|
Well that's a personal choice for anybody, If they still believe in TRON, why not, current price is very good to hold since it was a lot cheaper comparing the previous months, But just remember that there was some Bad publicity about TRON CEO wayback September so everyone must be consider these issues.
|
|
|
|
I noticed that there are quite a number of crypto-powered social media popping out in recent years. I believe the most successful one is Steemit, which most of us can agreed on. There are also other social network platforms like Appics, Uhive and etc. I am curious to know if anyone of you is willing to switch from the daily social network app like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to crypto-powered social network. And if you could, do share your reasons for doing so.
Crypto base social media platforms are needed plenty of time before they can catch up the social media giants like facebook or twitter, BTW comparing Steemit to facebook and twitter is just a miles away, most of the crypto base social media apps are buggy and the graphics are poor that's why it needs to improve more to be able to capture the market share. I'm not against of the proliferation of Blockchain base social media all i care is they need to improve so they can compete with the giants by using decentralized weapons of privacy. |
|
|
|
Heard of the project "Centrality" from NZ? They have a decent team and website ( https://centrality.ai/). But isn't it weird to call yourself centrality if blockchain is all about achieving decentralization? Bad marketing  and on that note: can someone explain to me why this project is supposed to be useful, given that we already have Ethereum and other Dapp blockchains? I think centrality is just a branding or just a name, and its should not be taken the name literally, if the platform was promoting decentralization then its useful and if not, i think let the people or investors judge them i'm very confident that NZ base cryptocurrency users or investors are intelligent enough to determined whats useful or not. |
|
|
|
Can we ever have a bounty campaign that stick to its Rules from the beginning to the end of the campaign. can that ever be possible just like the old days. bounty campaigns of early 2017 use to plead with participates. Ran a bounty of 3 weeks without any additional weeks. maintained a fixed number of token or pay amount without altering the total pay budget. stick to their rules of paying immediately at the stipulated time. Most of these projects are successful and remains top notch.
The truth about New projects these days is none of them are real. all are fake and copy cats. Knows that they have nothing to offer. they are just after the Money. if they are fortunate to raise the money, fine business starts. but if not;everything scrap to the scratch. it all depends on the money. money first. once it is realized, they do everything possible to protect the money not the project. from the project CEO to CEO. to the legal team and the rest.
Bounty participants are the LEAST in the list of Payment. before you join that bounty. Make sure you have the free time and won't regret in case target was not met.
Base on my previous experiences comparing before and today some bounty campaigns are still following its own rules, like Gold Stablecoin bounty campaign that i'm wearing, they are honestly followed its own rules and paid its participants accordingly without delays! But most of campaigns today are not following its own rules and even change most of its written rules in the end of the campaign, like locking of tokens in 6 months to one year, reduce the bounty allocation and more change that unfavorable to bounty hunters. |
|
|
|
And why?
Base of cryptocurrency coins that i was holding I prepare stellar lumens (XLM) and Ripple (XRP) since i was holding it, that's favorable to me. these platforms are the most promising in cross border payments solutions specially in my country XRP was favorite option in terms of overseas remittance transfers. because its fast and lesser TX fees compare to others. |
|
|
|
To all bounty hunters on this wonderful forum i want to know if its advisable to continue with the bounty you have been promoting for 12weeks that got extra 8weeks added more, have you promote projects this long that ends up with good end results? Thank you
You know buddy promoting bounties in these forum has change a lot back then, that's why don't expect good and profitable results since they are creating a new norms, that very disadvantageous to the bounty hunters. Like what you said "adding more weeks of promotion" I think it should not be permitted without additional payment, or if the budget still the same that's not fair, aside from bounty payments are too lengthy before getting paid and the worst they locked your tokens for 6 months to 1 Year for me that's not good, that's why i was carefully examine some bounties gladly i found some bounties that still worthy to promote. |
|
|
|
I think 0.0005k satoshi bitcoin withdrawal fee is not that big, most of withdrawal fees of other exchange is 0.00100k satoshi and that's 100% percent more high compare on Binance. it means that Binance is much cheaper comparing to others exchange in the market, aside from healthy and competitive volume also you can choose a wide listing of tokens and coins to trade, In my opinion i don't think there's another exchange that offering much lowers than 0.0005K satoshi Bitcoin withdrawal fee except Binance. |
|
|
|
This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.
As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.
I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.
Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.
This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?
I think most of the investors are also feel that way! Like me i was participated in numerous ICO, I accept that all i care is when the token will be listed so i can get my investment plus the profit, But i say it today all that assumptions are change today, sense after it was listed you cant expect profit specially when the token was listed on the sleepy exchange, But way back 2017-2018 profit after listing was usually times three, but now its been a different story. |
|
|
|
Yeah, that's a question I keep asking myself these days. There's so many DEX projects, some of them not even being "Real DEX's" like the Binance "DEX". I've been wondering if another bull run could trigger a huge influx of new users towards these projects, since you don't need to own an account to use them. Remember Q4 of 2017, when you couldn't even open a Binance account since they got too many registrations at once? With the recent influx of new trading options, some of the volume could be moved towards decentralized solutions such as Blocknet, just to name a project. Another thing worth speculating on, is people seem to HATE KYC like the plague. Imagine all the rich and wealthy people, like celebs, and people with big time careers, they might not even want to risk disclosing what they hold should a centralized exchange be compromised, which makes DEX's the best solution. Could 2020 be the year of DEX's? Just a thought...  I think for now its still impossible, if we take into consideration, some DEX are still thriving but some are Dead in terms of volume, that's why users are not happy with it. if you are into trading volume was very important to make the trading works, comparing to centralized exchange volume was great thats why despite of many security issues and regulation including KYC still CEX was getting much users compare to DEX. |
|
|
|
Binance in their new report indicates that market capitalization is likely to raise to $16 billion, per the reports that the staking of crypto for a particular time period and getting rewards, approximately have accounts of $8 billion in the market activity. Ethereum on the verge to make it a double-figure. The report, Binance praises ethereum’s community as “first major study into staking, ” says that it could give a sharp spike in the crypto industry soon. Source: TheCoinRepublicThat was not surprise me at all, Ethereum Development was continue since the very beginning, and I think the delays are just minimal and not contributing negative effect on the Network one more thing Ethereum community was very supportive that's why Ethereum was still thriving till today. Same as Binance the team are employing innovative ideas that make Binance more attractive and continue to shine despite the strong competition in the industry. |
|
|
|
China Creates Currency to Cancel-out Cryptocurrency
The Chinese government is on a mission to keep people dependent on government-controlled currency.
China’s government has now devised a cockamamie scheme where they will use their central bank and commercial banks to distribute a newly created digital fiat currency
in an attempt to trick citizens into believing that they have cryptocurrency all in hopes that the people will use the digital fiat instead of real cryptocurrency and stay government currency dependent.
The fiat digital currency will be totally centralized and the plan is to replace the current currency, the yuan,
with the new digital currency which right now is being referred to as Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). The digital currency will be issued to commercial banks via the central bank, and the commercial banks will, in turn, be able to distribute it to the people.
Well if china believes that it was effective Let them try with its own experiments, I think the chinese people are not dumb to believe and notice what was the true cryptocurrency and what is not. I hope in the long run bitcoin and other cryptocurrency will continue to shine in chinese investors. |
|
|
|
The experts of the Ripple reasoned that the XRP is a lot more secure and quicker alternative than other fiat money when it comes to cross border remittance, Ripple specialists said that its token XRP is a superior alternative for global installments. The XRP is multiple times less volatile when contrasted with conventional monetary standards during cross-fringe settlements. Source: TheCoinRepublicRipple has the capability and resources to prove that, Ripple blockchain is fast and secure with much lesser fee's compare to others, that's why it has more advantages compare to the most traditional cross border payment providers, I'm not a big fan of XRP But i notice that in my own country XRP was use favorably for remittances from abroad. |
|
|
|
I came up with an article across the web, explaining Ethereum's staking requirements in the future which is going to be a minimum of 32 ETH. Multiplying this with current prices, I get an average of $5,780 (USD) (at $180 per coin). This doesn't seem cost-effective for the average person, as it's somewhat expensive to start earning rewards from the ETH blockchain. If ETH devs leave that requirement for staking upon the launch of Ethereum 2.0, I'm afraid that the blockchain will be less secure than what it is right now (as less people will be able to keep the network strong). The best solution would be to lower the minimum ETH required for staking in order to encourage the average person to support the blockchain as much as possible. With lower costs, nearly anyone will be able to join the ETH blockchain, making it much more resilient against third-party attacks. What do you think about this?  Honestly speaking 32 ETH was too high for me, if that's true and it was required will we have no choice but wait! until it was launch Ethereum 2.0 was long overdue and thats not good either for Ethereum Network and now that the rumor staking requirement of 32 ETH now whats next! |
|
|
|
Despite the legal frustration faced by Libra and GRAM, altcoin is in line with the historical evolution of payment system; from bartering to the first coin ever minted (in 600BC) to bank notes to credit card.
In my opinion, full decentralization might not be achieved at the time being but if altcoin survives this phase of trial time, crypto market will witness a massive adoption compare to the previous years but in a very slow pace.
I agree with your insights No doubt that some altcoins are gaining trust as another payment option since its quite useful faster and lesser fees compare to the traditional one for example, Like stellar lumens, or Ripple these two altcoins has a future in payments and i don't know even some other platform and blockchain too that needs to be evaluated. |
|
|
|
Think it's 50/50. What about you?
Sometimes waiting for something that was not sure to come is boring! that's why for me its better to look into more productive ways to earn in the crypto industry, rather than waiting for nothing, Altcoin season is very hard to predict, thats why in my opinion it was only created to lure investors to speculate in altcoins, As we all know that there was no altcoin season if there is no Bitcoin uptrend movement as well because they are interconnected in the Market. thats why its better to move on. |
|
|
|
Going back to 2017 scam ICO launchings, one thing for sure, sites like Coin Market Cap have played a very big role in promoting those scams. Yes they did it because they want money but one thing they should realize that this thing would lead to distrust of new people in crypto which would ultimately also close their shop as well.
Coin Market Cap takes a huge amount of money from those scammers.
When i contacted CMC, i got this email.
Hi, and thanks for reaching out! Our pricing is based on impressions:
Desktop Formats:
· Top Banner (728x90) - $14.00 per 1000 impressions
· Side Banner (160x600) - $8.00 per 1000 impressions
· Bottom Banner (728x90) - $4.00 per 1000 impressions
Mobile Formats:
· Top Banner (320x100) - $8.00 per 1000 impressions
· Mid Page Banner (300x250) - $6.00 per 1000 impressions [Coin Detail Pages only]
· Bottom Banner (320x100) - $4.00 per 1000 impressions [Coin Detail Pages only]
May promotion: 10% bonus impressions for orders of $25k or more
If these sites just go for some verification before promoting these scams, it would be very good for the visitors. Verification can include Mobile verification, Identity verification etc. These sites are an open image of crypto, if these sites just reduce their earned money by a bit and plan for long term then it would be beneficial for all of us.
Wow! thats huge sum of money collected by CMC from those scam ICO's! I think these is not new it was happening already before but just today it was highlighted. that's the reason why every investors should observe due diligence before making any investments in cryptocurrency, because we cant rely with these platforms Beware! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
