Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 07:28:07 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 »
1981  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: I have achieved 500+ earned merit. (Motivational) on: February 19, 2019, 04:06:35 AM
Congrats! mate on your great success. Its really not an easy task to get 500 merit in short time.  But you did that with your quality work. I think we will be able to see more quality post from you in future too.
1982  Other / Beginners & Help / ★ Keep your role on default trust (DT) selection ★ on: February 18, 2019, 06:06:39 PM
"Keep your role on default trust (DT) selection"


Welcome to my thread. I think we have already got so many thread on forum which are relates to default trust selection system. I don't want to repeat those discussion again. Today i am going share some important information for our new users and IMO those will encourage them to play their role during DT selection.

What is default trusted (DT) member ?

Default trusted member specially works to keep the forum safer for its users. They are here to protect users from scammers, spammers and many more activities which are not accepted by forum community. They have got the power to take proper action against anyone who have committed fraudulent activities on forum.

What is DT1 ?

Which members are selected by voting system they get the place on DT1 list. To be a DT1 member you have to add 10 people on your custom trust list. Details will be shared bellow. You will find active DT1 members here.

What is DT2 ?

DT2 directly selected by DT1 members. Which members are in DT1 members custom trust list they called DT2 member. You can find active DT2 members here.

What is the eligibility of voting ?

If any member got 10 earn merit he/she is completely eligible to submit vote. Every 10 earn merit opens 1 vote for you. That means if you have 20 earn merits you can vote 2 person for DT1 selection. As it will increase depending on your total earn merit. Another thing is that if you have 30 earn merit but you submit 5 vote in that situation algorithm will select your vote for only 3 person. It will be on algorithms hand and no one knows for whom your vote will be counted.

How to submit your vote ?

To submit your vote you have to click on your profile first and then you can follow this users instruction for successful voting. Please take a look here;

Everything is correctly written, but I would have added more pictures for greater clarity.







How the custom trust list works ?

By using custom trust list you can vote someone during DT selection. If you include anyone on your custom trust list than its clear that you have trust on his/her judgement and feedback. According to your trust list  his/her feedback will be shown to you by default even he is not in the DT list.

As same as as if you exclude anyone from your custom trust list that means you don't have trust on his/her judgement and feedback. By default his feedback will not be visible to you.
 
What is Depth ?

If you select depth 1 in your trust setting than you will only be able to see the rating of DT1 members only. Its need to know that whoever included by you in your custom trust list they are DT1 for you. If you select depth 2 than all rating of DT1 & DT2 will be visible by default to you. Whoever on your custom trust list and also who are in their custom trust list will be DT2 for you. Their feedback will also be visible to you by default. Same calculation for depth 3 & depth 4

Why should you vote on DT selection?

Forum has given the opportunity to select your mostly trusted person by submitting your vote. I believe you can select them which members judgement you trust. As a citizen of your country you select your favorite party on your countries governmental election. where i believe  its your responsibility to choose the right one for ruling the country. As same as here on DT selection you have your choice and responsibility too.

What is inclusion and exclusion ?

Inclusion is the way you add someone on your custom trust list as instructed above. On the other hand if you don't like anyones judgement than you can exclude him/her from your custom trust list. You just have to use this tilde (~) before that members name to exclude.


Do you have chance to be a DT1 member ?

Yes, you have the chance if you select by current voting system which already described above. To check the requirement you may visit here.

Is it possible to be removed from DT list ?

Yes, That is the advantage of new DT system. DT1 members can remove anyone from DT instantly if he/she is corrupted. For example if Majority of the DT member exclude you than you will be removed from the DT list. Suppose you included by 3 DT1 member but 4 DT1 member exclude you than you will be removed from there.




Finally I believe every responsible member of this forum should keep their role on DT selection. Its the only way how we can choose our best faces for the improvement of our forum.
1983  Economy / Reputation / Re: Stake.com (SteveStake) is encouraging spam. on: February 18, 2019, 04:40:35 PM
Honestly i think its not possible to have enough traffic in website by just increasing particapators or post only. Quality post and creative poster make a great impression on visitors mind. That's why its better to highlght quality post rather than shitpost. As an example you can see the original scenario of ChipMixer Signature Campaign and web traffic


You can see here on the pic that 58.3% traffic drived from bitcointalk but stake.com haven't got the visibility of bitcointalk traffic yet. Now you can compare it with ChipMixer partipants and IMO obviously they are high quality poster. For that reason they got the high amount of traffic from bitcointalk.

It is to notify that every participator of ChipMixer is high merit earner. So i think its clear to everyone that you will not get traffic if you accept spammer on signature campaign.
1984  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos It's time to make DT blacklist. on: February 18, 2019, 06:49:17 AM

Thread link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988.0;all


I am not aware of any allegation that anyone in that thread has stolen money/property, or tried doing the same, nor am I aware of any of those people doing anything that might be consistent with a long con. Do you care to explain why you believe these people are untrustworthy?

I think there's no explanation need about those guys but you wanna hear from my side . yeah they are untrustworthy and there's no reason here to hide it. These guys have got several negative feedback on their trust section and have enough referrence link there to know their past records.I don't know why are you feeling so jealous with that,,,Maybe in your eyes they are trustworhthy because you also bearing multiple red colour on your trust section.
1985  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Xtripple - SCAM - Fake Team on: February 18, 2019, 02:16:16 AM
Yeah i will try my best to let you know if they make any ANN here on the forum. Its really surprising that their tokensale is going on now.
1986  Other / Meta / Re: HELP ME GET MY ACCOUNT BACK [The return of IBGigglin] on: February 17, 2019, 07:00:29 PM
Thank you iasenko & Minerjones for flagging my account with neg trust while I regained access. Please remove negative feedback. I have PMed you both from here and nah-256. Thank you guys.
Welcome to our forum again. Its really enjoying to see someone recovered his locked account by the help of forum authority. Waiting to see your best works in the future for forum community.
1987  Economy / Reputation / Re: Fake rating of ICObench. Misleading investors. on: February 17, 2019, 05:33:10 PM
This is just the tip of the iceberg.  Big exchanges posting fake volume, coinmarketcap going along with the scam, Bitmex trading against their own customers.  You should be going after the big guys.
It doesn't matter if anything big or not. If we can collect enough evidence against those big guys than i think there's no reason to take their site. Its not only one users responsibility to catch scammer or rise hand againg fraudlent activities. Lets do it together and save our investors from getting scammed.
1988  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcoin Mining section, over moderated on: February 17, 2019, 05:25:29 PM
Over-moderated? Yes. inner circle? No, i made few posts there but never deleted & i saw very few newcomers posts aren't deleted.
Yeah i am Completely agree with you. If newcomers posts meet the criteria of mining section then there's no problem with that. But i think those post were deleted by moderators which actually got no connections with mining related topics. Otherwise i think there's no reason to over moderate that section specially.

Its really necessary for our new users to realize that moderators are here to help us as a guard of those sections. Whatever they do its just for keeping those section effective. There's no way to think that they will discourage newcomers by over moderation. So its better to check before posting a thread on any section that its fair or not.
1989  Economy / Reputation / Re: HELP NEEDED! Found translation SCAM gang in same bounty on: February 17, 2019, 05:03:41 PM
Well done mate, its really looks like a gang who are doing the same thing in several campaigns. This guys used the same address again and again. Its completely a bunch of scammers who's are committing this everywhere IMO. I hope this going to help bounty managers to continue their campaign perfectly.   

I beleive those accounts going to tag by our DT members very soon. I am gonna left mine too.
1990  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos It's time to make DT blacklist. on: February 17, 2019, 03:06:59 AM
It doesn't really matter, it is just yet another example of how the rules are for some but not for others around here. There needs to be an objective standard set around here for trust ratings or else the community will continue to eat its own face. Eventually it will go past the point of no return. The trust system is too easily corruptible and open to unaccountable abuse. There is no reason people can not leave neutral ratings an open threads if they want to warn people of users rather than negative rating them without evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws.

Current trust system is good enough IMO. I don't know why do you think that its corruptible or open to unaccountable abuse. For positive feedback every user got theur own ideology to give someone or not. But for the negative feedback its common to everyone. Its pretty much simple that negative ratings are only for scammers, spammers or trollers who continuing their fraudlent activities to spoil our forum.

I beleive no one here giving someone trust for their own intention. Trust is only achievable not purchaseable 



1991  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcoin Mining section, over moderated on: February 17, 2019, 02:46:39 AM
Moderators on that section are enough careful to remove thread if needed. Maybe your post was repetitive there or subject of the thread didn't meet the criteria for that section.
1992  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos It's time to make DT blacklist. on: February 16, 2019, 09:50:58 AM
Take a note of who left merits too. Hey I thought leaving "political" oriented merits was not ok.
I don't know why you think that those merits are political oriented. There's no way to be agree with this i think. Merit doesn't mean alltime support. I always prefer to give someone merits only for his  quality works. It doesn't mean that i will support him in every single time in the future.  If i find him done something which doesn't meet the rules of forum i will definitely raise my hand against him.
1993  Economy / Reputation / Re: Fake rating of ICObench. Misleading investors. on: February 16, 2019, 09:36:18 AM
Its already been a common scenario that most of the ICO listing sites show ratings on their webpage without investigation. They just need money from the ICO owners. In recent times its been tough for investors to take decision about a project by seeing this type of ratings only. These ICO listing sites ratings have got no value IMO. Actually its nothing but a trap for investors to steal their fund.
1994  Economy / Reputation / Re: Timelord2067 com DO NOT TRUST proven trust abusing untrustworthy scumbag. on: February 16, 2019, 09:22:23 AM
Its not fair to put blame on someone without proper evidence. OP i think you can offer a great service for the community here... Can you guess it??? I think you got the power of great imagination and you should guess what am i thinking about your service. I will tell about the service at the end of my comment.Till then use your great imagination power to get the name. Lol.

How could you say that those website got virus or trojan. Is that confirmed by  your "great imagination" power or you are the victim. I am eagerly waiting here to see the evidence you got against those website links that thess are phishing.

I beleive its just a nasty try to spoil someones reputation.
Everyone who knows you better can easily understand that this thread is not different from your others meaningless poems.

Service that match with you: you can request to forum moderators to open a new section for you where you can teach shitposters.   

1995  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What is Quality post really ? on: February 16, 2019, 05:51:47 AM
Nice try OP. Its really important for our newbies to learn proper english. Without having this its not an easy task to participate on our forum several sections discussion. I beleive every thread that written by someone who really works for the forum has got a lot of things to learn.

Hey mate It doesn't matter if anyone take it funny just only for a little spelling mistake. I wish newbies will obviously get some valuable basic knowledge from your thread.

1996  Economy / Reputation / Re: What is Quickseller trying to hide? Gruesome stuff I'm sure. Hasn't denied it. on: February 16, 2019, 05:16:50 AM

I doubt it. He still kept the claim that Vod is "violent", so I don't think he changed his mind. Probably he's just hoping that other users he had mentioned in the original thread will forget his stupidity now that he removed their names.
Yeah agree with you and that's why i mentioned on my comment that he is trying to erase old fault. Where he knows it better that issues between him and vod is not going solve because his claim against "vod" is meaningless.

1997  Economy / Reputation / Re: Beware of these 2 projects [ zabtechnologies.net and coinsclone.com ] on: February 16, 2019, 05:07:24 AM
Its clear that these 3 website handling by same owner and its for sure these are nothing but a scam trap. These guys used similar comments on each of the website where sentence, photograph is 100% same.

Where they get the help of fraudness on building their website than obviously their main service is nothing but scam IMO
1998  Economy / Reputation / Re: What is Quickseller trying to hide? Gruesome stuff I'm sure. Hasn't denied it. on: February 16, 2019, 04:51:55 AM
"Quickseller" deleted multiple comments from his thread but its not going to make any difference IMO. On the archive  thread its clear that "quickseller" tried his best to take sympathy from others by shouting that "vod" give him threat. How funny it is that there wasn't anybody there who support him on be half of his claim.

There's no logic there to take vod's word as a threat but he tried there to make it logical. Maybe his realization guiding him to the real scene. That's why trying to erase old fault.

1999  Other / Meta / Re: "Recovering hacked/lost accounts" full process, nothing happened on: February 16, 2019, 04:17:27 AM
There's maybe another reason for the delay. I think you have followed the current account recovery system carefully. If everything is right than bitcointalk account recovery team will make a solution for you mate.

To protect your account from hacking and recovering hacked/locked account you can read this thread.

Here is the thread link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102404.msg49428413#msg49428413
2000  Other / Meta / Re: Reporting very old posts? on: February 16, 2019, 04:05:56 AM
I beleive its better to put your concentration on upcoming posts. Its not going to make any difference by reporting old posts. Everyday where new scammers trying to build their trap at that time its not gonna be a wise decission to report on old one. 

Yeah if Still then you have interest to do it than you can try to trace old scammers current activities. Discover where they are and if they are still active than whats their new trap for bitcointalk users.
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!