It is very easy. You can find to many things ready (so you don't have to work but only to adopt or correct) doing a search in internet with the words for which you need materials. I can assure you that you will find everything you about marketing. Myself have tried to find things exactly for marketing because I wanted something to do and I found all I wanted.

It is totally impossible. Are to many the factors that don't allow this and I can named only two. With bitcoin cannot be made monetary policies. So cannot be managed the currency of the nation like the other currencies. In some situation needed to much money in circulation and the Central Banks print more than needed and put those in circulation. With bitcoin is impossible to do this. Bitcoin is produced in the way we all know. Every ten minutes are produced 25 bitcoin, Nor less and nor more. So in the above situation the state will fail because of lack of currency in the market. This is the first reason. The second is that bitcoin is currency of the world is not and cannot be own but one nation only. And if cannot be totally own by the nation cannot be national currency. The economy of that country will be in serious risk if the currency is not owned by that country because of manipulation of the value or manipulation of quantity in circulation. Other reason might be because bitcoin is ignored from the most of countries and a nation cannot have a currency that is not ignored from almost all the world.

As for Liberland it is true that had as a currency bitcoin. I think because the only resident of this country is a bitcoiner and because him cannot create a Central Bank to produce its money.

And at the end you ask if me it will be happy if bitcoin will be the currency of my country. My answer is yes if all the bitcoins in the circulation will be own by my country. I will (the Central Bank of my country) produce even the physical coin so bitcoin will be a full money and can fulfill all the duties of the money. The coins in internet will be produced in our Central Bank and we will have a big amount produced before its launch in circulation.

You can buy to many things. But if you want to buy in the meaning to buy for investing you must buy something in which you are expert, which you know very well and which you can manage in every situation which can happen. If you are not an expert me, at your place, would send your money in the bank (long term choice) because there is the most secure place that you will not loose your money and you will have profit. The other choices given here in bitcointalk or in other forums are like gambling. You must find the jackpot but you must even lose everything. The probability to have the jackpot are 1% while to lose 99%. Yours the choice.

There can be million of reasons but I think because the only resident of Liberland is a bitcoiner. He loves bitcoin, cannot create a Central Bank (beyond the fact that this is very boring for him) to produce its currency and vuala. We have bitcoin. No one can stop me to adopt it as a national currency. Is produced by everyone in the world, can be found without problem in every moment and it is a good money (in this way is told). I'm wondering how he do to buy its bread.

I think will choose euro and be member of EU but who knows. Maybe they will create their own currency and will choose to be out of everything and on its own. But I can't stay without telling that it will be very few chances that Catalonia be independent. Sorry if you are an independents. Hope the best for them.  

This is a great sentence. I like it. But I can assure you that the meaning of that is not enough. If the government don't know (not adopt) and rule bitcoin there might not be future for it. This is not possible because in some country there are already the rules and in some others are thinking about those. In the future I am convinced that all the countries will do those (because of the power of technology which has invented bitcoin) but I wanted to specify that the adoption of bitcoin from people is the most important thing for it but not all.

The money will be affected by inflation everywhere will be. So this factor cannot be in consideration when someone need to take a decision about where to send the savings. In bank or everywhere else the savings will have inflation. Exact in the same amount. So this is not a factor that cannot leave us to save the money at the bank. There will have the same loss from inflation like in every other place. I don't know some place which protect the savings from inflation. At least in my country. If you know any please write here because I am curious to know that.

This prediction is maximally interesting (even it is fatalist and this kind of things happen very rarely or never). I am curious to know the facts that made you to write this sentence. Could you please show me the resources when are you based to write this? Are rare events which have to do with our and our's family everyday life and deserve very attention. Thanks! 

No, he is telling that if Catalonia it gets independent will push up the price of bitcoin like the push up of 24th September. Then if will adopt or not bitcoin as a national currency this will be decided with referendum. It will be one like in Greece and then will be made the opposite of it that will be decided by referendum. If the people will tell yes will not be adopted. If will tell no will adopted. Just like in Greece. People voted 60% to not accept the agreement proposed by IMF, EU and ECB and Tsipras after two or three days (I don't remember the exact date) accepted another agreement which was with conditions more severe than the one which was not accepted by the Greeks. This mean intelligence and power.

I think it depends from the economic and social phase and from overall development in which one country is. In the developed country there is not reasons that can impede the statement of minimum wage. In the poor countries is almost impossible. This because the basic need of everyone are to many and higher compared to the possibilities of payments that can be given by the employers. So the minimum wage which represent the vital minimum might be higher than the highest wage in the country. This make the placement of minimum wage objectively impossible.

Depends too from the economic policies which one country want to follow. There are country which are fanatics of freedom in economy and don't want such rules which limit this freedom.

But depends even from specific factors which can determine if this thing is possible or not. Independently from the phase of development one country is.

About this I can give the example of my country. And we are not to poor. Our GDP per capita is 4,619.2 us dollar. And our incomes level are classified as "upper middle income" according to World Bank. These are data that testify that our life must not be a poor life. There are to many requests from to many institutions and organisations in the country to place the minimum wage. Yet is not made. Because the most of economic revenue come from one specific entrepreneurship called "fason" which work with raw materials that come from out of our country (they give more than 30% of exports compared with the total of exports of my country and have a strong power in economic policies here). In my country is made only the processing work. It is a simple work which don't give to much added value. In this way the revenue created is low. Then after this work the finished product is sold in the country of origin of raw materials or when the foreign owners want. All the prices of all the phases of the work made are stated by the owners of raw materials. When is the time of giving the revenues, being justified from the low revenue assured by the work of our employees they don't give to much. So our owners of manufactory have nothing to do. Their cannot go over a certain level of wage. In this way the wages are defined and no one can "play" with those. There are thousand and thousand people employed in this field of economy here (and are to much more others that wait to be hired). Their wage is under the minimum wage. If our country applies the minimum wage all those employers remain without work. The conclusion can be understand by everyone itself.

Normally is talked about negative rates for the Central Banks and not for the commercial banks. The lasts have no sense to give negative rates because with the rates those assure their existence.

There are two levels of banks in one democratic country. The first level is the Central Bank which is responsible for the monetary policies, for the economic growth and to maintain under control the inflation. Then are the banks of the second level which are named commercial banks and are like a normal other business. They work with the money and take profit from those like every other business.

In the news of OP I have the impression that is talked about the rates of FED which is a Central Bank (play that role in USA). The negative rates are not a unknown phenomenon even in other Central Banks in other countries. Who want to know more I suggest to read this very good article made from BBC:

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32284393

Your answer is totally out of purpose of this thread so must not be written. Here must write about how the people earn free bitcoins. You don't tell nothing about this. But this is not the only bad thing. The worst is that you do publicity to something dirty like gambling. Gambling is the most nasty thing that someone can do. If you gamble you will lose all your money and will destroy even the life of your family. So please don't do this more and if you gamble leave it immediately. Otherwise you will lose you life.

This is something that need more explanation if you want thoughts by the members. You need to give facts and to give analysis in order that this thing can be confirmed that is true. At the end you need to give your opinion about this sentence and your thoughts how is possible that this can be changed. Only one sentence given at the end is not an interpretation or an explanation that can promote ideas about it. It is more an sentence to end the post than a real thought that can stimulate the others. I think that the principal post must be more engaging than that above.

Maybe I am wrong but the lack of thoughts is an fact of my interpretation.

I am not an expert in this field but if i had the above may say the mine.

From what do you have found and connected the title of your thread with the article given in your post? In the article there is no one word about bitcoin. If it is your idea to make this connection in order to know about how bitcoin can change the world in the directions given in the article my answer is it that you give at the end in your post: If the elite are able to get into btc, I don't see how it would be any different than the current system in place.

Bitcoin cannot change the social-economic formation. It is only a currency (not yet accepted, or worst, ignored but most of the countries) and its duty is to serve for buying goods and only in internet. That's all. Don't give at bitcoin power that cannot hold in its shoulders.

I can show you another way to earn more bitcoins that with the faucets. Try to participate in signature campaigns. Go in the section "Services" in this forum and do a search there about signature campaigns. There are to many. It will be difficult for you find one because are newbie but I know that are signatures campaign that accept even your rank. Inn this way you will have more bitcoins (not to much in the begging because of your rank) but day after day your activity will grow and you will earn more and more.

You are not sure? So in one nook of your mind you think to leave your normal work for focusing in bitcointalk? So, discussing in bitcointalk, you think that can give you the needed money (according to your thoughts in your nook only) to reckon with your life, to assure the money for make living normally yourself and your family.

You are a genius. I love to stay in bitcointalk and stay there to many hours. But I haven't found this way to have such profits from it. Can you please share with me your discovery? I swear to give 10% of my profits. If are in amounts mentioned above naturally.

Fatal words. I see that you are a big bitcoiner but a resident in one other world. Because for sure our world will not finish if bitcoin will fails. Bitcoin is only one currency (yet not accepted or ignored from the most of world after 6 years of life that is to much if this invention it would be so important) which is created by one disruptive technology (which is so revolutionary that can change to many others currently in use). This technology has produced other hundred coins like bitcoin and maybe will create the double of those in the years to come. This technology will be followed by another (maybe after 100 years) much better than that and which will have the same role like this about which we are talking. Only that. The life and the humanity are totally another thing.

It is not true. If I have money earned with my work that money are mine. Are not borrowed by no one (nor from the Central Bank, nor from my employer, nor by no one other) but my property. Fact is that that money can be spent in the way I do and I spend those in the way I do. I do this thing with my money and never no one have come to me to take those or to ask those. I have spent thousand and thousand of money since I had the first one and no one have told me why you have made this or give me that money. And never will come to ask for take those. Even if will come I will call the police and that man will go in jail.

If this is an answer for my post I don't understand what do you mean and at what you are referring. In my explanations is spoken about positive balance in the banks and about the debt. There are not in those explanations about financial problems.

Sorry if your post have nothing to do with my post.

And since are here can you explain better what is the difference between money and printed fiat currency and why our financial problems are derived from the existence of printed fiat currency and not money. Seems an interesting topic and I'm curious to learn more.

If it will be possible to make physical bitcoins (almost impossible because to many factors) they will not be equal with the traditional currency never. Don't make equally bitcoin with the traditional money the making of physical coins but to many others things. Which simply are not possibly to happen. I will tell you only one factor that can't make bitcoin equal with the traditional money. Even if it will be physical bitcoins that will not make bitcoin inflationable like the traditional money. Never. Bitcoin don't incurs in any way inflation because the number of bitcoin is fixed and cannot be produced never more. So not inflationable. Traditional money incurs inflation every day. Because can be printed (possibly) how many times want the Central Bank of that tradition money.