I think you need to understand that the people answering you have used ChipMixer many times so they know it is trustworthy and they wouldn't risk their reputation on this forum advertising a scam.


ChipMixer makes large sums through donations and it would be stupid to selective scam dust and lose the reputation they have built. Your theory is quite frankly ludicrous.


They were trying to help you to understand where you might have gone wrong.

There is no legal requirement to have a licence for a Bitcoin casino. Three people will tell you that the Lambo is real. The odds of winning a lottery are proportional to the number of tickets bought not the number of registered accounts. The company details are on every transactional email we send you.

They hadn't gone you just couldn't see them because the minimum bonus is 1000.

You don't have to deposit to be eligible so it's not strictly speaking a deposit bonus. Mahdirakib is correct about how it works.

They are a different type of site to us. We are both a faucet and a casino where you are welcome to play for free. They are a casino with a faucet that can either be used as a 'try before you buy" option or as a reward for loyal customers. There's a ranking system that increases the faucet for doing certain things. I once withdraw about $150 of ETH that came from the faucet and I got lucky at roulette with. They don't consider that faucet abuse because also I previously made many deposits and gambled with my own money.

---

That's correct and the reason we didn't use dead heat rules in the boxing match. We have previously done so in T20 cricket games and it was stated in the decision logic of the bet so everyone knew in advance.

It doesn't. juzaza is just a bitter, twisted, failed thief. He's sore because I banned him for multi-accounting faucet abuse.

The same as the Romain Grosjean bets, nothing. In parimutuel betting, it wouldn't be fair to the other bettors that placed their bets based on what was in the prize pool at the time to remove anything from that prize pool. If you bet early to get a higher time weight multiplier then you also take a greater risk of circumstances changing before the event happens. The same thing could happen to another driver if they have a bad crash in practice and can't participate on race day.
In the event of an unlisted replacement driver winning the race then all bets will be refunded.

Trump's strategy has been clear from the start. He wants to create enough doubt in the members of the Electoral College to make them Faithless.

We should know how successful he is by 14th December. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11641

The only deposit bonus we ever did was a 48hr period when you got free Golden Tickets for depositing but people abused it by just constantly depositing and withdrawing the same coin.

I agree with you but wetsuit overruled my decision on the grounds that we don't have that stated in any ToS or the bet details. It's easier to refund it as void than answering all the complaints from Tyson bettors that got back less than the staked.

It doesn't install anything it just enables push notifications to your operating system. It will tell you when the 5x RP bonus has started and stuff like that.

We usually do include the draw option but when draws are very unlikely we sometimes use the 50% of bet odds option instead. It was just an oversight in forgetting to write that bit in decision logic section this time.

That might be logical but it wouldn't be fair. Normally when sportsbooks offer a 2-way bet when a draw/tie is a remote possibility, in the event of a draw each side gets paid out 50% of the bet odds. In this case that would mean those that bet on Tyson would get back less then they bet. As we forgot to state the 50% payout rule in the Decision Logic section of the details we've decided just to refund the bet.

---

You're right that you can't make sports betting provably fair. As we offer parimutuel (player versus player) betting it doesn't make any difference to us who wins or loses so I've got no incentive for match-fixing  .

Thanks for posting. It was the first time I knew about it.



That's understandable, given the amount of work you are doing. "It's only those who do nothing that make no mistakes", as the saying goes.

However, I think if those who placed their bets on "$12,001 - $21,500" region requested to cancel their bets, their request should be granted.
[/quote]

I think it was an obvious typo. There can't be overlapping ranges because there would be 2 winning outcomes. I think the 90 odd people that bet on it before it was corrected were trying to exploit the mistake.

You are right it's a typo. 12 should be 21. I Changed all the ranges because of the new price zone we are in and despite checking my own work 3 times before putting it up I still made a mistake.

---

The 2020 bet has been up over a year so the early bettors will get more from the Time Weight Multiplier and the outcomes you can bet on are different.

Actually making a concession speech.


Saying he'll allow his team to work with a transition team in the same breath as saying he's continuing to fight isn't a concession. While it is still being contested by him it isn't an official result until the Electoral College decide it, whatever low percentage chance people think he has of success.

The one I spotted was not so final.


Source: https://twitter.com/JonLemire/status/1331015298774949889

No. As I just explained actually abusing the faucet will get you banned. Having another account just to earn interest that you don't use for free rolls is fine.

No. You can only get banned breach of our ToS.




You could achieve something like that by enabling 2fa and only keeping a paper copy of the secret key and deleting your cookies.
 

That's the simple solution if you want to separate balances so you don't accidentally gamble them. There's really no point us making complex changes when the same result can be so easily achieved already.