My username: gbl08ma

Thanks!

I just requested coins from testnet faucets and then sent back coins to those faucets' return addresses. Sending and receiving always to and from the same address/wallet.

Ease of use: 5 in 10. It's still too green now, even though its simplicity makes it easy to use.
I tested receiving, sending... my internet connection dropped so at some point I reloaded the page to force the wallet to refresh. The balance became clearly wrong: http://tny.im/mp
After I reloaded the page again, the balance came right.
I tried p2ptrade, but of course couldn't test it very well due to the lack of humans...

It would be good if the balance refreshes were more seamless. It often doesn't show the loading icon. And then there's the times where the balance comes wrong as I said above...
Also, while the wallet is loading, the page is very different (very noticeable on slower browsers/connections)... It would be less confusing if it showed the full wallet layout while it's loading, with a big "loading" message on top. Separate tabs would be welcome, yes. It would also look more familiar to users of other wallets.

Bitcoin address: 1tnyqm1UBJgUnv394Ns5WQo4tdWVQTdUW

EDIT: just noticed one thing: every time one reloads the wallet, it seems to get new coins, and apparently one can perform more transactions with them. I'll leave it up to you to check if the transactions actually occurred or not - apparently, the transactions aren't appearing on the testnet block explorers, even those with multiple confirmations. Infinite coins! http://tny.im/n8

The fact that it's cheap to maintain the service doesn't guarantee that after a while he doesn't get bored and decides to wipe the server and install something else. Also, if it's cheap it may not be that reliable. That's why I'm asking.

Does this support IMAP or other syncing methods (any that include the calendar, for example)?
What guarantees are there about service uptime, and how can one be sure you're not going away with your service one or two months after one has paid you the 0.09 BTC for the first year?

1EQ3r2ACkhF4mAmWuGE8VPawu4G1rx4ie9

Thanks!

It's only when you click on cur.lv links, I think. These are still flagged as containing malware.

These are the stats for a link I have on my signature (my donation Bitcoin address shortened with my shortener): http://tny.im/nx+
So yes, people click on signature links, and I don't even post a lot.

My experience with getting out of Google's blacklist is bad (back when I had to use free domains, this was oh-so-frequent), with it taking sometimes a week. Fortunately my sites had nowhere the traffic of CoinURL, and well, you get what you pay for.

Now that the $675 option has sold out, the raised value seems to have pretty much stagnated (or better: at the speed it's rising, I don't think they are going to meet the goal). I'd really like to see this happen, even if for nothing but to show that it's possible. But I can understand, not everyone will impulse-buy a phone anyone is yet to see and which has a estimated delivery time of May 2014.

Too bad the the movebits graph hasn't been updated in a while; does anyone know of something similar (or even something that works for any Indiegogo or Kickstarter project?)

Maybe, if Indiegogo took Bitcoin as a payment method, and they promised some powerful mining ASIC in there... before, we already had the chance to see how many people around here order vaporware

I had to remove CoinURL ads too, as I feared not only the effects of the bad impression new users would get of my website, but also any degradation of its position in terms of search ranks.

I think I saw someone say Firefox was blocking it too but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Right now it seems only Google and one or other blacklist is listing coinurl.com, but I get the impression these lists "learn" with each other.

I think this line of thinking is one of the main problems. Many of the people using or investing into Bitcoin today, are doing it as if Bitcoin were a "get rich quick" scheme. From the huge USD/BTC price changes we've seen in the last few months, many people have created the opinion that Bitcoin is mostly used for speculation, even though this may not be all that true. And as other people, which were interested in Bitcoin but not as a way to get rich by buying low and selling high, see these price changes, they lose that interest because they conclude Bitcoin is too unstable to use as a currency. Then you see these "Bitcoin is not money" and etc. articles in the media.
To sum it up in a sentence that is maybe too extreme, I'd would say: the speculators are preventing the mainstream adoption of Bitcoin.

What, Blockchain.info's mobile apps offer an option for remembering the password? That's just plain stupid. If such an option doesn't exist when using the web browser version, why should it exist on the apps? It's equally unsafe.

If I had 160 BTC, I wouldn't be storing them on Blockchain.info but on a very well kept paper wallet.

Blockchain.info seems down? I just get a CloudFlare page saying it's down and no cached version is available... right when I wanted to login to my wallet...

...and then you use a graph from Bitcoinity to base your post on, when Bitcoinity has a message on their page saying "Bitcoinity is currently completely behind.". I find their graph to be different from the other mtgox price graphs (from the few that are still online and not returning some HTTP status code other than 200).

You repeatedly forgot to add a zero to the right of your numbers...
"This price correction should level the coins at or around 150 USD and we'll start a slow climb back to 400-500 USD by July 1"*
* assuming mtgox doesn't fuck things up with a huge lag again, and other Bitcoin websites stop being so prone to DDoS attacks, which is very very unlikely.

If only the mtgox lag could be traded, it would have made a lot of people rich now with this "lag bubble". People can still bet on it, though...

O problema é convencer todas as pessoas que estão agora a fazer panic sell que não perderão dinheiro se estiverem quietas... tanta gente a querer vender (ou apenas obter informação) só põem mais carga em cima dos servidores que estão a ser atacados... não ajudam nada...

Six posts. Heh
We are still well above what we were three days ago. What you earn fast, you lose fast.

Given that they're using nginx (they would get DDoSed much more often if they used Apache...), and it's a 502 error which alternates with a DB access error, I'd say that since there are too many people sending requests to the server, PHP-FPM (or whatever reverse proxy for whatever language they are using) isn't running enough processes to keep up with nginx's demand, and the existing reverse proxies cannot connect to the DB as probably the connection limit there has been reached too.
The solution is simple: higher the limits for the processes and DB connections, until there's no more RAM left... then upgrade the/get another server. Such a high traffic site should already have learnt from previous situations and put auto-scaling mechanisms in place. This downtime may ultimately cost them their position as the most used Bitcoin exchange.