Nope. Take money possible only if enter two password. But as user and doubler have own passwords such
things impossible. Noone can take money himself. So user cannot take money himself like doubler also can't
take it without user. That's it. Please check how to multisig wallet working.
I'm saying about additional wallet, not main ponzi wallet.
Probably each "deposit" can have own additional wallet ( don't know 50% or whatever. You
can to offer, not so important, can be discussed later)
Technically setup is not the problem.
I don't know who should hold keys but let's think together...
I'm not saying that I'm absolutely right here ....
Please write Your variant here.
It's easy to do criticism....
Do you like to be scammed.... You saying that scam is OK....
So if you like scam ..... it's up to you........
Regards.
Ok I didn't want to discuss this matter again, because I always see users propose it and not build it and personally I don't believe in it. You talk about a portion in the mainwallet of a game and a portion in a two-out-of-two multisig wallet.
The game. as you call it, of doubling is pretty straight forward. If no one puts any coin in the end the last ones will lose. The bigger the game gets the more people are waiting. Ok I know people try to hide that fact with counting down 100 hours or 7 days or what ever. the principle is still the same.
So I ask you the same question as I have asked others before. How many of losing users do you think will release their coins to pay the others above them?
maybe a few is my answer, but a lot of crybabies will be stubbornly holding their keys up in their asses and will not give in. Simply said person 1 is paid by person 1 and person 2 their deposit, person 2 is paid by person 3 and person 4 their deposit, .... etc. How can you make person 3 and 4 to sign to pay for person 2? it doesn't really matter if you lock up 50% or more or even less you still need those funds to pay out others. As You call it a game it should be obvious that there is no team or trades or cloudmining or a gnome at the end of the rainbow with a pot of gold that pays the doubling.... in an honest doubler the users pay the users.
On the other side if the doubler wants to scam he can still run with the coins, but just the mainwallet now, but then again he will never sign to release the locked funds either. As a matter of fact I guess there will come projects that ask to log in with emails so when they scam they can ask for a donation to release the coins.
So yeah that is why I don't believe in escrow like some say or multisig like you say, or even in a straightforward honest doubler... deposits will dry up and the last users will lose, that is something that just is what it is when the resources aren't infinite.
But if you think it might work, I'll be happily proven wrong
Show Posts
Just wondering how someone knows it is the same and not a clone
