 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
|
How the privacy layer works exactly? Is there a wp I can read?
|
|
|
|
|
Good summary, thanks for sharing your experience.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a scam. They conducted a serie of private sale and never communicated this to the public. It's nowhere on the documents they share and nowhere to see since they pretend to be a no ICO coin. They accidentely said they had huge investors and when I asked questions due to their missleading communication, I got banned from their Discord after the team stated that since I didn't contribute (which is wrong) I have no right to talk (which is idiot). Any buyer now wouldn't be able to know exactly the conditions of the sales conducted in a shaddy way that even the shittiest ICO's in the space can't stand. Any buyer now can be dumped on by some private (selected?) investors who bought 4 times cheaper. This is more than a red flag, this is an inmportant exemple of why we need good regulation ; these deals under the table can kill any momenum. There are many exemple of VC's hurting projects by dumping on retail investors while they bought ten times cheaper, and here it's even more ridiculous since Semux team communication is based on the non ICO's strenght. They misslead. You can be dumped on anytime, not only because someone bought cheaper, but because big deals happened under the table, and if you ask questions about this issue, which is clearly an issue, they will ban you straight.
There are many competitors around. Semux is killing itself with such missleading communication and scammy execution.
|
|
|
|
|
Still dodging questions Semux ..
|
|
|
|
|
This is a scam. They conducted a serie of private sale and never communicated this to the public. It's nowhere on the documents they share and nowhere to see since they pretend to be a no ICO coin. They accidentely said they had huge investors and when I asked questions due to their missleading communication, I got banned from their Discord after the team stated that since I didn't contribute (which is wrong) I have no right to talk (which is idiot). Any buyer now wouldn't be able to know exactly the conditions of the sales conducted in a shaddy way that even the shittiest ICO's in the space can't stand. Any buyer now can be dumped on by some private (selected?) investors who bought 4 times cheaper. This is more than a red flag, this is an inmportant exemple of why we need good regulation ; these deals under the table can kill any momenum. There are many exemple of VC's hurting projects by dumping on retail investors while they bought ten times cheaper, and here it's even more ridiculous since Semux team communication is based on the non ICO's strenght. They misslead. You can be dumped on anytime, not only because someone bought cheaper, but because big deals happened under the table, and if you ask questions about this issue, which is clearly an issue, they will ban you straight.
There are many competitors around. Semux is killing itself with such missleading communication and scammy execution.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a scam. They conducted a serie of private sale and never communicated this to the public. It's nowhere on the documents they share and nowhere to see since they pretend to be a no ICO coin. They accidentely said they had huge investors and when I asked questions due to their missleading communication, I got banned from their Discord after the team stated that since I didn't contribute (which is wrong) I have no right to talk (which is idiot). Any buyer now wouldn't be able to know exactly the conditions of the sales conducted in a shaddy way that even the shittiest ICO's in the space can't stand. Any buyer now can be dumped on by some private (selected?) investors who bought 4 times cheaper. This is more than a red flag, this is an inmportant exemple of why we need good regulation ; these deals under the table can kill any momenum. There are many exemple of VC's hurting projects by dumping on retail investors while they bought ten times cheaper, and here it's even more ridiculous since Semux team communication is based on the non ICO's strenght. They misslead. You can be dumped on anytime, not only because someone bought cheaper, but because big deals happened under the table, and if you ask questions about this issue, which is clearly an issue, they will ban you straight.
There are many competitors around. Semux is killing itself with such missleading communication and scammy execution.
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't the mainnet supposed to be released in August?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't really get how a freelancer will be tempted to work for being paid with a non stable alt... But I'm open to be convinced. Waiting for your inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
Will you implement an offchain scaling solution at some point?
|
|
|
|
|
.... Good project ? It has no selling point..
|
|
|
|
|
Can someone explain me how margin trading needs blockchain?
|
|
|
|
|
Wow damn Feathercoin still alive XD
|
|
|
|
Alts getting smashed everywhere. No official development news pending for Force and no marketing activities and little new retail money coming in to market.
Thanks for your interest, the new codebase repository will be released soon. The marketing plan has been released and comes along with key events on Force. I’m not sure why you posted here, any question? I have a question. I've been reading the WP but I'm still trying to know if Force will allow us to use the "regular" internet while being protected or if it will come as a "closed" network first. Hello, thank you for your questions! And the answer is: yes, you will be able to access to the centralized Internet using our solution, but more than that, your identity will be preserved. If there was a "closed" network first as you asked, Force network couldn't really function very well, could it? If you have something like gatekeepers this wouldn't be close to the vision the team here has I think. Or will there be something like gatekeepers that prevent some actors from joining? If you are talking about a governance system that will allow everyone to decide if a service can be delivered or not on the Force Network, this has yet to be decided but could be handled via the masternode governance system. Yes but I thought the comment before was referring to whether or not could join the network at any time. And that is possible isn't it? Or will there be any kind of ID checks? I doubt there will be an ID check. It would kill the idea of privacy and anonymity don't you think? |
|
|
|
|
Good luck GBX. I know it's hard to launch and sustain a project like this one when there are so many competitors in the space.
|
|
|
|
|
You should work a bit more on your ann mate..
|
|
|
|
Just got a bunch of masternodes  Nice! Masternode management is a lot easier now because everything is autoupdated. Yeah the setup on this project is amazingly simple and user friendly. |
|
|
|
Just got a bunch of masternodes |
|
|
|
Thanks! Also you didn't answer about the masternode collateral. I saw the chat on Telegram and you said there will be masternodes and hop nodes. How much FOR for each?  |
|
|
|
|
