Are these lies too?
No. Bold removed to save forum users being alerted to a pinhead posting.How about you actually read what I said? 1) Bitcoin isn't money so it isn't gambling. 2) A BVI holding company that owns fiat gambling sites isn't engaging in Gambling in the BVI either. Continuing to repeat your mistakes continues to show you don't understand anything. |
|
|
|
Why snip the facts as dismiss them as lies.
Because I already answered them before. Repeating yourself makes you look like you are too stupid to understand those replies. When someone puts forward an argument and receives a rebuttal it is normal to engage with that rebuttal. When someone is not capable of doing that it shows they do not have the cognitive ability to engage in conversation and often results (on the internet) with them being put on an ignore list or blocked. |
|
|
|
~snip reapeated bullshit and lies.
I've already corrected all these lies. You repeating them over and over just makes you look stupid. I've been enjoying watching you chasing your tail trying to report us to "the authorities" for a few months now. I'll give you a clue. Bitcoin isn't money so you can't gamble with it and you don't need a bank account. Here's another one, it is legal for a fiat gambling business to incorporate a holding company in BVI for tax purposes because the gambling doesn't occur in BVI. Edit: I almost forgot the funniest bit. InterGlobal Limited own CloudFlare, you pillock. |
|
|
|
I am having a problem with multiply btc. everytime I play auto it says please reload page
I'd recommend trying a different internet connection as that is usually caused by a network timeout. |
|
|
|
i would love to see a feature where we can send payments to freebitcoin users without fees.
be course you need only to pull over black number no need for a real bitcoin transaction.
I just found out that i often sending bitcoin to freebitcoin addresses .....
This feature would be great !
regards
I'm not sure, but I think that such thing like off-chain transactions between users was planned few years ago. I might be wrong, maybe I confused it with Faucethub. Anyway, I don't think it's needed currently because transaction fees are really low for a long time already. Using of SegWit addresses also helps. I don't think transaction fees are the problem here but the time people are waiting for a confirmation. If you send a high amount of money it would be any problem paying a higher fee to get a quick confirmation but when you make transactions of only a few dollars paying a fee of 0.5$ is considered to be high. Anyways I am not sure how many people would use this feature, probably only for transactions between friends. With fees going up again it is something we like to do but there is one issue with it. We often get people complaining that they didn't receive withdrawals, with a blockchain transaction we can send them the transaction ID as proof we paid it to the address they requested. An internal transaction relies on just our word that we transferred the funds.
We're pleased to announce that Golden Ticket will be launching on 1st May.  for me this would be a great feature since a instant withdraw is now covered with 12 000 Satoshi fee. And this would safe also fees for freebitcoin- regards We can't do it because there would be no way of proving that we had made the payments. With fees going up we have made an improvement to the way we calculate what fees to use. We found that all fee estimators can from time to time recommend too high a fee so we now average it three different sources. |
|
|
|
We added code to uncheck the boxes for dumbasses like you that accidentally checked them. If there was ever anything wrong with our code that caused them to be checked as you claim you could find an archive of it as proof. You can't do that because there was never a fault.
Whether Freebitco.in was intentionally causing this issue is debatable but there was definitely a bug that affected the website which caused jackpots to be checked without the user activating them. I wrote a complaint through the site's contact form when this happened to me a few years ago and never received a response. I also found this post from a user that describes the exact same problem. I suspect the issue was caused due to browser compatibility issues since I only had the problem on old versions of Android and Linux that were no longer supported by Chrome and once on Brave desktop browser which is known to be buggy. Since nobody ever replied when I messaged the website I did not bother keeping any logs with definitive proof that this bug was occurring, but after seeing several complaints and from personal experience I do not think it's fair to say it's just dumb ass people accidentally enabling the jackpots. It isn't debatable at all. The Javascript source can be read and there no bugs in it. As you point out there might be issues on your device or browser but if we had done something wrong someone would have pointed it out in the code. I only took over the contact us and email support about 6 months ago. The previous guy always read them all but didn't have time to reply to many of them. If there had been a large number of similar complaints then that would have been highlighted to wetsuit. Since I've been doing it there might have been 4 or 5 customers reporting this issue. When something goes wrong I usually get 40 or 50 messages about it in one day.
Edit: I missed this the first time. If we are going to really say bad things about freebitcoin I know one and it is pretty obvious, no not the house edge we accepted that long time ago, it is the signature! Lol. How come you are basically the face of freebitcoin here and represent them at all possible ways and have chipmixer signature man  . That should be illegal ffs, if you are the representative of a casino then you put that casinos signature on your profile not other business's, you can't be thinking about making money from other places, you are probably already paid . Or, it means when you cannot convince your representative to wear your signature in terms of remuneration, then how good you will be in other business problems which are in terms of funds. That is literally the only thing I can think of that is both looking bad and not even a bad joke . That's actually quite funny. I was previously in The ChipMixer signature campaign but since I started working full time for freebitco.in I haven't had much time to post in other discussions on the forum so I left to open the spot up to someone who could do it justice. I left the signature on for a few reasons. 1) I'm a big supporter of the service. It's the best mixer there is and I believe privacy is of great importance when it comes to your finances. 2) ChipMixer paid me a lot of money to rent my signature space and I want to give them something back for free. 3) I'm rubbish at BBCode and haven't had time to knock up a good freebitco.in signature yet. |
|
|
|
So you are accusing them as scam site which is full of fake winners because you have never won anything from this site and you ignore the fact that their games are provably fair which can be verified?
That does seem to be a common theme  |
|
|
|
The level of discussion has dropped, so let's all try to lift it up a notch.
Thanks for that, it makes a change to have someone who actually understands it post. Conclusion: The site is not cheating, since you can verify each hash of each of your bets, but provably fair doesn't mean you will win, so only bet what you can afford to lose.
Hope this helps.
It is sad that so many people don't understand what provably fair actually does. It allows them to prove to themselves whether or not they were cheated. Given that information, they could choose to go and use another site if they found one that was unfair. Instead, they just act like babies crying "it's not fair" because they lost a bet. |
|
|
|
Hello Dear Having problem accessing your site. What's that? Why?  As I'm not telepathic I have no idea. Why don't you try describing the problem you are having and maybe we will be able to help you? |
|
|
|
Assinine at it's finest! How can you claim such a thing. Not everything you state is the gospel and much of it is lies.
You seem to be talking about yourself. Several people reported the incident that Jackpot Bets were being pre-clicked
Strangely you seem to know (or be) all of them. including the girl from Russia whom you threatened to turn over to her own authorities for participation in an Illegal Activity of Internet Gambling.
Untrue as I have already told you. When they threaten to report us I suggested they might want to report themselves at the same time. You call my friend a troll
I'll call all three accounts you are using on this forum a troll. ~snip more repeated lies.
The problem you claim to have experienced on Jackpots can only have been caused by you or your device. I've explained how you would be able to prove if it was our fault. |
|
|
|
but I still can't help but feel it is kind of unfair.
let's say I predict $50,000 price today that price is $5,000. but as we get to November 2020 price reaches $100,000 so even if I have the biggest weight I am never going to win since those who make the best in the final month will definitely win it since they are closest to the event and can make the best prediction.
this can work with sports bet,... but it won't work for price bets.
Any suggestions on how to improve it? as I said this design works well with other types of bets like sports bet because not that much changes that can drastically affect the result of a match. but when it comes to price speculation the timing matters so in this particular case a deadline for making bets would be best. for example for 2020 thing you can limit participation to end of 2018 so there is a whole year time between the end of the participation deadline and the end of the actual price deadline. also it would be great if smaller time frames were also added alongside this 2 year deal. with a bet that is for the price in a month from now this current design makes more sense. Sounds reasonable, I passed it on to wetsuit. |
|
|
|
but I still can't help but feel it is kind of unfair.
let's say I predict $50,000 price today that price is $5,000. but as we get to November 2020 price reaches $100,000 so even if I have the biggest weight I am never going to win since those who make the best in the final month will definitely win it since they are closest to the event and can make the best prediction.
this can work with sports bet,... but it won't work for price bets.
Any suggestions on how to improve it? |
|
|
|
he means that there is a code that resets all those checkboxes to default state of unchecked
this javascript will run and automatically do initialization whenever users open or reload the site
it's a standard practice of script writing to initialize/reset all inputs to default values onload
so the code exists for all users, not only for you...
This is correct. As it is Javascript that executes locally you can read the source so if there had ever been anything in it that caused the boxes to be checked you would be able to produce a copy of that code and prove it. The gormless troll thinks that just be repeating his false accusation over and over ad-infinitum it somehow becomes true. |
|
|
|
Everybody knows casino is full of manipulation, that's why they get their bad name. And online casino is the worst because almost no one supervise them at all, talking about evidence lmao, no casino is stupid enough to let player get evidence that they are cheating, but don't believe what they are saying about fairness, just think like 90% of people are actually losing in gambling, give me 1 story that people are actually becoming rich gambling and are having quality lives. Even though you win 1 time, you will lose if you keep gambling. I don't even want to try to understand their questionable mechanism, just think this way, if they give you nearly 50% chance, there's almost same chance that casino will lose if player gamble huge, do you think they will let this happen? So why are we wasting our time letting those people getting rich. If you have crypto, invest it or trade it, don't be stupid and gamble them away, simple enough.
Go away and do some research about how provably fair works. It is the thing that differentiates Bitcoin casinos from fiat ones as it actually does allow the customer to prove fairness rather than rely on a government agency just certifying an RNG. That's why we have a good name with people that understand it and it is only the people like yourself who are too lazy to find out the facts who still believe there is manipulation. We moved from Belize to BVI well over a year ago. I only insult idiots that get everything wrong and are too thick to accept that when they are corrected. |
|
|
|
What is the best way to communicate with them?
Here.
 |
|
|
|
This must be the biggest prize I have ever seen from a free game, but I guess the tickets are not free,,, so that is only fair to those who want to play. I have one query to ask here however. What would the value of BTC be for a person like me who if I won probably cannot afford to pay for the customs tax of the lambo? Is the BTC prize already set aside or will the value be calculated after the winner is found?
It's BTC value of the US list price of the Lambo when the competition ends.
Can you explain exactly how the WEIGHT MULTIPLIER works?
Can you make the example with the same bet of 0.1 BTC with 100% and 30% WEIGHT MULTIPLIER?
What change if the odds are the same?
0.1 BTC at 100% weight will have a weight of 100+100% = 0.1*200 = 20 0.1 BTC at 30% weight will have a weight of 100+30% = 0.1*130 = 13 So total weight is 33, and on winning first bet will receive 20/33 of the pot and 2nd will receive 13/33.
shouldn't there be a maximum deadline to participate in each of these "bets" that were introduced in the new feature called "BETTING"?
for example the one which is a bet on bitcoin price in 2020 is set to occur in 2020 or 626+ days from now. does this mean people can make bets starting from today up until 2020? if that is so then it is a very unfair game because the closer we get to that point the easier it is to make a closer bet so if anybody made a bet today they are going against others in the future with more advantage.
if it has a deadline then it should be mentioned in another countdown timer alongside this current and only timer.
The countdown timer is the deadline. Getting in early on the pot with heavy weights makes your small bet today be much bigger than another persons bet closer to the date.
Wow, it looks very interesting and exciting! I'm definitely going to try betting on Freebitco.in.
But I hope that you're going to add more short term events, like individual football matches, winner of certain F1 races and something similar. Because now some events have too long duration to wait. For example, betting on Bitcoin price by the end of this year or winner of F1 championship - these events will finnish only after more than half year. And weight multiplier looks like an interesting thing, but so far I haven't looked in deep how it works.
I've suggested that to wetsuit. |
|
|
|
legit = not licensed ?  legit = no public bank account? How is Coinbase or Bitstamp if Bitfinex is legit? Legit = not needing a licence. Nobodies bank account is public. Coinbase and Bitstamp chose to succumb to state supervision. ...and guess what.... Mad mayax has forgotten all about the bad things he claimed were about to happen. |
|
|
|
Holding 1 ticket will give you a fair chance of winning that lambo but whales will surely have more chances. I am planning to hold atleast 4-5 tickets if possible since the raffle is provably fair then we all have a small chances of taking home a brand new lambo
Do Freebitco.in has a raffle for lambo? That's great well I think many whales will do take this advantage. They will surely buy a lot of tickets in order for them to have a higher chance of winning. Maybe 500 tickets or so. It's a lottery so obviously the more tickets you have the more chance you have to win but that doesn't mean that someone with only 1 ticket can't win. The new Betting tab is now live where you can place bets on the outcome Game of Thrones, the winner of the Formula 1 driver's championship, the cricket world cup, UEFA champions league and the exact Bitcoin price at the end of this year and next year. |
|
|
|
If the main purpose is to join the Lambo lottery, buying tickets only is better than wagering but if someone is a real gambler in this site who want to try to make money from the Hi/Lo game then he/she will do wagering as usual while at the same time he/she is collecting tickets for the Lambo. In this case, if you have only 0.005btc to spend, it is better to buy 25 tickets instead of trying to bet all in with 1.01 payout. If you want to bet, I suggest to bet smaller amount but do bet as much as possible.  Or, just be more cautious. Wager as much as you dare, and then use the wins/profits to wager some more or to buy tickets direct. But I agree, if you only have 500k satoshi, then you're better off buying 25 tickets. 1.01 payout is only 95% chance to win or around that. Then therefore you have 1/20 chance of losing it all. Definitely not worth it to do all in. Like all gambling you'll be better off if you win. There's no definitive better way to get tickets it just depends if you want to take a risk to possibly get more or not. PS. This forum has a great ignore function for imbecile trolls who like talking to themselves. |
|
|
|
Why fools? These exchange has some issues with deposing/withdrawal? I'm not quite familiar with Bitfinex previous work experience and why minimum equity threshold was used.
this guy's one and only passion in life is appearing on any exchange thread he can find and attempting to scare people. it doesn't matter what the exchange is, or what the news is. it's seriously, seriously weird. there are only few legit exchangers. Bitfinex is not one of them. It is not licensed, it has no public bank account, no real office, nothing... Here, you can read more : https://twitter.com/bitfinexedhttps://www.reddit.com/r/bitfinexLol, mad Mayax returns from the dead. All his predictions of Bitfinex doing an exit scam and Tether collapsing have not materialized. So he and bitfinexed just keep repeating the same bullshit and Bitfinex continues to run a legit, successful business. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
