Bitcoin Forum
July 07, 2024, 08:50:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 ... 468 »
1921  Other / Politics & Society / Re: TRUMP WINS on: November 10, 2016, 02:21:36 PM
Californians are fucking retarded. Right, seceed from a powerful union with no guns. You don't believe in the 2nd amendment, so don't reneg now that you need it. Liberals getting violent in protests. Yanking people from cars, shooting people. Real smart. Meanwhile, the rest of the country is working normally.

Yep, we're the land of fruits and nuts. I've lived in Norcal for 35 years and always been amazed at how completely crazy the people are. Nothing they do seems to make any sense.

San Francisco is ground zero for gay rights but was the only place that voted against gay marriage.

They protest in favor of freedom and democracy at every turn but vote against gun owner rights at every opportunity.

There are more GMO crop protests in California than any other state but they grow more GMO crops than any other state.

They are holding some of the biggest protests to protect Dakota Indian land water from pollution but have some of the most polluted aquifers in the nation.

I think everyone in California is stoned most of the time.

1922  Other / Politics & Society / Re: TRUMP WINS on: November 10, 2016, 02:03:23 PM

This is most likely the same group of millennials that protested to pardon Edward Snowden for releasing inside government communications. Hillary the great floodmeister of top secret emails should be president?

What was in those cheerios we fed our kids in the 80s and 90s? LSD? It seems to have made them retarded.
1923  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The FCA Is Testing Bitcoin Cross-Border Transactions on: November 10, 2016, 08:42:24 AM
I guess they are just using bitcoin to test the blockchain technology. Bitcoin is too expensive for them to use for their purposes due to the limited number of transactions/second. They can set up a new bitcoin-like blockchain network when the experiment is successful.

You win a gold star. No one else seems to see that all the testing on Bitcoins blockchain will do nothing for Bitcoin.



Microsoft Azure is offering an Ethereum private blockchain network! Isn't that great for Bitcoin! To the moon! Smart contracts for the win! Yippee!

No, actually it's not great for Bitcoin. It won't shoot any Bitcoin rockets to the moon! NASA won't be involved. All it means is more and more companies are figuring out what's good about Bitcoin so they can duplicate it privately.
1924  Other / Politics & Society / Re: TRUMP WINS on: November 10, 2016, 07:16:41 AM
The sense that America is more divided than it used to be is backed by hard data. There’s been a sharp spike in the contempt that partisans express for their opponents, according to Pew Research Center polling.  More than 4 in 10 Democrats and Republicans say the other party’s policies are so misguided that they pose a threat to the nation.

I wonder if it'd help for California to secede, as some people are now advocating. I think that a large portion of Democrats are located in California, so there'd be a lot fewer Democrats who would have to worry about Republican policies, and vice-versa.

how did you embed the video? it doesn't work when i try and do it.

You can't. Wink

Texas v. White (1869)

In deciding the merits of a bond issue, the court held that the Constitution did not permit states to unilaterally secede from the United States, and that the ordinances of secession, and all the acts of the legislatures within seceding states intended to give effect to such ordinances, were "absolutely null".

The Articles of Confederation, formally the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, was an agreement among all thirteen original states in the United States of America that served as its first constitution. Its drafting by a committee appointed by the Second Continental Congress began on July 12, 1776, and an approved version was sent to the states for ratification in late 1777. The formal ratification by all thirteen states was completed in early 1781. Government under the Articles was superseded by a new constitution and federal form of government in 1789. Now under constitutional rule the existing number of states cannot be increased and no state or territory may unilaterally decide it no longer chooses to remain a part and parcel of the United States of America.

The above is the reason Puerto Rico, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa are not states. They are classified as unincorporated territories.

Any attempt of a local state or territory government that attempts to secede would likely be met with martial law from federal troops. That would either cause a retraction of the attempt or create a bloody civil war. I seriously doubt the pretentious pussys that live in multimillion dollar homes all around me in California, the ones that passed an assault rifle ban, would be able to muster up the forces to defeat a small army of heavily armed field mice. ROFL

1925  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Dubai accepts Bitcoin on: November 10, 2016, 05:14:04 AM
Do you people read anything you're commenting on?  That article doesn't mention Bitcoin at all. They're thinking about making their own Blockchain for "Dubai Points" (whatever the fuck that is). Does nothing for us.
1926  Other / Politics & Society / Re: TRUMP WINS on: November 09, 2016, 09:58:57 PM
Why did either candidate make it to the last two? One, a real estate mogul billionaire with no government experience. The other, a traitor to the country and a pathological liar saying whatever and anything it takes to sway popularity.
Trump was nowhere near a president the US wanted nor expected, but a capitalist businessman vs. a traitor running for the country became a no brainer.

I notice a lot of foreigners commenting and they just don't get it and don't get why.
People here are FUCKING SICK of the Obama terms doing nothing but say one thing, do another. Furthering problems and lying, allowing terrorism, and being a bunch of soft pussies against today's issues.

Everyone failed to mention, Bernie Sanders would have won if Clinton didn't manipulate the media, control an email scandal to use power to shut out Bernie. Simply, Bernie Sanders supporters just said "FUCK YOU" to the controlled establishment just for spite. The election was thrown for Trump to spite that lying, traitorous cunt. If you can't see that and didn't know that, maybe you shouldn't talk politics because you don't know whats even going on in this country here. Nothing to do with Trump. Everything to do with fuck Hillary and her intent to lie her way to office and then further our problems, war, and special interests. If we could have had better, we would have flushed out the entire government. Throw them all the fuck out. That's too drastic. This is drastic enough.

Absolutely right, no one voted for Trump except a bunch of looney rednecks in the heartland but everyone voted against Clinton. Trump was just the one left standing. The perfect example why the "first past the post" two party system doesn't work.
1927  Other / Politics & Society / Re: TRUMP WINS on: November 09, 2016, 09:55:30 PM
It's far worse than you people are discussing. Psychopaths Republicans won the presidency, the house and the senate. During Donald Ducks presidency he will appoint a majority rule to the Supreme Court because of open seats and aging magistrates. This will give the "oh fuck me" I mean "GOP" complete control of every branch of government. This is an almost unprecedented control of the United States by nigger/beaner hating white christian lunatics.
1928  Other / Politics & Society / Re: TRUMP WINS on: November 09, 2016, 03:09:37 PM




1929  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? on: November 09, 2016, 02:16:50 PM
So I guess murrica agrees with us. Hitlery Cunton isn't trustworthy.

PS: All you brown and black people have one week to leave before whitie rounds you up and lights up the gas chambers. ROFL
1930  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: $1.4 Billion Invested in Bitcoin & Blockchain Investments on: November 09, 2016, 04:03:27 AM
Blockchain technologies ≠ Bitcoin

Just the opposite, development of commercial Blockchain use, especially by mainstream banks with fraud protection, will most certainly end any public desire for Bitcoin. Why would you use Bitcoin when you can have a professionally developed system that's automatically fully integrated into society?
...
I think you know why. I would not even consider using bank-chains. Hell bitcoin is exactly rejecting using a professional system fully integrated into society, i.e. fiat.

Of course you would, you still know better even after all the bad media attention Bitcoin has had.

I'm talking about the average joe that would never even consider using Mark Karpeles' and Trendon Shavers Bitcoin. They will believe they are getting the best part of Bitcoin without the risk.
1931  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: $1.4 Billion Invested in Bitcoin & Blockchain Investments on: November 08, 2016, 01:35:31 PM
Blockchain technologies ≠ Bitcoin

Just the opposite, development of commercial Blockchain use, especially by mainstream banks with fraud protection, will most certainly end any public desire for Bitcoin. Why would you use Bitcoin when you can have a professionally developed system that's automatically fully integrated into society?

Current Bitcoin devs can't rapidly solve the growing pains of Bitcoin. If some well financed company like Chase bank or Wells Fargo decided to throw money at "Blockchain Technology" it sure as hell wouldn't take a couple of years to solve the block size issue.

Bitcoins continued success still relies on young people (broke people) wanting to mine free money from the internet. How survivable will Bitcoin be in ten years when that's no longer possible?
1932  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: actual number of people using Bitcoin? on: November 07, 2016, 12:14:42 PM
Let's face the facts. The first 3 years of its history Bitcoin had been virtually unknown to a wider world, consistently reaching 50k transactions per day only by the end of 2012:

Before 2012, the number of transactions is even hard to estimate accurately. After 2012 and till now, the number of transactions has increased fivefold, and it took over 2 years to grow from 50k to just 100k (2013-mid 2015). Within the last 12 or so months this number increased over two times. Okay, Visa or Mastercard are most likely processing a lot more transactions (I don't really know by how much, so everyone is welcome to chime in on this), but what would happen to the Bitcoin network if the number of pending transactions all of sudden grew a dozen times? Would the network be able to process, say, 2,500k transactions daily? And a 250k city is by no means a tiny one, to be honest (I guess that over 90% of all cities around the world are less than that)...

Even if totally omitting that such an analogy is meaningless itself (like your other analogies)

That's a long time in cyberspace dude. Pokémon Go is six month old and has 26 million daily users. Within two years most social media sites (facebook, MySpace, etc.) had millions of users. Apple Pay is two years old and has 4 million users. AmazonPayments had over 2 million users the first year of operation. In 2012, a stock of about 17 million M-Pesa accounts had been registered in Kenya alone. That's after only 5 years in operation. In cyberspace 6 years is an eternity. Bitcoin is becoming the grandfather of online payment systems.

Are you serious about Pokémon Go and shit like that, mate? In half a year no one will give a fuck about that crap anymore (since new wacky crap will surely come about). I'm curious if you yourself really understand how skewed, distorted and biased your analogies are? What does a game have to do with a currency? On the other hand, Bitcoin is a decentralized payment processor of sorts, but there were quite a few other Internet payment processors already before it and most, if not all, had established companies backing them (Apple, Amazon, whatever)...

Bitcoin was born into tough competition with essentially nothing behind it

So you can't read past the first sentence of a post, huh? What does M-Pesa, AmazonPayments and Apple Pay have to do with Bitcoin? Um, let's see? Everything since they're younger than Bitcoin and overtaking Bitcoin's payment processor markets. Masses of businesses that used to accept Bitcoin have stopped taking Bitcoin because no one uses Bitcoin to shop there. Even Patrick Byrne from overstock.com, the huge supporter of businesses that accept Bitcoin, said he would eventually stop accepting Bitcoin when the final iteration of "virtual gold" is widespread.
1933  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: bitcoin without china, how would it look? on: November 06, 2016, 12:50:25 PM
You'll get to see for yourself in three to seven years. At the next reward drop or possibly the one after that it will become unprofitable to mine bitcoins for just the reward profit. All the old mining hardware the Chinese are using will need to be replaced and updated. The massive cost of hardware replacement combined with the reward drop will most likely make the large Chinese farm owners move on to more profitable investments.

Based on the current cost of Bitcoin in three years for profit to remain flat (taking inflation and reward drop into account) Bitcoin will need to maintain a cost above $2,775 a coin and the transaction fee would need to double. In seven years the price of Bitcoin will need to be $5,130 a coin and the reward fee will need to increase four fold for the price to be equal to today's price. Taking into account a complete replacement of aging old mining hardware (using current hardware prices which will likely increase) the price of Bitcoin in order to equal today's mining profits would need to be roughly $16,400 a coin with a ten fold increase in transaction fees. I see the Chinese and lots of other miners moving on.
1934  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: November 06, 2016, 12:02:47 PM
I know that I'm god because every time I have my face buried in some sweet little furry beaver she starts screaming "oh god".
1935  Other / Off-topic / Re: Who is the Founder of Bitcoin?! on: November 06, 2016, 11:58:56 AM
I think satoshi nakamoto really the founder of bitcoin!
Maybe he is a group of peoples that have this name or maybe one person.
It's hard to find him, he is anonymous.
By the way, I think he is a japanese man  Grin


Lol!
The name Satosh Nakamoto is obviously for a Japanese Man Smiley
But we have no assurance that he is really a Japanese as we all know that Bitcoin is popular for bidding someone's identity Smiley
Maybe Satoshi Nakamoto is just a code name or a user name when he started creating Bitcoin Wink

ROFL

That's right, Satoshi Nakamoto is code for cat loving fat French faggot that steals all the bitcoins.

1936  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: actual number of people using Bitcoin? on: November 06, 2016, 03:23:28 AM
That's a pathetic little number considering how long bitcoin has been around now. After over six years bitcoin still has fewer users WORLDWIDE than the population of a tiny city in Iran.

Let's face the facts. The first 3 years of its history Bitcoin had been virtually unknown to a wider world, consistently reaching 50k transactions per day only by the end of 2012:



Before 2012, the number of transactions is even hard to estimate accurately. After 2012 and till now, the number of transactions has increased fivefold, and it took over 2 years to grow from 50k to just 100k (2013-mid 2015). Within the last 12 or so months this number increased over two times. Okay, Visa or Mastercard are most likely processing a lot more transactions (I don't really know by how much, so everyone is welcome to chime in on this), but what would happen to the Bitcoin network if the number of pending transactions all of sudden grew a dozen times? Would the network be able to process, say, 2,500k transactions daily? And a 250k city is by no means a tiny one, to be honest (I guess that over 90% of all cities around the world are less than that)...

Even if totally omitting that such an analogy is meaningless itself (like your other analogies)

That's a long time in cyberspace dude. Pokémon Go is six month old and has 26 million daily users. Within two years most social media sites (facebook, MySpace, etc.) had millions of users. Apple Pay is two years old and has 4 million users. AmazonPayments had over 2 million users the first year of operation. In 2012, a stock of about 17 million M-Pesa accounts had been registered in Kenya alone. That's after only 5 years in operation. In cyberspace 6 years is an eternity. Bitcoin is becoming the grandfather of online payment systems.
1937  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Determine the price of bitcoin (ForExpert) (Read Now) on: November 05, 2016, 06:44:44 PM
It sounds like you're talking about a new altcoin but I guess it also applies to bitcoin as well.

 The price of almost everything is determined by the number of people who want to purchase it. That's the concept of supply and demand. If a baker bakes 100 loaves of bread and prices the loaves at a dollar each and 110 people want to buy a loaf of bread from him then the price goes up to $1.25 each.  If the Baker bakes 100 loaves of bread and only 90 people want to buy a loaf of bread then the price goes down to $.90.

 The example above is an over simplification but it gets the point across. Speculation has always, and will continue for the forseeable future, to control the price of bitcoin. When speculators buy large quantities of bitcoin the price goes up and when they sell large quantities of bitcoin price goes down. Daytraders are having great fun right now manipulating the price of bitcoin to eek out small profit margins. The problem with that whole scenario is that bitcoin still has no economy and is relatively valueless.  What that means is people are not buying bitcoin because they desperately need to make a purchase that can only be made using bitcoin it means they're simply buying bitcoin to hold for a later date when the price goes up.  Any speculator that decides to completely sell out a large quantity of bitcoins can crash the price down to nearly nothing because there is no economy.
1938  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: actual number of people using Bitcoin? on: November 05, 2016, 06:25:40 PM
Bitcoin is moving forward with very solid growth even it may take some more time to reach its all time higher price ever, but I'm pretty sure it will surpass it very soon and the future of bitcoin will be more brighter than ever.The price started increasing. More are joining into this community which ia also an indication of its immense growth.

The topic is about the actual number people using bitcoin, and you are discussing the price and the growth, for sure it is growing day by day and that is a reason why we cannot count the exact users of bitcoin because if today we counted them (though it is not possible) and tomorrow they increase again and our yesterdays estimation will be wrong again in the next day.

That's why the number of people using or having used Bitcoin has little to no relevance for the purpose of assessing the dynamics of Bitcoin adoption. Just one individual (for example, a merchant) actively and heavily using Bitcoin on a daily basis would contribute to that purpose more than a dozen of Bitcoin newbies just testing waters with Bitcoin on some faucets. The said shouldn't be misconstrued as discrimination against people who are just learning about Bitcoin, though...

As I mentioned earlier in the thread, a number of transactions processed daily would much better serve that purpose

And that's about 250k.

For perspective:

That's about the same number of people in the United States that are married to their second cousin or  closer relative.

That's about the same number of people that march on Washington in any given protest in the US.

That's about the same number of people that are arrested in Morocco every six months.

That's about the same number of people that watched the band Muse play at Wimbley stadium in the UK.

That's about the same number of people that die annually from taking illegal drugs.

That's the population of Borujerd, Iran.

That's a pathetic little number considering how long bitcoin has been around now. After over six years bitcoin still has fewer users WORLDWIDE than the population of a tiny city in Iran.
1939  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? on: November 04, 2016, 06:19:04 PM
How is she any different than any other thieving lunatic POTUS?

Nixon was a crook that quit his job to keep from being jailed.

John F. Kennedy was responsible for a coup against Abdul Salam Arif in Iraq that placed Saddam Hussein in power.

Ronald Reagan was a senile old fool that let his wife Nancy make most of the important decisions. He used to fall asleep in his chair during important ceremonies. He called his wife Nancy "mommy" and acted like she was his mommy. Before running the country he was a stand up comic and an actor. Being an actor, playing a part, I guess qualifies you to bullshit the world.

Harry S. Truman nuked major cities in Japan, not once but twice, killing men, women and children and their descendants for generations. He said he did it to end the war faster and "save lives". If that's how he saves lives I'd hate to see how he likes to kill. 0-o

George H. W. Bush was a blithering idiot that said things like, "I'm not granting amnesty but the illegals that are here can stay". He was responsible for the middle-eastern war that made Muslems hate us so much they are still terrorizing us today. His Vice President, Dan Quayle, was so stupid he couldn't spell "potato".

President Grover Cleveland was a pedophile. When Cleveland’s law partner Oscar Folsom died, Cleveland became his daughters legal guardian. Frances Folsom was 11 years old at the time. He later married her at the White House. She remains the youngest First Lady in the history of the United States, having been just 21 when they married. They were "conjugal" when she was still an illegal teen girl. Oh well, I guess it's ok to fuck a little kid if you marry them when they grow up.

Jimmy Carter believes UFOs are real and has a fear of being abducted.



1940  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How to explain bitcoin to teenagers or children on: November 04, 2016, 05:32:29 PM
Based on the vernacular of the average forum member, I'm fairly certain the Bitcoin user base is mostly teenagers and children.
I think The meaning of this thread is introduce bitcoin to teenagers and children who did know about bitcoin yet. Teenagers and children with curiousity will easier to understand about bitcoin. I think they will really interesting with youtube video. Becouse it is more easy to explain.

@questionauthority lol great punchline


Actually they(or people in general) start to have curiosity about something when they need it so I don't think childrens have to learn about bitcoin or whatever, we can see the Venezuela thing right now, so now they(all citizens) have a bit of curiosity on bitcoin and that's how to introduce people on it.

You must be one of the few adults here. You actually understood what I meant. I doubt the average 12 year old forum member here can pronounce "vernacular" and they certainly don't know the meaning.
Pages: « 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 ... 468 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!