You're the one talking about religion.
But since religion occurs naturally among humans, you shouldn't apply your moral judgements to it.
BIM THANK YOU!!! So as Homosexuality occurs naturally among humans you shouldn't apply your moral judgements to it right?  But people also naturally find homosexuality disgusting. Now what? Well I naturally find religion so disgusting I wanna burn religious people alive. Now what? |
|
|
|
Why do Catholics believe in a different set of 10 commandments than protestant Christians?
Why ? Because Catholics, like the Orthodoxes, are true Christian, while the Prostants are just morron that tolerate what should not and are a bit retarded. Ahahah xD It's just too cool to see you saying this. There is ONE WAY and only ONE WAY! You dumb piece of shit ^^ |
|
|
|
Hmmm...why would this sort of thing not be allowed? I would imagine that a minor couldn't have a brokerage account to trade things like stocks, but having a bitcoin wallet is different and these bitcoin exchanges don't ask for your age when you sign up for the most basic membership. What kind of trading, btc--->altcoin or btc<--->fiat? That might make a big difference.
If kiddo trades on someone else's account, I don't see where the problem would be. Maybe there are some bitcoin lawyers around here?
It's not allowed for minors, but you can make them trade on someone else account yes. But he can't have his own account and do his own trading ^^ |
|
|
|
|
It's a scam. I don't know what it is and I don't care, anything giving you out 12% of interest on btc is a scam.
|
|
|
|
And why is it bad to be Marxist and/or critical about capitalism? You seem to love capitalism so much it's an argument in itself TECHShare... Because marxism destroys entire societies and is directly responsible for the deaths of several dozens of millions of people. Marxism is not the opposite of capitalism, and one can criticize marxism without implicitly supporting capitalism. Meh? What the fuck are you talking about? Capitalism is responsible for millions more death than Marxism... You seem completely biased ^^ Let me say it again... CAPITALISM IS NOT THE OPPOSITE OF MARXISMJust because Marxist rhetoric is anticapitalist does not make Capitalism its counterpart. Criticizing Marxism is not automatically a defense of Capitalism. I am criticizing Marxism here, not cheer leading for Capitalism. The only reason you have to bring up Capitalism is so you can distract from the reality that Marxism has DIRECTLY caused millions of deaths. I am not bias, I am informed and educated about the history of Marxism, Communism, and Socialism and know how very destructive it is to entire nations. As a matter of fact Marxism's entire purpose is to tear down society to make way for Socialism, then Communism. This is from Karl Marx's own mouth. Your accusation of bias is a logical fallacy. You claim because I am antimarxist, that I must be procapitalist. Capitalism is not under discussion here, Marxism is. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/black-or-whitehttps://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominemhttps://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoqueHere is JUST PART of the horrors of Marxism from one single regime: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomorhttps://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/september/naimark-stalin-genocide-092310.htmlhttp://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/04/was_the_starvation_of_the_kula.htmlLol, here you go with your logical fallacies shit again xD While making my point in your own answer, thx. You just said Marxism is here to makes way for socialism and communism, which are the opposite of capitalism. Hence Marxism is the opposite of capitalism, or at least the first step of the opposite of capitalism but here it's just semantic xD Capitalism is directly responsible for millions and millions of deaths since the begining of history... Crusades, wars, genocides, WWI and WWII, every USA wars, colonialism... It's all due to capitalism. You might be educated but you're clearly not intelligent or objective. Sure Staline + Mao makes a great combo, but it's only 2 events ^^ |
|
|
|
I don't see too much chance for some sort of "racial reconciliation". Racism is a good business on all levels. The political elite often exploiting ethnic tensions to keep us divided, distracted and/or get more votes (e.g.: "If you want a nigger for a neighbour, vote Labour").
Racism kills people, you dumb shit. How old are you? Who let you on the internet? He never said the contrary, he just said they (governments and banks and shit like them) won't let you go for your racial reconciliation because they use racial tensions. And I clearly agree with Snail2 |
|
|
|
I don't generally like the idea that I am going to say now, but it is a reasonably logical idea anyway. This idea is that even if I thought in the direction that God and religion were silly, I would do my best to become a Christian, anyway. Why? Because nobody knows that God does NOT exist. And if He does exist after all, I would NOT want to miss out on salvation. Besides, Christians have a great life these days, even if somehow God did not exist, and even if the grave happened to be final. So, why not attempt to turn and believe in God, just to cover your bet, so to speak.  What you're talking about is a well know logical fallacy called the Pascal's bet. It was explained by Blaise Pascal, a French philosopher and scientist. It is wrong in numerous way. First one is: what if God is not the good one? You talk about Jesus and shit but for Muslims if you follow Christian God you're also going to hell. So which God is the good one? You are very smart. You have a lot of work to do hedging your bet in all the different ways you can think of. I suppose you might go nuts if you tried to hedge your bet all those ways. Maybe you should simply go out and kill yourself with pleasure... "Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die." Oh it's funny you no longer have an answer here? Seems like I won over BADecker! |
|
|
|
So I've finally reached the end with the reading. And I'll say one thing: what the hell...
This is to for all the religious people: believe what you want, that's ok, but don't try to impose your craziness on others. You know how gay people are told that they can do whatever they want in the privacy of their own home? Do the same. Stop forcing people believe what you believe. We have the internet, we have libraries - we'll read, inform ourselves and decide for ourselves.
Thank you very much!
Best regards
(yeah, ok, that last one was a joke)
Not much to read to decide... Just read the first 20 pages of the Bible then see the Truth: They're dumb as hell ^^ |
|
|
|
The oldest near factual distance we can go back is barely 5,000 years. Carbon dating has proven itself unreliable. Sumer dating through the "pottery" method suggests an age possibly as far back as 5,000 years. And even that is not a certainty. We can tell that the earth is older than that, but we can't tell haw old beyond that. We absolutely have a lot of guesses, however. Since they are guesses, people who believe them as fact have a religion going for themselves. Carbon dating is absolutely not unreliable whatever you say. And not only that but carbon dating is not the only method we use to date old things. It's plain stupidity to think that the world is 5k years old. The fact that carbon dating is unreliable isn't my idea by any means. Google it. Even tree ring and ice core samplings are judgmental in the ways they are used to date things. We might be able to go back a little past 4,500 years or so, but beyond that, it becomes very unclear - dating pottery and written-on-clay fragments. Lingual and genetic changes seem to trace back only to about 5,000 years. Beyond that even these kinds of datings become foggy. What else is there other than guesswork? FOGGY? WTF??? Carbon dating is EXTREMELY RELIABLE! Yeah go and Google it! Seems you need to: "The reliability of the results can be improved by lengthening the testing time. For example, if counting beta decays for 250 minutes is enough to give an error of ± 80 years, with 68% confidence." It means you have 70% to have the right date with 80 years error. So if you do it 10 times in a row, you have A FUCKING GOOD RELIABILITY!!! And again carbon 14 datation is not at all the only one used by scientists! Do you even know how it works? |
|
|
|
The hype is definitely over, ETH continue to go down where it belongs.
I don't understand why some people paid for this train. It was an obvious scam! Price can't just go up like this without any reason! The price has risen too fast for the Ethereum in the last month. So it is reasonable for the drop to happen. Yeah but how could people buy? I mean if tomorrow btc goes over 500 I won't buy!!! It means there will be some kind of manipulation of the market, something that I don't understand. Be cautious when investing ^^ |
|
|
|
Well it's a good extract! I shall just take it out next time someone says "but it's so stupid to see Muslims not eating porks, at least there is nothing like this in the Bible it would be dumb" ^^
Newsflash: Not many Christians have actually read the bible... they have no clue what it says The quickest path to becoming an Atheist is reading the bible... I doubt many Christians would get past Deuteronomy before becoming an Atheist I'm neither Christians nor Atheist but I tried to read the Bible. I never past the page 15. It's probably the worst book ever! A style that could kill you of boredom and absolutely 0 sense or substance! Not to get technical, but if you don't believe in a god... that's the definition of Atheist Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities. In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Most inclusively, atheism is the absence of belief that any deities exist. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which, in its most general form, is the belief that at least one deity exists Hmm... Well I consider myself as an agnostic. Atheism is to refuse the existence of God. I don't refuse the possibility, but I have no faith either. You're an Atheist if you believe there is no God, not if you don't believe there is a God ^^ |
|
|
|
It should never hit 100$ again, since there is so much money invested in it as it is. It is the gold standard for the speculative cryptocurrency.
you're right, it probably will never happen, I would argue that even the lowest standards bitcoin today is $ 350, and currently riding for $ 450 and will further increase It could perfectly go this down if any miner dump his stock for example, or if a big holder like satoshi dumps everything. But no need to worry about it as it's totally unpredictable. if any ordinary miner dumps his stock then the price cannot go this much down as he don't have enough bitcoins to crash the bitcoin price. But if a big mining company or any other enterprise dump their bitcoin then the scenario will be different. Yeah so price could always crash like hell, we can't know. But that seems rather unlikely as it wouldn't profit anyone! |
|
|
|
And why is it bad to be Marxist and/or critical about capitalism? You seem to love capitalism so much it's an argument in itself TECHShare... Because marxism destroys entire societies and is directly responsible for the deaths of several dozens of millions of people. Marxism is not the opposite of capitalism, and one can criticize marxism without implicitly supporting capitalism. Meh? What the fuck are you talking about? Capitalism is responsible for millions more death than Marxism... You seem completely biased ^^ |
|
|
|
The hype is definitely over, ETH continue to go down where it belongs.
I don't understand why some people paid for this train. It was an obvious scam! Price can't just go up like this without any reason! |
|
|
|
I don't generally like the idea that I am going to say now, but it is a reasonably logical idea anyway. This idea is that even if I thought in the direction that God and religion were silly, I would do my best to become a Christian, anyway. Why? Because nobody knows that God does NOT exist. And if He does exist after all, I would NOT want to miss out on salvation. Besides, Christians have a great life these days, even if somehow God did not exist, and even if the grave happened to be final. So, why not attempt to turn and believe in God, just to cover your bet, so to speak. What you're talking about is a well know logical fallacy called the Pascal's bet. It was explained by Blaise Pascal, a French philosopher and scientist. It is wrong in numerous way. First one is: what if God is not the good one? You talk about Jesus and shit but for Muslims if you follow Christian God you're also going to hell. So which God is the good one? |
|
|
|
The oldest near factual distance we can go back is barely 5,000 years. Carbon dating has proven itself unreliable. Sumer dating through the "pottery" method suggests an age possibly as far back as 5,000 years. And even that is not a certainty. We can tell that the earth is older than that, but we can't tell haw old beyond that. We absolutely have a lot of guesses, however. Since they are guesses, people who believe them as fact have a religion going for themselves. Carbon dating is absolutely not unreliable whatever you say. And not only that but carbon dating is not the only method we use to date old things. It's plain stupidity to think that the world is 5k years old. |
|
|
|
EVERYONE wants bigger blocks, except for these guys, and it's not because they are all knowing gods and know what's best for us. there are many poeple that understand the nitty gritty details who agree bigger blocks is safe.
From what I saw it seems like bigger block is at least canted by all users. It's the miners who don't want it? |
|
|
|
Well it's a good extract! I shall just take it out next time someone says "but it's so stupid to see Muslims not eating porks, at least there is nothing like this in the Bible it would be dumb" ^^
Newsflash: Not many Christians have actually read the bible... they have no clue what it says The quickest path to becoming an Atheist is reading the bible... I doubt many Christians would get past Deuteronomy before becoming an Atheist I'm neither Christians nor Atheist but I tried to read the Bible. I never past the page 15. It's probably the worst book ever! A style that could kill you of boredom and absolutely 0 sense or substance! |
|
|
|
I think holding your bitcoins infinitely is not a good choice too, same as selling when the price fall. I think the user should some limits for himself and only sell at these limits. If people here recall the $1200 climb, Selling at that price was a great choice for the traders IMO.
Holding without limit means you just totally switch to btc. That means you have so much faith in btc you're ready to bet everything that btc will survive on usd... That's one hell of a bet ^^ |
|
|
|
It should never hit 100$ again, since there is so much money invested in it as it is. It is the gold standard for the speculative cryptocurrency.
you're right, it probably will never happen, I would argue that even the lowest standards bitcoin today is $ 350, and currently riding for $ 450 and will further increase It could perfectly go this down if any miner dump his stock for example, or if a big holder like satoshi dumps everything. But no need to worry about it as it's totally unpredictable. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
