 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
DSTM miner is now added to smOS  I will say I may be having a connection issue with my 12 card on it though. . https://youtu.be/oF9zMJ-EhvQ My 6 cards are working perfect though with increased hashrates EDIT had to take my 12 card off of DSTM . . not working properly any idea DSTM? This is most likely because zm uses one separate connection for each GPU - zm handles them completely independent currently. Some routers/pools seem to have issues with this. I'm currently testing a new version which uses a single connection. It has nothing to do with routers or pools. This is just because zm take too much cpu load. With G4400s, I can barely put 7 cards... it's too unstable. Just a background process (an update or something) is enough to crash everything. So, a 12 cards rig, I don't even think about it! If you still want to run 12 cards, you'll probably have to upgrade the proc... or stick to ewbf |
|
|
|
wooooo! Confirmed: 0.0001 BTG ! how cool is that! 0.0478 to go...  what pool are you using? Suprnova Confirmed: 0.0014 BTG now ! (I hope) And what about profit? Does u make more profit with BTG minning instead of Zcash or less than Zcash? We need some details, bro. We cannot dump them, so hard to tell now. The first 3 hours of mining I had 3.5 time more than zcash, but now it's getting very slow. Plus, BTG price is falling. Right now, according to coinmarketcap, I have 14 USD for 13 hours of mining with 7x 1070 (3300 sols) Party is over Now I'm down to something between 20 - 40cts for 1h30, so that's it... I'm out. Going back to ZEC |
|
|
|
wooooo! Confirmed: 0.0001 BTG ! how cool is that! 0.0478 to go... what pool are you using? Suprnova Confirmed: 0.0014 BTG now ! (I hope) And what about profit? Does u make more profit with BTG minning instead of Zcash or less than Zcash? We need some details, bro. We cannot dump them, so hard to tell now. The first 3 hours of mining I had 3.5 time more than zcash, but now it's getting very slow. Plus, BTG price is falling. Right now, according to coinmarketcap, I have 14 USD for 13 hours of mining with 7x 1070 (3300 sols) |
|
|
|
wooooo! Confirmed: 0.0001 BTG ! how cool is that! 0.0478 to go... what pool are you using? Suprnova Confirmed: 0.0014 BTG now ! (I hope) |
|
|
|
wooooo! Confirmed: 0.0001 BTG ! how cool is that! 0.0478 to go... |
|
|
|
yeah something just happppen with my Miner im in the SuprNova pool
and it was getting alot of lag MS then just fell off and went to there
web page and nothing thats only if you try and get threw there BTG pool page
but if you try Zcash Zec Dec ect... page its working i don't get it
Nova on their Twitter page said that btg told them their pool is on wrong chain so all mining work was useless. https://twitter.com/SuprnovaPools/status/929958628584493056Ouch ... Dem feels  Don't believe the lies, that person is full of s*it no no that was right at the time. Turns out this is the right chain eventually! You have to follow this shitty show... I wonder what's next! |
|
|
|
After mining 4 hr to a black hole, I removed my stuff back to zec.
Not sure where it all go.
Right now on suprnova I have a ROI 3.5 time better than zec. But, by the time it's confirmed and we can dump it on an exchange, this shit will probably fall down under 100 sat... or there could be other split chains... |
|
|
|
This BTG is just a big joke
I mean, a scam you try to hide it... but this! this is to much!!
If you don't take part in it, it really is funny!
I enjoyed the SIGT drama, but this one is killing it.
stolen testnet hash, official website down for days, premine scam after launch,
and now the split chain!!
Come on! What's next I wanna know!!!
Your 100% correct, this is not only a joke but a complete nightmare for me. I have been jumping from pool to pool, then guess what, the wallets are not working! Best bet for now is suprnova because you don't need a wallet for now. I would never mine on the official pool, they already demonstrated their professionalism and we all know they are crooks, so... |
|
|
|
|
This BTG is just a big joke
I mean, a scam you try to hide it... but this! this is to much!!
If you don't take part in it, it really is funny!
I enjoyed the SIGT drama, but this one is killing it.
stolen testnet hash, official website down for days, premine scam after launch,
and now the split chain!!
Come on! What's next I wanna know!!!
|
|
|
|
This was not a server outage but a network outage. That can happen everyday, maybe not that scale but it can happen anytime.
There is no hack to do, the real hack is your fee. You remove that and everything work fine.
The solution is simple: no connection, you drop the shares... nobody wins, but at least the miner don't crash. Is that a hack?
For now, you just make it look bad. It is unreliable because how your fee behave, and your reaction.
And telling people here on this forum, who has worked with you (yea, beta test), if your're not happy go use another miner: that's not very professional.
Lot's of us here had stability problems... well, it's becoming clear now. We have at least one explanation.
Not only we are paying fees, but it's turning against us.
But you don't wanna change anything, I get it.
I'm complaining, but I don't care, really. I just have a small rig. But think of those who have farms.
Some have spoken, you just ignore them.
Sry, I'm really trying to understand your intention, it looks like we are reading different things. I've stated it clearly: reliability is of high priority - I'm working to handle such kind of situations reliably. I don't want to provide an unreliable untested solution - so it will take a couple of days. If this is not fast enough people have the option to use a different mining software, if there was no other mining software available providing an untested solution would be an option. All right! I don't speak for everybody, but to me 2 days sound cool. I just had the impression that you didn't care and were about to do nothing about it. |
|
|
|
I have no intention. I'm just saying that zm should not shut down if you cannot connect to the server for your fees.
You have to act fast. Do something. Lower the hash rate or I dont know... but find a solution now.
We don't have to wait that you find the perfect anti piracy solution.
Let me remind you that you are taking 700 bucks everyday from us.
This is no donation! this is your fees. We are paying you. So, in case of problem like that we expect you to act fast.
No blabla, no bullshit.
We all lost today because of that (including you), and you act like it is nothing.
The problem is not the network failure, it is the way your miner react.
This is slightly one sided ofc. Server outage like today is very unlikely to happen during the next week. So there is some time (and it's a of high priority ofc) to think about a solution which works reliable for all users in all locations. People that have concerns about zm's current reliability (this is perfectly valid ofc) have the option to use a different mining software. I don't want to hack an unreliable solution as fast as possible just to make it look good. This was not a server outage but a network outage. That can happen everyday, maybe not that scale but it can happen anytime. There is no hack to do, the real hack is your fee. You remove that and everything work fine. The solution is simple: no connection, you drop the shares... nobody wins, but at least the miner don't crash. Is that a hack? For now, you just make it look bad. It is unreliable because how your fee behave, and your reaction. And telling people here on this forum, who has worked with you (yea, beta test), if your're not happy go use another miner: that's not very professional. Lot's of us here had stability problems... well, it's becoming clear now. We have at least one explanation. Not only we are paying fees, but it's turning against us. But you don't wanna change anything, I get it. I'm complaining, but I don't care, really. I just have a small rig. But think of those who have farms. Some have spoken, you just ignore them. dude, we fking got it, your'e salty. Run back to EWBF's and shut it, no one is forcing you to use this miner. Very constructive. You're actually the one who should shut it. |
|
|
|
I have no intention. I'm just saying that zm should not shut down if you cannot connect to the server for your fees.
You have to act fast. Do something. Lower the hash rate or I dont know... but find a solution now.
We don't have to wait that you find the perfect anti piracy solution.
Let me remind you that you are taking 700 bucks everyday from us.
This is no donation! this is your fees. We are paying you. So, in case of problem like that we expect you to act fast.
No blabla, no bullshit.
We all lost today because of that (including you), and you act like it is nothing.
The problem is not the network failure, it is the way your miner react.
This is slightly one sided ofc. Server outage like today is very unlikely to happen during the next week. So there is some time (and it's a of high priority ofc) to think about a solution which works reliable for all users in all locations. People that have concerns about zm's current reliability (this is perfectly valid ofc) have the option to use a different mining software. I don't want to hack an unreliable solution as fast as possible just to make it look good. This was not a server outage but a network outage. That can happen everyday, maybe not that scale but it can happen anytime. There is no hack to do, the real hack is your fee. You remove that and everything work fine. The solution is simple: no connection, you drop the shares... nobody wins, but at least the miner don't crash. Is that a hack? For now, you just make it look bad. It is unreliable because how your fee behave, and your reaction. And telling people here on this forum, who has worked with you (yea, beta test), if your're not happy go use another miner: that's not very professional. Lot's of us here had stability problems... well, it's becoming clear now. We have at least one explanation. Not only we are paying fees, but it's turning against us. But you don't wanna change anything, I get it. I'm complaining, but I don't care, really. I just have a small rig. But think of those who have farms. Some have spoken, you just ignore them. |
|
|
|
Some more information about the downtime:
OVH hosting went down for a couple of hours today. They are one of the biggest hosting service in Europe - multiple pools went down because of this in Europe.
Concerning zm's developer fee implementation:
It's not easy to differentiate between a server outage and someone simply blocking network access to dev fee servers for a user space program. This is why zm behaves like this. Nevertheless expected downtime due to this is still very low.
There are multiple technical solutions to this.
Failover servers is one possibility, however they have to be chosen carefully such that they are distributed among different hosting providers.
Another possibility is to differentiate between a server outage and someone trying to bypass dev fee. Such an implementation would allow to simply disable dev fee as long as the corresponding server is down. However this would require zm to communicate with it's own servers.
A third possibility is to extend zm such that it's able to solve blocks without the need of a pool. This one requires the most work - I'm currently not sure about the constraints of this solution, however it might also be useful for some users.
For users that have concerns about zm's current reliability because of this. Pls use a different mining software - it's your choice ofc.
Well, after reading this, it's clear that you fees are your number one concern. You do not care about the down time as long as your fees are not stolen. This kind of reasoning will get you hacked, this is just a matter of time. I'm not sure about your intention, I don't see any productive proposal in your statement. I've clearly stated the preference for reliability above the developer fee I've also stated some possible solutions I'm thinking of. This allows people to discuss them if there are any concerns about them. I have no intention. I'm just saying that zm should not shut down if you cannot connect to the server for your fees. You have to act fast. Do something. Lower the hash rate or I dont know... but find a solution now. We don't have to wait that you find the perfect anti piracy solution. Let me remind you that you are taking 700 bucks everyday from us. This is no donation! this is your fees. We are paying you. So, in case of problem like that we expect you to act fast. No blabla, no bullshit. We all lost today because of that (including you), and you act like it is nothing. The problem is not the network failure, it is the way your miner react. |
|
|
|
Some more information about the downtime:
OVH hosting went down for a couple of hours today. They are one of the biggest hosting service in Europe - multiple pools went down because of this in Europe.
Concerning zm's developer fee implementation:
It's not easy to differentiate between a server outage and someone simply blocking network access to dev fee servers for a user space program. This is why zm behaves like this. Nevertheless expected downtime due to this is still very low.
There are multiple technical solutions to this.
Failover servers is one possibility, however they have to be chosen carefully such that they are distributed among different hosting providers.
Another possibility is to differentiate between a server outage and someone trying to bypass dev fee. Such an implementation would allow to simply disable dev fee as long as the corresponding server is down. However this would require zm to communicate with it's own servers.
A third possibility is to extend zm such that it's able to solve blocks without the need of a pool. This one requires the most work - I'm currently not sure about the constraints of this solution, however it might also be useful for some users.
For users that have concerns about zm's current reliability because of this. Pls use a different mining software - it's your choice ofc.
Well, after reading this, it's clear that you fees are your number one concern. You do not care about the down time as long as your fees are not stolen. This kind of reasoning will get you hacked, this is just a matter of time. |
|
|
|
hmm what is problem?  i try port 3333 too..  Same here... here we go again. No flypool, no zm mining... can't connect to nanopool, working perfectly with ewbf... |
|
|
|
To avoid misinterpretations of my previous statement:
ZM's reliability is of high priority.
There is no doubt - this needs improvement.
I'm thinking about a better solution to this ofc.
This requires some communication with pool owners and some testing.
I'll provide an update as soon as possible.
Sry for the downtime.
NP just make it more clear what you mean this software seems awesome or better then EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner ...so until you get it working again please take your time fixing it and ignore some of the others an me for that fact ..... an fix it : ) ...the good thing i guess no one seems to care about the Fee they just want it working because it does work good, when it is working ... or better then EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner . I do have one request add some color to the screen ... ..... Yeah, make us pay to beta test and ignore us... that's the best way to go! If people change their miner for a 4% gain, they certainly care for 2% fee as well. |
|
|
|
With my 1070s, I have 460 sols instead of 440. So that's ~4.5% for me.
Today, with a 3 hours hole and the 2% fees, that makes 14.5% less...
I don't understand why the mining would need to stop if it can't connect to flypool. I mean, the fee shares are lost anyway.
So, what communication with pool owners? Just cut the crap
Looks like the dev fees are priority number one here, that sure works perfectly!
Was it so hard for you to visit pool website and realize, that EU nodes are down? Then was it so hard for you to edit your miner with US pool address and continue mining? No one shouldn't do this instead of you, for whatever fee... Guys! is that so hard to understand that you can edit whatever you want, it won't work! it is HARDCODED zm try to connect to eu server anyway, for the DEV FEE I'm as noob as you here, but at least read the last 2 pages before posting shit |
|
|
|
this morning there was an outage in EU affecting several pool providers that had the EU servers there: suprnova, flypool, ethermine, miningspeed, hence an almost 3 hour downtime.
We already know that. The problem here is that the server for the dev fee is hardcoded (eu flypool). So, if eu flypool is down, you can't mine anywhere with zm. |
|
|
|
Is there a consensus regarding this miner? Is it really much better than ewbf? Do we have an organized comparison between the two in various conditions for various cards?
The comparison is that this miner is clearly an unstable beta version, an I lost 3 hours of mining today... again. And we are paying 2% fee on top of that, to participate to a beta test... t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv yea... like I said, dev fee is working perfectly. just use Cheat Engine  |
|
|
|
It happens because very smart boy - dstm hardcoded fee pool in this miner. When pool (flypool) is down miner is out of work. So I lost more than hour on my farms it is much more than fee. Now I switched to EWBF - it is less vulnerable to such a treats.
Bye bye dstm..
I was trying to figure out what went wrong, it's been stable AF, running few weeks straight and then suddenly all those emails saying that miner has gone offline. Few hours downtime is not that bad compared to all those months EWBF's made ~7% less. With my 1070s, I have 460 sols instead of 440. So that's ~4.5% for me. Today, with a 3 hours hole and the 2% fees, that makes 14.5% less... I don't understand why the mining would need to stop if it can't connect to flypool. I mean, the fee shares are lost anyway. So, what communication with pool owners? Just cut the crap Looks like the dev fees are priority number one here, that sure works perfectly! |
|
|
|
|
