Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
|
but for free
I have extracted all the kernels from the other devs and can soon publish a ptx opensource miner.. 30MHASH x17(asus 1080ti 90% tdp, +130 core +600 mem). 0.8% dev fee. Kernels made by t-rex/enemy/sp-mod. Thanks for the free work guys.. Do not forget to rename everything - _sp and in a month write that we steal your code from you
|
|
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.20 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
....
New versions appear faster than they could be tested Will try x16r and bitcore algo for the next several days Test config is the same: 6xGTX1080ti, Win10 x64. There is only one condition: power limit should not exceed 230W per GPU for me (PSU limitation) Yes lol And thanks for your tests btw
|
|
|
Links fixed, sorry . Check #1 page .
|
|
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL ( 250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36 ver 1.19 x32 X16R&S : ~ up to 27 MH/s X17: ~ 28 MH/s Bitcore: ~ 47,5 MH/s Z-enemy Test Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3rahex algo 32bit or 64bit is faster? For hex ( XDNA), high intensity is more important, for example 24 and the x64 version is more stable on 24 ...
|
|
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL ( 250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36 ver 1.19 x32 X16R&S : ~ up to 27 MH/s X17: ~ 28 MH/s Bitcore: ~ 47,5 MH/s Z-enemy Test Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra
|
|
|
32-bit version seems to be faster in some algos again, feel free to test it !
Which algos was is faster on under your tests? Perhaps, but there are no real tests yet.
|
|
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)IMPORTANT:For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers (ver. 398+) http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx - Major performance improvements: 5-7% + in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) - Stability improvements 32-bit version seems to be faster in some algos again, feel free to test it ! Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3raWindows :Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!AHgUyQAT!JkbrD5e22ISRM92mpAwa9hTlNgon7T9i995RYqf3OBICuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!lPgmhKiJ!VejTVr_HrsCPz2cQ2i9QpmtT0jZF1k9o6qbwcwMjL4YCuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!8T4STYqI!S030a6ring6PRM-NMmbPpKP01aIwFJ54jFIgizFspPkCuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!1OpiVARD!OJJnd4qVGdVJVL0Mmw3A7FBCCj5y3tJT3GkB249XsVwLinux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!1WgmVKSZ!FEzFrexYQrBHu7jkbDI_RYXogKy8n8-i0zZBMId3pSc Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!RPpkGKbD!aQEY1StU23-5YXvA0qUTWARGNXj26YWTmmdjRjNdkRcCuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!JXhU2YTD!sd73_19oz-Vfizyhmp0nGSljH_g_3mw4DNtoroiORtsFTP:Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu) http://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.19-cuda90.tar.gzhttp://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.19-cuda91.tar.gzhttp://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.19-cuda92.tar.gz
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm running the miner with GTX1080Ti, GTX1080 and GTX1070 GPU on Nicehash but I get all share rejected, with T-rex there are no problem, do you know why ?
the cmd that i run is:
z-enemy -a x16s -o stratum+tcp://x16r.eu.nicehash.com:3366 -u xxxxxxxxxxxxx -p x -i 20
z-enemy -a x16s -o stratum+tcp://x16r.eu.nicehash.com:3366 -u xxxxxxxxxxxxx -p x -i 20Check it ...
|
|
|
We’re getting reports of bugged xevan, please use 1.16 while we investigate and fix it.
|
|
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.17 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)IMPORTANT:For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers (ver. 398+) http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx Greetings, fellow miners! We're releasing an updated version of our mining software with some speed inside:- Major performance improvements: 5-10% for X16R & X16S, XDNA (hex), x17, Bitcore(BTX), c11, Sonoa, Renesis, Aergo - Lower end cards like 1050/1060 will see additional few % (yes, a bonus) - The miner no longer depends on memory, it allows to run memory clock at +0 or -500 MHz without performance loss. Happy mining!Windows :Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!hbQQyIBD!IAvlCaKdjtZtvYx0IRLdLWoYHJIPHm2HC0yltgytq30Cuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!xeBC1QKa!9xqhC51iMUIZ4cSw_MkZUDfPXeqT5XMFuOvoWPkCLgkCuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!cOZmTI5S!o9jzJeSTAeKxuX7a-MXgUZja_PnuRBubdCWd_pouQRUCuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!caZWnCIK!bNEiavwcSUPnAFev4s4cU1gtzUa5HqiGssaPThPJWy8Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)Сuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!xHQUxAzZ!rLlge4ZPqkaescfUHoZmAGqS_zqjuIty6aOao0Y__54Сuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!ZPZETQBR!OB7TkaPVJB4NBlz_mXM80ToITxjb7Us6158KN8ilqnYCuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!xfI2nawC!Wx_oQbMU3veo_rjUkmNliiaizzGGIGEYbVJboLIL6sQ
|
|
|
What would be HEX algo difficulty for 1.16?
Built in 23 crashes my miner in few sec.
Hex new algo , new settings . Try to lower your PL in the first place ( 50-70%) , to obtain stability , intensity not much important at all (if you do not care about the profit) .
|
|
|
What speed I shod expect 1070 cards for HEX? Using 1-15a-cuda9.1_x64.
Mining in supernovapool.
And where I remove - f2? Can't find the file nor place.
-f 2 for ver 1.15 , not for 1.15a GPU 1070 XDNA ( -a hex) 9-11 Mh/s is ok . PL 70-80%, CC +100 and intensity ( -i 23 or 24 )
|
|
|
The x64 version can work with intensity -i 22, although I'm not sure about the efficiency. Tests have not yet been completed, optimal is 21 for 10x0ti and 20-21 any 10x0 atm.
|
|
|
What is version 1.15? another fork or just new version released, not announced here?
1.15 ver.2 not ready for public atm. Still testing. Check our discord https://discord.gg/TAsg44t #software
|
|
|
please open the links that only posted by me , thanks
|
|
|
|