Bitcoin Forum
July 05, 2024, 10:29:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
21  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 04, 2015, 07:55:18 AM
Any updates from the poor souls that may still have their coins stuck with Cryptsy? Has anyone been able to withdraw any amount of BTC, anyone at all? It's Dec 4th already, and the last successful withdrawal that I know of happened on Nov 25th. By now, any notion that this might be a temporary fluke should have evaporated even in the minds of the otherwise incapable... Get your coins the fuck out of there before it's too late.

To the guy who says he will take his chances and keep his coins there and even send some more... you are the reason banksters get away with financial murder in this world, fucking mellow and passive fools who allow these greedy assholes to walk all over them, an in return they simply shrug their shoulders and dismiss it with an "oh well". If you trust these scumbags with your money more than you trust your own "flash drive operating" abilities or whatever the fuck you called it, you deserve to be parted with your money. I just wish you wouldn't be enriching low lives in the process.

/fucktheCraptsyscumbagsrant
22  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 02, 2015, 04:32:31 AM
So I have a question for ya'll keyboard detectives: do we know all of the cold and hot wallet addresses for BTC, DASH, LTC and ETH that Cryptsy uses/used? Has anyone entertained the idea of running a sort of impromptu audit? Would that be too colossal of an undertaking? Just looking at the blockchain makes my primitive head spin, but I have seen/heard of more intellectually acute people conducting such tasks... I noticed some wallets being discussed a few posts ago, but those weren't the full picture.
23  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 02, 2015, 02:08:53 AM
As of the last while, I had a full 1 Bitcoin in Cryptsy, shouldve known better to put it there after the gradual withdrawal issues over the last few months.....

Long story short, I figured out a way to get most of my funds out in the last while......There has been some sketchy shit happening to my account over the past few months, negative balances, coins that they withheld from me but it had a fake transaction withdrawal id provided to me!! Then, they decide to release my withdrawal once the market crashes 75% Wtf? TOTAL THEFT

Anyways, i'm glad to be done there. Fuk em, i'm finished with their bullshit. They can take the rest of their shitcoins and baghold them. I dumped every last piece of shit altcoin that only resides on Cryptsy..... SEEE YAAAAAAA LOL

*** PS - If you are desperate to get bitcoin off of cryptsy, pm me IMMEDIATELY.
I'm willing to sell my secret for a couple of bucks (I'm just trying to recoup the remaining coin that i have on that shithole exchange) If I can help you get a good chunk of your coins off of there then I would be happy to do so...In fact, I will share my secret withdrawal method once i get every last satoshi off of there....I'm afraid that by that point, it may be too late for many of you, so PM ME, I WOULD BE GLAD TO HELP for a small fee, whatever you are willing to donate to me...Good luck all


It would be nice if you could just post what you've figured out for all to see, like I did a few posts ago, and not be greedy. Post your address too and hopefully people will decide to tip you out of their own accord...
24  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: December 02, 2015, 12:41:03 AM
My concern is not about future whale diggers, my concern is:
"Why would future users of Clam, buy Clams, knowing that the protocol can change
if majority holders don't like something about the protocol, at that time?"
My concern is future users/investors.

Exactly that is what i thought too. Though i think that danger is now avoided isn't it? Price stabilizes and the fork is dead or am i missing something?

Not exactly, all the hoopla surrounding the digger (aka "curious") is over, since we bought him out. So that's over, and almost 300K clams have been introduced in the wild.

However, we are still going to vote through staking, to see just what the majority wants, in case of future diggers appearing (the likelihood of which is not insignificant). We need to figure this out before the next one shows up and throws the community into a nosedive again.
25  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 02, 2015, 12:30:50 AM


Personally, I'm still stickin' with BitJohn (real name unknown) was part of Cryptsy prior to it comin' online live. Further, I don't buy the story of him being in Afghanistan most of 2013 while also handling various important affairs pertaining to Cryptsy. Also, BitJohn and Paul Vernon were key players of Mintsy that is now kaputski.

One more thing, I'm 100% beside myself that cryptocurrency enthusiasts are providing their vitals to a dude having the nym Horus in Canada whom we also don't know his real name.

The characters that make up DigitalBTC/DigtalX have a shady past as well, with most the lot located in Florida where Paul Vernon resides now in a million-dollar-plus home since March of this year, 2015. While Paul's living the high life, his Cryptsy user base have to jump through all kinds of crazy hoops to withdraw what's rightfully theirs with nary a support team member visiting this forum to at least settle nerves, the same forum that Paul Vernon et al. had no problem with using during Cryptsy's nascent stage.

Could you elaborate on the highlighted text, please? Spasibo!
26  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 02, 2015, 12:26:01 AM
@NorthStar ..Here you go.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1173703.msg12461307#msg12461307

He responded to the OP..

Quote
THEY CLEARLY DID NOT TELL ME HOW. See 2 posts ago of mine.....

I don't see any response.

Community: these ppl trying to discredit me are Cryptsy's troll accounts. I opened the account with the same IP, put the funds in- they have my ID and all my info... There's really nothing else a human can do to prove the account is theirs, I've given them everything.

Well, at least I have on the record them saying the coins are in the account. So, If/when they mysteriously "disappear", there's going to be alot of explaining to do to the judge. I am just calling it here in advance(again): they are going to say the account is hacked and someone withdraw the $ and that it's my fault. Sorry Cryptsy, its not going to work. Also notice they haven't  done a single thing to contact the "legitimate" owner(an email would be nice). They have done nothing. I know because its my account.
 
Cryptsy = reverse security. Security intended to keep the owner of the acct out, and put down all security barriers (three 2FA options simultaneously) so a "hacker" can get into the account and fuck around.

CRYPTSY/MULLICK/BITJOHN: Still waiting. Lets just get this over with.

The fact that you have not even tried to reset your password concerns me.   You are willing to make forum posts and replies and make support tickets, but you are unwilling to take a few seconds to reset your password?   This really makes no sense to me.   It's good practice to change your passwords from time to time anyways.

From our perspective, this really just looks like somebody trying to access an account that they are not authorized to access.   We get people trying to social engineer their way into peoples accounts all the time, so we don't take this lightly.

BigVern

EDIT:
Side Note:
I don't know what to say about the OP's story.. Maybe Paul had a point ?
I do know eventually way before me or Gleb got on this topic Thrillhou created another topic about Cryptsy..
Asking people to PM him to inquire about Class Action lawsuit participation.
He also claimed this topic had been taken over by Trolls etc.
I figure he was a bit uptight about it.. and i repeat this was way before me or Gleb Gamow commented here !
It's going to trigger a lot of complaining from us all creating a topic like this.

And believe it or not some good has come of this in a variety of ways.
BitJohn was nice enough to tell us he doesn't work at Cryptsy anymore and other staff have posted comments too.
So a lot of public info has been brought to light.. including doxxing and bad stories that could be used in court maybe.

EDIT2:
If there was a lawsuit then we need to know who is involved and who has more info and what happened.. make sense ?

EDIT3:
You know guys for the most part i have always liked BitJohn and i have all along hoping i don't hear he screwed us.
He said he left and i can only guess at his level of involvement with things and take what he has said under consideration.
I am saying i hope it's a situation where the boss was doing things leaving BJ and crew in a tough position.
Aside from Jshock habitually being a massive jerk to me and others and being mega trigger happy with the ban button.
I don't have any animosity towards the Cryptsy staff and volunteers.
I have posted Fuck you blah blah etc.. because they have at times treated me unfairly on their chat-box.
And i'd say that is a ME problem LOL
That alone would not be proof of their wrong doing.. more a personal issue of sorts i guess.

But i have a large collection of stories about them with sketchy circumstances.
THAT contributes to the overall picture of Cryptsy's track record.

I hope when the dust settles the only guy caught wrong doing is the Boss !

Thanks for posting this, Spoetnik. This was actually his last post here on these forums, from over a month ago. You'd think he would be in here trying to alleviate concerns if this was a repairable, regular problem.

At this time I am not sure what to think about the Cryptsy staff. Presumably they don't know exactly what's going on, but at the same time, you can't be on the inside and not see that there is something seriously wrong. I, for one, know that if I was part of an organization that was acting benevolently, I wouldn't just continue to "do as I am told" and go about my job as if nothing is happening, knowing full well that a lot of average Joes are about to get proper fucked. So on one hand, support staff are probably just doing as they are told, but given the circumstances, should they?
27  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 01, 2015, 10:47:52 PM
@Northstar
You do know Paul Vernon AKA: BigVern the owner of Cryptsy has previously commented on this topic right ?
Not for a long time though..

His minions and ex employee's have taken up the fight for him here..

They claim for the most part it's nonsense by Troll's FUD'ing.

And if you looked up my post history i came to the same conclusion and warned others long ago.
I couldn't come to any other conclusion.
What ?
That they toy with our money then fuck up.. then feed us bullshit excuses and insult us then ban us and call us..
FUD'ing Troll's

The only thing I've seen from Vernon himself is a tweet on Nov 25th 2015 about a DDoS attack. If he was posting here, could you please link his post? 

And a DDoS attack would, first of all, affect his servers and not particular wallets but not others (DOGE withdrawals would have been affected too), and second, it would not last for a week straight.

His minions calling everyone trolls and FUD'ing is absurd, we are not talking about isolated incidents here, we are talking no one can do BTC withdrawals for the last 6 days now, with a multitude of problems appearing as far back as 2 months ago.

The problem is very serious indeed, and this is not FUDding. When a large currency exchange effectively halts all BTC withdrawals without any explanation or good reason, you cannot help but conclude that they are insolvent. There have been enough precedents in the recent past. And to anyone who says "oh you don't know any of this, just wait and see, this is all speculation" what exactly do I need to wait for? An official announcement that the site is closed? I don't need to be spoon-fed facts, I can make my own conclusions on-the-go, and I know enough to say "get your coins the fuck out while you still can". The world took a similar  stance with Hitler, and he ended up invading several countries before the first shot was even fired, thanks to a "wait and see" policy.

So yeah, Spoetnik, I applaud you for calling people out when you see something's not right!

/preemptive anti-troll rant Smiley
28  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 01, 2015, 10:37:46 PM

According to Cryptsy's top personnel, Paul Vernon is the only person who tweaks Cryptsy's innards just like Mark Kapeles of Mt Gox had sole control of his exchange's inner workings. Paul doesn't trust anybody while he expects his users to hand over their vitals to some dude in Canada of whom we don't even know his true identity, albeit one day we shall, then some serious doxxing will take place. HAHAHA

I figured, which is precisely why when talking about Cryptsy's shenanigans, I refer to Paul Vernon interchangeably.

Aside: I admire your grammatically correct sentence structure there.  Smiley

As a non-native English speaker, this warms my heart. Thanks Smiley
29  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 01, 2015, 10:02:17 PM

According to Cryptsy's top personnel, Paul Vernon is the only person who tweaks Cryptsy's innards just like Mark Kapeles of Mt Gox had sole control of his exchange's inner workings. Paul doesn't trust anybody while he expects his users to hand over their vitals to some dude in Canada of whom we don't even know his true identity, albeit one day we shall, then some serious doxxing will take place. HAHAHA

I figured, which is precisely why when talking about Cryptsy's shenanigans, I refer to Paul Vernon interchangeably.
30  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 01, 2015, 08:12:34 PM
Excellent, thank you for the info.

Paul Vernon needs to step forward and speak out. The longer the silence, the louder the questions will get.

I am starting to consider a new theory as to what might be going on at Cryptsy, but this is just a thought experiment of mine. I was thinking, it is apparent to me that there is an issue with the BTC and some other wallets right now, and the only issue that could take so long to resolve would be if the problem is that it's empty, or under capacity. What could cause this? A hack, for one, could do it. Outright theft could cause the same problem as well.

But somehow I doubt that a person who until now was a prominent public figure in the crypto world, where everyone knows his identity, and who had been trying to develop a good, reputable business, would be motivated to outright steal funds. Especially if located in the USA. If a theft was perpetrated, I think it would have occurred under different circumstances, much more rapidly, with the site shutting down rather quickly.

A hack is also unlikely, I think Vernon would have taken a different course of action that would have had a lesser fallout. Frankly, I don't know if an outright hack with today's cold wallets and security measures taken would be even possible. And if it were, it would have affected only hot wallets, and Cryptsy would have been able to mitigate the damage. No need to ruin a good business and a cash cow over one hack. Heck, such an occurrence can even be used as PR to further bolster trust, as Bitstamp did early this year.

No, the way I see it, given Paul Vernon's reaction so far, or lack thereof, it's quite plausible that he fucked up in a way that he didn't anticipate. I noticed that the mass withdrawal issues started right around the time of bitcoin's latest bubble a month or two ago. Is it possible that he didn't segregate the BTC and other wallets, and had a short position somewhere using BTC? When BTC moved against him, he was stuck with a loss, thereby wiping out a large portion of the wallet. I would imagine that in his position of control over so much currency, as a mere mortal human being it would be quite tempting to "borrow" some of these funds to trade with and make more money? That might also explain why some wallets are affected, and not others (i.e. Dogecoin seems to be fine). Could he simply have misappropriated the funds out of gross negligence, not necessarily with malicious intent?

Either way, it would be inexcusable. Again, this is just a theory that I have been thinking about, using the bits and pieces that we have now. One thing is for sure, the lack of communication and at the expense of trust in this company clearly points to it being in very serious trouble, and quite likely it is already insolvent. The silence to me means a passive acknowledgment of a serious underlying issue, and it is done only to buy more time.
31  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 01, 2015, 06:26:40 PM
I posted my 2 cents on this topic here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206845.msg13117828#msg13117828

Here is the gist of it:

I am going to call it out as it is, Cryptsy is insolvent in terms of BTC, either due to a hack or outright theft by insiders. Either way, we are not being told the truth. There are many things that point to all this. Where do I even begin?

1. The most obvious problem: many, many users are reporting slow withdrawals of BTC. I have been observing the Cryptsy chat for the last two days, as well as other places online and especially since around Nov 25th, no one is getting their BTC withdrawals. It gets stuck in "pending". I myself tried withdrawing 5.5 BTC and it was stuck for half a day. I created a support ticket and it was ignored for a few hours. They responded with the generic "we are working on an issue" that everyone else is getting. I made a DOGE withdrawal around the same time, and that cleared within 5 minutes. So from that and from reading others' responses, I knew some alts withdrawals are working.

2. Not an issue with their site - Their support staff are working, as evidenced by their response to my tickets. Their system receives deposits correctly and timely, and DOGE withdrawals work well too. I withdrew various amounts several times and they all happened within 5 minutes. So the issue is specific to BTC/DASH/ETH and some other more popular coins. Which leads me to believe they simply have no coins to cover the withdrawal requests.

3. Complete silence on the issue: you will not find any statement or anything that remotely resembles an acknowledgement that there is a serious problem. People who cause too much fuss in the chat get banned, some for one year.

4. Big Vern himself posted a tweet on Oct 21st, right around the time when the Tier system was incorporated, that "there are some good deals to be had on Alts right now". This seems like a marketing ploy to boost volume slightly and make money off commissions, but the main added effect would be BTC coffers swelling at the expense of Alt coin wallets. It is possible the problem with solvency has began back then, and it does coincide with the first reports of delayed BTC withdrawals.

5. The importance of trust - from other big sites going belly up, exchange operators know that once users' trust is gone, it can never be fully regained again. If there was a technical issue, like a prolonged DDoS attack, they would have admitted it in a timely manner, everyone has problems once in a while, but admitting to it boosts trust in the user base. In this case, there is complete silence despite a very obvious serious problem, and it's only getting worse. I think the only logical explanation is that Paul Vern knows that the only way to save the ship is "a la pyramid style", if mass panic is avoided and if he can hold off on people withdrawing their BTC for just long enough, he can recuperate enough funds to keep going (in case Cryptsy was hacked). OR, if the funds were stolen by an insider, then he is just buying more time. It is obvious they are trying to avoid a run on the BTC wallet, and it's probably already completely insolvent given that no one has been able to withdraw even the smallest amounts in the last 4-5 days. (I even tried withdrawing small incremental amounts, as small as 0.049 BTC, and still it didn't go through).

Basically, I am confident this is the end of Cryptsy, there is no good reason for what's been happening and the silence on Cryptsy's part. Save your funds and GTFO while you still can. While we are on the subject, here is how I was able to get my ~9btc out of there since yesterday:  buy Doge. Yes, you will take a hit. You only have a couple of viable options where to sell them later, right now you can buy them for 38-39sats on Cryptsy and sell them back on Poloniex for 32-33 sats, the situation is the same on BTC38, you can sell them for CNY and then buy BTC with CNY with the same result. You are losing about 15% in the process. From my research (and I stayed up most of the night yesterday looking at all sorts of options) Doge is the only currency that you can still buy on Cryptsy in large amounts and withdraw without issues.

If you have a stuck pending withdrawal of BTC, you can create a ticket asking to cancel your withdrawal. It's amazing how quickly they responded to 2 such tickets that I created. It's like they don't want you to even try taking out BTC, could it be because they don't have any?

Again, this is one option that you have, take it or leave it, I lost ~1btc in this process but I saved 8, to me it was worth the risk, because I am pretty sure this ship is not salvageable. Their shady practices combined with the fact that this is a wide-spread issue now, leads me to believe Cryptsy is, as of yet, unofficially insolvent.


One more thing, for anyone who wants to know where to look for their coins, here is the Founder and CEO's name and home address:

Paul E. Vernon
8656 Tourmaline Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33472

This is publicly available information that can be discovered by anyone who does a little digging.
I wish everyone best of luck, and I hope this was helpful to at least some of you.

Edit: someone pointed out that this address might be out of date now, please update me if I am wrong. This was the official address of registration of his corp, and it was used early in 2015 again.
32  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Problem with cryptsy.com? on: December 01, 2015, 06:23:25 PM
not sure if you have correct info on principle owner. that may be old address
this other thread has dox info on all related parties to the shitstorm formally known as crypsty
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1173703.0



Sorry, I can't comb through 78 pages of tread right now, could you point me to the particular post(s) with his updated info? Thanks.

I think people have the right to know who has their coins, or had, and where they can be found, especially when they are obviously hiding.

33  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Problem with cryptsy.com? on: December 01, 2015, 08:02:11 AM
By the way, I challenge an official representative from Cryptsy, preferably Paul Vernon to come forward and prove me wrong on all this.

Come forward and make a fucking statement already, and let everyone know what is going on and why.
34  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Problem with cryptsy.com? on: December 01, 2015, 07:57:56 AM
I am going to call it out as it is, Cryptsy is insolvent in terms of BTC, either due to a hack or outright theft by insiders. Either way, we are not being told the truth. There are many things that point to all this. Where do I even begin?

1. The most obvious problem: many, many users are reporting slow withdrawals of BTC. I have been observing the Cryptsy chat for the last two days, as well as other places online and especially since around Nov 25th, no one is getting their BTC withdrawals. It gets stuck in "pending". I myself tried withdrawing 5.5 BTC and it was stuck for half a day. I created a support ticket and it was ignored for a few hours. They responded with the generic "we are working on an issue" that everyone else is getting. I made a DOGE withdrawal around the same time, and that cleared within 5 minutes. So from that and from reading others' responses, I knew some alts withdrawals are working.

2. Not an issue with their site - Their support staff are working, as evidenced by their response to my tickets. Their system receives deposits correctly and timely, and DOGE withdrawals work well too. I withdrew various amounts several times and they all happened within 5 minutes. So the issue is specific to BTC/DASH/ETH and some other more popular coins. Which leads me to believe they simply have no coins to cover the withdrawal requests.

3. Complete silence on the issue: you will not find any statement or anything that remotely resembles an acknowledgement that there is a serious problem. People who cause too much fuss in the chat get banned, some for one year.

4. Big Vern himself posted a tweet on Oct 21st, right around the time when the Tier system was incorporated, that "there are some good deals to be had on Alts right now". This seems like a marketing ploy to boost volume slightly and make money off commissions, but the main added effect would be BTC coffers swelling at the expense of Alt coin wallets. It is possible the problem with solvency has began back then, and it does coincide with the first reports of delayed BTC withdrawals.

5. The importance of trust - from other big sites going belly up, exchange operators know that once users' trust is gone, it can never be fully regained again. If there was a technical issue, like a prolonged DDoS attack, they would have admitted it in a timely manner, everyone has problems once in a while, but admitting to it boosts trust in the user base. In this case, there is complete silence despite a very obvious serious problem, and it's only getting worse. I think the only logical explanation is that Paul Vern knows that the only way to save the ship is "a la pyramid style", if mass panic is avoided and if he can hold off on people withdrawing their BTC for just long enough, he can recuperate enough funds to keep going (in case Cryptsy was hacked). OR, if the funds were stolen by an insider, then he is just buying more time. It is obvious they are trying to avoid a run on the BTC wallet, and it's probably already completely insolvent given that no one has been able to withdraw even the smallest amounts in the last 4-5 days. (I even tried withdrawing small incremental amounts, as small as 0.049 BTC, and still it didn't go through).

Basically, I am confident this is the end of Cryptsy, there is no good reason for what's been happening and the silence on Cryptsy's part. Save your funds and GTFO while you still can. While we are on the subject, here is how I was able to get my ~9btc out of there since yesterday:  buy Doge. Yes, you will take a hit. You only have a couple of viable options where to sell them later, right now you can buy them for 38-39sats on Cryptsy and sell them back on Poloniex for 32-33 sats, the situation is the same on BTC38, you can sell them for CNY and then buy BTC with CNY with the same result. You are losing about 15% in the process. From my research (and I stayed up most of the night yesterday looking at all sorts of options) Doge is the only currency that you can still buy on Cryptsy in large amounts and withdraw without issues.

If you have a stuck pending withdrawal of BTC, you can create a ticket asking to cancel your withdrawal. It's amazing how quickly they responded to 2 such tickets that I created. It's like they don't want you to even try taking out BTC, could it be because they don't have any?

Again, this is one option that you have, take it or leave it, I lost ~1btc in this process but I saved 8, to me it was worth the risk, because I am pretty sure this ship is not salvageable. Their shady practices combined with the fact that this is a wide-spread issue now, leads me to believe Cryptsy is, as of yet, unofficially insolvent.


One more thing, for anyone who wants to know where to look for their coins, here is the Founder and CEO's name and home address:

Paul E. Vernon
8656 Tourmaline Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33472

This is publicly available information that can be discovered by anyone who does a little digging.
I wish everyone best of luck, and I hope this was helpful to at least some of you.
35  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Have over 0.3BTC on Cryptsy? DO NOT TRY TO WITHDRAW! on: November 30, 2015, 07:15:28 AM
Any updates on your withdrawals? I had no idea they were having issues. Withdrew 5btc no problem back in September. Anyone still not get their BTC? I have a 5btc withdrawal request pending right now since 2 hours ago...
36  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 29, 2015, 06:50:19 PM

Only 12 million + more undug clams to go

Who will hit the next jackpot?

Wink

I assume a lot of clams were distributed to "lost" addresses, ie addresses that were "migratory" in one way or another, ones that had miniscule amounts of currency in them, on exchanges or in private wallets, that have been lost forever because people didn't keep them or don't even remember about them. I know I have at least 5 such addresses that I didn't bother keeping credentials for.
I am curious however just what percentage of the total clam supply has fallen victim to such lost addresses.
37  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 13, 2015, 09:08:37 PM
Quote from:  link=topic=623147.msg12966489#msg12966489 date=1447438514
So we have two main camps here. Exaggerating the positions, we have:

Camp A: wants to leave everything how it is so it's fair for future diggers. It's not OK to cancel their free CLAMs. The stakeholders knew massive digging was a risk and accepted it. They hoped it wouldn't happen but it did. Suck it up.

Camp B: bought into CLAM and saw the price drop. To fix this, let's ban digging. Then the price can recover and we can all get rich.

Sure there are shades of grey between these extremes, involving halvenings and such like, but let's ignore those for now.

You're proposing a third camp:

Camp C: It's not fair to change the CLAM rules, but it's OK to make a new coin, let's call it doogcoin. We use a variant of the CLAM distribution method: everyone who held non-distribution CLAM outputs at lunchtime yesterday can use their CLAM private key to claim their doogcoins. Just-Dice stops using CLAM and starts using doogcoin. The CLAM rules are unchanged, everyone can keep digging their CLAM, so everyone's happy, right?

All three correct I'd say.

Quote from:  link=topic=623147.msg12966681#msg12966681 date=1447440235
[...]

I'm not sure whether the "fuck you, don't answer my posts"

I prefer it the "Don't use energy answering my posts, fuck you" clause and I was trying to keep my nasty attitude off the public forums as requested by Creative.  That's why I pm'ed it.

Tbh I'd prefer for the clause to stay in effect, but really I can get the fuck over it because it's the internet and if you don't let one river flow, 10 other things branch off it.  I need to not be cranky.  I'm working on it.  I see it as you described in Camp B.

I'm really glad to see reason prevailing over emotions, you guys are all an important part of the solution to our problem due to your past contributions and I don't think any solution would be good unless all important parties are on board and we eventually reach consensus. If Iran and the US can sit down and hammer out a deal, I am sure we can find a solution to our predicament as well.
38  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 13, 2015, 09:00:13 PM
Only allowing people who hold coins to vote about the future of the coin could be argued to be unfair to those who didn't yet discover the coin. But how else do we make it fair? There are billions of people who didn't discover the coin.

The way to make if fair between current and future participants is by not making changes the the fundamental economic structure at all. That creates an equivalence between people who are involved now and people who are involved in the future in that neither get to vote. This in turn avoids future participants feeling disadvantaged (and thus discouraged from participating) because they weren't around when important economic decisions are made. It also avoids people not wanting to invest as small participants because they risk getting screwed over by larger participants voting their own interests.

As you point out, you can't make it fair by allowing both current and future participants to vote, so you make it fair by allowing neither to vote.

The sensible way to address not liking something about the fundamental economic design a coin is to create a new coin. Use the claim method to preserve the existing distribution if you think the existing distribution is a good starting point. That has the same economic effect as forking the chain except that you avoid having transactions that confirm on either or both chains, leading to chaos.

This, BTW, includes the idea of whether changes can be made by voting. If you want a coin where the design states that coin holders vote by balance on future changes then create one, but put that in the design from the start, so again everyone is entering on equal terms.

So we have two main camps here. Exaggerating the positions, we have:

Camp A: wants to leave everything how it is so it's fair for future diggers. It's not OK to cancel their free CLAMs. The stakeholders knew massive digging was a risk and accepted it. They hoped it wouldn't happen but it did. Suck it up.

Camp B: bought into CLAM and saw the price drop. To fix this, let's ban digging. Then the price can recover and we can all get rich.

Sure there are shades of grey between these extremes, involving halvenings and such like, but let's ignore those for now.

You're proposing a third camp:

Camp C: It's not fair to change the CLAM rules, but it's OK to make a new coin, let's call it doogcoin. We use a variant of the CLAM distribution method: everyone who held non-distribution CLAM outputs at lunchtime yesterday can use their CLAM private key to claim their doogcoins. Just-Dice stops using CLAM and starts using doogcoin. The CLAM rules are unchanged, everyone can keep digging their CLAM, so everyone's happy, right?

Anyone who wants digging to stop switches to doogcoin. Presumably JD switches to doogcoin too. I guess most CLAM holders dump their CLAM to buy more doogcoin. CLAM price goes to 0, doogcoin price goes to the moon. Is that the correct outcome? Is that what you're proposing?

What do people think of this "Camp C" option?

It seems like would satisfy both Camp A (since we're not changing the rules of CLAM, like they want) and Camp B (since it gives them a way of holding their value without being diluted by future diggers). Did I miss anything?

Why not implement said Doogcoin alongside Clam on JD, instead of in its place? Kind of like Alex's site where you can gamble a few different crypto's with one common trollbox, etc?
39  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 11, 2015, 09:58:17 PM
Which site was that? Did it end in a scam? Might be interesting for those who got damaged. Though maybe i await already always the worst related to bitcoin businesses. Cheesy

I am not sure on the exact details, Doog will have to chime in on this one.
40  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 11, 2015, 06:00:57 PM

BAC I have a question for you: do you see a problem with a large exchange, for example coinbase, deciding to dig all of their constituents' wallets for clams, and gaining all the riches from them? (not all exchanges will be noble like Poloniex, as the current digger is proving). If you do see a problem with that, then advocating not changing anything and staying the course is not compatible. Because I think it is a huge problem that goes against the grain of "fair distribution" that was the very intent of this coin. As Doog put it, it would be technically not feasible to somehow "blacklist" exchanges from perpetrating such offense, so we need another solution. But I do think it is worth pursuing a solution as long as it is compatible with the core principles of the coin.

I don't see a problem with it.

"By definition the rightful owner of any coins is "he who can send them". If you take issue with that, please stick to fiat."

I believe that it is very important for the users to help steer the service in the proper direction by bring up the conversation with them about possibly retrieving their CLAM.

There was talk about being able to stake Clamcoins by using a signature alone.  This would open up all of coinbase's clams for users to begin earning off of them.

As Doog put it, it would be technically not feasible to somehow "blacklist" exchanges from perpetrating such offense, so we need another solution.

I'm VERY much against blacklisting and limiting digs of any type.  Regardless of how rich the user is or the number of addresses they posses ect.


That may be so, but you yourself argued that you resist change brought about by opportunism, and that your issue is that we are trampling on the foundations of the coin. I think it's perfectly reasonable to assume that the founders of the coin had fair distribution as the core value of the coin, and that one exchange taking control of a vast amount of users' coins would not be considered fair distribution. Luckily, the founders are around us so perhaps they can chime in on this?


I think it is very important to realize that changing the rules along the way is not necessarily compromising the "foundation", so long as it is done for the right reasons, ie as I have stated before, as long as we don't change rules with the purpose of preserving the monetary value of the coin. If we do it to preserve the "fair distribution", then it's ok. Understand, it is not always possible for founders to foresee all possible contingencies from the very beginning. That is why the US constitution had 27 amendments. Did the amendments compromise the constitution? No, because they were enacted in the spirit of preserving and BUILDING upon the the Constitution and what it was trying to accomplish. We have an opportunity now to build upon and improve this coin.

Our country has had some pretty nasty effects due to the amendments that I think we would have been much better without... the majority of those "bad amendments" were pushed by people with their heart in the wrong place and trying to take advantage of timing and such in for them to personally profit more.  (Booze for example... they waited until all the men where shipped off and then rammed that shit down the public's throat.)

Yeah there may have been some bad apples. But what about the 2nd, 4th and 5th amendments for example? Aren't you glad those were passed? From talking to you before, I get the feeling you are quite happy about them.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!