Some good news  |
|
|
|
There it is again, Monero. Do you know for a fact that I support monero? Where did you get this information or are you just making assumptions? It sounds like you're running out of arguments and trying to steer the topic to another coin. If XMR is a scam, start another thread about it. Plenty of people care about the massive, intentional instamine. you must be stupid if you've looked at all the facts including the rushed launch, Evan's deceptive comments about the launch time, lack of windows wallet and still believe it was just a "bug"  |
|
|
|
"Difficulties" - that's putting it mildly Dash is a high risk investment like any altcoin. However, if it implodes, it won't be because of the evidence-less allegations of a fraudulent launch. Dash is a proven instamine scam Proof please. I'm not trolling. I would like you to provide some proof that Dash is a proven instamine scam. If you provide some proof then this stupid debate can be put to bed. The instamine is proven. It's the scam part that's opinion/conjecture and part of what the poll asks. And if you think whether a coin is a scam or not is stupid, then you aren't seeing it from the viewpoint of a potential investor. How would someone new to crypto know about the instamine? It's not like it's written anywhere on the Bitcointalk ANN thread, or anywhere on the website. No, a watered down version of what happened is on a shitty wiki site barely anyone visits. It's deceptive at best, and a blatant attempt to continue deceiving people into buying into the scam (which for some reason you keep apologizing for) |
|
|
|
of course CRAVE!!!
Monero
Please explain why you believe so |
|
|
|
|
There will be a big market for anon coins in the coming years..
Now that DRK/DASH is a proven instamine scam with zero credibility, what coin will replace it and why?
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the info...Sorry that i missed this coin but it's never to late to step in. I look now for a good starting point to buy in!!
Gr Zeero
I don't think you missed anything, this is an amazing point of entry and the project is setting itself up for long term success. The problem for most altcoins is that people get involved already thinking about an exit strategy so they have no long term vision. With Dash I have no exit strategy neither does the rest of the development team, we are just going to work hard for years to come and when real life happens and you need to spend some of your coins the idea is that you can spend Dash directly for whatever you need. Great time to join the biggest and most deceptive instamine crypto has ever seen! Good job to all the instaminers, good job lowering the block rewards from 500 to 5 once you were done instamining and then blaming it on a bug. Real fantastic job you're doing legitimizing crypto |
|
|
|
"Difficulties" - that's putting it mildly Let me say it in a troll friendly way then: Dash is a high risk investment like any altcoin. However, if it implodes, it won't be because of the evidence-less allegations of a fraudulent launch. Dash is a proven instamine scam where the dev proudly proclaimed "NO PREMINE" in the thread title and then proceeded to instamine 575,500 coins in the first hour, then tried to convince everyone it was due to "bug". Once the instamine scammers had their fill, they decreased emission from 500 to 5 and lowered total supply from 80 million to 20 million. Of course, you already knew all this. You're just a scam apologist troll |
|
|
|
I do not think that I could be disruptions to the Internet, I use the VPS, the program runs from 3 to 10 hours. and not just a problem I tried to use Bittrex balance Poloniex problem remains. conclusion - update is necessary because the current state of the use of the program is not appropriate
Using VPS is part of your issue. Its likely adding hops between you and the exchange servers that are causing packets to be dropped or lost causing an issue with the bot. Why do you need VPS? Does your country/city/town/whatever block access to the exchanges? sorry but this is completely wrong.. the bot is connecting to the exchange api's from the VPS, so it has nothing to do with his home connection anymore. if anything, there will be less hops between the vps to exchange server api's Wow, you really believe that a vps reduces the # of hops? This is only possible if the vps is being hosted in the same datacenter as the exchanges, which is not possible as they all 3 are likely hosted in seperate datacenters. Also, are you saying that he is hosting the bot at the datacenter that is running the vps? This is the only way the bot could be connecting to the api from the VPS. I hope you are simply mistaken in your understanding of this situation or that english isn't your first language, because from this it would appear you have no clue how the internet works. Yikes... you must be trolling. Do you really not know what a VPS is? Yes he would be hosting the bot at the datacenter that is running the VPS... that's the whole point of using one. Maybe you're thinking of a VPN... at least know what you're talking about before insulting people and embarrassing yourself |
|
|
|
If Evan is so open about it, i wonder why he doesn't mention it in the DASH thread on Bitcointalk, or any thread whatsoever on Bitcointalk Because Evan only posts on BCT about updates or in response to technical queries. If he replied to 10% of the posts about the early days of Darkcoin he wouldn't have any time to code. Why do you still feel the need to apologize for him and make ridiculous excuses? If he's open and honest about the instamine as you claim, then it should be in the BCT announcement thread. Period Evan doesn't need my apologies and he also doesn't need any excuses, ridiculous or otherwise. I recommend sanitary towels if you have your period. You might run the risk of Toxic Shock Syndrome if you use tampons. Nice response, i asked a valid question and you lash out. you know as well as i do that the only reason to keep it off the OP is because he knows how bad it looks and doesn't really want people to know. So fuck off with your ad hominem attacks |
|
|
|
"Difficulties" - that's putting it mildly |
|
|
|
If Evan is so open about it, i wonder why he doesn't mention it in the DASH thread on Bitcointalk, or any thread whatsoever on Bitcointalk Because Evan only posts on BCT about updates or in response to technical queries. If he replied to 10% of the posts about the early days of Darkcoin he wouldn't have any time to code. Why do you still feel the need to apologize for him and make ridiculous excuses? If he's open and honest about the instamine as you claim, then it should be in the BCT announcement thread. Period |
|
|
|
You don't get it, do you?  The coin was a crap, buggy one at launch. Now, after more than a year of hard work is valuable. Wanna do a relauch? Do it, is open source!! Just clone it, call it "obitcoin" and that's it! You have your own coin. With Masternodes, InstantX and all the stuff. What I see every day is greed and desperate people from other coins, trying to destroy what they think is better. Just a little advice from an old man: Just live and let live others. And do something positive with your time.  meh, I don't like the centralising Masternodes either ;-) But hey, nice of you to admit the launch was buggy and thus lead to a de facto instamine... I don't care what the intention was (bad or good), the result was an instamine, nice of you to admit that. best regards I am not aware of anybody within the Darkcoin/Dash community (including Evan) who has ever denied the instamine happened. There is even a section in the Dash wiki about it. Yes, the incomplete, watered down versions are mentioned on dashtalk and on a shitty looking wiki barely anyone visits. If Evan is so open about it, i wonder why he doesn't mention it in the DASH thread on Bitcointalk, or any thread whatsoever on Bitcointalk He knows how bad it looks, and no one is believing that it was a "bug" either. It was a deliberate instamine which he later blamed on a bug because he couldn't hide it. Despicable. |
|
|
|
...snip
I am fairly new to crypto and dont understand masternodes, what good are they?
...snip
A great way to keep 2.5 M coins off the market. Instamine fraud wasn't enough... they needed a way to monetize that fat instamine |
|
|
|
I do not think that I could be disruptions to the Internet, I use the VPS, the program runs from 3 to 10 hours. and not just a problem I tried to use Bittrex balance Poloniex problem remains. conclusion - update is necessary because the current state of the use of the program is not appropriate
Using VPS is part of your issue. Its likely adding hops between you and the exchange servers that are causing packets to be dropped or lost causing an issue with the bot. Why do you need VPS? Does your country/city/town/whatever block access to the exchanges? sorry but this is completely wrong.. the bot is connecting to the exchange api's from the VPS, so it has nothing to do with his home connection anymore. if anything, there will be less hops between the vps to exchange server api's |
|
|
|
Not sure how you can respect a dev that shouts NO PREMINE and then proceeds to instamine 575,500 coins in the first hour and 1.5 million in the first 8 hours.   But you support deception, and that's okay. Personally, I don't. I won't try to change your opinion, but I will do my part to make sure all the facts about what i consider one of the biggest scams in crypto history remain visible indefinitely, no matter how much you or anyone else cries about it and tries to blame on another coin. Dark supporters continue dancing around the issue, but that screenshot of "NO PREMINE" is the smoking gun in all of this. Why did Duffield include it in the original thread title? Because he recognizes people want an honest coin with no unfair advantages. The fact that the coin was not relaunched even after this supposed "bug" is proof of a dishonest developer that obviously cannot be trusted. He wanted an instamine that functioned like a premine, but didn't look like an instamine. Then he blamed it on a bug. It's obvious the people defending these actions (and who continue making vicious personal attacks against the whistleblowers) are highly invested, and therefore biased  Now that the instamine fraud is out in the open, the only people supporting DASH are either braindead or scammers themselves. |
|
|
|
rdyoung you really need to tone it down a few notches I said operating systems don't need to be restarted. you don't see people rebooting due to a temporary loss of internet connection. guess what, not everyone has enterprise-grade connections with multiple failovers, there are a variety of reasons why a residential connection might go down. maybe it's spotty wireless, maybe you're tethering to your smartphone, maybe you're on dialup. who cares. there's absolutely no reason why the trader should stop working due to a temporary loss of connectivity, and yelling "it's not the trader it's YOU" isn't helping whatsoever |
|
|
|
|
I would agree that it is an error in the program. Operating systems don't need to be restarted if you lose internet connectivity temporarily, same with browsers or most other software. It's a serious issue and it needs to be addressed.
|
|
|
|
Development on Quatloo trader seems to have come down to a crawl and price action on Bittrex not so hot either  I just started getting into the updates. I'm shooting for an update release by next weekend. Things are going well.
Let's see what the weekend brings. I'm hoping the updates will address the "Not enough QTL" issue |
|
|
|
Description of Ad Hominem
Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person."
An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:
Person A makes claim X.
Person B makes an attack on person A.
Therefore A's claim is false.
The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made).
|
|
|
|
Not sure how you can respect a dev that shouts NO PREMINE and then proceeds to instamine 575,500 coins in the first hour and 1.5 million in the first 8 hours. But you support deception, and that's okay. Personally, I don't. I won't try to change your opinion, but I will do my part to make sure all the facts about what i consider one of the biggest scams in crypto history remain visible indefinitely, no matter how much you or anyone else cries about it and tries to blame on another coin. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
