|
I am french and I have no idea what a french toast is.
|
|
|
|
ok thanks. I had to send you 0.01 BTC as I run bitcoin version 0.3.19. I guess you won't mind  transaction hash is d462627b042f24cb212fe51a595deef13527fec3b3a44c11d60fca8ca002c2eb Thems like you should have updated your client. Until now there is no confirmation for your transaction  should be coming. I am not always connected so sometimes it takes some time as the client has to resend transactions. Please be patient. |
|
|
|
ok thanks. I had to send you 0.01 BTC as I run bitcoin version 0.3.19. I guess you won't mind transaction hash is d462627b042f24cb212fe51a595deef13527fec3b3a44c11d60fca8ca002c2eb |
|
|
|
.001
Ok, then the auction is ended, as I accept your offer. A password should never be sent clearly trhough internet. Please use the following public key to cypher the login/password: Edit. removed public key link. |
|
|
|
Well, actually the thing is I don't want to give them a real email address, and they implemented a security against mailinator-like addresses.
I guess if that's all (you had me worried it was for some devious purpose), I'd be willing to do it for 0.05 BTC. (I'm desperate) Wow, that a very very low starting price for a reverse auction  ! If nobody asks for a smaller price in the next minutes or so, I'll end the auction and accept your offer. |
|
|
|
If you don't mind me asking, why do you not want to agree to the Youtube user conditions?
Well, actually the thing is I don't want to give them a real email address, and they implemented a security against mailinator-like addresses. |
|
|
|
Interesting...so if Person A creates an account with Company C and agrees to their ToS, and then Person B purchases Person A's account voluntarily, then is Person B bound to the ToS that Person A agreeded to with Company C?
I don't know and I don't care. I just buy a login/passwd from person A. |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to post messages on youtube but I don't want to go through the registration process, nor do I want to accept their user conditions.
So I start this reverse auction for a login/password on youtube.
Auction will end on block 123,000
I may cancel the auction if at the end I'm not happy with the finite price.
|
|
|
|
|
Strongly agree can mean a lot of stuffs. It can mean for instance that you feel passionnate about it, and that you could debate during a long time with someone who disagree. It can mean that you could be willing to put yourself in danger in order to defend this idea. Or that you could put some money into it.
Gandhi (one of the famous people mentionned as a left libertarian in the politicalcompass website) strongly believed in his principles and yet he was non-violent.
|
|
|
|
J'aurais aimé rencontrer des gens lors de conférence… pour parler d'open money…
Tu parles de ça ? |
|
|
|
|
Caveden, I agree with what you said about abolitionnists being seen as extremists at their time, but you lost me when you say ethics is a matter of logic. To me it is just not, really.
The exemple of someone defending his property is a good exemple. Some people don't even believe in property. "Property is theft", as Proudhon said. So, those people can think they have the right to take other people belongings, with force if necessary. To you and me it is silly and outrageous, but for them it is highly moral. And logic has nothing to do with this.
|
|
|
|
Yup, acting that way would put us all in the red square One to the middle would most likely believe "people can change", and indeed does as they accumulate life experiences, and would wait for it. And then you would have those others who, being in the middle, are too strong upon a single subject alone. As this test goes around many subjects and not measuring how "strongly" do you agree to one particular issue. Also, most people believe it's not morally acceptable to judge people for their beliefs. People must be judge for their acts, not their thoughts. There is no such think that a "mental criminal". But now, even this is nothing but a belief. You can agree with it, or not. And if you don't you are probably in a red square anyway. This whole thing is too complex to make any sense. I think I'll become a nihilist after this debate  |
|
|
|
That's not consistency, that's to have strong positions towards all and everything, which is by itself violent. That "non-violence" principle has way too many nags and bugs. Specially that all of it keeps a secondary threat of "self-defense". "Self-defense" is OK if you're dealing with people one can negotiate with, but to people in the edges and corners negotiation is impossible, so they end up with violent reactions claiming to be self-defending. A bit like the view of Bin Laden, he wasn't "attacking" WTC, he was "self-defending" of something that contradicts his fanatic views and therefore was, for him, a threat. I colored some squares for a better demonstrative purpose (as I'm not English, American or even use English as native language, native would be Portuguese):  People falling to the red are extremely dangerous, those stand strong for all and everything and you can't try to deal with them as their minds are set (and if they're muslims probably "set to blow"). It doesn't quite matter on which of the corners they stand, they're equally dangerous. Yeah, I think you're right. We should make sure everyone takes this test, and then we'll put all people who fall in the red squares into jail, until we execute them for the greater good. Hum wait... if I think this way, shouldn't I be placed in a red square too? Oh gosh... |
|
|
|
Sorry, but I read the first question, "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.", and realized that this quiz was totally biased, poorly written, and limited.
+1 I also thought this question was totally biased, but then I just answered "Disagree", as I don't understand what the heck the epression "serve humanity" means. |
|
|
|
I pledge 1000 BTC if the girl is topless.
Any requirement specs for boob size? I also would like to know. Just to make it clear: I was kidding guys, don't have your girlfriend do something like that, you won't get the 1000BTC |
|
|
|
|
I'd like to add:
"What if some people start an other block chain? Or ten of them? Won't that depreciate bitcoin's value?"
"What if miners collude to reward themselves more bitcoins?"
And above all:
"Since bitcoins are not backed by anything, aren't they ultimately worthless?"
PS. But aren't all these questions in the FAQ already? What am I missing?
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect you have added the total aggregates for all currencies. If so, I doubt this makes any sense. Different currencies don't add one another.
|
|
|
|
In my mind, if Bitcoin took over the world then your ideal society would be impossible to accomplish unless it is on small closed communities.
Why would left libertarians not be happy with that? As long as they can do whatever they want inside their community, they are fine, aren't they? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
