Krisz, I don't waste time arguing right-wing brain farts about Obama.
You should know that by now.
Yes you do, you just can't answer my question, and it pisses you off when I destroy your silly comments. Hey, how about that Jared Loughner, being a left wing loon must not sit well with your right wing BS comments |
|
|
|
Exactly. Thanks for playing.
Right-wingers trip over themselves trying to paint all the racist mass murderers as loons and quickly dismiss them instead of facing the problem of our gun laws allowing nutters to buy weapons, and dealing with the racist, intolerant, violent culture that the right promotes that enables and inspires these so-called loons.
Meanwhile any Mexican or Muslim that commits a crime is hysterically heralded as irrefutable evidence of the utter depravity of their entire culture and the need to deal with all of them very harshly.
The hypocrisy from the right is nauseating.
More lies "hey rio what's that gun in your hand" (*)(*)(*)(*) and bull from the left. Here is an example of your crazy liberal Jared Loughner that you try and paint as conservative rio a) Jared Lee Loughner cited the liberal bible, Karl Marx's The Communist Manifesto, as one of his favorite books; b) Loughner was intrigued by flag-burning videos; c) Loughner, in one of his YouTube videos, said, "No! I won't trust in God"; and d) if listing The Communist Manifesto as one of his favorite books wasn't enough proof of his political inclination, one of his friends confirmed his left-wing views I noticed you have failed to address my previous post about the arrests and conviction of your esteemed king with regards to "straw purchases". His "fast and furious" idiocy is costing lives even to this day |
|
|
|
Those laws are notriously difficult to enforce, too. The NRA works hard to make sure it stays that way.
Oh yes, more excuses. Then why don't you tell me why they were passed? Passing a bunch of stupid gun laws is what you liberals do, enforcing them is another story, so you pathetically make excuses why they are rarely enforced Also, give me some examples where the NRA thwarts straw purchases? Can't wait to hear your next excuse |
|
|
|
Au contraire, mon ami, the pathetic little distraction comes from right-wingers bleating chicken little hysterics when a Mexican kills someone with a gun while tripping over themselves to make excuses when domestic right-wing extremists massacre innocent people with guns that they obtained legally because of the insane gun laws that the nra and its idiot lapdogs promote.
You people are so fond of repeating the nra mantra that guns don't kill, people do. Well, billy, why are you blaming the gun now?
Nobody is buying the hypocrisy that right-wingers are peddling.
Please tell us what the NRA mantra is rio? The fact that nuts will get guns no matter what is a sad part of life, but your esteemed king you elected chose to put thousands of them in circulation illegally and now innocent people are being murdered by them. So sad to see you promote illegals being in our country murdering people. But then, I would expect nothing less from you Also, are you trying to claim all the insane murders are from right wing extremists? Post it or retract your pathetic comment |
|
|
|
The purchases would have happened with or without fast and furious. Not sure what your point is. The government has no ability to stop gun runners from purchasing guns unless they can prove they are gun runners. What a shocker, maybe they need to know what guns they are buying and where those guns end up. Fast & Furious is a normal idea for people to want to understand how guns move between our country and Mexico.
Total bull(*)(*)(*)(*), try again: Straw purchases are illegal, end of story, and your little dance ain't gonna work the ATF "purposely allowed licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to illegal straw buyers, hoping to track the guns to Mexican drug cartel leaders and arrest them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal |
|
|
|
You guys literally know nothing about Fast and Furious. The Government did not force gun shops to sell guns to people. They tracked the guns that were legally bought by individuals they thought were gun runners in order to get evidence to arrest them or to find out how they are distributing these guns. Arizona law prevented the government from stopping these purchases. They were all legal purchases. If you really are a realistic person, Fast & Furious makes gun protection laws look horrible. The government can't stop gun runners from purchasing as many guns as they want in order to distribute to drug cartels. They have to prove that they are distributing these guns to the cartels.
Great excuse for a failed inept president. Bush was smart enough to know how (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up this program was, but not your esteemed king Maybe you can produce the number of straw purchase convictions the gun hating liberal loon Obama administration has prosecuted? Can't wait for your answer on this one |
|
|
|
So what? The racist right-winger who massacred a church-full of blacks was allowed to buy a gun because of the insane laws foisted on us by the nra and its lapdogs. The right-wing nutter, Houser, had an arsenal of weapons he was able to buy under our current gun laws. The list goes on and on.
People who support the insanity of our current gun laws are morally responsible for all of the gun killings that are perpetrated by these extremists.
Why don't you tell us how many straw purchase convictions has Obama prosecuted since he has been in office Joe? Those laws have been on the books for a long time, with little to none results Your little pathetic diversion from the fact that Obama and Holder failed stupid program just shows what a kool aid drinker you are and what inept pathetic lying leadership you elected. I guess it's natural for someone like you to try and divert this thread, you must be embarrassed |
|
|
|
Freakshow gets shot at and its the start of a "hate crime" epidemic.
Stop right there, this whole case has suspicious circumstances all over it , that led me to believe it was a setup. |
|
|
|
"She said"? Lemme tell you something..That there is no "she"
That there is an OBT streetwalker.
Who knows the circumstances around him getting shot at?
How do they know the kid was 12?
What does that say to all these people pushing..crazy gender stuff?
Maybe the kid thought it was wrong.
I might go "eyew..looks what's on OBT"
doesn't mean I'm trying to beat or shoot 'em though.
The kid missed because either wasn't familiar with the gun, because he was just given it by someone or he missed because of that or he wanted to miss.. |
|
|
|
|
number #2 thinking here.. why did he miss? was this whole shooting ATTEMPT a ploy trick on us.. why did the kid mention /telegraph to her what he was going to do? why not say anything and just walk up and shoot the trans women in the back point blank.? did someone or her give the kid that gun, and say: lets not shoot her. miss on purpose. lets play art of war deception here and make the news. promoting sympathy for her on the media
|
|
|
|
ok lets see here thinking cap on now.. looks like a hit attempt, why was it was down town area location ? how did a 12 year old get a pistol and was in downtown area? someone gave him the gun and told him to do it..  |
|
|
|
A 12 y.o. boy opens fire on transgender woman but misses.
That's not good.
what that he missed? |
|
|
|
The Sanders campaign is a wonderful development for 2016 and beyond in many ways. 1) The Sanders campaign can shift the dialog from the right wing and objectively boost the various initiatives underway around the country for a progressive agenda. 2) The campaign has the potential to inspire people to engage in the political process and increase voter turnout. It has the potential to help create progressive structures, campaigns and coalitions at the local level to shift the political climate. 3) It is already changing the political debate within the Democratic primary and the Democratic Party. 4) Sanders identifying as a democratic socialist opens up long-term discussion about what socialism is and could be in our country, and makes socialism respectable. It offers the possibility to deepen the discussion about socialism, third parties and political independence in and outside the Democratic Party. Read MoreWhat a hoot. Give Bernie a prime time slot at the DNC!! |
|
|
|
Not sure whats come over Matthews, but I liked it. And of course she couldn't give an answer on the difference....they're the same thing with different banners. Camaro vs Firebird lol.
And we have Bernie Sanders to thank for proving it beyond a doubt Then there's the "progressive" brand that socialists love to hide behind. Dig this excerpt from a glowing Communist Party USA piece on Bernie's "political revolution": |
|
|
|
I don't know why they have her on these shows. She's going to say nothing that isn't dnc or pro-Hillary talking points.
Well, she is the DNC Chair, godly, and most of MSNBC's viewers are Dem voters. I thought Matthews had some great questions for her, too. It'll be interesting to see what time slot Sanders gets at the DNC - prime time or early morning zombie time. |
|
|
|
Idiotic comparison. Tell us, is there no difference between individual members of the GOP? Of course there is just like there are differences between the individual Dems. BTW the GOP has NO problem whatsoever taking money from other people to support platforms THEY like so does that mean the GOP are socialists?
So lobbying is socialism now? Nice try. Of course, there are differences between individual Democrats, but the fact remains that many Democrats are socialists, or democratic socialists, if you prefer. And the fact remains that a self-confessed socialist is running for the Democratic nomination for president. Evidently, the difference between Democrats and socialists is blurred, at best. |
|
|
|
What was that about Sanders' “progressive populist message”? Very revealing. The Communist Party USA said something along the same lines several weeks ago: Bernie Sanders 'political revolution'http://www.cpusa.org/bernie-sanders-political-revolution/I find it amusing that DWS dodged Matthews' question about the difference between her and a socialist. I'll take that as a nadda. |
|
|
|
Here's Mediaite's coverage of Tingles' interview with DWS, which provides a little more background info involving Comrade Bernie Sanders... Things Get Awkward When Matthews Asks DNC Head About Bernie Sanders, Socialismby Josh Feldman | 8:43 pm, July 30th, 2015 Chris Matthews chatted with DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz tonight and things got awkward fast when they dived into talking about Bernie Sanders. Matthews asked Wasserman-Schultz if, even if he loses, Sanders would have a place at the DNC convention, seeing as how he’s really popular with the base and could fire up a Democratic audience before the election. She said he should get to speak, but Matthews kept prodding away to see if he would be allowed to speak in primetime instead of “when nobody’s watching.” Wasserman-Schultz talked up his “progressive populist message” that people like, when Matthews asked her point-blank, “What’s the difference between a Democrat and a socialist? I used to think there was a big difference. What do you think it is?” Wasserman-Schultz ducked the question, but Matthews pressed her and said, “You’re the chairman of the Democratic Party. Tell me what’s the difference between you and a socialist.” She insisted that the bigger debate is the gulf between the Democrats and the Republicans on the issues... http://www.mediaite.com/tv/things-get-awkward-when-matthews-asks-dnc-head-about-bernie-sanders-socialism/ |
|
|
|
Classic!
"Oh,I don't know the answer to that;better deflect it somewheres else"
Hey now;It says something that Matthews asked a question like that.
It proves he has more of an open mind than some portray him to have.
That episode should have been titled 'Curveball with Chris Matthews'. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
