Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:14:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 233 »
1981  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Did I lose my bitcoins? on: April 28, 2017, 06:54:52 AM
First of all, download the latest Bitcoin Core, let it sync in full. Next, don't PM me over basic support.
1982  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Did I lose my bitcoins? on: April 27, 2017, 06:04:49 PM
Your coins are fine, your issue is that you have not properly synchronized Armory with the Bitcoin network. Armory can't show you your up-to-date transaction history without looking at the up-to-date blockchain.
1983  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 27, 2017, 05:17:56 AM
make install installs to $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX):

https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/blob/testing/Makefile.am#L39

For info, $(DESTDIR) is empty, only $(PREFIX) has anything in it, which defaults to /usr/local

You could either set a DESTDIR or use a custom PREFIX during ./configure and build yourself.

If you insist on having a built package that fits your setup, I would consider doing that for the gcc4.7 build, but you'd have to research how to force the different install path with dh-make (which calls ./configure each run). This is the script used to package .deb:

https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/blob/testing/dpkgfiles/make_deb_package.py
1984  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 95.1 is not working on either of my Macs... Is there any reason not to use 93.3? on: April 25, 2017, 07:47:18 PM
Ask droak about OSX ailments. 0.93 tx are fine.
1985  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 95.1 is not working on either of my Macs... Is there any reason not to use 93.3? on: April 25, 2017, 07:08:47 PM
0.93's database is not compatible with 0.95's. Either delete it or use a different dbdir.
1986  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Matrix of offline wallet Armory versions and compatible with current Armory vers on: April 25, 2017, 05:12:08 AM
Looks something like this:

Code:
] - 0.91][0.92 - 0.95][0.96 - [

0.96 can create transactions for the previous bracket as long as the UTXOs are for the right script type.
1987  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 25, 2017, 05:09:35 AM
ugh this is supposed to work... I'll try one more thing to get the deb going. What's your CPU on that machine btw?
1988  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 24, 2017, 08:47:59 AM
Try the .deb
1989  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 23, 2017, 09:54:22 PM
Can you try the .3 gcc4.7 deb on a Ubuntu machine?
1990  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 23, 2017, 08:39:57 PM
Wonderful, that worked now. Thank you so much!   Kiss

What worked? The .deb, the txsigcollect, or both?
1991  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 23, 2017, 12:08:37 PM
Quote
Just checked again. Testing build 2 on both systems. Can you ELI5 gcc4.7? Where should I install this? On both systems or on my online system only?

I'm not telling you to install an older GCC, I'm telling you to try the 0.95.99.3 gcc4.7 testing build.

Quote
What about the terminal output I posted above? It seems to not be able to recognize certain parts of the TX as it states it's no legal ASCI or so.

Fixed on 0.95.99.3. You need it on your online machine to create proper txsigcollect packets.
1992  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 23, 2017, 11:16:28 AM
3rd testing build has the fix for the txsigcollet issue. I was assuming you were using that.

You can get the gcc4.7 build in the usual place:

https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/releases/tag/v0.95.99.3-testing
1993  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 23, 2017, 09:20:53 AM
1) What is the signer's version?

2) The .deb packages work, I got no idea what kind of Ubuntu you are using that it can't get them to run. Try the gcc4.7 I made just in case you are using some weird distro.
1994  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 23, 2017, 06:52:43 AM
It worked, thank you so much! I am online!  Grin

Regarding the ram usage, on this machine I have 16gb, and I switched over from the Ubuntu PC which only has 4gb. In the long run I would prefer the Ubuntu PC as I can leave it online 24/7. Do you think with the settings you recommended to me now, it might also work on the Ubuntu PC where it always got stuck building the DB?

On your low RAM machine, you should use:

Code:
db-type=DB_BARE
ram-usage=1

On your other machine, you shouldn't need any of these extra settings at all. If it's still failing to build & scan, use DB_BARE. DB_BARE is an initialization setting, you can't swap it around after the DB has been created. Once you create a DB_BARE db, that setting will stick for the db's lifetime, so manage it accordingly.

The fact that your machines require DB_BARE suggests some sort of system instability (by default the build phase will max out your CPU).

Quote
@goatpig, did you change the location of the Armory installation for 0.96? I've tried the 0.95.99.3 .deb package, but I'm getting an absence of installation at /usr/lib/ (even the directory /usr/lib/armory isn't created, /usr/local/armory & /usr/local/armorydb are created). Installation is suspiciously quick also, is there some error in the install package?

Plenty changed, courtesy of autotools. All binaries now go to /usr/local/bin, libs and python code files go to /usr/local/lib/armory. Desktop files still go to /usr/share/applications. The .deb does not distribute CPP code files anymore.
1995  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Fixing the "transaction timed out"/"transaction broadcast failed" issue on: April 23, 2017, 06:09:45 AM
You can try the 0.96 testing builds with it, should be fine.
1996  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 third testing builds on: April 22, 2017, 05:59:12 PM
Add this line to the .conf:

Code:
db-type=DB_BARE

Then start from the top.

How much RAM do you have? If you have less than 8GB, also add ram-usage=1
1997  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 second testing builds on: April 22, 2017, 02:19:21 AM
Quote
Without that option the behavior seems the same, a console with ArmoryDB.exe appears with a ton of -INFO and Armory starts making its things. Currently at 14% of building database and also initializing Bitcoin engine. I changed and let armory handle bitcoin in the background. Who knows, maybe works better that way without starting BitcoinQt first. I'll update.

Don't run ArmoryQt with the arg. Just run ArmoryDB with the arg, then run the client on its own. It will find the db.

First, delete the databases folder again. Then, in F:\Armory, create a armorydb.conf text file. Fill it with this:

Code:
satoshi-datadir=F:\Bitcoin
thread-count=1

Save and close, then run:

Code:
> ArmoryDB.exe --datadir=F:\Armory

Then in another cmd prompt, run the client (while the DB is still running):

Code:
> ArmoryQt.exe --datadir=F:\Armory

Quote
Is there an ArmoryDB log somewhere?

dbLog.txt in your datadir.



1998  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Stuck on "Initializing bitcoin engine" forever on: April 22, 2017, 02:12:41 AM
Don't run auto bitcoind if your setup isn't stable. Run BitcoinQt and make sure it's sync'd before running anything else. The fact that it's eating 40% CPU implies it's not done syncing.
1999  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 second testing builds on: April 21, 2017, 06:59:35 AM
Quote
Delete the database and try again from the top with --thread-count=1. Does it always fail at the same spot now?

That's what I hope to reveal

Quote
Do you recommend to re-download the whole chain again?

Not yet, I wanna see what's messed with it.
2000  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96 second testing builds on: April 20, 2017, 10:41:36 PM
Are you using the same block file data on the Windows machine than on the Ubuntu one?

Quote
So far always happended between maybe 18 an 28 % progress.

Delete the database and try again from the top with --thread-count=1. Does it always fail at the same spot now?
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 233 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!