Do you know what metod is bitcoincharts.com using to estimate next difficulty? Is it sliding window of 2016 blocks? I'm watching allchains.info. Author says he is using the exact calcluation since last diff change. Right now there is 1652 blocks left in this round (18.06% blocks measured), with 9.43% increase. Bitcoincharts: 4.38%. I'm not sure what method it's using.
|
|
|
For a 30% increase in diff, network need a minimum of 50T of new hashing power. Not very likely in next 10 days. Anyway, nice effort on your part. How are you calculating the data? Is there some webpage with calculations, or are you pulling data from blockchain?
10 Minirigs per day = 50 Th/s in 10 days. There's Avalon, ASICMiner, and BFL units coming online. Between the 3 of them, 50 Th/s over the next 10 days is certainly a possibility. As for the data I'm using, it's just taken from http://bitcoincharts.com/Also, my estimate will be based off the data I post here. That initial 30% guess is based on observations of the data over the past few days. We'll be able to see how it's progressing over the next few data points though.
|
|
|
The problem with these services is that there's simply too much arsing around at the moment. Buy chips from A, send them to B to be put on a board, send board to C to be assembled into an actual product, then get it shipped to yourself.
If you had a full product to sell me, I'd buy. As it stands, though, I just couldn't be bothered with all the hassle.
|
|
|
I think nobody can expect a full 12 month retail warranty; this is a community DIY effort after all.
Just be sure to specify this explicitly in the T&C's to avoid any problems/misunderstanding in the future.
Those T&Cs would be completely irrelevant. EU law states that all consumer goods sold in the EU have a 2 year guarantee, regardless of what the sellers say.
|
|
|
I'll track the estimated difficulty increase over 126 block periods. The increase shown is the increase in difficulty from the last round, not an increase between blocks. I missed the first 2 periods but I'll try not to miss any more. Just in case though, feel free to post the right value if I haven't updated the post and nobody else has posted the value.
From the initial values, 3.16% increase 1/8 into the round, it's looking to be a 24% increase for this round. I suspect that the rate of increase will itself be increasing though, so my initial estimate for this round is about a 30% increase.
1,720 blocks remaining (just over 1/8 into the round) = 3.16 % increase 1,638 (3/16) = 4.72% 1,512 (4/16) = 5.12% 1,386 (5/16) = 6.76% 1,260 (6/16) = 7.4% 1,134 (7/16) = 7.95% 1,008 (8/16) = 8.94%
882 881 (9/16) = 9.99% 756 (10/16) = 12.95%
630 629 (11/16) = 15.48%
504 503 (12/16) = 15.52% 378 (13/16) = 18.33% 252 (14/16) = 19.98% 126 (15/16) = 20.21% 0 (new round) = 22.63%
So, we're half way through now and here's a quick summary. The difficulty round was seeing impressive increases between periods of about 1.5%. That fell to 0.4% and has steadily increase backup to 0.99%. Based on the initial results, the difficulty increase for the next round should be at least 18% based on doubling what it's at now. Taking into account the accelerating rate of increase, it should be a bit higher, so say at least 20%.
3/4 into the round and we're at 15.5%. We've seen some big 3% gains in a couple of periods, yet over the 11th, the increase was only 0.04%, the smallest so far. Was is just an extremely unlucky period or did it correspond to the lack of shipping on previous weekends?
So, at the end of the round, my initial estimate of 24% based on the first 252 blocks turned out to be pretty close. The difficulty increases varied wildly, from 0.04% to 2.96%.
|
|
|
Would you all PLEASE STOP FEEDING THE FUCKING TROLL?
This thread has gone to shit again due to you replying to him. Just ignore him and keep on speculating on real stuff. For fuck's sake that's one of the oldest Internet techniques to fuck up a discussion, and you are all falling to it! Push that fucking ignore button and go on!
I'm not trolling, so disregard this person who clearly does not know what trolling is. I'm providing my opinion of the future of AM - that both mining income and hardware sales income will decrease once there is competition on the shelves and that AM is overpriced. Apparently, some people thing think replying to peoples comments with maths and facts is trolling simply because they hold a different opinion. Ask yourself why these people are calling me a troll when all I'm doing is providing facts based on the maths and looking at the problems which AM has to tackle in the near future. The answer is obvious. These people don't want you making informed decisions. You've informed everyone. People can now make an informed decision. No need to continue guys. There's no need for anyone to post anything here. People do so because they want to. If people reply to my comments, I'll reply back to most of them. If I see a comment I want to reply to, I will do so. You do not get to tell people what they can or can't post. It does not matter whether you like what they've got to say or not. My posts have been bang on topic, which is all that really matters. If you want to ignore what I have to say, then do so. Nobody is forcing you to reply to me.
|
|
|
Would you all PLEASE STOP FEEDING THE FUCKING TROLL?
This thread has gone to shit again due to you replying to him. Just ignore him and keep on speculating on real stuff. For fuck's sake that's one of the oldest Internet techniques to fuck up a discussion, and you are all falling to it! Push that fucking ignore button and go on!
I'm not trolling, so disregard this person who clearly does not know what trolling is. I'm providing my opinion of the future of AM - that both mining income and hardware sales income will decrease once there is competition on the shelves and that AM is overpriced. Apparently, some people think replying to peoples comments with maths and facts is trolling simply because they hold a different opinion. Ask yourself why these people are calling me a troll when all I'm doing is providing facts based on the maths and looking at the problems which AM has to tackle in the near future. The answer is obvious. These people don't want you making informed decisions.
|
|
|
Multiply the BFL number by 75 and you'll find that in a month from now, the BFLs would have earned at least 75 BTC more than the AM shares. Did you have a point or are just trying to reinforce mine?
A first day Jalapeno will have made more profit than an AM IPO share by the end of the month and you'd still have the Jalapeno, whereas you'd have to sell the AM share.
You really are smoking crack. A Jalepeno cost 33 BTC if you ordered one early enough to expect delivery before the fall of this year. Those lucky buyers will never get their 33 BTC back, let alone profit from the device. BFL devices are priced in USD not BTC. The Jalapeno cost 149 USD not 33 BTC. You're agrument is completely irrelevant.
|
|
|
Was saying that based on the delivery of orders the AM share is still a lot more profitable than the miner since the miner did not deliver the whole year And yet, the Jalapeno after being delivered a year later, will still have made more profit a month from now. That's all that needs to be said really.
|
|
|
A single person could assemble 10 Minirigs in an 8 hour working day. That's 150 Th/s in a month.
Mabsark, you're a funny guy. No one is forcing you to buy ASICMINER shares at 3.4 BTC each. Your calculations would be correct if the case was that BFL was sending the order in a week from ordering, if you were to order today you think that you will get your order in 6 months? I ordered a single from BFL almost a year ago and I still have nothing. ASICMINER will have chips that will be superior to Bitfury before they start shipping and I don't believe that Kncminer will actually deliver 28 nm chips. There's no evidence whatsoever that AM will have chips better than BitFury. That's just pure hype with no evidence whatsoever to back it up. And yes, I know you can't buy a BFL and get in within a week. I've stated numerous times now that that's the reason why AM is so overpriced. Use your brain for 1 minute and think about the consequences of being able to buy an ASIC miner off the shelf from BFL or anyone else for that matter. It's blatantly obvious that under such circumstances, AM will not sell as much hardware and it won't be able to sell that hardware for ridiculous prices, which means less income from hardware sales. If you could buy a BFL off the shelf right now, how much would you pay for an AM USB miner? But you can't. And you won't be able to for at least 3 months, likely 4. And by that time difficulty will be 10-15X what it is now. ASICMiner is filling a niche. Yes, it is a temporary advantage, but it will continue to exist for a while yet. That's what I've been saying all along and that's precisely why AM is overpriced. My argument is not that BFL is the greatest or that AM is the worst. My argument is simply that AM is overpriced basically because it has a monopoly. Right now it is not overvalued because there is no threat to the monopoly. Once one appears, if prices don't fall it may be overvalued. There is a threat to the monopoly though. It's there for everyone to see, inching its way closer and closer. Anyone looking to invest, rather than speculate, needs to take these things into account.
|
|
|
A single person could assemble 10 Minirigs in an 8 hour working day. That's 150 Th/s in a month.
Mabsark, you're a funny guy. No one is forcing you to buy ASICMINER shares at 3.4 BTC each. Your calculations would be correct if the case was that BFL was sending the order in a week from ordering, if you were to order today you think that you will get your order in 6 months? I ordered a single from BFL almost a year ago and I still have nothing. ASICMINER will have chips that will be superior to Bitfury before they start shipping and I don't believe that Kncminer will actually deliver 28 nm chips. There's no evidence whatsoever that AM will have chips better than BitFury. That's just pure hype with no evidence whatsoever to back it up. And yes, I know you can't buy a BFL and get in within a week. I've stated numerous times now that that's the reason why AM is so overpriced. Use your brain for 1 minute and think about the consequences of being able to buy an ASIC miner off the shelf from BFL or anyone else for that matter. It's blatantly obvious that under such circumstances, AM will not sell as much hardware and it won't be able to sell that hardware for ridiculous prices, which means less income from hardware sales. If you could buy a BFL off the shelf right now, how much would you pay for an AM USB miner? But you can't. And you won't be able to for at least 3 months, likely 4. And by that time difficulty will be 10-15X what it is now. ASICMiner is filling a niche. Yes, it is a temporary advantage, but it will continue to exist for a while yet. That's what I've been saying all along and that's precisely why AM is overpriced. My argument is not that BFL is the greatest or that AM is the worst. My argument is simply that AM is overpriced basically because it has a monopoly. Concedes that but no competitors = valuations are ok I mean even BASIC is at 2 BTC right now lol after the 1:10 split 0.2 but check those stats out if you think ASIC is overvalued I've said a few times that all mining stocks are overpriced at the moment.
|
|
|
Your previous comment assumed delivery did you calculate if it was undelivered
That doesn't make sense. The Jalapeno was shipped on the day I specified according to the BFL shipping blog and I added an extra week to account for shipping time. Using a value of 100 USD a bitcoin is outlandish last years values should be forced into your calculation using 20 dollars not 100 for all your calculations.
BFL devices are priced in USD not BTC, so it makes no difference what the price of bitcoin was last year. In fact, the backlog demands you use last years values they won't deliver 2013 before 2012 http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg360ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zvhttp://bfl.ptz.ro/Cost: 149 USD Bitcoin at 20 dollars in 2012 where it should be 7.5 BTC Shipping: 2013/05/18Delivery: 2013/05/25 BULL! Reality Ordered: 2012/06/18 Shipping: 2013/05/18 Delivery: 2013/05/25 What witchcraft is this to say BFL can deliver in 1 week in your lalalalaland Standard shipping within the same country usually takes a couple of days at most. AMC's Avalons were shipped from Hong Kong to the US in 1 day. The time value of money 7.5 BTC @ 100 dollars in current value non-refundable in this case you got delivery Assumes rest is fine 213.48 USD - 750 dollars Negative $536.72 keep mining BFL does not deliver in a week using Shipping: 2013/05/18 Delivery: 2013/05/25 Is trolling Dreaming about those Jalapeno you need to access the Silk Road more Bought IPO ASICminer 0.1 Dividend 0.3 300% Return Sold at 3.5 3400% Return 3.5 BTC = 350 Dollars a Share Bought ASICminer at IPO instead of BFL Jalapeno 75 Shares 7.5/0.1 75*0.3 = 22.5 BTC Dividends Sold 75 Shares @ 3.5 75 * 3.5 = 262.5 BTC Gross Profit 285 BTC Less 7.5 BTC Net Profit 277.5 BTC 277.5 BTC @ 100 = $27,750 So, get your facts straight Multiply the BFL number by 75 and you'll find that in a month from now, the BFLs would have earned at least 75 BTC more than the AM shares. Did you have a point or are just trying to reinforce mine? A first day Jalapeno will have made more profit than an AM IPO share by the end of the month and you'd still have the Jalapeno, whereas you'd have to sell the AM share.
|
|
|
A single person could assemble 10 Minirigs in an 8 hour working day. That's 150 Th/s in a month.
Mabsark, you're a funny guy. No one is forcing you to buy ASICMINER shares at 3.4 BTC each. Your calculations would be correct if the case was that BFL was sending the order in a week from ordering, if you were to order today you think that you will get your order in 6 months? I ordered a single from BFL almost a year ago and I still have nothing. ASICMINER will have chips that will be superior to Bitfury before they start shipping and I don't believe that Kncminer will actually deliver 28 nm chips. There's no evidence whatsoever that AM will have chips better than BitFury. That's just pure hype with no evidence whatsoever to back it up. And yes, I know you can't buy a BFL and get in within a week. I've stated numerous times now that that's the reason why AM is so overpriced. Use your brain for 1 minute and think about the consequences of being able to buy an ASIC miner off the shelf from BFL or anyone else for that matter. It's blatantly obvious that under such circumstances, AM will not sell as much hardware and it won't be able to sell that hardware for ridiculous prices, which means less income from hardware sales. If you could buy a BFL off the shelf right now, how much would you pay for an AM USB miner? But you can't. And you won't be able to for at least 3 months, likely 4. And by that time difficulty will be 10-15X what it is now. ASICMiner is filling a niche. Yes, it is a temporary advantage, but it will continue to exist for a while yet. That's what I've been saying all along and that's precisely why AM is overpriced. My argument is not that BFL is the greatest or that AM is the worst. My argument is simply that AM is overpriced basically because it has a monopoly.
|
|
|
A single person could assemble 10 Minirigs in an 8 hour working day. That's 150 Th/s in a month.
Mabsark, you're a funny guy. No one is forcing you to buy ASICMINER shares at 3.4 BTC each. Your calculations would be correct if the case was that BFL was sending the order in a week from ordering, if you were to order today you think that you will get your order in 6 months? I ordered a single from BFL almost a year ago and I still have nothing. ASICMINER will have chips that will be superior to Bitfury before they start shipping and I don't believe that Kncminer will actually deliver 28 nm chips. There's no evidence whatsoever that AM will have chips better than BitFury. That's just pure hype with no evidence whatsoever to back it up. And yes, I know you can't buy a BFL and get in within a week. I've stated numerous times now that that's the reason why AM is so overpriced. Use your brain for 1 minute and think about the consequences of being able to buy an ASIC miner off the shelf from BFL or anyone else for that matter. It's blatantly obvious that under such circumstances, AM will not sell as much hardware and it won't be able to sell that hardware for ridiculous prices, which means less income from hardware sales. If you could buy a BFL off the shelf right now, how much would you pay for an AM USB miner?
|
|
|
Facepalm use a better company and we can talk But fine BFL 5 GH/s 274 USD, 2.74 BTC @ 100 USD/BTC 5,000,000,000 / 2.74 = 1.825 Gh/s per BTC Did not deliver Time Value Lost One year Bitcoin $25 Total Cost 11 BTC 1 year Later Bitcoin 100 Dollars Unit not Delivered Net loss $1100 Revenue generated 0 Lets compound that 1100 net loss and assume it delivered now I believe you cannot disagree that the time value of money is a value so lets add that 1100 not your 2.74 lets also assume for simplicity sake you would have made a bit of money reinvesting that to and keep the 11 5 GH/s 274 USD, 11 BTC @ 25 USD/BTC 5,000,000,000 / 11 = 0.45454 Mh/s per BTC Now lets make some changes to that when applied to AM 400,000 shares 3.5 BTC per share 2,500 Th/s 2,500,000,000,000,000 / 400,000 = 6.25 Gh/s per share 6,250,000,000 / 3.5 = 1.786 Gh/s per BTC Nothing I can do to change that Well I guess the time value of money is nothing Go fix the AM scale and tell me what the TOTAL Hash Rate of the whole network is currently if your going to put out numbers like that Heres a hint http://www.coindesk.com/exponential-leap-in-bitcoin-hash-rates/Again, as I said in a previous comment: Actually. Profit from placing an order for BFL 1 year ago is:
Cost: 149 USD Hash rate: 4.5 Gh/s Shipping: 2013/05/18 Delivery: 2013/05/25
Difficulties: 2013/05/25 - 2013/06/05 = 12,153,412 2013/06/05 - 2013/06/16 = 15,605,633 20313/06/16 - current = 19,507,041
Income: 2013/05/25 - 2013/06/05 = 0.1862 BTC per day * 11 days = 2.0482 BTC 2013/06/05 - 2013/06/16 = 0.1450 BTC per day * 11 days = 1.595 BTC 20313/06/16 - current = 0.1170 BTC per day * 8 days = 0.936 BTC Total = 4.5792 BTC = 457.92 USD @ 100 USD/BTC
Electricity costs: 35W 0.2 USD per kWh Daily cost = 0.35 * 24 * 0.2 = 0.168 USD Total usage cost = 0.168 * 30 = 5.04 USD
Profit = 457.92 - 274 - 5.04 = 178.88 USD = 1.7888 BTC @ 100 USD/BTC I posted that on the 24th June, so add another 3 days of profit to that, bringing the total to: 3 * 0.117 BTC = 0.351 BTC Total = 4.9302 BTC = 493.02 USD @ 100 USD/BTC 3 * 0.168 USD = 0.504 USD Total usage cost = 0.168 * 30 = 5.544 USD Profit = 493.02 - 274 - 5.544 = 213.476 USD = 2.13476 BTC @ 100 USD/BTC Profit from purchasing AM shares at IPO was stated to be 3.72 BTC. So, AM IPO share holders are currently 1.58524 BTC ahead of first day Jalapeno buyers. Difficulty is set to increase by about 10% and the income from the BFL is set to be about 0.1053 BTC/day, which is 1.4742 BTC over 2 weeks. AM dividend will come to about 0.06 BTC over the same period. That puts AM at 3.78 BTC and BFL at: 14 * 0.168 USD = 2.352 USD 2.13476 BTC + 1.4742 BTC = 3.60896 BTC By this time next month, a first day Jalapeno will have made at least 1 BTC more profit than an AM IPO share. So, get your facts straight.
|
|
|
he wants to cause doubt so he can buy in under 3.3.
Dude, it ain't working.
His "maths" is nothing more than ignoring real data from the last 8 months, and pulling numbers out of his ass.
Nothing is always cheaper than something
What data am I ignoring? What numbers am I pulling out my arse? BFL 5 GH/s 274 USD, 2.74 BTC @ 100 USD/BTC 5,000,000,000 / 2.74 = 1.825 Gh/s per BTC AM 400,000 shares 3.5 BTC per share 2,500 Th/s 2,500,000,000,000,000 / 400,000 = 6.25 Gh/s per share 6,250,000,000 / 3.5 = 1.786 Gh/s per BTC In order for AM to offer similar value to a 5 Gh/s BFL in hashing power, it needs 2,500 Th/s. That's a fact and nothing you can say or do will change that. Why should people ignore facts and make decisions based on ignorance, simply because you want to increase your profit at their expense? Thought you were pawned 4 days ago That would be impressive if it wasn't for this wall of Undelivered Orders Did I mention thats over 4000 http://bfl.ptz.ro/Onward https://i.imgur.com/qorOH5y.pngWhy? Because you said so? Prove the maths wrong, then you claim I've been "pawned". Like I said back then: At an assembly rate of 2 per hour, a single person working 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, could assemble those Minirigs in 39 days. At an assembly rate of 5 per hour, a single person working 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, could assemble those Singles in 119 days. At an assembly rate of 10 per hour, a single person working 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, could assemble those Jalapenos in 53 days.
With 2 people assembling Singles, 1 assembling Minirigs and 1 assembling Jalapenos, the backlog could be cleared in 60 days with an adequate supply of components. A single person could assemble 10 Minirigs in an 8 hour working day. That's 150 Th/s in a month.
|
|
|
another troll to ignore!
Man, I am collecting trolls on here. I need a tally somewhere...
Well said. Some people here think that anyone not participating in their circle-jerk and trying to inflate the share price is trolling. When you show them the maths to prove just how inflated the prices are, they start talking about buying in at the IPO for 0.1 BTC, like that's in the slightest bit relevant for someone looking to buy shares now. The fact is that even if AM had a hash rate of 250 Th/s, with 400,000 shares at 3.5 BTC each, that works out to be just 178.57 Mh/s per BTC. In order for AM's mining operation to provide similar value to a 5 GH/s BFL, it needs a hash rate of around 2,500 Th/s at a share price of 3.5 BTC. Then they go on about hardware sales and delude themselves into believing that people will continue to pay insane prices for the worst ASIC hardware on the market and that hardware sales are going to increase as will dividends. They probably know they're full of shit and they're just trying to pump before they dump. Why do people keep comparing AM hardware to BFL hardware? BFL hasn't shipped 90%+ of their outstanding orders and anyone ordering today won't get a product for months, possibly not even until 2014. I tell you what, I'll sell you Unicorn-PT shares that mine at 1TH/s per BTC - how many would you like? Maybe AM is overpriced and maybe it's not, however, this has zero to do with BFL and everything to do with what you think AM can execute in the coming 6 months (not 6 days or 6 hours like some over-eager day traders). Short of calling him a derogatory name, I'd say there's always people who just don't get it, and he's one. His math and facts on this subject were laughable earlier in this thread, thus not worth acknowledging. Instead of saying that my maths and facts are laughable, I'd like to see you try and show that. You won't because you know for a fact that the maths is spot on and anyone can confirm that for themselves. People are free to make their own minds up based on the information available to them. Now, they can use the solid mathematical facts which I've provided to help them with their decision, or they can listen to the nonsense which you guys spew in order to try and increase share price.
|
|
|
he wants to cause doubt so he can buy in under 3.3.
Dude, it ain't working.
His "maths" is nothing more than ignoring real data from the last 8 months, and pulling numbers out of his ass.
Nothing is always cheaper than something
What data am I ignoring? What numbers am I pulling out my arse? BFL 5 GH/s 274 USD, 2.74 BTC @ 100 USD/BTC 5,000,000,000 / 2.74 = 1.825 Gh/s per BTC AM 400,000 shares 3.5 BTC per share 2,500 Th/s 2,500,000,000,000,000 / 400,000 = 6.25 Gh/s per share 6,250,000,000 / 3.5 = 1.786 Gh/s per BTC In order for AM to offer similar value to a 5 Gh/s BFL in hashing power, it needs 2,500 Th/s. That's a fact and nothing you can say or do will change that. Why should people ignore facts and make decisions based on ignorance, simply because you want to increase your profit at their expense?
|
|
|
another troll to ignore!
Man, I am collecting trolls on here. I need a tally somewhere...
Well said. Some people here think that anyone not participating in their circle-jerk and trying to inflate the share price is trolling. When you show them the maths to prove just how inflated the prices are, they start talking about buying in at the IPO for 0.1 BTC, like that's in the slightest bit relevant for someone looking to buy shares now. The fact is that even if AM had a hash rate of 250 Th/s, with 400,000 shares at 3.5 BTC each, that works out to be just 178.57 Mh/s per BTC. In order for AM's mining operation to provide similar value to a 5 GH/s BFL, it needs a hash rate of around 2,500 Th/s at a share price of 3.5 BTC. Then they go on about hardware sales and delude themselves into believing that people will continue to pay insane prices for the worst ASIC hardware on the market and that hardware sales are going to increase as will dividends. They probably know they're full of shit and they're just trying to pump before they dump. Why do people keep comparing AM hardware to BFL hardware? BFL hasn't shipped 90%+ of their outstanding orders and anyone ordering today won't get a product for months, possibly not even until 2014. I tell you what, I'll sell you Unicorn-PT shares that mine at 1TH/s per BTC - how many would you like? Maybe AM is overpriced and maybe it's not, however, this has zero to do with BFL and everything to do with what you think AM can execute in the coming 6 months (not 6 days or 6 hours like some over-eager day traders). Because that's the competition. I could compare it to BitFury or KnC if you prefer but that will just make things look a hell of a lot worse. Does it matter if BFL hasn't shipped 90% of it's hardware? AM hasn't brought online 90% of it's hashing power either and it most certainly hasn't brought online the 2,500 Th/s that it would need to provide equal hashing value with BFL. You say it has nothing to do with BFL, but that's just wilful ignorance. BFL, Bitfury, KnC and AMC will all effect AM with regards to both hardware sales and share of the network. You can keep comparing the competition to imaginary unicorns, but that's just pure stupidity as it's a fact that the competition is real. Prove to me that your Unicorn-PT shares can actually provide me with 1 Th/s and I'll buy as many as I can afford. Otherwise, stop talking nonsense simply because you can't refute the claims.
|
|
|
another troll to ignore!
Man, I am collecting trolls on here. I need a tally somewhere...
Well said. Some people here think that anyone not participating in their circle-jerk and trying to inflate the share price is trolling. When you show them the maths to prove just how inflated the prices are, they start talking about buying in at the IPO for 0.1 BTC, like that's in the slightest bit relevant for someone looking to buy shares now. The fact is that even if AM had a hash rate of 250 Th/s, with 400,000 shares at 3.5 BTC each, that works out to be just 178.57 Mh/s per BTC. In order for AM's mining operation to provide similar value to a 5 GH/s BFL, it needs a hash rate of around 2,500 Th/s at a share price of 3.5 BTC. Then they go on about hardware sales and delude themselves into believing that people will continue to pay insane prices for the worst ASIC hardware on the market and that hardware sales are going to increase as will dividends. They probably know they're full of shit and they're just trying to pump before they dump.
|
|
|
|