 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
This was the explanation I got after I filed a case and verified i was real person to their automated email. Hello, Your account has been suspended due to multiple or repeat violations of the Twitter Rules: https://twitter.com/rules. Please do not respond to this email as replies and new appeals for this account will not be monitored. Thanks, Twitter Support I'm assuming my "repeat" violations were the subsequent posting of etherscan links. I had a prior post that got suspended that also had an etherscan link, that i reactivated with my phone, but i wasn't really sure what the issue was; now i definitely think they didn't like the etherscan links--maybe i should have tinyurl'd it? Sucks, because i was trying to help someone find a transaction that was claiming their ico wasn't delivering to them (Refereum). that's a very vague message from twitter without any specification. Can you send a dm? Try contacting them on on twitter.com/twittersupport via direct message or other account. Hope you get it back. Thanks for the tip. I tried the DM and it ended up routing me back to the form i had already used to appeal a suspension. Oh well. Not that tied to twitter anyway. Just made me feel cool to follow other more cool people. |
|
|
|
that's quite interesting as I don't see any mention of it on the web. What was your tweet about? could be possible they picked up some other keyword as spam. Do you have a screenshot?
Can't find it anymore--i guess the suspension removes all posts from the account? I was replying to some other posts on the Refereum ICO that were about the token releases--people saying they hadn't received there's--just showing them there were transactions on etherscan. And also pointing out that one wallet still held 99.6% of RFR tokens, and if that meant more tokens were yet to be transferred. |
|
|
|
Where you suspended or warned before? Links are usually automatically converted to short URL so might not be because of links. Probably due to etherscan.
Yea, i had a suspension a few days prior that i was unable to unlock by verifying a code from my phone. That post also had an etherscan, but at the time i didn't think it was an issue. But now I'm pretty sure it was after it happened again. I'm just surprised they stuck to the ban rather than investigating it and seeing that etherscan is an ok site to link to. |
|
|
|
This was the explanation I got after I filed a case and verified i was real person to their automated email. Hello, Your account has been suspended due to multiple or repeat violations of the Twitter Rules: https://twitter.com/rules. Please do not respond to this email as replies and new appeals for this account will not be monitored. Thanks, Twitter Support I'm assuming my "repeat" violations were the subsequent posting of etherscan links. I had a prior post that got suspended that also had an etherscan link, that i reactivated with my phone, but i wasn't really sure what the issue was; now i definitely think they didn't like the etherscan links--maybe i should have tinyurl'd it? Sucks, because i was trying to help someone find a transaction that was claiming their ico wasn't delivering to them (Refereum). |
|
|
|
i don't understand? I thought the token sale ended weeks ago. Why would they be compensating purchases from the markets?
21,02 their backup tokens have been stolen, and the bastards have completely dumped the market! But the team responded perfectly! Oh wow. That is unfortunate. |
|
|
|
|
i don't understand? I thought the token sale ended weeks ago. Why would they be compensating purchases from the markets?
|
|
|
|
|
Hope this topic is ok in this forum. Just wanted to see if others have run into this? I was replying to someone with an etherscan link and immediately got suspended. I figured the etherscan url just got picked up as spam or phishing so I opened a ticket to appeal. Twitter denied the appeal! Goodbye account.
Fortunately i wasn't a big twitter user, so whatever, but it surprised me they stuck to the suspension.
|
|
|
|
|
looks like token sale finished. interested in hearing some updates.
|
|
|
|
There are 99,983,677 tokens of which 69,988,574 are in circulation and 29,995,103 are held by Crypterium as per the release on their Medium account.
I do not understand the people who are upset by the token count for several reasons...
1. The technical hard-cap was 300,000,000 tokens and there were less than 1/3 of that number issued.
2. This information was clearly stated by Crypterium... NO ONE should have been confused by this if they bothered to read the website or Whitepaper.
3. It was clearly posted that the team would take 30% of the total number of coins issued for themselves so I don't understand why people including, CoinmarketCap, ever thought there would be 44,029,586 tokens(the incomplete number that was posted on the Etherscan page for so long) so even had that number been accurate the token count would have been .70x=44,029,586 x= 44,029,586/.70 = 62,899,408.57 tokens total...point being it was never going to be under 50 million and people should have known this
4. With CRPT being burned during every transaction made on the mobile banking platform they will release in the coming months the token count isn't really an issue they should be concerned with... the real concern people should have is what partnerships they are pursuing and how they will attract users to their platform who make transaction that use CRPT as fuel
5. This was not the ICO to invest in if you were looking for quick gains and never was... the price decline is expected because some people were always going to sell some tokens and "ride the free ones" or sell the bounty tokens they got free... This investment is about the app and nothing else... It is really simple here if the app attracts hundreds of thousands/millions of users then CRPT will shoot up in price if they don't attract users of fail to make partnerships then CRPT is worthless and will drop sub penny... I expect the price will stay in the $1.75-3.00 range until there is news released about partnerships or their app, because until then there is no catalyst to move the price upwards...Just disgruntled day traders selling who aren't getting the 500%+ gains they hoped for
Well said. We can't expect to see crypto move forward if everything is a pyramid scheme. |
|
|
|
|
i got my coins a few days ago. It took about a week after i requested the withdrawal. I felt like they were pretty clear that it could take several days and was something that was out of their control being on a eth blockchain. Hopefully for those there will be support for those who didn't receive their withdrawal correctly.
|
|
|
|
the part i like is the feedback element. I've used yelp for years, but it gets flooded with fake reviews. a blockchain platform should eliminate that since it will be aware of your transactions.
Yes, only real visitors will be able to post a review, and blockchain will allow to keep them unchanged and store them in the system forever. Cool. I'd love to see that implemented. down with yelp. |
|
|
|
|
the part i like is the feedback element. I've used yelp for years, but it gets flooded with fake reviews. a blockchain platform should eliminate that since it will be aware of your transactions.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the update! There are many lower cap coins in this space that would be interested in partnering up for smart contracts PHORE was mentioned but I do not think they have smart contracts built into their code as of the time of this post. Please consider other coins such as KOMODO or E-classic I am sure if you reach out to the team they may also give insight to your vacant block chain position. While I understand the hesitation in wanting to stay on your own blockchain without having a dev that can handle the code in the event of mining pool orphaning or similar it can really tank the value of GRWI. I will continue to Hodl, PoS rewards are nice, the team is actively communicating, and I love the idea of supporting a coin that supports my favorite hobby  Phore plans smart contracts in the future. They are about to enter their marketplace beta. Seems like grwi has a lot of products already--does it need a marketplace? |
|
|
|
|
Are stake returns lower because #coins staked has increased recently? Looking backwards about a month i see someone reported 1000 staked was giving a couple coins a day. I'm seeing 1000 staked gave around 1/10-1/5 of a coin a day average.
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for the cool update. Perhaps there are some smaller cap coins with smart contracts that could be partnered with? Phore and Lux come to mind (i know both plan on smart contracts, but not sure if implemented); i've found both of their dev teams to be really engaged with the community on the discord channels.
|
|
|
|
|
I like getting the frequent stake rewards--it is fun, even though the amounts can be small. Does the size of your reward depend on the amount of coins used to unlock to block? I've noticed the reward amounts can vary by almost 10x, at least for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. McAfee just tweeted about Bob's Repair, an ICO I've not heard of, but i think their idea is quite sound. I certainly support using a blockchain to validate reviews are from actual customers.
|
|
|
|
|
agreed this should be fixed quick because it can influence investment choices.
|
|
|
|
|
wow, just got an email about a 70% discount (limited to 200 eth). Honestly this makes me a bit uneasy about it.
|
|
|
|
|
