 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
I don't even pay attention to Spreadcoin, The development update came from Francis and I chatting about it for weeks (Francis can vouch for the masternode improvement ideas being his in the document). There's some copying going on, but it's only in the other direction. David dude you've been decapitated crawl back were you came from ill football your head in that general direction Would you really expect him to say otherwise? Look at the thread ---- https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/A couple months ago I open sourced the design so that I could work with researchers on perfecting it. However, it’s not presently done and the code is a simple prototype of what I intended. I would recommend other crypto-currencies from not using it until we’ve had a chance to thoroughly test and refine the logic, otherwise grave damage could be done to your network. Spreadcoin is the only other coin implementing masternodes and InstantX. If Evan pays no attention to Spreadcoin, who exactly is he warning? He has been working on this new masternode system for weeks and weeks and just happens to post about it 3 hours after Spreadcoin releases theirs? Pretty big coincidence. |
|
|
|
Interesting note at the bottom about the algo...... Is it another copy/paste of DRK like SPR is? The only problem with your argument is it's not correct. Spreadcoin is not a copy paste of Darkcoin. Spreadcoin's masternode system is written from scratch. In fact, it's so good, that very shortly after the Spreadcoin developer released the code, Evan Duffield made a post detailing how he was going to do the exact same thing as what the Spreadcoin dev did. Seriously, look at the time stamps here: http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37.0 - Our dev releases his code January 27, 2015, 11:48:42 AM https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/ - Your dev writes his masternode update thread: January 27, 2015, 3:14 PM And here is our dev explaining that's exactly what Spreadcoin already did: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/page-2#post-39115The fact of the matter is, Darkcoin now has a very viable competitor that not only has a much more userfriendly masternode system (we created over 1600 masternodes in less than 48 hours on testnet because it's so easy) but it is much more profitable to run a Spreadcoin masternode as detailed here -- http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101.0So keep buying your Darkcoin at these levels and I'll buy my Spreadcoin at these levels and run masternodes that are much more profitable. Then in a couple months, maybe Darkcoin's new masternode implementation will be as good as Spreadcoin's is now. Copy/paste? By all means keep discounting the first serious competition Darkcoin has that is using similar technology and doing a better job of implementing it. We'll see where we are in 6 months. Regarding profitability, if it sounds to good to be true, it usually is, so let's wait for actual data. As for the rest, Spreadcoin took basically every single starting idea from darkcoin and then built on top of that. Standing on the shoulders of giants, who then push you down and stand back up on yours. Tell that to MySpace. Serious? MySpace was never open source. Facebook was never built from MySpace as a starting point. /facepalm Facebook adopted the same general vision as MySpace but with a more userfriendly implementation. Just as Spreadcoin is doing. Darkcoin came up with masternodes and Spreadcoin rewrote them from scratch in a way that is much more user friendly. And for the record, oblox has been posting up a storm in the Spreadcoin thread as well. Fair is fair, right? |
|
|
|
Interesting note at the bottom about the algo...... Is it another copy/paste of DRK like SPR is? The only problem with your argument is it's not correct. Spreadcoin is not a copy paste of Darkcoin. Spreadcoin's masternode system is written from scratch. In fact, it's so good, that very shortly after the Spreadcoin developer released the code, Evan Duffield made a post detailing how he was going to do the exact same thing as what the Spreadcoin dev did. Seriously, look at the time stamps here: http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37.0 - Our dev releases his code January 27, 2015, 11:48:42 AM https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/ - Your dev writes his masternode update thread: January 27, 2015, 3:14 PM And here is our dev explaining that's exactly what Spreadcoin already did: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/page-2#post-39115The fact of the matter is, Darkcoin now has a very viable competitor that not only has a much more userfriendly masternode system (we created over 1600 masternodes in less than 48 hours on testnet because it's so easy) but it is much more profitable to run a Spreadcoin masternode as detailed here -- http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101.0So keep buying your Darkcoin at these levels and I'll buy my Spreadcoin at these levels and run masternodes that are much more profitable. Then in a couple months, maybe Darkcoin's new masternode implementation will be as good as Spreadcoin's is now. Copy/paste? By all means keep discounting the first serious competition Darkcoin has that is using similar technology and doing a better job of implementing it. We'll see where we are in 6 months. Regarding profitability, if it sounds to good to be true, it usually is, so let's wait for actual data. As for the rest, Spreadcoin took basically every single starting idea from darkcoin and then built on top of that. Standing on the shoulders of giants, who then push you down and stand back up on yours. I second that, skimmed through the code and saw its (SPR) just a clone of a old darkcoin codebase. Spreadcoin used Darkcoin's codebase then modified the algorithm and rewrote masternodes and InstantX from scratch. And for the record, ocminer is one of the Darkcoin people who has been over trolling up our thread and is a big part of the reason I am now here. |
|
|
|
@DavidR you have absolutely no business sense or understand the concept of added value. There are a million reasons why you are not correct, but I really don't have time to go into it right now. Please just not spam our thread and we can talk again in a year. Thank you.
Please try not to quote this guy is boring.
"You're so wrong but I won't list a single reason why". Darkcoin people have been posting in our thread lately and we haven't been posting here yet people are making incorrect statements about Spreadcoin. So I figured fair is far. |
|
|
|
Interesting note at the bottom about the algo...... Is it another copy/paste of DRK like SPR is? The only problem with your argument is it's not correct. Spreadcoin is not a copy paste of Darkcoin. Spreadcoin's masternode system is written from scratch. In fact, it's so good, that very shortly after the Spreadcoin developer released the code, Evan Duffield made a post detailing how he was going to do the exact same thing as what the Spreadcoin dev did. Seriously, look at the time stamps here: http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37.0 - Our dev releases his code January 27, 2015, 11:48:42 AM https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/ - Your dev writes his masternode update thread: January 27, 2015, 3:14 PM And here is our dev explaining that's exactly what Spreadcoin already did: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/page-2#post-39115The fact of the matter is, Darkcoin now has a very viable competitor that not only has a much more userfriendly masternode system (we created over 1600 masternodes in less than 48 hours on testnet because it's so easy) but it is much more profitable to run a Spreadcoin masternode as detailed here -- http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101.0So keep buying your Darkcoin at these levels and I'll buy my Spreadcoin at these levels and run masternodes that are much more profitable. Then in a couple months, maybe Darkcoin's new masternode implementation will be as good as Spreadcoin's is now. Copy/paste? By all means keep discounting the first serious competition Darkcoin has that is using similar technology and doing a better job of implementing it. We'll see where we are in 6 months. Regarding profitability, if it sounds to good to be true, it usually is, so let's wait for actual data. As for the rest, Spreadcoin took basically every single starting idea from darkcoin and then built on top of that. Standing on the shoulders of giants, who then push you down and stand back up on yours. Tell that to MySpace. |
|
|
|
Interesting note at the bottom about the algo...... Is it another copy/paste of DRK like SPR is? The only problem with your argument is it's not correct. Spreadcoin is not a copy paste of Darkcoin. Spreadcoin's masternode system is written from scratch. In fact, it's so good, that very shortly after the Spreadcoin developer released the code, Evan Duffield made a post detailing how he was going to do the exact same thing as what the Spreadcoin dev did. Seriously, look at the time stamps here: http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37.0 - Our dev releases his code January 27, 2015, 11:48:42 AM https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/ - Your dev writes his masternode update thread: January 27, 2015, 3:14 PM And here is our dev explaining that's exactly what Spreadcoin already did: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/page-2#post-39115The fact of the matter is, Darkcoin now has a very viable competitor that not only has a much more userfriendly masternode system (we created over 1600 masternodes in less than 48 hours on testnet because it's so easy) but it is much more profitable to run a Spreadcoin masternode as detailed here -- http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101.0So keep buying your Darkcoin at these levels and I'll buy my Spreadcoin at these levels and run masternodes that are much more profitable. Then in a couple months, maybe Darkcoin's new masternode implementation will be as good as Spreadcoin's is now. Copy/paste? By all means keep discounting the first serious competition Darkcoin has that is using similar technology and doing a better job of implementing it. We'll see where we are in 6 months. |
|
|
|
It's is mooning for the same reason it did last time, manipulators brought in around 2 weeks ago then they do what they do best pump to a level and now we have the amateurs panic buying because it's going to be the next bitcoin  Next step we will see what we see last time (check the graphs) freefall the manipulators will be even richer the panic buyers will be even poorer it's a great world we live in where the rich get richer and the poor get... Ps there is money to be made obviously but make sure you get out before the crash http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/darkcoin/ The nice thing about Spreadcoin and its improved masternodes is it's still very cheap. The poor have a chance to get rich. |
|
|
|
Our dev rewrote the masternode code. There isn't a single line of Darkcoin code so it is no longer based on Darkcoin code. Your dev wrote his thread about the new masternode system hours after our dev released his source code. Your dev must have read the code and realized, "Wow, this is how I need to do it." And sure enough, everything he said he was going to do is exactly what Spreadcoin has already done. Seriously, look at the time stamps here: http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37.0 - Our dev releases his code January 27, 2015, 11:48:42 AM https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/ - Your dev writes his masternode update thread: January 27, 2015, 3:14 PM Coincidence? I THINK NOT! |
|
|
|
...and the utility that Spreadcoin offers over Darkcoin is what exactly? Easy to setup masternodes that don't require a centralized reference node. We setup over 1600 masternodes in less than two days. Once masternodes are on mainnet, the Spreadcoin dev plans to implement anonymity as well. As he created a superior masternode system, I'm sure he'll create a superior anonymity system. I'm sure Darkcoin will appeal to darknet markets but no big retailer is going to use a, "Dark" coin despite wanting privacy for their customers. That's where Spreadcoin will come in. You guys can have the drugs, we'll take the rest. lol, good luck with that. I guess do what you need to in order to get some volume into your coin. You guys were laughing when our dev said he was going to create an improved masternode system. Not laughing about that now though, are you. At least if you have the ability to read code and can look at both masternode systems objectively. I'm still laughing... $4,600 in 24 hour volume compared to $560,000. Keep riding the coat-tails of DRK. Any useful code, being that both projects are open source, can be implemented as needed should that be the direction Evan and team decide to go in. <3 Besides, running 1600 nodes with no capital requirements and no restrictions on how many can be on an IP isn't anything that strikes me as superior. Academically interesting, sure, but a good model for a diverse network, no. We already concluded that your dev is going to copy Spreadcoin's masternodes. We're ok with that and are quite flattered. When masternodes come to mainnet, you'll be eating crow. I bet there will be more than 1600 setup in the first two days because there will then be a financial gain to be had unlike testnet. As they are more than 4 times as profitable as Darkcoin masternodes, I bet a lot of Darkcoin masternode owners will end up running both on their VPS. |
|
|
|
...and the utility that Spreadcoin offers over Darkcoin is what exactly? Easy to setup masternodes that don't require a centralized reference node. We setup over 1600 masternodes in less than two days. Once masternodes are on mainnet, the Spreadcoin dev plans to implement anonymity as well. As he created a superior masternode system, I'm sure he'll create a superior anonymity system. I'm sure Darkcoin will appeal to darknet markets but no big retailer is going to use a, "Dark" coin despite wanting privacy for their customers. That's where Spreadcoin will come in. You guys can have the drugs, we'll take the rest. That being said there is always room for improvement in every coin tech... So keep the faith there big guy  You have faith in what you can't see or touch. I can see and use Spreadcoin's improved masternodes. At this point, it's not about faith, it's about educating people about a viable and superior alternative. |
|
|
|
...and the utility that Spreadcoin offers over Darkcoin is what exactly? Easy to setup masternodes that don't require a centralized reference node. We setup over 1600 masternodes in less than two days. Once masternodes are on mainnet, the Spreadcoin dev plans to implement anonymity as well. As he created a superior masternode system, I'm sure he'll create a superior anonymity system. I'm sure Darkcoin will appeal to darknet markets but no big retailer is going to use a, "Dark" coin despite wanting privacy for their customers. That's where Spreadcoin will come in. You guys can have the drugs, we'll take the rest. lol, good luck with that. I guess do what you need to in order to get some volume into your coin. You guys were laughing when our dev said he was going to create an improved masternode system. Not laughing about that now though, are you. At least if you have the ability to read code and can look at both masternode systems objectively. |
|
|
|
...and the utility that Spreadcoin offers over Darkcoin is what exactly? Easy to setup masternodes that don't require a centralized reference node. We setup over 1600 masternodes in less than two days. Once masternodes are on mainnet, the Spreadcoin dev plans to implement anonymity as well. As he created a superior masternode system, I'm sure he'll create a superior anonymity system. I'm sure Darkcoin will appeal to darknet markets but no big retailer is going to use a, "Dark" coin despite wanting privacy for their customers. That's where Spreadcoin will come in. You guys can have the drugs, we'll take the rest. |
|
|
|
I'm back  So in your opinion should the moderated thread be closed since it just hurts this communities image? If any of you think the admin of Darkcointalk is worried about the image of Spreadcoin you're kidding yourself. They want this thread open so it can be trolled with sockpuppets because Darkcoin is scared of Spreadcoin. lol Darkcoin is the original - Spreadcoin the copy, why should Darkcoin be scared  Because very soon Darkcoin will be the copy: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-instantx-development-update.3769/page-2#post-39115 |
|
|
|
I'm back So in your opinion should the moderated thread be closed since it just hurts this communities image? If any of you think the admin of Darkcointalk is worried about the image of Spreadcoin you're kidding yourself. They want this thread open so it can be trolled with sockpuppets because Darkcoin is scared of Spreadcoin. |
|
|
|
Where's the PROOF??? To anything you say??? WHERE IS THE FUCKING PROOF? Can you answer that one simple question? Show how intelligent and smart you TRULY ARE and PROVE ONE FUCKING THING YOU'VE CLAIMED!!!
Everyone that has had the time to pay attention knows that they can't back up shit. It has been made obviously clear by both Wolf0's post and the graphs presented of the SPR and DRK network distributions posted by thelonecrouton, that there is no optimized miner in widespread use (yet) and that the no-pool initiative is in fact working better than with ANY OTHER POW COIN to date...
Not to mention the fact that nonce-pool, the operator of the ONLY "pool" actually being referenced in the FUD campaign HAS CLEARLY STATED that his "pool" was nothing more than a few solo miners sharing the same wallet private key...
That is clearly not a "pool" by any reasonable definition, and nothing at all like the familiar "pools" and "multi-pools" that miners have all had to register with to point our hashes at in the past. It is no more of a "pool" than someone with more than one mining rig and/or a few CPU's pointing them all at the same wallet, and so far from the "standard pool" that it's almost laughable.
But for some reason the trolls choose to ignore those facts. Hmmmm... I wonder why? And its pretty shitty that BCT allows this sock puppet terrorism, flooding the threads with such nonsense and making it hard for folks to find the truth "from the horses mouth" buried in all the bullshit. BCT is becoming a joke. Its past time to start respecting this community and clean up the place before it becomes an irrelevant footnote in cryptocurrency history. the whole point of projects coming under attack is to see if they can survive. that's also the nature of the bitcoin code and mining. edit but seriously, this project at this stage is overpriced. it really should be closer to 0.0001000 are you the one controlling those sockpuppet shill accounts? Just wondering. I know you'll probably deny. I just have a gut feeling it's you .lol Coins101 is definitely Spreadnodes. I'm not sure on others, but am positive on that one. |
|
|
|
If Evan tweaked the algo to make the $$$ miners redundant for a few months, I'd mine DRK again.
Lots of people still have their rigs/farms switched off, waiting... I've moved all my rigs to Spreadcoin as it's still profitable. |
|
|
|
|
