lot of people say this one is a scam
lots of people say every coin is a scam, including Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Hi guys, I'd like to present here my Profit Calculator and Convertor for Maxcoin!With difficulty-graph and course on stock exchange By default there are DwarfPool' data: 1%fee and 1%rejects. http://dwarfpool.com/max/calcThis seems to over-estimate by about 25% (for days on end now, which accounts for variances in difficulty and luck). Is this calculator maybe based on your old (lower) hashrate calculation from the site? If I entered the old number you used to display for Hashrate, it gets closer to what I get in reality per day. |
|
|
|
|
Could you perhaps add a switch to increase the amount of MAX in the account before payouts?
Because there is no WALLET_clientname feature, I have each of my machines set up with different addresses (to make it trackable when things go wrong), but now I get multiple payouts on virtually each block, which is very annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
Pool (erebor) down? I just received this:
Stratum connection to Pool 0 interrupted
Lost 178 shares due to stratum disconnect on Pool 0
Pool 0 stratum share submission failure
Pool 0 not responding!
Waiting for work to be available from pools.
Setting GPUs to idle performance.
|
|
|
|
But maybe its good time to BUY more of them ? I'm still buying, 0.002 (poloniex.com)is worth to buy i think, soon we have to see 0.004-0.006 and all cryptos market not gonna crash, we could see and 0.01btc
Wow, the finances for Riecoin just doesn't work, does it. I now have 26 cores on Riecoin, and it only finds about 0.05 Riecoin per hour, which works out to 0.0024 BTC per day. Those same cores, while mining Yacoin gets around 400 Yacoin per day, or 0.01079 BTC per day. I'll give it a 24 hour run and see if it improves, but so far things don't look good. At this point mining Riecoin doesn't even pay for its electricity use. It has to come up to around 0.01btc to be a mining-competitive coin. |
|
|
|
|
Is it normal for the 1gh/Dwarfpool cgminer.exe to always run at 100% on all CPU cores?
I have it running on a 4-core Core i5 now, and it's always pulling the CPU flat.
That CPU is only driving 5 video cards (R9 290, 7990, 2 x R9 270, 7850). Well, 6 cards if you count the 7990.
What on earth is cgminer doing that it needs that much CPU for??
I have another machine on which I only have an R9 290x on a 6 core Core i7, but that seems to be ok for cgminer.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there currently a problem with the Hashrate graph?
I see no lines over the last 5 hours, yet I have shares being submitted and the numbers are being updated.
The balance graph is also updating.
|
|
|
|
The displayed hashrate is only rough approximate. The formula is based on the count of your shares and some constants. payments do not depend on it! your payouts are calculated on the real sent shares.
I have tuned this formula, now you should see nearest hashrate.
Thanks for the quick response. I wasn't so much concerned with payments, as just having a good reference to diagnose my hardware against. I do see an improvement, but I think now you're slightly over-reporting. I have a R9 290 that has constantly been reported by cgminer as 453 for days on end now, and yet DwarfPool now reports it as 480. |
|
|
|
i would very much like a estimate of maxcoins per mh/s and day or something similar
and a graph over my hashing speed over time
Yes please, and the ability to chart by worker, e.g. WALLETID_worker. Basically copy & paste Eligius please  |
|
|
|
Sorry for thinking it was a kind of p2pool  I am using the France server (30ms), mining at 313MH/s and the pool says I have 238-242MH/s how many rejects does the miner show? can you please give the statistic from miner? thank you! Same here, I'm mining at ~2000 and pool says ~1600. I have reject rates between 0.6% and 1.4% - that doesn't explain a 20% underreporting. What gives? Is this because of no-submit-stale? (i.e. is stale shares displayed in the cgminer hashrate?)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU 0: 73.0C 50% | 221.8M/221.8Mh/s | R:0.6% HW:0 WU: 50.3/m T:1 I:14
GPU 1: 74.0C 1862RPM | 145.0M/145.1Mh/s | R:0.6% HW:0 WU: 31.3/m T:1 I:14
GPU 2: 73.0C 19% | 303.5M/303.5Mh/s | R:0.5% HW:0 WU: 66.8/m T:1 I:14
GPU 3: 74.0C 2640RPM | 198.1M/198.1Mh/s | R:1.4% HW:0 WU: 44.7/m T:1 I:14
GPU 4: 74.0C 2048RPM | 211.2M/211.2Mh/s | R:0.6% HW:0 WU: 46.1/m T:1 I:14
GPU 5: 74.0C 2844RPM | 303.5M/303.5Mh/s | R:1.0% HW:0 WU: 68.4/m T:1 I:14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU 0: 73.0C 3647RPM | 456.7M/457.7Mh/s | R:0.8% HW:0 WU:101.9/m T:1 I:14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-02-14 00:44:15] accepted: 7918/7970 (99.35%), 66103 khash/s (yay!!!)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPU 0: 73.0C 3081RPM | 131.8M/132.0Mh/s | R:0.8% HW:0 WU:27.7/m T:1 I:14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Guys, I asked about the upgrade kits and MPP and was told there were no MPP or upgrade kits ever offered in batch one. So apparently just because your BJ system was batch one, doesn't mean additional boards would be in the same batch.
-Phil
Great so much for the MPP. Guess there will be lawsuits coming
I am NOT "shooting the messenger" (nor am I in Batch 1) but what they told you seems to directly contradict what is CURRENTLY posted on the Hashfast website MPP page:
"At HashFast, we understand that healthy, prosperous customers make for a healthy and prosperous company. We know that our customers are concerned about the rapid growth of the network hashrate – and we stand by our customers. We designed our silicon so efficiently per square mm, that we are able offer you this protection. If the Bitcoin network hashrate increases so that your Baby Jet doesn’t generate more Bitcoins in ninety days than you paid for it, HashFast will give you additional ASICs. In fact, we will give you up to 400% more hashing capacity than the Baby Jet you purchased. Yes, that does mean that if you don’t make your money back in 90 days, we will increase your mining capacity to up to 2 Terahashes! The Miner Protection Program™ was given retroactively to ALL purchases of Batch 1 Baby Jets. For second and third batch machines, the Miner Protection Program™ was offered as an add-on, that customers could purchase for an additional fee. Currently the Miner Protection Program™ is not available for purchase."
So, while they may not have been "offered" at the time of purchase, ALL Batch 1 orders should be covered by the MPP since they were "GIVEN RETROACTIVELY."
Or am I misunderstanding something?
You guys are talking past each other. I believe what Phil is saying is that even if you placed your upgrade kit order for a BabyJet Batch 1, the upgrade kit order itself wasn't a Batch 1 order. It's a Batch 2 or Batch 3 order. And similarly, the MPP for Batch 1 wasn't to be delivered together with the Batch 1 orders - it was closer to the Batch 3 or Batch 4 orders in the line. This is technically true. However, I feel that the original order queue shouldn't be kept at least with the MPP program. MPP had a specific non-queue based timeline associated with it that has more to do with the actual Hashrate out there than a place in the queue. The original queue order should be interrupted for the MPP fulfillment. |
|
|
|
Edit: So far general consensus might be you need ~ 200 - 600 cores to find a block per 12h! WOW! I remember mining with laptop when XPM was released and still getting a block.
That must mean there is about 500'000 cores currently on the network supporting this coin. That clearly cannot be just from random miners on this thread. Either someone has a massive > 100k machine botnet on this (why??), or there is a GPU miner that we don't know about. Does anybody have a way to export the wallet addresses of each payout in the blockchain to excel and chart it so that we can see if they went to 1000's of distinct wallets (botnet) or to a few wallets (GPU miners). |
|
|
|
|
I have 3 v1. blades for sale on eBay if anybody is interested:
$129 each + $12 shipping.
update: gone
|
|
|
|
I am selling because it needs someone that is really into Bitcoin to run it.
Or are you selling because you discovered PayPal will simply reverse the transactions and then you're out of your BitCoin? |
|
|
|
I think there's just a huge backlog, and lots and lots of people asking about orders, etc. which slow down tech support issues.
-Phil
How do people asking order questions slow down tech support? I haven't seen any actual responses from HashFast sales in the last 4 weeks (nor do I know of anybody else who did). All questions are answered by the bot that replies with: "Thank you for your message. We are currently receiving a very high volume of customer support cases, and as a result, we might be slower to respond than usual. However, we will get back to you as soon as we can." I'm sure that you guys are overwhelmed with lots of things to do, but dealing with customer questions can't possibly be slowing down anything - if it did, there would have been some evidence of actual replies! |
|
|
|
Did difficulty just increase?  Nope. It stays at 1 still. That's a bug in the miner client. The diff just says 1 regardless of what it actually is. |
|
|
|
Did difficulty just increase? Yeah, supposed to be. |
|
|
|
|
Something weird happened to me over the weekend.
I ordered this new 180gh/s BitCoin miner from a manufacturer yesterday. There wasn't a promise of 3 months in the future. They said they can ship it the next day (today).
So I did the usual ASIC supplier math, carried the ones, dotted the T's etc. and figured that means I'll receive it around the middle of March, end of February if I'm lucky. The ROI at BTC 1.45 still looked ok for then.
But then something weird happened... They actually shipped it today! And it's with UPS right now and I'm getting it tomorrow.
There was no excuses. No failed promises. No outright fraud. Whatever am I going to do with all the time I'm getting back by not fretting about miners? And no more re-scheduling of vacations so that I can be home for a specific promised delivery date that never materializes?
Just takes the fun out of life...
Ahh. There is, and always will be, the M.P.P. to look forward to.
|
|
|
|
99 null blocks of primes to be chained. 99 null blocks of primes.
Take one down and pass it around, 98 null blocks of primes to be chained!
...
...
1 null block of primes to be chained. 1 null blocks of primes.
Take one down and pass it around, no more null blocks of primes to be chained!
No more null blocks of primes to be chained, no more null blocks of primes.
Go to exchanges and sell them all, 99 bottles of beer on the wall...
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to see in the transaction how high a block you found was in the block index?
I found block ~ #476, but it doesn't really list that anywhere:
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "RR1firQtq6i2Xy2CB2rYHPphEd9gnm81Ug",
"category" : "immature",
"amount" : 0.00000000,
"confirmations" : 71,
"generated" : true,
"blockhash" : "bfd1395dd50f129dd098414b985e108832dec6020317a8a4b8e52wxc789551f8",
"blockindex" : 0,
"blocktime" : 1392159564,
"txid" : "7282fc14bba46486792db3185219a41d94a7d8be7ca589c1a5d40c337f93b89c",
"time" : 1392159564,
"timereceived" : 1392159565
}
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
