Korner hasn't been Autobanned, as far as I know he serves a temporary ban. LZ зaшквapилcя oб BTC-E кoнкpeтнo, пoэтoмy c пoзopoм пoкинyл cвoю дoлжнocть. Taким здecь нe мecтo
LZ зaшквapилcя oб BTC-E кoнкpeтнo, пoэтoмy eгo пoзopoм выкинyли c этoй дoлжнocти. Taким пpoxoдимцaм здecь нe мecтo
He is the source, so it's not real plagiarism. |
|
|
|
lnbc1pwj9h9wpp5g0rv83yfcjg5elzuejmdtxsefnlps6xzttj4gjgqkjhjkqy86yqsdqqxqr4rqrzjqwryaup9lh50kkranzgcdnn2fgvx390wgj5jd07rwr3vxeje0glc7z89q5qqssqqqqqqqqlgqqqqqeqqjq4whdkcv375dy5k4xr5ndpmer5ae9pyak7ssnuwtdl6ypawruttxycp6f6au8l54m3xma4gjtcmtu8vxqeep3sg8j44prk6awz4qx5mqp4y9km9 I used BlueWallet this time, and the payment is currently "in transit". I'm not sure how long it will stay that way, it may or may not complete. BlueWallet used a whopping 100 sat fee. I figure you're trying to redistribute the incoming from just one node across many channels? That's something for the Lightning Network itself to figure out, but from what I've seen earlier, it didn't use multiple channels on my side. |
|
|
|
We do have the private keys Sr! I still flind that hard to believe, so I'll ask again: what's the story behind this, and how did you obtain the private key? |
|
|
|
|
I highly doubt you own the private key to the address that receive 50 BTC in 2010. Just a guess: did someone try to sell you a read-only address some way? That's a common scam, but usually happens with much lower amounts. Can you explain the story behind why you think this is your address?
|
|
|
|
hmmmm, not that it matters, but something is wonky Received in the last 120 days
July 07, 2019, 01:43:27 PM: 1 from jbreher for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
July 04, 2019, 03:59:23 PM: 1 from Hueristic for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
July 03, 2019, 11:48:01 PM: 1 from infofront for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
July 02, 2019, 12:53:45 PM: 1 from JimboToronto for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
June 30, 2019, 09:49:51 AM: 1 from BTCMILLIONAIRE for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
June 30, 2019, 01:31:04 AM: 1 from infofront for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion From LoyceV files last week you had 747 merits on this thread. This week only 745. Yes, something strange. Might be merited on deleted posts? Some glitch in my table? Hopefully this is enough to summon sir LoyceV explaining this wonkiness in my data. Merited deleted posts are still mentioned in merit.all.txt. Last week: Merit distribution if Bitcointalk had nothing else than Wall Observer Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 566Sample 7. 768 Merit received by jojo69 (#49008) from 102 unique users in 532 transactions I have to leave soon, so can't look into it further now. |
|
|
|
2-of-3 Multi-Sig-Setup Alice and Bob
* H: Trezor1 + Passphrase_Alice + Passphrase_Bob
* V: LedgerS + Passphrase_Alice + Passphrase_Bob
* S: TrezorT + Passphrase_Alice + Passphrase_Bob I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around all scenarios, so I'll only respond to this one now: if both Alice's and Bob's passphrase are needed for all wallets, you have no fail safe if either one of them can't reprodue the passphrase. And that brings me to the next question: where are the seed word phrases for all wallets stored? |
|
|
|
Even with my poor English / the language barrier/ still, i would love go out and take a beer /Heineken or Grolsch/ together. I know this will never happen due to his high level of privacy, but anyway I love Amsterdam I'll be there in two weeks and then again in August, so in case he change his mind, I'm available  I won't be there, unless wearing a balaclava  My wife suggested she'll go, to add to the confusion by pretending to be me  an infograph That doesn't sound like me. |
|
|
|
No - this is more a simple and easy to use service that relies on the trust of me as an operator. In crypto, we have the saying "verify, don't trust" (I don't know the original source). I have quite a bit of credibility in a lot of industries so I think it's not a problem. You have NO credibility here. For people to trust you with private keys, you'll need to have a trust level comparable to casascius, and even then, the keys should be generated offline instead of on a server that transfers the keys over the internet. For those people who really are paranoid about security, then this probably isn't for them For anyone who understands the very basics of not losing their coins, this isn't for them. UPDATE: We now support split-key on our website! Split key should be the only option, so you can PROVE you're honest instead of having people "trust" you. |
|
|
|
Thanks for that knowledge I thought it is solely for all the replies been merited on the topic. I can give you an update of the sum of all Merit per topic if you're interested, but it'll be a long list to manually check which board each topic was posted on. |
|
|
|
On a side note the sight of merit source report unmerited good posts to another merit source seems ridiculous I don't mind, I have more sMerit left than ever (now 500+), so I'm glad to spend some. As a long-term solution, you could ask theymos to increase your source amount. You made a decent list of posts. |
|
|
|
Bump! 10,000,000 milli-satoshis are waiting for a 7 day loan |
|
|
|
|
Are the coins still on your side of the channel? In other words: when you click Channels, is there a balance under "Total can send"?
If so: click the channel (the one with the green word NORMAL), then CLOSE CHANNEL.
There will be a on-chain fee, and although I haven't tested closing a channel, this should work.
|
|
|
|
I've sent a reminder to Poloniex, asking about the status of the still disabled NMC-wallet. In just 11 days, they're going to delist it, and 23 days ago they told me it'll be updated. The instant response by email: I really dislike the way Poloniex support works, I now have to enter a detailed request in a field a quarter of the size of the subject line of this post! They just leave me in the dark with an approaching deadline to lose all NMC. I'm not sure if this is their normal way of business, but I'm not amused  |
|
|
|
Thanks, I guess This thread is a lot nicer than the previous one holding my name He was also creating simple vanity wallets for others (without charge). I think he's too swamped under with other work to do any these days. It's still available, and I'm still bumping Pretty Addy Giveaway - part 2. There's just less interest (maybe because of SegWit). I would love to see Theymos make them a Mod. Beyond deserving! I'd love to have one of these  ( source) work rate of his is just over the roof. I too have my time restrictions, my dtview-viewer for instance has been long overdue ( Vod beat me to it) and my Trust Flag viewer still has some minor but annoying bugs. Thanks for the support guys 
This would probably have fitted in LoyceV's reputation thread. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
