 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
|
Can you provide me with a screenshot of the emails you are referring to? I will review it. the last email I received was on January 11, and since the beginning of this year I have only received 3 emails.
LoyceV claims his mailbox is full of requests. A HUNDRED OF TIMESI've sent the same email hundreds of times by now, and want to save some time. |
|
|
|
Consider this the last time I'm feeding this...
This topic is not for you and your neutral rubbish feedings. Say thank you that I even allow you to be here This topic for complaints of applicants who was rejected for whitelistingFirst why this thread is self-moderated?
All stupid questions - it's to the Thermos. I don't know why he allows self-moderated topics to be created in this section. I’m also not going to feed the DT system trolls - that’s why I made the topic self-moderating. |
|
|
|
I've been called "Switzerland" for being neutral and subtle.
You are not neutral, you "don't-give-a-f*ck" man Stop dodging and answer the questions. I'll post all whitelisted users in this topic. They can expect scrutiny. If you're a real user and don't deserve the "evil" label, this scrutiny can lead to earning some Merit.
How do you determine whether he is a spammer or not? By the degree of tearfulness in the letters? Or maybe you after all have access to the IP addresses at which your reconciliation the profiles? What privileges does LoyceV have? I'm happily married and have healthy kids  LOL. neitral troll is trolling |
|
|
|
Dear proxybanned applicants, who was rejected for whitelisting by LoyceV, SFR10, Welsh, hugeblack and Upgrade00 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350260You can complain here. If you have friends on the forum, you can ask them to report it here Also I have a question From now on, I'll stop responding to rejected emails. If you haven't received an email telling you you're whitelisted after a few days, that means I've rejected you. I've sent the same email hundreds of times by now, and want to save some time. Is such behaviour allowed? Otherwise, it seems that LoyceV did not rejecting the applicants, but is simply sleeping and not performing his functions. A convenient cover for not fulfilling one's duties. I consider that every applicant should receive a letter confirming the rejection of their application. How can one generally determine whether a person is fulfilling his whitelisting function or not? If there are no statistics on rejected users? He may be doing everything at random. No control over LoyceV With the same success, I can add everyone to the whitelists at random and then report here that the work is done User LoyceV should be punished. His rights of whitelisting should be revoked due negligence |
|
|
|
All these corrupted flunkies will also be punished. Coming soon
This sounds like you are not neutral. Don't worry, yo're a good guy. For good users - I am positive |
|
|
|
I express a vote of no confidence to the user LoyceV. Took on too many functions. In the end, everything will be done carelessly. Let him choose one thing for himself and do it well From now on, I'll stop responding to rejected emails. If you haven't received an email telling you you're whitelisted after a few days, that means I've rejected you. I've sent the same email hundreds of times by now, and want to save some time. Lazy and cunning ass. He made up an excuse for himself and thinks that he will avoid responsibility Shenanigan! listen... it's not only him . I've got a whole squad of mysterious members right under my nose, enjoying extra-privileges and keeping the bitcointalk on its toes!
All these corrupted flunkies will also be punished. Coming soon |
|
|
|
The whole point of the whitelisting process is to approve suitable applicants while rejecting unsuitable ones. LoyceV would be negligent in his duties if he approved everyone. Why even bother having a whitelist in that case?
Where is a topic about rejected applicants? Where is a transparency? Without statistics all activity of LoyceV is a performance for believers |
|
|
|
I'll post all whitelisted users in this topic. They can expect scrutiny. If you're a real user and don't deserve the "evil" label, this scrutiny can lead to earning some Merit.
How do you determine whether he is a spammer or not? By the degree of tearfulness in the letters? Or maybe you after all have access to the IP addresses at which your reconciliation the profiles? If you turn out to be a spammer, I'll report you myself.
Here you are loudly proud again It turns out they can’t even complain about him or file an appeal for unfair non-addition to the white list
That is absolutely correct. Just like they can't bribe me (and yes, I've been offered payment, even in altcoins). Deal with it. And here you are something not so brave. Why not keep a public log of everyone who tried to bribe you? Where is the transparency? How do we know that you weren't bribed? There are no guarantees for this |
|
|
|
|
Anyone who applied to be added for whitelisting and was ignored by LoyceV - complain here
We will soon file a complaint to deprive him of his rights of "whitelisting" powers due to negligent performance of his functions
|
|
|
|
LoyceV accepts applications to be added to the white lists via email. Some users are added to whitelists, and some are not. But he has statistics is only for whitelisted users by him. Why do those who submitted applications but not added to the white lists not appear in the statistics? Not good. Where is transparency and openness? Well, last year I asked him to whitelist my account, he ignored it
We need to talk about this more so everyone knows. Take a merit from me |
|
|
|
But he doesn't see IPs, only can whitelist accounts.
Now we move on to the next question Here LoyceV proudly flaunts his statistics of whitelisted users https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350260.0Ehhhhhh. A new question arises. Where are the statistics of users whom he did not add to the white list? WHERE? It turns out they can’t even complain about him or file an appeal for unfair non-addition to the white list |
|
|
|
And anyone who contacts me, can keep my email address! If only I could create more than one email address....
Your email address for whitelisting is public. Feel the difference Lol. You're grasping at straws here. What do you want me to do, provide my snail mail address?
Foolish man. The 21st century is upon us. Have you heard about Tox or Signal? Why do you force crypto-users to registering to old-school email services for whitelisting which are collecting logs for governments too? I'm not sure what you're after, but I know for sure you have nothing on me. So good luck trying to find dirt  If you read a bit more and post a bit less, you may learn a thing or 2. Many of your questions can be answered by reading instead of writing. You may be a scrupulously honest person, but that’s not the point. Any power turns any person into a corrupt monster. This amount of power should not be concentrated in one hand. |
|
|
|
Provide a full list of extra priveleges and rights of LoyceV. His capabilities on the forum clearly exceed those of the average user.
The honest public should know everything
He can whitelist IP addresses associated with "evil fee" Oh my god I found another forum vulnerability. Knowing Loycev’s passion for keeping logs, we can assume that he collects the email addresses of users who contacted him for whitelisting. This also comes with a risk for users. Risk of leaking their emails. Because Loycev does not provide any alternative for contacting about whitelisting other than contacting by email. I wouldn't exactly call the capability to whitelist IP addresses from evil fee as a privilege. It's volunteer work. Database collecting, social engineering & blackmailing I believe that a such huge amount of power and privileges should not be concentrated in the hands of one person. The one who owns the information owns the whole world. This means he can dictate and impose his own conditions. If you say that such super priveleges was given to LoyceV to fighting with scammers, then you are mistaken. Scammers need to be fought, but not by the cost of the privacy of honest users |
|
|
|
|
I do not like Kalemder. And his behavior at the past art competition. He supported his friends only at his f*cking 3d gallery
Corrupt rotten user
|
|
|
|
Those are peanutswar IP addresses, Loyce gave him the link which he clicked to see his own IPs, if you click on this link https://bitcointalk.org/myips.php you will also see your IPs. Okay. Got it But I have a next question about LoyceV User Loycev has many more privileges and rights than a regular user. However, Loysev is not an even a global moderator. This is a potential threat to the security of the forum
I see that you keep writing things that you know nothing ( or very little) about Then tell us everything we don’t know about him, then we won’t ask such questions Provide a full list of extra priveleges and rights of LoyceV. His capabilities on the forum clearly exceed those of the average user. The honest public should know everything |
|
|
|
What privileges does LoyceV have? Why doesn't anyone advertise the fact that LoyceV sees your IP addresses? This is a potential threat to the safety of users LoyceV recently give the IP addresses...
 Source https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5459055.msg62520566#msg62520566Dear forum DT-mastodons, please inform all users what other hidden privileges and rights LoyceV have |
|
|
|
|
I don't know him, but accept my condolences.
|
|
|
|
Will not come as much of a surprise if it turns out to be true.
No, it will be a much bigger surprise when it turns out that he didn’t sell the account to anyone.  More aggressive, and less intellectual. And strange figures of speech.
After so many accusations, why he should be kind? I think anyone would change if they were punished such unfairly Ratimov is simply in a bad mood. His bad mood is not a proof of account-selling |
|
|
|
Instead, you should explain what competitions of icopress are unfair. And how.
Because this is an offtopic in this thread. Stop provoking offtopic, trolls Still waiting for the proofs.
Why don't you answer ?
I am still waiting for the comments too Why don't you answer to quoted post below?: Royse777 said about icopress and GazetaBitcoin: Don't force me to go bad and expose what you two do behind the scene (the template, scripts - guess what I mean).
|
|
|
|
|
