Urrrrrgg

I think we found the ceiling, dammm it, just when I cash out of one position to jump in here, the rise comes to a screeeeeching halt, purchased at 92 had to sell at 91 because it was clearly reversing, then after that the rate drops so low so fast have to take a couple more losses, then I finally get in under it and start making my money bank and ended up a bit.  of course now it flat lines.  uuuuurrrrrrrgggggggg -- fun though

wow, that was actually fun.

When I requested the faucet drip, I expected a tiny drop but when it arrived I was shocked at it's value (far more than I expected -- .05 BC).  Thanks for the info

The CC is so volatile right now I traded the coin up to .052.  I know if it was a lot of  BC it would not have traded as quickly but it's crazy over there.

You do realize there is life outside of BTC right?

LTC was the positioned alternative to BTC, now all other "alts" are the alt to BTC and LTC, about a month ago when BTC was going down, LTC decided to go in a differnt direction (people moved their non performing BTC $$$s to LTC), up, up, and up.   But as soon as BTC made tracks back to the profitland the btc believers returned.   Now we are back to the same situation except this time BTC, and LTC has gone now (most others too) so what do CC speculators do, they look down the Market cap list, they look over the list of other CCs, and they start to examine other charts to see which are ripe for picking.  That's how so many "alts" get action, when the big guys fail to perform.

As new CC player enter the market they won't know BTC as the one and only, they will simply just know it as the biggest/oldest, but they will be accustom to seeing BTC as much as LTC, DOGE, Ripple, NXT, PPC and a host of others.   Once there is a fiat to alt coin exchange (I thing there are some beta) with the strength of a Coinbase you will see tremendous competition on a primary level not just a secondary level (buy BTC with fiat to get alt).







explain further what you mean there

hahahahahaaaaa,  I bought into Blackcoin and Darkcoin only minuses a part from one another on April 11, BC was too quiet for me, so sold my couple of coins for a tiny profit and focused my energy on what appeared to be a better bet (BRK).  BRK did well, but BC is doing fantastic. 

I sold my BC at 0.00009700 on April 11 -- yeah that hurts

Here we go again; what do you mean by "made-up person"?   

  HUH ... you thought the subject was "financial markets"?  

See what happens when I dumb it down for a moron, it trips an idiot.     

"Stupid"?  hahahahaaaa

It's that type of mentality that causes the type of nonsense we are experience.

Here's an analogy to help you to understand, if you want a starter fire to grow you gradually add fuel, however notice that if you add TOO MUCH FUEL too early it will EXTINGUISH the fire, likewise for the financial markets, if you see a rally beginning you support it with just enough supply to keep it moving, ONLY when the rally is in full swing can you dump large quantities of coin in and expect it to be supported.

There are very many stages of a deal, especially "short sales", rest assured the court is supervising the finial outcome.

Personally, I think the community should get together and make a better system, there's no need to buy a purposefully broken system unless it is part of a structured settlement -- 'take it or leave it'. 

However, I think a criminal court should also have some involvement in the matter.

I have to admit, I really didn't think gox would going to give back anything whatsoever, with btc driven to the ground apparently the bigger whales were willing to empty the whole pond jut to make sure Gox doesn't swim free.

When it's all said and done, I doubt if Karp sees his 40 birthday, he's just too much in love with fraud. 

Hi there Roslinpl, how are you?  I remember long ago when you said we would never see $300 btc, I wonder how you feel about that now?

As for the price change of DRK, all of the variables for the value of DRK to rise substantially have been in place for a full week, as indicated above that rise was initiated 6 times but all 6 times it was artificially cut short, as if someone is actually trying to keep the price down.   If you look at the patters of all of the other higher ranking CCs you will notice a general chart flow that appears to mimic the flow of BTC, essentially that is what you 'naturally' would expect to see when one CC is tied to another CC. 

AUR has a massive influx of constant supply entering the system so their numbers are in constant free fall, and will likely drop in rank much below where it presently is at. Counterparty, and Blackcoin probably have their unique stories too, but for the most part all other chart performance pictures above Darkcoin resemble BTC chart performance.   

Since I'm actually closely monitoring DRK and have witnessed the rally attempts first hand that is why I made the public address.

I can't believe this, for the whole week Darkcoin has been trying to rally (6x this week, 2 of the 6 today) but every time one starts-up someone throws a monkey-wrench into the mix and throws it off -- WTF?

Come on, you know opportunities don't knock always, next go around please let it do it's thing.

thanks for your reply, sorry about your coin's performance

The heart of my problem with any substantially premined coin and Market Cap is the fact that you are providing yourself with a head-start, if Market Cap has manipulated the number perhaps it's because you too manipulated the numbers so they are trying to provide a balance.  If you don't like with is being reported by Market Cap you know you could ask them to remove it from the list altogether -- look ripple is on the list but not even a coin, clearly MC does what they want.

Hey look it's Isracoin, headed in the same direction.

The publishers of Market Cap really need to improve their system, the asterisks are not good enough, 'substantially premined' coins need to be segregated so that their numbers aren't misinterpreted, particularly for those new premined coins.  Give them a month or two of performance if you feel a need to keep them with the nonpremined coins.  

It's sad to see any coin enter the top 10 only to slowly fall to below 20 in a month.   Of them all, Marine Coin made the biggest entrance and the fastest nose dive, starting in at #2, then diving to #3, #5, #12 ...  now submerged at a depth of 27th (in about 20 hours) -- gotta be cryptocurrency history book record.


Oh, remember SpainCoin, they too entered in the top 5, NOW at 95!!!  wow another CC record.

I get into ANC then when I thought there wasn't much UP left in the swing ran to DKC, actually I was in both for a few pennies a bit then decided to liquidate the stuck-in-the-mud VRT to get in deep with DKC, was investing nicely then all of  a sudden the crash shown, most of the time I would dive right in, but THIS time I thought, waitttttt a second, what if this crash goes longer than my wallet, let's just throw in a couple pennies let's some others have some fun and let's see it it goes lower than the 124 ... NOPE.   Yeah, it backfired and I'm still pissed, now I'm looking at 130s again and NO movement (just like VRT).

well, time for a nap, when I wake I'll take a look at  "QRK, HoboNickels, DGC" as suggested, hope I would not have slept though a good opportunity with any of those.

exactly what you did is how I did my critical analysis


Question, what else looks like a sleeping giant? 

I don't know who the F you are, but may I call you Sensei - that was exceptionally sharp and mind-opening analysis -- thanks

and it just so happens that I'm considering both of the coins you referred to. 

well it looks like the sleeping giant ANC has awakened and since the coin appears to be legit, I might as well grab what I could before it's too late.

One day as a child walking along the beach I found a $5 bill, it made me so happy ...

Was looking at Anoncoin (ANC) moments ago for the first time, from the charts it looks ripe for the picking, so then I looked at the site (didn't like what I read), then I looked at long term charts (back to 2013), it looks like a solid CC, what I don't understand is the low volume extremely low price, particularly at this point in time -- WHY?


Now that I've gotten older, I have massive doubts when something looks too good to be true, so with this find I come to the "experts" the (BTC forum), because there is no better group of cryptocurrency industry pros anywhere -- is there anything wrong with ANC in the past few days or anticipated to happen in the immediate future?

thanks

If you do everything according to Paypal rules the above situation is covered.   A seller is not responsible for hacked paypal account activity, never was.

Paypal will try to skirt any issue with no compliance, if not with the buyer then with the seller, whatever they can't skirt they will absorb if not big enough to pass on to insurance.   

When core market value go down it naturally weeds out the ponzi schemes  IMO, just add it to the list:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83794.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQTM8NkbIVw&t=24m30s

cryptocurrency investors, and speculators want and need more accountability, responsibility, and transparency from their service providers.

1) Identification -  if you claim to have 5 employees/partners, support that with photos and info on each (About Us page), this is an old current standard, the new current standard would be to have an affidavit sworn or affirmed to by each indicating that they ... [are not a bad guy, or is a reformed bad guy, ...], pdf all of the already public info like license, etc so that the community could better know you

2) Insurance - general liability, officer E/O, employee bonding, etc

3) Community certification - the community to rate you, provide the star rating on your site

4) Internal Audit - used the blockchain to prove assets, solvency.  A signed transaction, on a regular basis. ie: 50Kbtc represents assets on hand 'signed by exchange'

5) External Audits -  quarterly security audits, and annual whole system audits (financial, security, customer service, policy, procedures)


The community must demand AT LEAST the above from EXISTING and all new exchanges, 2FA and FinCen registration is not nearly enough. 

It's time for service providers to make the promises, warrants, guarantees, and assurances and to proudly stand behind them, those who do will LEAD the industry with higher quality standards.

On the heels of the biggest abuse of customer trust in cryptocurrency history -- Mt. Gox, and the growing list of smaller abusers:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83794.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQTM8NkbIVw&t=24m30s
cryptocurrency investors, and speculators want and need more accountability, responsibility, and transparency from their service providers.

Here is a short list of things we feel should be incorporated into new exchanges:

1) If you claim to have 5 employees/partners, support that with photos and info on each (About Us page), this is an old current standard, the new current standard would be to have an affidavit sworn or affirmed to by each indicating that they ... [are not a bad guy, or is a reformed bad guy, ...], pdf all of the already public info like license, etc so that the community could better know you

2) Insurance on the company, the insurance could be in different forms: general liability, officer E/O, employee bonding, etc whatever you deem to be fitting

3) Community certification, start a poll thread (if not done already) that asks the community to rate you, provide the star rating on your site

4) Used the blockchain to prove assets, solvency, a signed transaction, on a regular basis. ie: 50Kbtc represents daily avg ' cryptomargin', 5000K btc represents 50% of assets on hand ' cryptomargin'

5) Provide for outside security audits quarterly, and whole system audits (financial, security, customer service, policy, procedures) annually

6) Give customers the option to have signed transactions, sometimes signed transactions make life easier


With the above you can make tremendous claims and have a tremendous amount of supporting evidence to go with it. That level of accountability, transparency, security, and communications is worthy of community regard, and market share.

It's time for service providers to make the promises, warrants, guarantees, and assurances and to proudly stand behind, those who do will LEAD the industry with higher quality standards -- I'll sign up in a heart beat.

We would like faucets at www.ArmisGame.com how much would that cost to do?