I do agree with your vision and approach to use bearish market for development and like someone else drew attention towards tokens.coins which are not on other exchanges but have high potential and communities can help you see adoption by large number of traders. People will automatically come to trade and when quality of services will be high they will switch fully to CGCX trading platform. You need to give people reason to come to trade and test the services.

I know getting approval for any patent is time consuming but if the lawyers team is good this sometimes sees accelerated process. If somehow this patent is approved before the start of main crowdfunding round in February that can be game changer. Endchain team needs funds to develop the project and that will show great impact, talking about probability.

That sounds great and logical to say then keep 10% of the recovered fund but fee to be deducted directly from the invested money. Asking advance fees of 10% from investors those already lost money doens't sound good. If they are so confident then they should arrange on their own behalf and charge people later before releasing funds anything else will sounds another attempt to rob them.

When they are active they release updates one after other and then again enter in silence. This irregularity in their activity isn't very positive impression giving habit. They were write ups where productivity and real business development was the topic and main focused on. That was just simple pump and volume is washed completely even exchange is big but interest in this market isn't of that level anymore.

I will switch to lighter version of wallet off course but first to recover my ADA tokens. I see last upgrade brought unpleasant experience to many users those were using Deadalus and unfortunately support is poor. They need to work on existed issues before moving ahead. They wrote article by self declaring issue has resolved without feedback while we are facing restoring wallet issue.

What is with website today there is nothing in order ? You can see same words everywhere is looks like they were doing some update while fonts order went wrong and some closing of paragraphs is missing. I hope this issue will be fixed soon to be able to read everything once again. New look of website has more professional alike that is notable thing.

If that's true about KYC to use Xwallet then users will be lesser because basic idea of freedom and privacy hurts with such steps. I will continuously keep holding NPXS as investment tool and that's all. I hope they will not go for such things what some other projects introduced and lost users. It is started to shows some sign of recovery hardly and Bitcoin's drop spoiled the party before even starting.

People are running after new Dex'x which are neither tested nor backed by well known developers when Blocknet is providing complete solutions. I don't understand what is keeping Block at back foot and why it didn't see adoption at large level yet. It is best solution and fully reliable at the same time. Dex's are rising and Blocknet can't be ignored even it is not getting attention which it deserves.

It seems that market is awaiting for perfect moment for breakout upwards and that will be spike in its price. We all know how much work has been done here all that has added just fuel for taking off. It is probably Bitcoin which is holding the altcoin's on the spot once there is something clear some markets will show excellent performances and Stratis should be one of them.

LAToken exchange's representative is not active here anymore. If the purpose of these posts with unresolved issues is to aware others with what's going on that is appreciable. If you are trying to reach support or seeking help via this forum then that is not good place. Few post above mine someone has also indicated reaching out to support using correct channel may make things faster. I never used this exchange or any newly launched and prefer to stay with old tested exchanges.

I will wait for the complete list of exchanges those are going to support next hard fork. That is more convenient for many users that's why they keep asking. This is quite understandable as I see myself in same position with them. There is plenty of time else those apps option are on the table already. What great will be if remaining people complete the migration in next fork for things to move steadily ahead.

I will say it isn't about which is better or more advanced but is what has more support and is trusted across the industry. We can see many faster, advanced and scaling solution providers but they don't get external industry's support. Ethereum is first mover and this is its biggest advantage and this will always play role whenever it comes to choose one over other.

I also saw this announcement with appointment of Davidson & co this is huge step which clears everything in mind of people. If you are still waiting and don't get what's going on here then will never come time to get on at cheap price. The more the time is passing the more I am becoming fan of Bankex project how systematically and with planning it is being pushed forward.

I decided to move my ADA coins into personal wallet off the exchange. I choosed Deadalus as well and it is third day and still chain is being downloaded and hardly I reached at 52% now. At the same time I see people reporting issue with syncing or restoration. This made me little concerned to look at other alternative ways if anyone is using or has tested any other wallet ?

There were exchange announcements one after other is short period of that and they created lot of buzz for this token. PumaPay is moving to adoption phase for payments and listing on couple more big exchanges should be on their plan. In spite of decline in price the daily volume is looking very decent which shows what is happening at this floor.

I second you with your concern about bio-metric verification and I will add more by saying detailed KYC also isn't good. Basic verification mechanism to prevent fraudulent activities and combat criminal activities is good and supportable. When too much information on name of so-called verification needs are asked that is other level. I am holding HMQ as investor and don't plan to go for bio-metric anyway.

Large supplies concept has been irrelevant back in 2017 when we saw tokens with large supplies ruling the market. This is the very reason that many people active in this space lost the train, thinking that coins with large supplies can't get high price and when they reached there everyone was saying this isn't sustainable. You need use cases and strong communities and limits exist in our mind only.

I didn't check back but about the launch of exchange and now see alpha version was launched back on 29th of December. This mean exchange is still in basic versions and need lot of features and development. I still wonder about progress on listing on new exchanges because importance of that part can't be ignored or denied. This token also need liquidity from external sources.

What kind of liquidity do you consider real because over $3 millions daily volume doesn't meet your criteria @Moris1987. If we apply your formula of criteria then more than 90% current projects are not meeting that requirement. You are cutting more half of its current market value without providing reasons just based on assumptions.

There is no update neither you can find any communication in last ten days but this is second consecutive day when market of CAG is showing good signs. First I thought may be there is something but didn't reach to anything. We can consider this volume in specific market conditions good enough. May be someone is buying anticipating ahead of updates.