are apparent free, even if they still require a minimum of work, but just because they are free they usually end up having no value.

I frankly would not trust too much of what the "experts" write in the newspapers.
And anyway, in the absence of global regulation, what the individual states do has very little value.
Perhaps, if there is a guarantee of a state, there may be a little more reliability, but in the end this may be a blockage.

If we had the ability to predict the future we would all be billionaires. There is no sense of accusation of incapacity: we move in an unstable and volatile market, no technique allows us to predict even only approximately the movements of the coins, so we can only rely on intuition and luck.
And then, take advantage of the experience.

In this market, most projects have the sole purpose of collecting some funds, and then dying.
There is no intention or effort in pursuing a true goal that implies the creation of value, and without the creation of value no project can be finalized.
We can only hope that natural selection, press really good projects.

What you say is theoretically true, but in this market, where anyone can tell what he wants, and present fantastic projects without providing the least proof of ability and investment, no matter how much you study there is never the certainty - but not even the hope - to make a good deal.

Governments do not really want to kill the crypts. They were interested in curbing their diffusion in order to have time to study a system to tax them and make them traceable.
I would say that we are perfectly successful, before we can reproduce the euphoria of last year it will still take a long time.
Meanwhile, the terrocrats are at work ...