Charlie Lee, not much care there. He is obviously such a power house of innovation............
He might have a point though. Maybe we should create a new coin..."
the Charlie Lee way !":
start from scratch and dismiss the formally expressed community will to conserve it as an "original"
ditch the articulated protocol so...
no native network monetary value
interest on holdings
...or incentivised nodes
ditch the idea of making crypto "user friendly" through the worlds first active-consensus based DAPI
ignore 10,000 years of monetary history which says that
transparent fungibility is a high value monetary property and worth doing properly
forget the idea that a monetary "bearer instrument" (commonly known as "cash") ceases to be that unless the blockchain can scale natively
dismiss the problem of giving
all 4 stakeholders a voice that allows them to assert their views on the asset's governance, instead of only bitcoin's 3
Only 1 problem to solve then - how would we gain any traction after creating Charlie Lee's "perfect cup of tea"
![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
Ah ! Get Evan's brother to list it on the world's biggest bitcoin exchange exclusive of any other altcoin - that should do it.
(Oops, Evan hasn't got such a brother - he might have to succeed on merit
![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif)
But wait,
@SatoshiLite has maybe we can use his
![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
He's a "fair" guy after all).
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCzvxCTz.png&t=663&c=VMHS0fMcQH7YFw)