netmark
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 11, 2018, 06:08:48 AM |
|
--log switch doesn't work on my side. Ubuntu 16.04, Driver Version: 396.54, CUDA 9.2 miner output: [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 zealot/enemy-1.18 miner (64 bit) [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 NVIDIA CUDA 9.2 [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 Dev fee is 1.0% [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 MAIN POOL---------------------------------------------- [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 URL : stratum+tcp://phi2.mine.zergpool.com:8332 [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 USER: 1KD3rNyzAiLdfsxm7coXFHqwb9h4e1ycM1 [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 PASS: c=BTC [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 ------------------------------------------------------- [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 FAILOVER POOLs----------------------------------------- [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 NONE [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 ------------------------------------------------------- [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 Starting on stratum+tcp://phi2.mine.zergpool.com:8332 [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 GPU monitoring enabled (NVML). [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 Mining 'phi2' with 1 thread. ./test.sh: line 12: 17623 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ./z-enemy -d 0 -a phi2 -o stratum+tcp://phi2.mine.zergpool.com:8332 -u 1KD3rNyzAiLdfsxm7coXFHqwb9h4e1ycM1 -p c=BTC -i 19 --log=phi2.log This is what is written to log: [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 zealot/enemy-1.18 miner (64 bit) [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 NVIDIA CUDA 0.1135396928 [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 Dev fee is 0.0% [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 MAIN POOL---------------------------------------------- [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 URL : H‹<$H‰ÂèGÞ [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 USER: H‹<$H‰ÂèGÞ[NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 PASS: H‹<$H‰ÂèGÞ[NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 ------------------------------------------------------- [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 FAILOVER POOLs----------------------------------------- [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 NONE [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 ------------------------------------------------------- [NOTICE ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 Starting on  [INFO ] 18/09/11 08:59:49 GPU monitoring enabled (NVML). Whithout --log switch everything seems to be working. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
@enemy (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
|
|
September 11, 2018, 10:53:44 AM
Last edit: September 12, 2018, 05:01:33 AM by @enemy |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)IMPORTANT:For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers (ver. 398+) http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx - Major performance improvements: 5-7% + in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) - Stability improvements 32-bit version seems to be faster in some algos again, feel free to test it ! Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3raWindows :Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!AHgUyQAT!JkbrD5e22ISRM92mpAwa9hTlNgon7T9i995RYqf3OBICuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!lPgmhKiJ!VejTVr_HrsCPz2cQ2i9QpmtT0jZF1k9o6qbwcwMjL4YCuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!8T4STYqI!S030a6ring6PRM-NMmbPpKP01aIwFJ54jFIgizFspPkCuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!1OpiVARD!OJJnd4qVGdVJVL0Mmw3A7FBCCj5y3tJT3GkB249XsVwLinux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!1WgmVKSZ!FEzFrexYQrBHu7jkbDI_RYXogKy8n8-i0zZBMId3pSc Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!RPpkGKbD!aQEY1StU23-5YXvA0qUTWARGNXj26YWTmmdjRjNdkRcCuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!JXhU2YTD!sd73_19oz-Vfizyhmp0nGSljH_g_3mw4DNtoroiORtsFTP:Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu) http://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.19-cuda90.tar.gzhttp://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.19-cuda91.tar.gzhttp://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.19-cuda92.tar.gz
|
RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
|
|
|
FloppyPurpleGherkin
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 306
Merit: 2
|
|
September 11, 2018, 11:32:32 AM |
|
32-bit version seems to be faster in some algos again, feel free to test it !
Which algos was is faster on under your tests? |
|
|
|
|
@enemy (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
|
|
September 11, 2018, 11:37:48 AM |
|
32-bit version seems to be faster in some algos again, feel free to test it !
Which algos was is faster on under your tests? Perhaps, but there are no real tests yet. |
RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
September 11, 2018, 12:41:38 PM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
...
Thanks! I'm testing x16r algo. In the miner I see about 5-10% increase of hashrate compared with v1.18. Power consumtption is practically the same. After 24 hours I'll check the hashrate at pool. Hope will see the same improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
entinio
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 1
|
|
September 11, 2018, 04:35:41 PM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? |
myha.sh (http://myha.sh) : your realistic mining calculator
|
|
|
@enemy (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
|
|
September 11, 2018, 05:53:54 PM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL ( 250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36 ver 1.19 x32 X16R&S : ~ up to 27 MH/s X17: ~ 28 MH/s Bitcore: ~ 47,5 MH/s Z-enemy Test Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra |
RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
September 11, 2018, 08:42:52 PM |
|
Haven't noticed major difference on 1080 and 1080ti @ x16r in hashrate in v1.19, well, mb 1-2%. Power draw is more stable though, less spiky, so to say.
|
|
|
|
|
HE[A]RTLESS
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
September 12, 2018, 03:08:13 AM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL ( 250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36 ver 1.19 x32 X16R&S : ~ up to 27 MH/s X17: ~ 28 MH/s Bitcore: ~ 47,5 MH/s Z-enemy Test Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3rahex algo 32bit or 64bit is faster? |
|
|
|
|
jazz1984
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 5
|
|
September 12, 2018, 10:41:12 AM
Last edit: September 12, 2018, 11:24:48 AM by jazz1984 |
|
Hi all. On my system both x16 little faster on 32bit version. win7 64, 398 driver, 1060 cards, z-enemy 1.19.
Almost 9Mh/1060
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marvell2
|
|
September 12, 2018, 10:44:00 AM |
|
please add progPow
|
|
|
|
|
mininghope
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
September 12, 2018, 11:00:41 AM |
|
Pls Enemy fix linux version of cuda 9.2. mining@mining-ntc:~/mineros/enemy$ ./z-enemy
[ERROR ] 18/09/12 12:54:19 Unable to query number of CUDA devices!
this is the output of nvidia-smi Wed Sep 12 13:01:09 2018
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 390.77 Driver Version: 390.77 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 108... Off | 00000000:02:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 63% 73C P2 185W / 190W | 282MiB / 11177MiB | 100% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 1 GeForce GTX 108... Off | 00000000:03:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 62% 73C P2 190W / 190W | 241MiB / 11178MiB | 100% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 2 GeForce GTX 108... Off | 00000000:04:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 53% 72C P2 172W / 190W | 241MiB / 11178MiB | 100% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 884 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 30MiB |
| 0 1479 G compiz 17MiB |
| 0 25953 C ./z-enemy 223MiB |
| 1 884 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB |
| 1 25953 C ./z-enemy 223MiB |
| 2 884 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB |
| 2 25953 C ./z-enemy 223MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL ( 250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36 ver 1.19 x32 X16R&S : ~ up to 27 MH/s X17: ~ 28 MH/s Bitcore: ~ 47,5 MH/s Z-enemy Test Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra |
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
September 12, 2018, 12:35:22 PM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
...
Thanks! I'm testing x16r algo. In the miner I see about 5-10% increase of hashrate compared with v1.18. Power consumtption is practically the same. After 24 hours I'll check the hashrate at pool. Hope will see the same improvement Unfortunately I can't estimate the improvements of new version on pool statistic due to emergency power loss at my rigs for several hours. Will test another day P.S. I use Win64 Cuda9.2 version |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
@enemy (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
|
|
September 13, 2018, 07:47:47 PM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL ( 250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36 ver 1.19 x32 X16R&S : ~ up to 27 MH/s X17: ~ 28 MH/s Bitcore: ~ 47,5 MH/s Z-enemy Test Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3rahex algo 32bit or 64bit is faster? For hex ( XDNA), high intensity is more important, for example 24 and the x64 version is more stable on 24 ... |
RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
|
|
|
stevascha
Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 10
|
|
September 14, 2018, 07:18:37 AM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL ( 250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36 ver 1.19 x32 X16R&S : ~ up to 27 MH/s X17: ~ 28 MH/s Bitcore: ~ 47,5 MH/s Z-enemy Test Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3rahex algo 32bit or 64bit is faster? For hex ( XDNA), high intensity is more important, for example 24 and the x64 version is more stable on 24 ... any plan add merit algo? https://github.com/meritlabs/merit |
|
|
|
HE[A]RTLESS
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
September 14, 2018, 09:15:34 AM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..) Any benchmark with numbers ? What do you get guys ? The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL ( 250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36 ver 1.19 x32 X16R&S : ~ up to 27 MH/s X17: ~ 28 MH/s Bitcore: ~ 47,5 MH/s Z-enemy Test Discord:https://discord.gg/JTZm3rahex algo 32bit or 64bit is faster? For hex ( XDNA), high intensity is more important, for example 24 and the x64 version is more stable on 24 ... thank for info |
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
September 14, 2018, 02:46:22 PM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
...
Thanks! I'm testing x16r algo. In the miner I see about 5-10% increase of hashrate compared with v1.18. Power consumtption is practically the same. After 24 hours I'll check the hashrate at pool. Hope will see the same improvement Unfortunately I can't estimate the improvements of new version on pool statistic due to emergency power loss at my rigs for several hours. Will test another day P.S. I use Win64 Cuda9.2 version Well after 3 day test I got the following results for my 6x1080ti rig (OC, DV) Win x64 x16r algo v1.18 ~ 170 Mh/s (48h average on pool) v1.19 ~ 180 Mh/s (48h average on pool) Power consumption about 220-230W per GPU But payment amount is less than WTM predict about 15%. Maybe it's due to pool luck or smth else... |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@enemy (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
|
|
September 14, 2018, 06:56:33 PM |
|
Links fixed, sorry . Check #1 page .
|
RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
|
|
|
|
