Blockchain seems to run normal again on one of my nodes  Yeah, but according to the blockchain explorer, blocks are being found every 5 seconds... Bounce-back from the holdup Gonna be a little wave wrt difficulty, but soon corrected |
|
|
|
Blockchain seems to run normal again on one of my nodes |
|
|
|
As an update, the stuck tx's will be "soon" mined. Once i find a block  Now tell us more about the blocks you have found the last 24 hours? Everybody please put this troll on ignore and be done with him, he just wants to spread panic, why else register a new account today just to talk trash in this thread. Then do you have any explanation for the blockchain problem? The explanation is very simple. The difficulty for mining has jumped to 500 (not sure why, probably multipools?). It is going to take a long time to mine the next block. Nothing to worry about. Just look here http://ancblockchain.com/chain/AnoncoinIt is my understanding that this kind of problem will be fixed in the next release: the devs are going to replace the kimoto gravity well algorithm with something better. Sorry but you are wrong. Someone is spamming the network with 8 Ghz since more than 24 hours! The fun part about this is that it only proves that some scriptkidde with a big wallet out there with a altcoin, or heavily invested in a altcoin is scared of our actions, again meaning we're doing the right thing. Enjoy wasting your 8Ghz, oh wait... let's say it's 8GH, I prefer realistic numbers.. Personally I would rather have used such power on mining and yes KGW will be replaced. |
|
|
|
|
Notice
For all pools and people mining, please apply the following three lines bellow to the anoncoin.conf file:
blockminsize=0
blockmaxsize=1000000
blockprioritysize=1000000
And restart Anoncoind. The blockchain got spammed with some huge transactions, and this would solve the issue.
|
|
|
|
My activity to the left is ... Activity: 420 And we all know what 420 is  |
|
|
|
If there is going to be a 2-Blockchain-Solution, I ask myself whether Exchanges are able to trade this Zerocoin separately?
I mean... ANC and this ZC are tied together as I understand this, since we would be able to exchange it with one another, right?
Still wondering : )
ZC trading would be stupid and probably wont work well. ZC is ment so you have anonymous transactions. The value is bound to ANC directly, its not a "new coin", "subcoin" or anything like this. Think of it as a token, if i "convert" 10 ANC to ZC, i have 10 ANC ZC tokens. Now i can redeem these 10 tokens to get 10 ANC back, but nobody knows which original 10 ANC it was, therefore its anonymous. Also, the zerocoins will not be "stored" in the second blockchain. As far as I know, this will just be a long list that contains the zerocoin zero-knowlegde proofs used when converting a previously minted zerocoin to an anoncoin. After these proofs have been verified, they are useless, and there is not much reason to keep this hanging around. As far as I know, it is not possible to transfer zerocoins. To do this you would need to give someone the private serial number and random number associated with the coin. I believe that you can transfer "zerocash coins", but that is a different story. Correct, so it's just a temporary storage. But we still discuss for how long, and how to trigger the deletion of old ones etc. |
|
|
|
new site: http://image.bayimg.com/1ff07e5f6d9a029c0afbf6060611687f35949e66.jpgplease check it out and give us some serious input on the texts before its translated to hindi and so on. i would like to include some words/themes, i dont know how, or if? good for newbies: bitcoin global good for techies: open source good for activists: anti-authoritarian activist community powered movement non-corporative all proposals are welcome. Awesome, just awesome - News is under last "editor's review now"  I'll be back shortly with post. |
|
|
|
It seems that Cryptsy still have problem for withdrawing ANC. To withdrawal 3000 ANC I had to do 10 successive withdrawals. Only 1921 ANC have arrived now, four of the ten transactions sent were not included in a block yet (but I see them as unconfirmed in my ANC-qt). It seems the transactions are alot of small inputs and this increase the fee tremendously! Here is an example of one of such transaction: http://ancblockchain.com/tx/7ede9c1d53fb78ba4e16140a1389eee22ea7afd2df2ed9d7fc93c8b663ae90d6I requested 547.27272638 ANC but got only 136.7956816 ANC from 375 inputs with a fee of 0.59 ANC (cryptsy paid the fee, I paid 0.03 ANC fee) In total I paid 0.3 ANC in fee (ten times 0.03 ANC) to withdraw the 3000 ANC, the process of withdrawing took hours because I had to do it ten times and right now 4 transactions are still not confirmed. Please Cryptsy can you do something to not have such a big number of < 1 anc inputs?? This become impossible to trade at you exchange if you do nothing about those hundreds of small inputs. Hello everyone, Im currently investigating an issue with our ANC wallet where the blockchain isnt picking up the majority of our send transactions. We apologize it took us so long to spot the issue. But we are working hard on correcting it and getting the unconfirmed transactions pushed to the blockchain Some of them get confirmed after a simple restart of the daemon but others do not/ Ill keep everyone informed when I find the solution Thank you for your patience UPDATE: I think it comes down to transaction sizes. Our daemon is sending transactions that are too large to be accpeted into the chain. Im basing this on the fact that all unconfirmed send transactions have unusually high fees paid. Our default Txfee is .01 ANC and the mean over the last 1000 transactions is 0.10169169169169 which is why our withdrawal fee is set to .1 ANC anoncoind listtransactions "" 1000 | grep -A 1 -B 4 '"confirmations" : 0,' | grep fee
"fee" : -0.82000000,
"fee" : -0.90000000,
"fee" : -0.98000000,
"fee" : -0.65000000,
"fee" : -0.69000000,
"fee" : -0.72000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.76000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.81000000,
"fee" : -1.00000000,
"fee" : -0.68000000,
"fee" : -0.72000000,
"fee" : -0.73000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.76000000,
"fee" : -0.76000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.78000000,
"fee" : -0.79000000,
"fee" : -0.85000000,
"fee" : -0.96000000,
"fee" : -0.64000000,
"fee" : -0.66000000,
"fee" : -0.67000000,
"fee" : -0.69000000,
"fee" : -0.71000000,
"fee" : -0.72000000,
"fee" : -0.73000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.79000000,
"fee" : -0.84000000,
"fee" : -0.87000000,
"fee" : -0.92000000,
"fee" : -0.95000000,
"fee" : -0.98000000,
"fee" : -0.63000000,
"fee" : -0.64000000,
"fee" : -0.65000000,
"fee" : -0.66000000,
"fee" : -0.68000000,
"fee" : -0.68000000,
"fee" : -0.69000000,
"fee" : -0.70000000,
"fee" : -0.71000000,
"fee" : -0.71000000,
"fee" : -0.72000000,
"fee" : -0.73000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.76000000,
"fee" : -0.78000000,
"fee" : -0.80000000,
"fee" : -0.83000000,
"fee" : -0.88000000,
"fee" : -0.92000000,
"fee" : -0.99000000,
"fee" : -0.98000000,
"fee" : -0.97000000,
"fee" : -0.87000000,
"fee" : -0.81000000,
"fee" : -0.86000000, Our daemon is up to date so ill be going over the source to see if I can find anything that would cause this Anyone else with the following problems with ANC? My multipool operator sent earned ANC to me on August 18 at 2:01AM CDT, was not received and posted to my wallet until August 21 at 13:58 CDT. The multipool operator states: "The transaction hasn't been included in a block yet. It should make it into a block eventually and be confirmed. I have no control over this. It's been an ongoing issue with the ANC network for a few weeks now." That would seem to be a very strong negative against this coin.
Yes I have the same problem with huge transaction from several small inputs from Cryptsy, the transactions refuse to be included in blocks. Meeh, K1773R, can this be solved ? Cryptsy, what is this dust? Thanks As an update, the stuck tx's will be "soon" mined. Once i find a block Good luck |
|
|
|
Thanks for all the feedback!!  It's soon time to move away from i2psam now, and over to libi2p btw, more tomorrow @ PS weekly |
|
|
|
|
Say your opinion!
A hypothetical question that does not necessarily have any ulterior motive; If Anoncoin switched hashing algorithm, what type of hashing algorithm would you liked to see then?
|
|
|
|
Could you please add rss to your blog? It's on my todo list, I will fix it. But ANC needs some love first What about this: "For Norwegians with Android phones, today will be a great day. I'll get back to it later " Have a look on Twitter : ) ... Well, I2p for Android released.. on GPlay : ) great step forward for mobilephones. Also been talking with developers wrt Anoncoin on Android, working version not far away. But more on that @ Monday, Privacy Solutions weekly news. |
|
|
|
Could you please add rss to your blog? It's on my todo list, I will fix it. But ANC needs some love first |
|
|
|
It seems that Cryptsy still have problem for withdrawing ANC. To withdrawal 3000 ANC I had to do 10 successive withdrawals. Only 1921 ANC have arrived now, four of the ten transactions sent were not included in a block yet (but I see them as unconfirmed in my ANC-qt). It seems the transactions are alot of small inputs and this increase the fee tremendously! Here is an example of one of such transaction: http://ancblockchain.com/tx/7ede9c1d53fb78ba4e16140a1389eee22ea7afd2df2ed9d7fc93c8b663ae90d6I requested 547.27272638 ANC but got only 136.7956816 ANC from 375 inputs with a fee of 0.59 ANC (cryptsy paid the fee, I paid 0.03 ANC fee) In total I paid 0.3 ANC in fee (ten times 0.03 ANC) to withdraw the 3000 ANC, the process of withdrawing took hours because I had to do it ten times and right now 4 transactions are still not confirmed. Please Cryptsy can you do something to not have such a big number of < 1 anc inputs?? This become impossible to trade at you exchange if you do nothing about those hundreds of small inputs. Hello everyone, Im currently investigating an issue with our ANC wallet where the blockchain isnt picking up the majority of our send transactions. We apologize it took us so long to spot the issue. But we are working hard on correcting it and getting the unconfirmed transactions pushed to the blockchain Some of them get confirmed after a simple restart of the daemon but others do not/ Ill keep everyone informed when I find the solution Thank you for your patience UPDATE: I think it comes down to transaction sizes. Our daemon is sending transactions that are too large to be accpeted into the chain. Im basing this on the fact that all unconfirmed send transactions have unusually high fees paid. Our default Txfee is .01 ANC and the mean over the last 1000 transactions is 0.10169169169169 which is why our withdrawal fee is set to .1 ANC anoncoind listtransactions "" 1000 | grep -A 1 -B 4 '"confirmations" : 0,' | grep fee
"fee" : -0.82000000,
"fee" : -0.90000000,
"fee" : -0.98000000,
"fee" : -0.65000000,
"fee" : -0.69000000,
"fee" : -0.72000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.76000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.81000000,
"fee" : -1.00000000,
"fee" : -0.68000000,
"fee" : -0.72000000,
"fee" : -0.73000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.76000000,
"fee" : -0.76000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.78000000,
"fee" : -0.79000000,
"fee" : -0.85000000,
"fee" : -0.96000000,
"fee" : -0.64000000,
"fee" : -0.66000000,
"fee" : -0.67000000,
"fee" : -0.69000000,
"fee" : -0.71000000,
"fee" : -0.72000000,
"fee" : -0.73000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.77000000,
"fee" : -0.79000000,
"fee" : -0.84000000,
"fee" : -0.87000000,
"fee" : -0.92000000,
"fee" : -0.95000000,
"fee" : -0.98000000,
"fee" : -0.63000000,
"fee" : -0.64000000,
"fee" : -0.65000000,
"fee" : -0.66000000,
"fee" : -0.68000000,
"fee" : -0.68000000,
"fee" : -0.69000000,
"fee" : -0.70000000,
"fee" : -0.71000000,
"fee" : -0.71000000,
"fee" : -0.72000000,
"fee" : -0.73000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.74000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.75000000,
"fee" : -0.76000000,
"fee" : -0.78000000,
"fee" : -0.80000000,
"fee" : -0.83000000,
"fee" : -0.88000000,
"fee" : -0.92000000,
"fee" : -0.99000000,
"fee" : -0.98000000,
"fee" : -0.97000000,
"fee" : -0.87000000,
"fee" : -0.81000000,
"fee" : -0.86000000, Our daemon is up to date so ill be going over the source to see if I can find anything that would cause this Anyone else with the following problems with ANC? My multipool operator sent earned ANC to me on August 18 at 2:01AM CDT, was not received and posted to my wallet until August 21 at 13:58 CDT. The multipool operator states: "The transaction hasn't been included in a block yet. It should make it into a block eventually and be confirmed. I have no control over this. It's been an ongoing issue with the ANC network for a few weeks now." That would seem to be a very strong negative against this coin.
Yes I have the same problem with huge transaction from several small inputs from Cryptsy, the transactions refuse to be included in blocks. Meeh, K1773R, can this be solved ? Cryptsy, what is this dust? Thanks Can someone send me the debug.log file please? Also make sure debug=1 when trying to send. Try it and post the debug.log |
|
|
|
Interesting. Gonna read about it, wonder how they secure it |
|
|
|
Anoncoin has its own four page section in my book called Cryptocurrency "The Alt-ernative" Reference Book. Here is the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483187.0I will document all major historical events for ANC as well as the current coin specifications. I have been working on the book for a few months. If you would like to help fund this future publication, here is my ANC wallet address: ANVLEZMHZYZRtS9mT4WNxunwLN7xi89imD How many confirmations are there per transaction? Here is the preview section for ANC:  I'll send u some Should be on it's way! Feel free to use my real name with my nick as middle name which I started with after breaking the anonymity. Might be worth reading this, http://geti2p.net/en/blog/post/2014/08/15/The-privacy-solutions-project and with recent news it seems that Orignal is joining in on the Zerocoin implementation. When do you plan to release the book? Hoping with Orignal we would be finished with ZC before you press it. Also please provide a link when I can buy it |
|
|
|
Nobody comment this post?? Congratulation on all this projects, and good luck in work! : ) This only can be win-win for ANC. Btw, most of us wait for ZC news.. I know you are working on that, but give us something.. Gracias And here u get them. I was in talk with orignal now, which is maindev on "Purple I2P" as it now is named. Since I've helped him a lot with the C++ router, and uses much time on ZC because of all the math (waste when he got degree in math. if he help me now, I can help him more afterwards, removing a lot of time I'm using to study the new math). He would probably help me now, which in the end will speed both developments up, since I help him a lot now, but could have done more if it wasn't for ZC. Since he knows math and I know the Anoncoin source, it could go quickly. We have discussed a lot development and delegation of tasks lately, and it was here this was now mentioned. But we will talk more on Monday. If this is the result, it will be win-win for all parts Also, Awesome as hell!! I connected with i2pd, now Purple I2P on IRC 23:15, and it's now 01:48 and still not disconnected, nor has i2pd crashed!! It was also there the discussion took place I will get back when I can confirm more with post on sigterm Do you know if Gnosis is still working on ZC or did he quit? Gnosis is still doing the RSA-UFO stuff. He just doesn't got time to write code. However, it seems like it's decided that I and Orignal (I2Pd main dev.) will finish the Zerocoin implementation now, with Gnosis's RSA-UFO implementation. Orignal got a higher math degree himself and Zerocoin seemed like an easy task for him with help from me who already know how Anoncoin works, or coins in general for that matter. - But I get back to you guys on Monday (when he was going to read whitepaper) or later with more about what's going to happen. Much of this is because it would benefit both projects since I can do and has done a lot on i2pd as well. I'm writing first server node as proof of concept now. Next is profiling, after profiling it's stable enough to be the underlying transport layer of Anoncoin. Implementation methods already discussed! |
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback! I'm glad u liked the project I will sure look more into your sayings about plugins. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
