I'm an investor of this project (Beetoken). A team from Uber, Facebook. The project has collected a huge pile of money. Have you seen where the price is now 3 months after the ICO? And it looked as if they would compete with Booking.com.
 It would be very cool to have house prices in one currency and not recalculate at the rate to the national currency, etc. Maybe Beetoken will surprise everyone. So far, disappointment.

I think basically bounties are paid before the coin begins to be traded on the stock exchange. Therefore by the time trade begins it is absolutely not clear who sells there - large investors or bounty hunters.
But your technique can work if the exit to the exchange passes earlier than tokens are paid for participating in the bounty.

OP, you asked a great question. I often ask myself this question. New projects seem so fresh in their ideas. And it's very difficult to believe that the old projects will start to move and do something exclusive.
 I don't know the answer to your question since I believe in both old and new ones from your list. I also absolutely don't know and cannot decide what to do with my tokens. Therefore, I just leave them in my wallet.

This will never happen. You can create a more advanced post in the Meta section.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0
But no one will support this idea. I saw similar thoughts in local branches. People are not ready to pay for insurance. People only want to receive and don't give anything away, it's in the first place. Secondly, participation in the bounty is as risky as participating in ICO. You do it as you wish. You risk and don't always get a win. Such laws are in the world of cryptocurrency.

In good projects, such sharp decreases occur rarely. If the team doesn't consist of incompetent people, then the price of a normal prospective project will be all right.
1. You need to gradually unlock coins. Initially, a small investor, then a month or two average, well, six months later, when the market is stabilized - large whales.
2. Do not sell a large number of coins in one hand. Prevent any possibility of participating in ICO (whitelist) multiple accounts.
3. Engage in the development of the project, and not sit and count the money that was collected during sales.
It's my opinion.

Switzerland is friendly not only to deposits in dollars or Euros. This country always looks to the future. And it's not surprising that they create special departments deal with the storage of your digital money.
I, by the way, participated in two Swiss projects on ICOs. There people are calm. There is no frenzied correspondence. Very rarely questions on the case and brief answers. I like. Foreigners in this chat are very different. They try to write a lot, ask the same thing. Swiss very quickly explain that it's not necessary to flood. Read the chat, use the search, and then ask. Heck. I like it.

Absolutely not. Until Verge's team fixes its bugs in the code, nothing good will happen.
 Investor confidence is very easy to lose, reputation is even easier to lose. But to return everything as it was before - you need to try very, very much. I don't know what they have there with security.
But I came out of this coin. And the next time I don't even want to look in this direction.

Again, the news of possible errors in the code and attack of the hacker.
After a recent attack, which was no more than two months ago, I didn't sell anything.
Since I thought that developers know their business well and work on problems and fix bugs.
Today's attack, as I understood it, is connected with the same problem in the code ..... Not enough information yet.
But I've had enough. 

https://coinjournal.net/verge-is-being-hacked-again/

I'm using Neon Wallet.
https://neonwallet.com/
It is quite specific not as MEW and I didn't immediately figure out what's there and what. For example, there you need to take Gas yourself. Unknown coins (which fall for the first time on the wallet) you add on your own. It is necessary to add the address of the contract, but only for the first time.
The rest is quite a convenient and reliable purse.

Well, if you said "A" then you have to say "B".
You can't to tell just one sentence to try to destroy someone's honest name.
If you doubt the honesty of the project, then give here the arguments. What exactly made you doubt? What do you disagree with and consider it suspicious? What is the essence of your opinion that Zеon is a scam? Was either of your friends fooled or something like that?

Some companies that produce sweets bring such kind of shares to children before the New Year.
They use their personal finances to fulfill childhood dreams. You want to use the money of other people. Well, why not. I think some will support this kind of idea. The only thing that I would have attributed оn the negative side. An adult's dream requires much more money than a child's dream.

Many projects of stable coins want to seize some of the users of Tether. And in my opinion, they will succeed. Many don't trust Tether.
I saw their store. And there you can buy some gadgets for Havven. It's a pity that for today it is available only to people from the United States.
If it gets more widespread, then wow. I think many will gladly support the idea of altcoin with a stable course. Not only for various purchases but also in a period of price fluctuations.

It all depends on what kind of analysis you mean, and how deep you mean by that.
I'm in the technical part pretty deadbeat. And with all my desire, I can't even conduct a surface analysis of some sort of calculations or mathematical ideas, or complex computer solutions and developments.
 However, I have eyes and I can analyze the part of the project that is available to me, which I understand and can assess the risks. In a deep analysis, I trust the opinion of professionals. I read all sorts of evaluations of experts. What disadvantages they noticed and what preferences.

Bitcoin is certainly a leader.
In occasion of altcoins - well here it is more difficult. I read somewhere the statistics of the capitalization rating in December of different years. I can't find the link now, unfortunately. So every year twenty leaders look different. I would really like Zilliqa to hit the top 5 by the end of the year. Today it looks incredible. But who knows. Maybe it will be in December.

If you are confident in your investments, then why should you panic? You can buy more tokens at a lower price. In this case, you already have a lower average price, and therefore a larger profit on growth.
Among investors are too, a lot of "one-day holders." They simply make big money with very little profit. As large investors had large bonuses and discounts. You think they are selling cheaper prices than on ICO. In fact, this may not be the case, and this price is even slightly higher than in a private pool.

I voted for the tokens 100%. If this is a promising project, then why not.
Clearer conditions for participation and payments are much more important for me. Sometimes you read bounty post and don't understand anything. There is no information when the end, how much they pay.
The efficiency of bounty manager is also of great importance. I have seen many times how bounty managers stopped the bounty project at the slightest suspicion of fraud. They have more experience and they can quickly notice signs of scаm, as they often communicate with the developers themselves.

You wrote a pretty constructive post.
But there are not enough examples from life. Yes, it sounds beautiful and looks on paper very well. But which tokens instilled in you such confidence? I always doubt everything. No matter how promising the project is and how I like it, I will always doubt it.
Doubts can leave me if the product is already on the market. It found its customers. Demand is increasing and investors are happy. If it's about development, then I would not be sure.

I read a message about Merit one of the Legendary. You know what he said? During these three and a half months he received only 40 or 50 merits. And he's a very smart dude & understands all sorts of technologies. I'm for example not strong at all.
So he confirmed that it is very difficult to get Merit even for him. About small ranks there's nothing to say. To get a merit is not enough to write a good post. It is necessary that Source of the Merit notice it or a member of the forum with a high rank.

Of course an officially registered company with different licenses is necessary for safe investment.
But the reality is. Many companies are not even connected with cryptocurrencies are willful taxes fraud and accept employees without official employment.
Not to mention about companies in the crypto world. Rarely on which site you can even see some information about legitimacy at least. Basically, these are empty promises and the call "Give more money - get more bonuses."
But do you know the main paradox? No official licenses will guarantee that the project will be successful. I stupidly put money in one bank. It is real, with licenses and official registrations. You know what? A year later, its price fell 3 times.

P.S. You ask fucking interesting questions .... Among this garbage .... It is a pity that such topics disappear, found them on your profile.

Yes, you are in something right. I was attracted to this idea (cryptography) because of encryption of various data.
I would not call it anarchy, as it = lawlessness. I think if anarchy is a condition of a society, it would be very difficult to maintain at least some sort of order.
However, many anarchists are quite good people.
I think now the authorities want to submit the crypto world. Look at this KYC, these crazy taxes, theft by politicians of personal data from social networks and banks.
No country has offered a 10% tax, no, they want much maybe 30 or more than 50%. What anarchy is there? It's just slavery.