 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
I changed password and moved miners to hosting facility. Now when I log into web interface of miners I get this error: 500 Internal Server Error
The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cherrypy/_cprequest.py", line 606, in respond
cherrypy.response.body = self.handler()
File "/mineros/web/mako_h.py", line 14, in __call__
env.update(self.next_handler())
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cherrypy/_cpdispatch.py", line 25, in __call__
return self.callable(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
File "/mineros/web/auth.py", line 142, in login
cherrypy.session.regenerate()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cherrypy/lib/sessions.py", line 91, in regenerate
self.delete()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cherrypy/lib/sessions.py", line 163, in delete
self._delete()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cherrypy/lib/sessions.py", line 263, in _delete
del self.cache[self.id]
KeyError: '00619a402a4766f5389200bc12872a007fcb2f54'
Powered by CherryPy 3.1.2
How do I fix this? PS: Miners are still hashing, but I can't change settings. |
|
|
|
I finally received my miners today.  |
|
|
|
|
E please add overclocking How to.
Do I understand it right, that I have to change /mineros/boot.py?
Edit:
My miners were delivered yesterday, here is some gathered knowledge.
Delivered boxes were in good shape, miners are really heavy.
Ribbon cable was disconnected from module interface board (both miners) and module interface board was disconnected from 1-2 boards on opposite side from ribbon cable (5 module miner) even though small piece of foam was inserted between module interface board and cover.
Sometimes miner does not pick up IP address from DHCP server (on display is shown 0.0.0.0 frever), after power cycling it connects to the network.
Pool balancing in CGminer settings after restart of CGminer returns to Balance mode.
Power consumption of 5 module miner is around 1070W.
Overclocking is not worth it, power consumption rises a lot and errors too.
|
|
|
|
75 shares
keep!
you own 75 shares? well then lets us sell one . then you will have 75 out of 100 shares. if you really like the machine just buy the other 25 shares. since one machine is 4 coins send in a coin you would own one complete machine. the other people would get 5 coins to split up no, he owns 15 shares in R5 - if I tracked down right old R5 and R6 threads |
|
|
|
My order was collected by UPS on 28. 2., today I was contacted by UPS to fill papers for customs, delivery is scheduled for tomorrow. Bitmine never sent e-mail with tracking numbers  (but I know them now and from delivery note scanned by UPS I know that my CPP is + 60%). |
|
|
|
|
My order with queue position 59 is complete according to e-mail from Bitmine, but I have no tracking number yet.
|
|
|
|
-1 to sell please dont sell. if bitcoin goes to 5k$ we can mine next few years  UP If we sell miners now, you will probably get more BTC, then you will ever mine. |
|
|
|
|
I think we should sell miners now.
|
|
|
|
|
Queue Position: 59
Order number: 126x
Date of payment: 10 September
Method of Payment: Bank/Wire Transfer
Product : Desk
Hashing Power: 1 Th/s
Destination: Czech Republic
Same queue position as RetroGamer???
|
|
|
|
Prorated balance still not received...
Prorated balance received, thanks Soniq |
|
|
|
Hi all members,
I would like to know your opinion of the disagreement I have with Soniq. We tried to solve it through PM, but our points of view are different.
[..]
yes baros008, it does makes sense that you receive the dividend payout for the period you have owned the shares. The new share owner should receive the dividend payout for the period HE has owned the shares. If this is not the case, soniq, please clarify the rules and reasoning behind. Perhaps also update the rules so that we all know how this will be handled in the future. The issue arises when I dont know who he sold his shares too? One of the many issues associated with Bitfunder. I know how many shares are associated with each payment addresses on Bitfunder, but I don't know who sold and bought what. That is why the dividends are paid to to the payment address associated with the shares on dividend payment date. In a private sale I would know the buyer and be able to "hold dividend payments", but in this situation I cannot. Listing on BitFunder was meant to be able to trade shares. But if you traded and finally sold shares when Jupiters started mining, your dividends are gone now. All aspects of listing on BitFunder were not think out enough and rules were not specified. Was it my fault? I used only common logic in my calculation of dividend. I understand there were issues with Bitfunder (Soniq helped me to solve some of them) and that it isn't possible to trace sold shares. But there is one thing that undoubtedly belongs to me - prorated balance. Will you return it to me? Can you please reply my question? Sorry about the delay, I can send the prorated balance back to the address on record, is that fine? Otherwise I need a signed message from the original payment address stating a change of payment address. Yes, you can use that address, thank you. Prorated balance still not received... |
|
|
|
Hi all members,
I would like to know your opinion of the disagreement I have with Soniq. We tried to solve it through PM, but our points of view are different.
[..]
yes baros008, it does makes sense that you receive the dividend payout for the period you have owned the shares. The new share owner should receive the dividend payout for the period HE has owned the shares. If this is not the case, soniq, please clarify the rules and reasoning behind. Perhaps also update the rules so that we all know how this will be handled in the future. The issue arises when I dont know who he sold his shares too? One of the many issues associated with Bitfunder. I know how many shares are associated with each payment addresses on Bitfunder, but I don't know who sold and bought what. That is why the dividends are paid to to the payment address associated with the shares on dividend payment date. In a private sale I would know the buyer and be able to "hold dividend payments", but in this situation I cannot. Listing on BitFunder was meant to be able to trade shares. But if you traded and finally sold shares when Jupiters started mining, your dividends are gone now. All aspects of listing on BitFunder were not think out enough and rules were not specified. Was it my fault? I used only common logic in my calculation of dividend. I understand there were issues with Bitfunder (Soniq helped me to solve some of them) and that it isn't possible to trace sold shares. But there is one thing that undoubtedly belongs to me - prorated balance. Will you return it to me? Can you please reply my question? Sorry about the delay, I can send the prorated balance back to the address on record, is that fine? Otherwise I need a signed message from the original payment address stating a change of payment address. Yes, you can use that address, thank you. |
|
|
|
Hi all members,
I would like to know your opinion of the disagreement I have with Soniq. We tried to solve it through PM, but our points of view are different.
[..]
yes baros008, it does makes sense that you receive the dividend payout for the period you have owned the shares. The new share owner should receive the dividend payout for the period HE has owned the shares. If this is not the case, soniq, please clarify the rules and reasoning behind. Perhaps also update the rules so that we all know how this will be handled in the future. The issue arises when I dont know who he sold his shares too? One of the many issues associated with Bitfunder. I know how many shares are associated with each payment addresses on Bitfunder, but I don't know who sold and bought what. That is why the dividends are paid to to the payment address associated with the shares on dividend payment date. In a private sale I would know the buyer and be able to "hold dividend payments", but in this situation I cannot. Listing on BitFunder was meant to be able to trade shares. But if you traded and finally sold shares when Jupiters started mining, your dividends are gone now. All aspects of listing on BitFunder were not think out enough and rules were not specified. Was it my fault? I used only common logic in my calculation of dividend. I understand there were issues with Bitfunder (Soniq helped me to solve some of them) and that it isn't possible to trace sold shares. But there is one thing that undoubtedly belongs to me - prorated balance. Will you return it to me? Can you please reply my question? |
|
|
|
Hi all members,
I would like to know your opinion of the disagreement I have with Soniq. We tried to solve it through PM, but our points of view are different.
[..]
yes baros008, it does makes sense that you receive the dividend payout for the period you have owned the shares. The new share owner should receive the dividend payout for the period HE has owned the shares. If this is not the case, soniq, please clarify the rules and reasoning behind. Perhaps also update the rules so that we all know how this will be handled in the future. The issue arises when I dont know who he sold his shares too? One of the many issues associated with Bitfunder. I know how many shares are associated with each payment addresses on Bitfunder, but I don't know who sold and bought what. That is why the dividends are paid to to the payment address associated with the shares on dividend payment date. In a private sale I would know the buyer and be able to "hold dividend payments", but in this situation I cannot. Listing on BitFunder was meant to be able to trade shares. But if you traded and finally sold shares when Jupiters started mining, your dividends are gone now. All aspects of listing on BitFunder were not think out enough and rules were not specified. Was it my fault? I used only common logic in my calculation of dividend. I understand there were issues with Bitfunder (Soniq helped me to solve some of them) and that it isn't possible to trace sold shares. But there is one thing that undoubtedly belongs to me - prorated balance. Will you return it to me? |
|
|
|
I have bought simple trade bot yesterday and am tinkering with the settings. Up to now i haven't been able to get it working properly, due to a couple of things: (I am using Bitstamp/btcusd) - First you have to select the market in both the trade bot tabs, or else you get a bunch of 'object reference' errors in the debug log and the currency data and graph will not be updated.
- When the bot tries to buy the order often does not get processed at the exchange, however the bot thinks it went okay. I noticed that for the trades that did not come through the debug log states: 'Order accepted, received id: 0', where a trade that does come through the received id is a proper trade id.
The transaction log on bitstamp does not show the trades that got an id '0' back.
Anyone else with the same problem?
Also, the column that displays your profit after a trade seems not to take the tradingfee into account. Is that intentional? MtGox is not on the list of supported exchanges. As it is the largest btcusd and btceur exchange at the moment, I would like to be able to use it. Or is there a reason it is not supported? Regards, Rob I have same problems. Only one instance of program running, Bitstamp selected in both STB tabs, only one tab with trading activated, USD and BTC available on Bitstamp, RSI indicator with default settings and trade orders are not really accepted by Bitstamp (order id:0) There was 6 trade orders sent during night...  no one was accepted...  |
|
|
|
Yesterday I tried to manually buy some BTC, this is result:  Few seconds later same transaction was sent to BitStamp without problems and id was returned:  Even when trade is not really accepted by exchange, Simple Trade Bot thinks that it was accepted and changes it's position. Sometimes it works, sometimes not, so this is not usable for real trading. |
|
|
|
|
Hi all members,
I would like to know your opinion of the disagreement I have with Soniq. We tried to solve it through PM, but our points of view are different.
I used to own 12 shares (40%) of the first Jupiter in this group buy, which were listed on BitFunder as 1200 shares.
All 1200 shares were owned by me since 21. 7. 2013 until 10. 10. 2013, then I was selling my shares gradually up to 21. 10. 2013. I still owned 900 shares on 18. 10. 2013.
I sent Soniq table with time, date and amount of shares I held on BitFunder (so he could calculate my dividend) on 22. 10. 2013, I even saw it included in KNC GB Calc spreadsheet in that time.
Jupiters were supposed to start mining 3. 10. 2013, but they really started mining 9. 10. 2013, compensation received from KNC was 5 BTC per Jupiter. I still owned 1200 shares at this time, so I should get 2 BTC from compensation.
Since this date Jupiters were mining and I still owned some shares, so I should get earnings from mining with corrected number of shares up to 21. 10. 2013.
Soniq says I sold my shares too soon and that dividends are paid to the current owner at the time of dividend payment. I read first post and through all 27 pages of the thread and I can't find this statement anywhere.
First dividend payment for GB1 was on 14. 10. 2013, on 18. 10. 2013 loan for 2 months of hosting from Jon at Bitfunder was fully paid. In this time I still owned 900 shares on BitFunder, so I should get my dividend. I don't know why he postponed dividend payment for members listed on BitFunder.
He released my dividend payment (BTC mined with my shares between 9. 10. 2013 and 21.10. 2013) and compensation for late delivery to new owner of my shares, I think it was error.
My logic says he should hold my part of compensation and BTCs mined with my shares till we clarify this situation, deduct hosting and other fees and then eventualy release my dividend.
All I got from Soniq in this group buy is test payment long time ago.
Prorated balance of 0.32 BTC (which was suposed to be returned with dividend payment) wasn't returned to me till now.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Below is calculation of my dividend, it's only theoretical value (no problems with hosting included, no exact mining time and amount of shares calculations, hosting and fees not deducted).
-prorated balance
0.32 BTC
- late delivery compensation from KNC -5 BTC pre Jupiter x 12/30 (my 12 shares of 30 shares per Jupiter)
2 BTC
- 12 shares (200 Gh/s) mining with difficulty 189281249 for approx 3 days (9.-12. 10. 2013)
1.5 BTC
- 9 shares (150 Gh/s) mining with difficulty 189281249 for approx 3 days (13.-16. 10. 2013)
1.5 BTC
- 9 shares (150 Gh/s) mining with difficulty 267731249 for approx 4 days (17.-20. 10. 2013)
1.12 BTC
Total: 6.44 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
