-snip- thanks for your answer.
So I get now from where the 1Mb limit was coming from...
however, can this limit of 1 Mb per block increase over time if needed?
Yes, there are currently ongoing discussions (to put it polite, some might say an all out brawl) how to do this best. There are different approaches. Some (bitcoin classic) prefer to simple increase the limit to 2MB first and do a more fancy solution called SegWit later. This however would split the network and would require everyone to update their client. Others (bitcoin core) prefer to do SegWit first, which results in parts of the transaction (the signature) to be stored "outside" of the 1MB limit. It would allow 1.75 times as much transactions as the blocklimit, so with 1 MB it would allow 1.75 MB worth of transactions can be done without splitting the network. SegWit itself is not really a blocksize solution. It has other nice properties that make it a desirable solution. Eventually both parties want 2MB blocklimit as well as SegWit.
|
|
|
So you're thinking about what? Calling their mobile? Swinging by their home/work? Have a little patience, if shorena is not online, sho is probably busy. If sho wanted you to contact them via alternative methods, sho would have provided those.
No, defenately nothing like that... I just wondered if somebody had his/her email addy or something... Maybe icq or something similar. I get a Mail when you send me a PM, I skimmed it when I woke up a few hours ago. Did not have time for the board until now, will be answering your PM as well as the others now.
|
|
|
I will ignore 2. and 3. as they have no meaning here. If you are saying you bought the account, do you have a signed message? The TX linked by Jhanzo is the finally one for all addresses so its possible that it was some sort of cash out.
This is pretty sad coming from a member like you,giving negative feedback without investigating the matter.As I have clearly mentioned ,I had purchased the account from one of the members listed above in the list ,it doesn't link me to any of them anymore.You could simply wait for me to post proofs about the account sale without abusing your trust power before hearing both sides of the story.Requesting you to remove the feedback ,proofs will be presented as you want .What do you want to conform this account is not linked to them anymore ? What do you have that can convince me of the transfer? Based on the word of QS and Lutpin I will temporarily remove the rating as I need some sleep now. Send me a PM if you want to keep it private.
|
|
|
I should've searched more thoroughly... Patatas,
What ? lol You do suck at finding Alt's boy.Do your homework more carefully.There are other constraints you should know about the forum. 1.The accounts could be sold at the forum .2.New addresses could be staked. 3.Random guesses don't mean shit. I will ignore 2. and 3. as they have no meaning here. If you are saying you bought the account, do you have a signed message? The TX linked by Jhanzo is the finally one for all addresses so its possible that it was some sort of cash out.
|
|
|
Is there anything I can do? I still have all PMs and the PGP signed agreement.
Did you ever check the email address the account was using? That would clear things up if it was indeed ctlaltdefeat@bitcointalk.org as the seller wouldn't be able to reset password by email. I never accessed the account. I prefer to only hold the funds, ActSeller did expect me to hold the account and hold the funds at the same time though. We did it my way this time and switched to ActSellers system for other trades. The point of me holding the account is to verify that it is like described. Its essentially seller protection to make sure the buyer has no reason to back off because of the name. Thus even in those cases where I accessed the account I did not check the mail, nor do I keep a record of it. I do advise to change the password, mail address as well as the security question (or remove it). Its part of the default text for account trades. I always assumed the buyers would do these steps, as they are quite important to actually secure the account.
|
|
|
I guess that makes sense. I was thinking with a local wallet there is no database, but I was not considering the use of an old fashioned flat file database. The system you described is how I imagined the exchange sites working.
What you described are so called HD (hierarchically deterministic) wallets. They use a seed or master private key from which all other private keys are derived. Examples for wallets/services that use this method are: Electrum 1.x and 2.x, Multibit HD, Armory, blockchain.info v2/v3 (its named v3 in their git repo, but commonly refered to as v2 as Im not sure which is correct), mycelium and many others. Many wallets however do generate private keys non-deterministic like Danny described above, examples are Multibit Classic, Bitcoin Core, blockchain.info and many others. The biggest difference for the user is that HD wallets need a single backup.
|
|
|
Is there anything I can do? I still have all PMs and the PGP signed agreement.
|
|
|
-snip- For the 100days plan: I have several times said that I need the investments only for dispatching the profit. All my investors have understood this perfectly. On a page you see the percentage invested.If one sees 12% this means that the investors get 12% of the estimated profit generated by the site.
For the U2cloudmining system: it is almost the same principle...hard to explain is few words what you can learn in many pages on the site.
See, this is where you lost me. You say you dont need investments, why take them? Do you keep the invested coins? and you lost me... I need the investments only to dispatch the profit. So you dont use the investment as an investment as such you dont need the investment to make profit. If you only use it as a way to distribute existing profit its not an investment. Its a dare. -you have not spend enough time on my homepage complaint-
I will start to cut down your posts like this, maybe it helps you to shorten them. Adding more words that have nothing to do with the topic are not helping me to understand you better, in fact they make me less interested to read your posts at all and just leave it as it is. Explain me how it is possible to run a investment system without investment?
What even is an investment for you? For me an investment (unless its a ponzi) is needed when a company or business needs funds to expand and increase their profit. The need the investment to work with the invested funds. What you explain is not an investment in this sense. If you have a different definition feel free to share it. -I will do more of the same in the future.
-no one has invested anything yet-
-I gamify the thing to attract traffic-
People can sell their shares or reinvest pending cash.
-at least one person trusts me-
-people ask me questions.
-"investments" can take a long time to ROI
-many people agree with you shorena, but they are all wrong-
|
|
|
-snip- since 99% of bitcoin users are poor, we need to give them incentives. -snip-
I have to assume the 99% is just your assumption and not based on anything. I dont see a reason to reply to the rest of your points as we start to circulate. Its pretty obvious that we have greatly different views on the world and maybe some day we will meet in person and talk about it in more detail. The incentive you give is like the fish in the proverb, where I prefer people would learn to fish instead. Maybe you are right and those that come here no longer have the mental capacity to learn fishing. I hope you are not. I will be here answering questions regardless, at least for a little longer.
|
|
|
Would it be possible to launch without the old blockdata? I think this would attract more people to join in. It should be enough to keep the UTXO as it was at a certain block. For the ultra paranoid this UTXO could still be verified using the pre fork bitcoin blockchain. For everyone else it would be 70GB less to start. Im not sure how viable this is to implement given the current state of the development.
|
|
|
-snip- If I was not allowed to sign the campaign no problem, but I hope you provide paid me the last time, because it was my right
Posts must be constructive and on topic
Your posts have been rated as unconstructive as such you violated one of the rules and have been removed without payment. Continuing this argumentation will not help you. In fact it is very likely that you will get banned for some time because of your spam posts. See here for more (including an assessment by a staff member) -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1428897.0
|
|
|
In the new Blockchain.info I don't believe this feature is possible in the web interface anymore. You will have to export the Private Key of the address into another wallet in order to sign it. You can do this by following this guide, as described by shorena's thread here. You should refer to that post if you have any further questions with signing an address. Thanks for the guide, I will try it just as an experiment to see if I can get the private key out (have to make a blockchain.info v2 wallet first), though I doubt that newbies who don't think twice about using web wallets will be able to pursue these steps. I wonder if there is a way to do it with the 12 words seed they provide now? In their code its called "v3", I thought it would be v2 as well. Im a bit disappointed that they removed signing as well. I hope it will get added and thats is just not the highest priority. Blockchain.info is one of the most popular web wallets and as you say not many will be able or willing to follow the guide. They are implementing BIP 32[1] so the seed should work with other BIP 32 wallet as long as its in hex format. [1] https://github.com/blockchain/My-Wallet-V3/blob/master/src/hd-account.js#L197
|
|
|
Hello,
I heard somewhere that there is a limit of 1 MB per bitcoin for the data related to the transaction of each bitcoin. I also heard that some bitcoin will be unusable (transaction will not be possible anymore for those bitcoin) starting next november because they will exceed their own 1MB limit.
Is there such a limit of 1MB per bitcoin?
For the 1MB limit see the post by altcoinhosting. Id like to add to the bolded part. This is probably a misunderstanding. Any bitcoin will always be spendable as long as someone has control over the correct private key. What the person that told you this probably referred to is that due to the limit it will be more expensive to make small payments. Due to the limit only a certain number of TX can fit into a block. This number currently is roughly 2000. If there are over 30k TX waiting for a confirmation (as there are now[1]) miners only confirm those that pay the highest fee per byte. This can become a problem if you want to transfer a very small amount (e.g. 0.0001) as the fee required to get a timely confirmation will need to be as high or even higher as the transfered amount. Thus it might no longer economical to use bitcoin for small amounts of coins. There are different views on how to solve this, but AFAICT the great majoriy agrees that the limit must be increased - the question is how or rather in which order the needed steps are taken. [1] https://i.imgur.com/BCDDom8.png
|
|
|
Hmm, kannst Du die wallet Datei auf einem anderen Rechner öffnen?
|
|
|
Hallo nochmal, ich habe soeben geupdatet und importiere die Wallet neu nachdem ich den Schreibschutz und versteckt weg gemacht habe. Die Dateigröße meiner Wallet Datei ist 426 Kb nur. Kann da überhaupt noch etwas drin sein? Klingt für mich ja sehr klein irgendwie. Naja, hoffentlich klappt alles. Ich dachte eigentlich, dass normalerweise schon Transaktionen usw. angezeigt werden müssten. Eben wars ja bei ca 1/3.
Also meine "unbenutzte" hat 1KB. Da sind ja primär auch nur die privaten Schlüssel sind. Die haben pro Stück 32 byte, klingt also erstmal nicht zu wenig.
|
|
|
Thanks a lot for your help, Lutpin and --Encrypted-- So you didn't notice that you lost control over your collateral for a year?
I took some distance with cryptoworld for about a year. I'm back since a few day now. Nope, I didn't notice that I lost control of that account until now. How is that possible ? I did exactly the same as for another account and I still have control on the latter. I mean, I changed the email and the password .. How could eddyubachs recover his account ? A signed message to the admin via PM can do that. IMHO this should be a scam accusation as its about a trade where you got tricked. Its very unlikely that staff or admins will intervene here.
|
|
|
Staking my address ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) 3BY9qKjkQmSrmrAMKpU3y8rBKbG5c9J28b A pay-to-script-hash-address can not be used to sign a message, staking this address will not help you.
|
|
|
Also die Wallet-Datei in der linken Spalte ist immernoch nicht zu sehen. Ich schätze es sind nun 5-10 % geladen. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Hoffentlich zeigt es sie wieder an, sobald alles geladen ist. Update mache ich dann natürlich auch noch. Erstmal herzlichen Dank, ich denke ich schreibe gegen Abend wieder ob alles funktioniert hat. Klasse Geholfen hast du mir ja schonmal. :-) p.s. die Multibit-Wallet Datei ist auf schreibgeschützt. Kann das wohl so bleiben? Mach ma zur Sicherheit ne Kopie und änder das. Nun ist der Ladebalken bei ca 1/3 gewesen und nun fängt das alles von vorne an.. So ein Mist, hoffentlich wird das noch. Ich bin am verzweifeln. Anzahl der Blöcke aber nur noch ca. 75.000 .. also es tut sich immernoch etwas irgendwie, auch wenn der Ladebalken ganz weiß ist.
Klingt komisch, ich würd erstmal auf die aktuelle Version updaten und gucken wie es da läuft (ohne Schreibschutz).
|
|
|
|